House lawmakers have offered two different plans for stablecoin legislation, causing some disagreement and creating a possible speed bump in Congress’ cryptocurrency work.
House Financial Services Chair French Hill, R-Ark., and Rep. Bryan Steil, R-Wis., chair of the House Digital Assets, Financial Technology and Artificial Intelligence Subcommittee, on Feb. 6 released a 47-page discussion draft of a bill establishing a stablecoin framework.
However, on Feb. 10, Rep. Maxine Waters, D-Calif., the top Democrat on the House Financial Services Committee, introduced her own 84-page discussion draft of a stablecoin bill that she previously worked on with former House Financial Services Chair Patrick McHenry, R-N.C.
At a subcommittee hearing Feb. 11, Waters contended that the Republicans’ stablecoin legislation is “light on consumer protections.”
“In the legislation I release, there are robust protections for consumer wallets, including risk management and financial resource requirements to ensure consumers do not lose their payment stablecoins to the scams and fraud that have plagued the crypto industry for far too long,” Waters said.
Rep. Stephen Lynch, D-Mass., the ranking member of the House digital assets subcommittee, also expressed concern about deciding on how best to regulate digital assets.
“I agree with most of my colleagues that a regulatory regime is needed, but not one that reflects a wish list from industry advocates,” Lynch said at the hearing. “As this committee considers legislation to address stablecoins and the market structure, I hope we can have collaborative and bipartisan discussions.”
Steil said he and Hill “appreciate feedback from all relevant stakeholders” on their stablecoin bill and contended that achieving regulatory clarity will take collaboration.
“Together, we can ensure that stablecoin issuers, digital asset firms and blockchain developers operate under fair, transparent and predictable rules in the United States,” Steil added.