The fourth-ranked story was a tumultuous year for the Securities and Exchange Commission, which faces a real challenge to its use of in-house judges, as well as industrywide concern on the agency's pace of rule-making, including its developing stance on cryptocurrency.
On Nov. 29, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Jarkesy vs. SEC, a case challenging the constitutionality of the SEC's administrative law judges, or ALJs, which handle administrative enforcement cases in-house. While the justices' decision will likely not be disclosed until after the new year, it appears likely they will rule the SEC's use of judges to adjudicate enforcement proceedings violates Americans' right to a jury trial, according to legal experts after hearing the arguments.
The Supreme Court agreed to hear Jarkesy vs. SEC after the SEC petitioned it to review the case following a May 2022 decision from the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans. The 5th Circuit sided with the plaintiff and ruled that the SEC's ALJ system was unconstitutional.
Hamish Hume, a partner at law firm Boies Schiller Flexner, said in a December interview he thinks there will be five or six votes to uphold the 5th Circuit ruling and deal the SEC the loss.
In 2023, the SEC's regulatory agenda listed 29 items in the final rule-making stage and 23 items in the proposed rule-making stage, a breathless pace that some in the industry thought perhaps might be too aggressive.
Karen Barr, Washington-based president and CEO of the Investment Adviser Association, a trade association representing fiduciary investment adviser firms, described the SEC's rule-making pace as "very aggressive."
"The SEC has issued not only a large number of rule proposals, but the significance and substance and complexity of the rule proposals … these are all big deals," said Karen Barr, Washington-based president and CEO of the Investment Adviser Association, in a March interview. "These are rule-makings that could dramatically shift the landscape for investment advisers in a lot of different aspects."
One proposal that still is causing controversy over a year and a half after its introduction is the SEC's climate disclosure rule, which will likely be challenged legally once it is finalized. The rule would require public companies to provide a host of climate-related information in their periodic reports and registration statements. House Republicans have introduced multiple bills, which have not passed, that would block the rule.
Another one of the more hotly debated topics in 2023 among watchers of SEC decisions was the agency's continued refusal to approve a spot bitcoin ETF. James Angel, an associate professor of finance at Georgetown University's McDonough School of Business, said in a September interview he suspects the SEC fears that if it greenlights a spot bitcoin ETF, that will be seen as government approval of bitcoin. The regulator, aware of Wall Street's marketing muscle, doesn't want to "unleash a bitcoin bull" into the retail investor china shop, he said.
Later, in December, the SEC declined to create additional rules for cryptocurrency. On Dec. 15, the agency denied cryptocurrency exchange Coinbase Global's petition for the agency to issue rules governing digital assets, with Chairman Gary Gensler reiterating his position that "no further regulation is needed to oversee the crypto market."
Gensler said that SEC was denying Coinbase's petition because there are already laws and regulations in place that apply to the crypto market, the SEC is working on various rules that pertain to digital assets, and the commission must maintain discretion with respect to its rule-making priorities.