The committee voted 28-22, along party lines, to advance the resolution to the House, as many Democrats spoke out against it.
“I strongly oppose (the resolution) because it would deny investors material information about the companies they're invested in and how these companies are faring even as climate change and severe weather events worsen,” said Rep. Maxine Waters, D-Calif., who serves as the top Democrat on the committee.
The rule, which the SEC finalized March 6, would require public companies to disclose a host of climate-related information in their registration statements and periodic reports, including material climate-related risks and activities to mitigate or adapt to such risks. The final rule did not include one controversial feature of its original proposal, known as Scope 3, which would have required companies to report the indirect emissions generated from their supply chain, if material, with an exemption for smaller companies.
After its finalization, the rule faced nine lawsuits, which will now be heard on a consolidated basis in the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in St. Louis. The SEC then decided to voluntarily halt implementation of the rule pending judicial review, according to an April 4 filing.
“This rule is squarely within the SEC’s mission and authority and is consistent with the demands of investors and market participants,” said Reps. Sean Casten, D-Ill., and Juan Vargas, D-Calif., who co-chair the Congressional Sustainable Investment Caucus, in an April 17 statement after the markup. “We applaud the SEC for developing this final rule-making and encourage our fellow capitalists in the House to vote against this CRA resolution should it make it to the floor.”
Sen. Tim Scott, R-S.C., ranking member on the Senate Banking Committee, also introduced a resolution April 17 to overturn the rule, garnering support from 32 Senate Republicans and Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.V.