Skip to main content
MENU
Subscribe
  • Subscribe
  • Account
  • LOGIN
  • Topics
    • Alternatives
    • Consultants
    • Coronavirus
    • Courts
    • Defined Contribution
    • ESG
    • ETFs
    • Hedge Funds
    • Industry Voices
    • Investing
    • Money Management
    • Opinion
    • Partner Content
    • Pension Funds
    • Private Equity
    • Real Estate
    • Russia-Ukraine War
    • SECURE Act 2.0
    • Special Reports
    • White Papers
  • Rankings & Awards
    • 1,000 Largest Retirement Plans
    • Top-Performing Managers
    • Largest Money Managers
    • DC Money Managers
    • DC Record Keepers
    • Largest Hedge Fund Managers
    • World's Largest Retirement Funds
    • Best Places to Work in Money Management
    • Excellence & Innovation Awards
    • Eddy Awards
  • ETFs
    • Latest ETF News
    • Fund Screener
    • Education Center
    • Equities
    • Fixed Income
    • Commodities
    • Actively Managed
    • Alternatives
    • ESG Rated
  • ESG
    • Latest ESG News
    • The Institutional Investor’s Guide to ESG Investing
    • Climate Change: The Inescapable Opportunity
    • Impact Investing
    • 2022 ESG Investing Conference
    • ESG Rated ETFs
  • Defined Contribution
    • Latest DC News
    • DC Money Manager Rankings
    • DC Record Keeper Rankings
    • Innovations in DC
    • Trends in DC: Focus on Retirement Income
    • 2022 Defined Contribution East Conference
    • 2022 DC Investment Lineup Conference
  • Searches & Hires
    • Latest Searches & Hires News
    • Searches & Hires Database
    • RFPs
  • Performance Data
    • P&I Research Center
    • Earnings Tracker
    • Endowment Returns Tracker
    • Corporate Pension Contribution Tracker
    • Pension Fund Returns Tracker
    • Pension Risk Transfer Database
    • Future of Investments Research Series
    • Charts & Infographics
    • Polls
  • Careers
  • Events
    • View All Conferences
    • View All Webinars
    • 2022 Innovation Investing Conference
    • 2022 Defined Contribution East Conference
    • 2022 ESG Investing Conference
    • 2022 DC Investment Lineup Conference
    • 2022 Alternatives Investing Conference
Breadcrumb
  1. Home
  2. MARKETS
April 19, 2021 12:00 AM

Debate over changes to listing rules roils U.K.

Review looks to maintain governance standards and still attract capital

Sophie Baker
  • Tweet
  • Share
  • Share
  • Email
  • More
    Reprints Print
    Ashley Hamilton Claxton
    Photo: Michael Walter/Troika
    Ashley Hamilton Claxton said there is tension between wanting good governance and attracting listings to London exchanges.

    Money managers and market players are split on whether recommendations to amend U.K. listing rules are a good idea from a governance point of view and the right way to attract more capital to London.

    The U.K. Listings Review, published last month and chaired by Lord Jonathan Hill, was launched by the U.K. chancellor of the exchequer in November to ensure the U.K. could stand up to "stiff competition as a financial centre" from the U.S., Asia and elsewhere in Europe, a document of the review said. Mr. Hill is a former European Commissioner, financial stability, financial services and Capital Markets Union.

    One of the suggestions is to introduce dual-class share structures to U.K. "premium" listings — companies that have the potential to be included in the FTSE 100 and FTSE 250 — moving away from the one share, one vote model of what sources said was a "gold standard" among global markets.

    "At a high level, there's this real tension," said Ashley Hamilton Claxton, London-based head of responsible investment at Royal London Asset Management. "We're big advocates of good governance … (but) there's this tension about being able to attract capital to list in London" — particularly technology businesses that tend to go to the U.S. or Hong Kong where there might be lower listing standards, she said.

    Under dual-class structures, a company will typically have two classes of shares — one with the right to one vote per share, while the other has a high or "super" vote, usually carrying 10 or 20 votes per share.

    In the U.K., premium-listed companies are prevented by the Financial Conduct Authority's principles from offering shares with differently weighted votes.

    The FCA now needs to consult on any changes it might make to listings rules — including other proposals such as removing a barrier that deters special purpose acquisition companies from listing in the U.K. — based on the recommendations.

    While the debate over amending U.K. listings rules has popped up over the years, the review is particularly relevant now: Between 2015 and 2020, London accounted for only 5% of initial public offerings globally.

    "We need to get the balance right. London does need to attract capital, but needs to maintain good governance standards," Ms. Hamilton Claxton said.

    Getty Images/iStockphoto

    An aerial view of London's skyline

    Conditional changes

    The review said any changes must come with certain conditions, including introducing investor protections such as sunset clauses, which put time frames on how long something such as a dual-class structure may operate.

    While some welcome the changes with protections and provisions in place, many in the industry oppose the proposal.

    "We discourage it and most of our members do as well," said George S. Dallas, policy director at the International Corporate Governance Network in London.

    The ICGN's case on why dual-class structures are a bad idea begins with common sense. While stewardship codes aim to "empower investors and encourage them to be good and active stewards, the explicit purpose of dual-class structures is to water down (that ownership). It is regulatory schizophrenia — they want to give investors power, but not real power. That's an issue," Mr. Dallas said.

    Caroline Escott, London-based senior investment manager, active ownership at RPMI Railpen, agreed that dual class structures "dilute market discipline and the ability of minority shareholders like Railpen properly to hold companies to account, with voting control skewed in the interests of the few who own those share classes with superior voting rights."

    The firm, which runs about £31 billion ($42.9 billion) for railway pension plans, welcomed the safeguard proposals — something it had called for — but still believes "these new proposals will make it harder for long-term investors to undertake the effective stewardship of individuals' savings which the government has been laudably keen to encourage through other recent initiatives," Ms. Escott said in an email.

    Joe Dabrowski, London-based deputy director of policy at the Pensions and Lifetime Savings Association, also highlighted that investors are seeking and increasingly required by U.K. law "to positively influence corporate behavior." Introducing the changes "would be a backwards step and risks reducing the U.K.'s strong reputation for high corporate governance standards," he said in an email.

    The changes would also mean less accountability from companies, said Tom Powdrill, London-based head of stewardship at corporate governance and shareholder advisory firm Pensions & Investment Research Consultants Ltd., in an email. "Dual-class share structures are designed to protect management from challenge by those who have provided capital to the company (which) seems unlikely to contribute to positive governance outcomes."

    The Principles for Responsible Investment thinks that weakening existing rules risks "undermining confidence by institutional investors and could reinforce concerns around a potential global race to the bottom," Athanasia Karananou, director, corporate governance and research in London, said in an email.

    Some money managers agreed.

    Legal & General Investment Management Ltd. will continue to push the FCA on the issue of one share, one vote "as a matter of principle," said Sacha Sadan, London-based director of investment stewardship, in an email.

    Andrew Millington, head of U.K. equities at Aberdeen Standard Life in Edinburgh, agreed in a separate email that the recommendations "represent an important evolution of U.K. equity markets in strengthening the U.K.'s position as a global financial center …(but) any measures aimed at encouraging companies to list and raise capital in the U.K. must be balanced with high standards of governance." While the firm has "strong reservations" about introducing dual class structures, the suggested safeguards were welcomed.

    Another concern is that the "great access to directors" that managers currently have may change under dual-class structures," RLAM's Ms. Hamilton Claxton said. "If we want to meet with the chairman of a FTSE 100 company, it's very rare we get turned down."

    It's a different experience in other markets such as the U.S., where Securities and Exchange Commission rules do not prohibit the use of dual-class structures on public markets. The listings review said 20% of companies listing in the U.S. used dual-class structures between 2017 and 2020, vs. fewer than 10% in 2016.

    Bloomberg
    Skyscrapers in London's financial district. A deal on Brexit seems to have slowed the exodus from the City of London.
    Not against the idea

    However, other money management executives are not against the introduction of dual-class structures to U.K. premium indexes — provided provisions are in place.

    "The big question for investors to consider is whether the principle of one share, one vote should be considered a price of entry to capital markets, or whether it should be considered as a governance destination," said Jeremy Richardson, senior portfolio manager, global equities at RBC Global Asset Management (U.K.) Ltd. in London.

    Coming to the public market shows a maturity of the business. "Allowing other shareholders to now participate in this company, taking it from private to public, is a stage in the company's natural development as it grows," Mr. Richardson said.

    Investors can also benefit from diversification in terms of new companies to invest in. While he thinks the one share, one vote concept "should be retained as a gold standard," Mr. Richardson "would be open to thinking about permitting under certain circumstances super voting shares for, in particular, (company) founders."

    Dual-class structures can keep company founders who have long-term ownership in mind and who are "strong drivers of the ethos of the business, its purpose, its culture" on board as a company matures to public ownership — something that can benefit both parties. "But the key thing here is the presence and use of sunset clauses," Mr. Richardson said.

    An important clause is that any super voting shares remain in the hands of founders, reverting to ordinary voting shares once that person relinquishes the shares rather than being gifted or bequeathed, Mr. Richardson added.

    Sudhir Roc-Sennett, New York-based head of ESG at Vontobel Asset Management's quality growth boutique, agreed that provisions are needed but said the proposal is "fresh thinking," with dual-class structures fitting into the box of "acceptable risks" for investors.

    But if investors think it is an acceptable risk, it is key that investors have visibility of controlling shareholders' goals "so they can value the potential against its inherent risks," he said.

    Overall, "we feel dual voting would not be something bad for the long term, as long as shareholders can understand what the controlling shareholders are trying to achieve. We don't think it brings more risk than, say, highly cyclical or poorly run businesses," Mr. Roc-Sennett said.

    And Peter Harrison, group CEO at Schroders PLC, said in a notice on the firm's website March 4 that the firm "is in full support of Lord Hill's review. It is crucial that we do all we can to make the U.K. the most attractive place for companies to list and to do business for the benefit of investors."

    He said a balance is needed "between ensuring the highest standard of governance and supporting the growth of companies and the U.K. economy. Lord Hill's review achieves that balance," adding that the announcement "should encourage more innovative and pioneering businesses to list in the U.K."

    Related Articles
    Brexit pushes 440 financial services firms to move some U.K. business to Europe
    Financial jobs continue to move out of U.K. amid Brexit
    Recommended for You
    ONLINE_180509969_AR_0_TABEPHATBADK.jpg
    Goldman to pull out of most SPACs over threat of liability
    Musk_Elon_i.jpg
    Elon Musk turns to money managers, billionaire backers, skeptics for Twitter bid
    Milken2022-main_i.jpg
    Inflation, recession on top of minds at Milken conference
    OCIO, Anchor in Rough Seas
    Sponsored Content: OCIO, Anchor in Rough Seas

    Reader Poll

    May 9, 2022
    SEE MORE POLLS >
    Sponsored
    White Papers
    Are Factors a Thing of the Past?
    Q2 2022 Credit Outlook: Carry On
    Leverage does not equal risk
    Is there a mid-cap gap in your DC plan?
    Out of the Shadows: The Revolution in Shadow Accounting
    The pivotal role of fixed income markets in the ESG revolution
    View More
    Sponsored Content
    Partner Content
    The Industrialization of ESG Investment
    For institutional investors, ETFs can make meeting liquidity needs easier
    Gold: the most effective commodity investment
    2021 Investment Outlook | Investing Beyond the Pandemic: A Reset for Portfolios
    Ten ways retirement plan professionals add value to plan sponsors
    Gold: an efficient hedge
    View More
    E-MAIL NEWSLETTERS

    Sign up and get the best of News delivered straight to your email inbox, free of charge. Choose your news – we will deliver.

    Subscribe Today
    May 9, 2022 page one

    Get access to the news, research and analysis of events affecting the retirement and institutional money management businesses from a worldwide network of reporters and editors.

    Subscribe
    Connect With Us
    • RSS
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn

    Our Mission

    To consistently deliver news, research and analysis to the executives who manage the flow of funds in the institutional investment market.

    About Us

    Main Office
    685 Third Avenue
    Tenth Floor
    New York, NY 10017-4036

    Chicago Office
    130 E. Randolph St.
    Suite 3200
    Chicago, IL 60601

    Contact Us

    Careers at Crain

    About Pensions & Investments

     

    Advertising
    • Media Kit
    • P&I Content Solutions
    • P&I Careers | Post a Job
    • Reprints & Permissions
    Resources
    • Subscribe
    • Newsletters
    • FAQ
    • P&I Research Center
    • Site map
    • Staff Directory
    Legal
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Request
    Pensions & Investments
    Copyright © 1996-2022. Crain Communications, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
    • Topics
      • Alternatives
      • Consultants
      • Coronavirus
      • Courts
      • Defined Contribution
      • ESG
      • ETFs
      • Hedge Funds
      • Industry Voices
      • Investing
      • Money Management
      • Opinion
      • Partner Content
      • Pension Funds
      • Private Equity
      • Real Estate
      • Russia-Ukraine War
      • SECURE Act 2.0
      • Special Reports
      • White Papers
    • Rankings & Awards
      • 1,000 Largest Retirement Plans
      • Top-Performing Managers
      • Largest Money Managers
      • DC Money Managers
      • DC Record Keepers
      • Largest Hedge Fund Managers
      • World's Largest Retirement Funds
      • Best Places to Work in Money Management
      • Excellence & Innovation Awards
      • Eddy Awards
    • ETFs
      • Latest ETF News
      • Fund Screener
      • Education Center
      • Equities
      • Fixed Income
      • Commodities
      • Actively Managed
      • Alternatives
      • ESG Rated
    • ESG
      • Latest ESG News
      • The Institutional Investor’s Guide to ESG Investing
      • Climate Change: The Inescapable Opportunity
      • Impact Investing
      • 2022 ESG Investing Conference
      • ESG Rated ETFs
    • Defined Contribution
      • Latest DC News
      • DC Money Manager Rankings
      • DC Record Keeper Rankings
      • Innovations in DC
      • Trends in DC: Focus on Retirement Income
      • 2022 Defined Contribution East Conference
      • 2022 DC Investment Lineup Conference
    • Searches & Hires
      • Latest Searches & Hires News
      • Searches & Hires Database
      • RFPs
    • Performance Data
      • P&I Research Center
      • Earnings Tracker
      • Endowment Returns Tracker
      • Corporate Pension Contribution Tracker
      • Pension Fund Returns Tracker
      • Pension Risk Transfer Database
      • Future of Investments Research Series
      • Charts & Infographics
      • Polls
    • Careers
    • Events
      • View All Conferences
      • View All Webinars
      • 2022 Innovation Investing Conference
      • 2022 Defined Contribution East Conference
      • 2022 ESG Investing Conference
      • 2022 DC Investment Lineup Conference
      • 2022 Alternatives Investing Conference