Skip to main content
MENU
Subscribe
  • Subscribe
  • Account
  • LOGIN
  • Topics
    • Alternatives
    • Consultants
    • Coronavirus
    • Courts
    • Defined Contribution
    • ESG
    • ETFs
    • Hedge Funds
    • Industry Voices
    • Investing
    • Money Management
    • Opinion
    • Partner Content
    • Pension Funds
    • Private Equity
    • Real Estate
    • Russia-Ukraine War
    • SECURE Act 2.0
    • Special Reports
    • White Papers
  • Rankings & Awards
    • 1,000 Largest Retirement Plans
    • Top-Performing Managers
    • Largest Money Managers
    • DC Money Managers
    • DC Record Keepers
    • Largest Hedge Fund Managers
    • World's Largest Retirement Funds
    • Best Places to Work in Money Management
    • Excellence & Innovation Awards
    • WPS Innovation Awards
    • Eddy Awards
  • ETFs
    • Latest ETF News
    • Fund Screener
    • Education Center
    • Equities
    • Fixed Income
    • Commodities
    • Actively Managed
    • Alternatives
    • ESG Rated
  • ESG
    • Latest ESG News
    • The Institutional Investor’s Guide to ESG Investing
    • ESG Sustainability - Gaining Momentum
    • Climate Change: The Inescapable Opportunity
    • Impact Investing
    • 2022 ESG Investing Conference
    • ESG Rated ETFs
  • Defined Contribution
    • Latest DC News
    • DC Money Manager Rankings
    • DC Record Keeper Rankings
    • Innovations in DC
    • Trends in DC: Focus on Retirement Income
    • 2022 Defined Contribution East Conference
    • 2022 DC Investment Lineup Conference
  • Searches & Hires
    • Latest Searches & Hires News
    • Searches & Hires Database
    • RFPs
  • Performance Data
    • P&I Research Center
    • Earnings Tracker
    • Endowment Returns Tracker
    • Corporate Pension Contribution Tracker
    • Pension Fund Returns Tracker
    • Pension Risk Transfer Database
    • Future of Investments Research Series
    • Charts & Infographics
    • Polls
  • Careers
  • Events
    • View All Conferences
    • View All Webinars
    • 2022 Retirement Income Conference
    • 2022 Managing Pension Risk & Liabilities
    • 2022 WorldPensionSummit
Breadcrumb
  1. Home
  2. Regulation
May 17, 2021 12:00 AM

More risks than rewards seen in super fund reforms

Douglas Appell
  • Tweet
  • Share
  • Share
  • Email
  • More
    Reprints Print
    David Carruthers
    David Carruthers believes the lure of securing a top spot in the ranking tool could prompt some funds to take on more risk.

    Australia's government is counting on superannuation system reforms to get employees to play a greater role in maximizing their retirement savings, but industry participants fear more harm than good.

    Analysts warn the Your Future, Your Super reforms — outlined last October in Australia's 2021 budget proposal and set to take effect July 1 — are likely to constrain asset allocators and hurt the disengaged workers the reforms are ostensibly focused on helping.

    A final round of consultations, under the auspices of the Treasury Department, gives industry players until May 25 to urge changes on regulators.

    Critics predict that, under current plans, a litany of government good intentions — working toward goals such as weeding out perennially underperforming super funds and preventing job-hoppers from accumulating dormant retirement accounts — could come to naught, due to faulty design and execution.

    Their biggest focus for now is on the government's plan to introduce an annual performance test for the MySuper balanced default options super funds were required to launch eight years ago to ensure that even Australian workers unwilling to learn the first thing about the country's highly regarded A$3 trillion ($2.31 trillion) defined contribution system could count on decent retirement outcomes.

    To pass the test, as currently constituted, MySuper products can't underperform a reference portfolio of passive exposures tailored to each product's strategic asset allocation by more than an annualized 49 basis points over a rolling eight-year period.

    If a MySuper product's performance drops below that, its super fund sponsor will be required to send participants a letter to that effect and refer them to a new "comparison tool" ranking competitors by investment returns and fees, should they opt to select a better-performing fund.

    Getty Images
    Masking returns

    As the government noted, the steady growth of retirement savings from employers' monthly 9.5%-of-salary contributions to employee accounts can serve to obscure subpar investment returns, with severe long-term consequences. For example, the government said employees in the worst performing My Super product would be "up to A$98,000 worse off at retirement."

    Meanwhile, funds that don't pass the performance test two years in a row would not be allowed to take on new participants.

    Analysts note that the test doesn't touch on areas crucial to retirement savings outcomes, such as asset allocation.

    It's "a very narrow test" of whether a fund is doing a good job of implementing its strategy — more focused on operational matters than whether the strategy is effective in terms of long-term outcomes for participants, said David Carruthers, a senior consultant with Frontier Advisors LLC and head of the Melbourne-based firm's members solutions group.

    It's "a very harsh measure — 49 basis points, I survive, 50 basis points, I don't, black or white, pass or fail," said David Knox, Melbourne-based senior partner at Mercer Australia and lead author of the annual Mercer CFA Institute Global Pension index.

    And it's far from foolproof, according to The Conexus Institute, a Sydney-based research outfit focused on achieving better retirement outcomes for Australians. David Bell, the institute's executive director, said Conexus research suggested the proposed performance test would identify "good" funds as "poor" 35% of the time, while correctly identifying poor funds roughly half the time.

    Meanwhile, the asset-class benchmarks the government has signaled it will recognize for those MySuper-specific reference portfolios remain broad, leaving well-diversified super fund investment teams facing enormous tracking error risk.

    "It's not your precise strategic asset allocation, it's a top-level strategic asset allocation," Frontier's Mr. Carruthers said. For example, for bonds "there's Australian bonds and there's global bonds but no credit, no high yield, no bank loans" — a much less diversified benchmark, he said.

    Likewise, the test doesn't take account of how much risk a portfolio is taking on. "If you were underperforming the test by 50 basis points but ... you had a risk level 2% less than the benchmark, your risk-return outcome — your Sharpe ratio — is much better" but the strategy still gets a failing grade, Mr. Carruthers said.

    And with a six- or seven-year evaluation period tail, a fund that takes appropriate or innovative steps to turn around performance could remain underwater for years, analysts said.

    Related Article
    Expecting participants to play key role in super reforms seen as risky move
    Reason to trim risk

    Analysts said inevitably a sizable segment of the industry will have an incentive to trim risk exposures to better position themselves to clear the new performance hurdle.

    Your Future, Your Super "is forcing funds to reconsider how they construct and manage portfolios, and that will have a bearing on their risk taking," said Troy Rieck, chief investment officer of A$13 billion, Brisbane-based LGIAsuper.

    The government's goals are laudable but "there's strong potential for collateral damage, that funds will take actions based on this test that they wouldn't do in the interests of long term member outcomes," Mr. Carruthers agreed.

    And that fund-level environment will have broader implications for Australia's retirement preparedness, analysts say.

    "Inevitably across the industry there'll be lower returns," resulting in smaller retirement benefits, Mr. Knox predicted. For example, when equity multiples push to historic highs, investment teams that previously would have responded by trimming stock market exposures could decide the risks of doing so are too great, leaving portfolios facing the full brunt of a potential sell-off rather than trying to mitigate potential downside, he said.

    "Who can afford to be underweight listed equities, in case you're wrong in the short term," agreed Mr. Rieck. "The implications of what might be sound, long-term investment decision-making are too great," he said.

    "If this legislation gets through then the industry in five years' time looks a lot different," with more "index hugging (and) less willingness to try alternative assets that might not be well represented in the indexes," Mr. Knox said.

    But it won't be the same for all funds and will vary over time for specific funds, depending on how far head of the benchmark they're likely to be at any point in time, Mr. Rieck said.

    For funds comfortably clearing the performance test, the lure of securing the top one, two or three positions in the promised comparison ranking tool — which would make them the easy choice for participants looking to shift out of poorly performing funds — could prompt them to take on more risk, Mr. Carruthers said.

    Bloomberg

    Josh Frydenberg, Australia's treasurer, reads the budget in the House of Representatives chamber at Parliament House in Canberra.

    Reviewing impact

    If super funds have different starting points, all are reviewing their investment approaches now.

    "Most of our funds have gone through or are currently going through a big analysis on how (the reforms) will impact the investment strategies that they run for their members," Mr. Carruthers said. "All need to know what the impact is and what level of risk it runs for them, or level of risk it introduces for them," he said. For now, however, it's the funds that are closer to that negative 50 basis points danger zone that are "actively doing stuff or have already put stuff in place to make sure they reduce the risk" of being flagged for underperformance, he added.

    Much depends on the final list of benchmark indexes used for the annual performance test — a likely focus of submissions to the Treasury over the final week or two of consultations.

    On that score, market participants welcomed an April 28 update from Treasurer Josh Frydenberg adding Australian unlisted infrastructure and unlisted property as specific asset classes covered by the test. The government's initial announcement had only mentioned a global listed infrastructure benchmark, which would have left Australian super funds with material allocations to domestic infrastructure and real estate facing big tracking error risks.

    The Conexus Institute's Mr. Bell said the ability to use those unlisted domestic infrastructure and real estate benchmarks should slash the bulk of the A$3.3 billion in annual opportunity costs his research team had initially calculated from super fund investment teams having to cut exposures to reduce tracking error. Even so, he said, the continued focus on a performance test that doesn't take account of risk or asset allocation will leave super funds facing considerable challenges.

    Related Articles
    AustralianSuper, Club Plus Super explore potential merger
    UniSuper opens to participants beyond higher-education sector
    Australia’s Future Fund reports 4.5% quarterly gain
    Recommended for You
    SECHQ-main_i.jpg
    SEC targets hedge funds, private equity for enhanced reporting requirements
    SEC building
    SEC proposes governance requirements for clearinghouses
    FCA taps Ruairi O'Connell to lead post-Brexit strategy
    Private Markets
    Sponsored Content: Private Markets

    Reader Poll

    August 10, 2022
    SEE MORE POLLS >
    Sponsored
    White Papers
    Gaining Momentum: Where Next for Trend-Following?
    The market opportunity in U.S. residential mortgage-backed securities
    Credit Indices Evolve with Enhanced Data Inputs
    Hedge Funds 2.0: Back to the future
    How Has 2022's Carnage Reshaped Global Stock and Bond Markets?
    Crossroads: Politics, Inflation, & Bonds
    View More
    Sponsored Content
    Partner Content
    The Industrialization of ESG Investment
    For institutional investors, ETFs can make meeting liquidity needs easier
    Gold: the most effective commodity investment
    2021 Investment Outlook | Investing Beyond the Pandemic: A Reset for Portfolios
    Ten ways retirement plan professionals add value to plan sponsors
    Gold: an efficient hedge
    View More
    E-MAIL NEWSLETTERS

    Sign up and get the best of News delivered straight to your email inbox, free of charge. Choose your news – we will deliver.

    Subscribe Today
    August 1, 2022 page one

    Get access to the news, research and analysis of events affecting the retirement and institutional money management businesses from a worldwide network of reporters and editors.

    Subscribe
    Connect With Us
    • RSS
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn

    Our Mission

    To consistently deliver news, research and analysis to the executives who manage the flow of funds in the institutional investment market.

    About Us

    Main Office
    685 Third Avenue
    Tenth Floor
    New York, NY 10017-4036

    Chicago Office
    130 E. Randolph St.
    Suite 3200
    Chicago, IL 60601

    Contact Us

    Careers at Crain

    About Pensions & Investments

     

    Advertising
    • Media Kit
    • P&I Content Solutions
    • P&I Careers | Post a Job
    • Reprints & Permissions
    Resources
    • Subscribe
    • Newsletters
    • FAQ
    • P&I Research Center
    • Site map
    • Staff Directory
    Legal
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Request
    Pensions & Investments
    Copyright © 1996-2022. Crain Communications, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
    • Topics
      • Alternatives
      • Consultants
      • Coronavirus
      • Courts
      • Defined Contribution
      • ESG
      • ETFs
      • Hedge Funds
      • Industry Voices
      • Investing
      • Money Management
      • Opinion
      • Partner Content
      • Pension Funds
      • Private Equity
      • Real Estate
      • Russia-Ukraine War
      • SECURE Act 2.0
      • Special Reports
      • White Papers
    • Rankings & Awards
      • 1,000 Largest Retirement Plans
      • Top-Performing Managers
      • Largest Money Managers
      • DC Money Managers
      • DC Record Keepers
      • Largest Hedge Fund Managers
      • World's Largest Retirement Funds
      • Best Places to Work in Money Management
      • Excellence & Innovation Awards
      • WPS Innovation Awards
      • Eddy Awards
    • ETFs
      • Latest ETF News
      • Fund Screener
      • Education Center
      • Equities
      • Fixed Income
      • Commodities
      • Actively Managed
      • Alternatives
      • ESG Rated
    • ESG
      • Latest ESG News
      • The Institutional Investor’s Guide to ESG Investing
      • ESG Sustainability - Gaining Momentum
      • Climate Change: The Inescapable Opportunity
      • Impact Investing
      • 2022 ESG Investing Conference
      • ESG Rated ETFs
    • Defined Contribution
      • Latest DC News
      • DC Money Manager Rankings
      • DC Record Keeper Rankings
      • Innovations in DC
      • Trends in DC: Focus on Retirement Income
      • 2022 Defined Contribution East Conference
      • 2022 DC Investment Lineup Conference
    • Searches & Hires
      • Latest Searches & Hires News
      • Searches & Hires Database
      • RFPs
    • Performance Data
      • P&I Research Center
      • Earnings Tracker
      • Endowment Returns Tracker
      • Corporate Pension Contribution Tracker
      • Pension Fund Returns Tracker
      • Pension Risk Transfer Database
      • Future of Investments Research Series
      • Charts & Infographics
      • Polls
    • Careers
    • Events
      • View All Conferences
      • View All Webinars
      • 2022 Retirement Income Conference
      • 2022 Managing Pension Risk & Liabilities
      • 2022 WorldPensionSummit