The firms claim Morgan Stanley went out of its way to hide revisions to the original credit agreement allowing the share issue, even attaching an earlier CK signature page to avoid showing them the amendments.
"Given Morgan Stanley's concealment," the suit claims, the language "went undetected for months."
The issue should have triggered the deal's prepayment make-whole provisions, the firms claim. They are asking for an order requiring Brightline to prepay the loan and make the make-whole payments.
Brightline describes itself as the only privately owned and operated intercity railroad in the U.S. It currently operates between Miami and West Palm Beach and is set to extend service to Orlando on Friday. The company hopes to break ground later this year on its West Coast service, which it claims will take riders from Southern California to Las Vegas in just over two hours at 186 miles per hour.
According to the suit, Morgan Stanley was motivated to defraud Certares and Knighthead because it wanted to "position itself for future lucrative investment-banking business with Brightline Holdings and its private equity owners at Fortress, including through handling municipal debt transactions for Brightline Holdings which could generate sizable fees for Morgan Stanley."
Certares also claims it has faced retaliation from Morgan Stanley for objecting to the bank's actions. According to the suit, Morgan Stanley last month declined to participate in another, unrelated financing deal with Certares because of the Brightline dispute.
"This kind of retaliation is unfair and unbecoming of a global financial institution," the plaintiffs state in the suit.
The case is CK Opportunities Fund vs. Morgan Stanley, New York State Supreme Court, New York County.