Skip to main content
MENU
Subscribe
  • Sign Up Free
  • LOGIN
  • Subscribe
  • Topics
    • Alternatives
    • Consultants
    • Coronavirus
    • Courts
    • Defined Contribution
    • ESG
    • ETFs
    • Face to Face
    • Hedge Funds
    • Industry Voices
    • Investing
    • Money Management
    • Opinion
    • Partner Content
    • Pension Funds
    • Private Equity
    • Real Estate
    • Russia-Ukraine War
    • SECURE 2.0
    • Special Reports
    • White Papers
  • Rankings & Awards
    • 1,000 Largest Retirement Plans
    • Top-Performing Managers
    • Largest Money Managers
    • DC Money Managers
    • DC Record Keepers
    • Largest Hedge Fund Managers
    • World's Largest Retirement Funds
    • Best Places to Work in Money Management
    • Excellence & Innovation Awards
    • WPS Innovation Awards
    • Eddy Awards
  • ETFs
    • Latest ETF News
    • Fund Screener
    • Education Center
    • Equities
    • Fixed Income
    • Commodities
    • Actively Managed
    • Alternatives
    • ESG Rated
  • ESG
    • Latest ESG News
    • The Institutional Investor’s Guide to ESG Investing
    • ESG Sustainability - Gaining Momentum
    • Climate Change: The Inescapable Opportunity
    • Impact Investing
    • 2022 ESG Investing Conference
    • ESG Rated ETFs
  • Defined Contribution
    • Latest DC News
    • DC Money Manager Rankings
    • DC Record Keeper Rankings
    • Innovations in DC
    • Trends in DC: Focus on Retirement Income
    • 2022 Defined Contribution East Conference
    • 2022 DC Investment Lineup Conference
  • Searches & Hires
    • Latest Searches & Hires News
    • Searches & Hires Database
    • RFPs
  • Performance Data
    • P&I Research Center
    • Earnings Tracker
    • Endowment Returns Tracker
    • Corporate Pension Contribution Tracker
    • Pension Fund Returns Tracker
    • Pension Risk Transfer Database
    • Future of Investments Research Series
    • Charts & Infographics
    • Polls
  • Careers
  • Events
    • View All Conferences
    • View All Webinars
    • 2023 Defined Contribution East
    • 2023 ESG Investing
Breadcrumb
  1. Home
  2. INVESTING
August 19, 2019 12:00 AM

It's racial bias, not merely an issue of access

Danielle Walker
  • Tweet
  • Share
  • Share
  • Email
  • More
    Reprints Print
    Robert Greene
    Robert L. Greene called the research ‘extremely consistent’ with past experience.

    Black fund managers must overcome racial bias to win institutional money and are judged more harshly as top performers, research finds.

    New research pokes holes in the theory that the lack of diversity in asset management is primarily a pipeline problem, caused by either a lack of access or outreach to minority talent in the field.

    There are "systemic racial disparities in how investors evaluate funds and allocate money," a research paper published Aug. 12 by Stanford University and Illumen Capital, a venture capital and private equity firm in Oakland, Calif., found.

    When institutional investors were asked to evaluate seemingly real "one-pagers," or summaries of venture capital teams led by white vs. black men with near identical credentials and track records, researchers found that top-performing funds led by black managing partners appeared to be "most harmed by racial bias," the paper said.

    "Even when funds led by people of color possess identical, strong credentials as white-male-led funds, they are judged more harshly," the paper noted.

    The new research on racial bias in institutional investing was published in the scientific journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and funded by Prudential Financial and the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation.

    For the study, researchers asked 180 primarily white asset allocators to evaluate "one-pagers," which displayed four fictitious venture capital teams — two led by black male managing partners and two by white male managing partners. There was one weak and one strong performing fund for each group.

    "To test for the presence of bias, we analyzed asset allocators' responses to the following: overall performance ratings of the team, evaluations of investment skills, attributions of competence, attributions of social fit, expectations of how much the fund would raise and the likelihood of taking a meeting with the team, beginning due diligence and investing in the team," the paper said.


    Preliminary study first

    Researchers first did a preliminary study before experimenting with the races of managing partners listed on the one-pagers, to make sure asset allocators would perceive both the two stronger funds as equal in quality, as well as the two weaker funds. For the main study, researchers used photos from the Chicago Face Database of the University of Chicago to create fund teams. Adobe Photoshop was used to superimpose solid-colored, button-down shirts on each person, while names were selected that were deemed ambiguous in terms of race and social class, and similar in terms of likelihood of being a fund manager, according to supplementary information published alongside the paper.

    The paper, "Race Influences Professional Investors' Financial Judgments," was co-authored by Sarah Lyons-Padilla, Hazel Rose Markus, Ashby Monk and Jennifer L. Eberhardt at Stanford University, and Sid Radhakrishna, Radhika Shah and Norris A. "Daryn" Dodson IV at Illumen Capital.

    "There is a bias that exists, and that is preventing a whole group of allocators from properly considering a full set of market opportunities," Mr. Monk, the executive and research director of the Stanford Global Projects Center, said in an interview about the findings. "Our data ultimately shows that asset allocators are leaving money on the table."

    Mr. Dodson, who is a managing partner at Illumen Capital, said the research "helps put to rest the idea that it's only a pipeline problem," that affects how investors allocate capital to minority fund managers.

    The study noted that less than 1.3% of the industry's $69 trillion in assets under management is managed by women and minorities.

    "You can imagine across the country, there are hundreds of fund managers that are presenting to asset allocators and very few of them get investments," Mr. Dodson said. "They then ask themselves: 'What's wrong with me?'"

    The research helps reframe the question in a powerful way, he said. It asks, "What's wrong with the process?"

    According to Mr. Monk, the team selected venture capital for the study because "we did want a risky asset class (or) one people did perceive as risky, where you often assess very deeply the caliber of the managing partner."


    ‘Spot on'

    Robert L. Greene, president and CEO of the National Association of Investment Companies, Washington, called the research "spot on" and "extremely consistent" with what he and member firms have experienced in the industry.

    NAIC's members are diverse-owned private equity and venture capital firms as well as hedge funds collectively managing more than $100 billion in assets for institutional investors.

    "The notion that the higher performing firms had even more challenges with market bias, we've observed that definitely," Mr. Greene said.

    "We've found that unless institutional investors are intentional about identifying top-performing (diverse) managers and getting them into searches, they oftentimes don't come out with a diverse manager," he added.

    While researchers saw evidence of bias against the funds led by black men — asset allocators did not rate the strong, black male-led teams as favorably as the strong teams led by white men — they also found that asset allocators could not distinguish between the stronger and weaker fund management teams led by black men.

    Additionally, researchers noticed bias in favor of black male-led teams with weaker performance, the paper said. But institutional investors were not likely to invest in either black or white-led teams with weaker performance.

    There are two possible explanations for the bias in favor of weaker performing black male-led teams.

    Funds with white male leaders "who are stereotyped as competent, might be penalized more for underperforming in a domain where they typically succeed," the paper said.

    "A second possibility is that asset allocators felt compelled to give black male-led teams the benefit of the doubt and felt morally credentialed by charitably rating the lower-performing black male-led team strongly, thereby relieving themselves of any sense of obligation to express serious intentions to invest."

    Overall, the case study found that minority fund managers "are likely to encounter more bias as they achieve stronger credentials," researchers found.

    Researchers likened the findings to the results of a March 2018 study by Natasha Quadlin of Ohio State University, which found that female job seekers with the strongest credentials were penalized substantially more than men and more than women with weaker credentials, the paper said.


    Trained to overcome biases

    The study suggests that asset owners should be trained "to overcome their biases by revamping their investment criteria and strategies, and ensuring they are knowledgeable about the success of firms led by people of color," the latest paper said.

    Ms. Eberhardt, who is a social psychologist and professor in the department of psychology at Stanford University, noted the fact that most of the participants in the study were white has its own implications about the impact of underrepresentation on the investor side.

    Out of 180 asset allocators who participated in the study, 131 were white, 15 East Asian, six South Asian, six multiracial, five Hispanic/Latinx, and five "other," while one was Middle Eastern and one black. Ten participants did not report their race or ethnicity, the paper said.

    "That has a real impact on how people think ... The disparities that you find in the system can also influence the bias that people carry around in their head, and it does so in a way that disparity is self-perpetuating," said Ms. Eberhardt, who is also the author of the book "Biased: Uncovering the Hidden Prejudice That Shapes What We See, Think, and Do."

    JoAnn H. Price, co-founder and managing partner at Fairview Capital Partners Inc., a West Hartford, Conn.-based private equity and venture capital firm serving institutional investors, said the minority-owned firm wouldn't have been as successful without the network-building she and co-founder Laurence C. Morse set out to do.

    "We (joined) non-profit boards and got to know people that we wouldn't have known otherwise," Ms. Price said. "We gave and contributed and built a network across the country."

    Fairview has been in business for 25 years and has $9.7 billion in assets under management, she said.


    ‘A lack of knowledge'

    Of the research paper, which showed more bias against strong-performing funds led by black managers, she noted: "I think part of the bias is a lack of knowledge, (such as) the connectivity to that particular group because you are calling for references."

    "You are trying to check (as an investor), and you don't really know anyone that knows them," she added.

    In her experience, investors might also question whether diverse managers' achievements are because of affirmative action programs.

    "There's no reason to think that it wouldn't happen in private equity, if it happens in every other intersection in this country. There's a constant proving, and we have to spend more time proving than our counterparts," Ms. Price said.

    Juan J. Martinez, vice president, chief financial officer and treasurer of the John S. And James L. Knight Foundation, Miami, which has $2.3 billion in assets, said there is a "cultural fallacy" of more risk associated with minority- and women-owned firms.

    "It becomes sort of an inherent bias against people you don't think you have a lot in common with – and it's a risk-mitigation thing," he continued. "Part of the conversation should be how are we (as investors) being intentional as decision-makers that we have a variety of viewpoints around the table."

    Related Articles
    Black fund managers likely to face more bias as top performers – research
    Citigroup discloses gender and racial pay gaps, plans raises
    More companies espouse gender and racial diversity on boards than disclose it
    Recommended for You
    China stocks
    Global investors take cautious approach to Chinese stocks following the country's reopening
    Calculator
    25% of institutional asset owners considering OCIO in next 24 months – Cerulli
    watchglass stock chart 1550-main_i.jpg
    U.S. insurers likely to increase risk tolerance, private assets – Conning
    The Institutional Investor's Guide to ESG Investing
    Sponsored Content: The Institutional Investor's Guide to ESG Investing

    Reader Poll

    January 25, 2023
    SEE MORE POLLS >
    Sponsored
    White Papers
    Show Me the Income: Discovering plan sponsor and participant preferences for cr…
    The Future of Infrastructure: Building a Better Tomorrow
    Outlook 2023: Opportunity in a volatile world
    Research for Institutional Money Management
    View More
    Sponsored Content
    Partner Content
    The Industrialization of ESG Investment
    For institutional investors, ETFs can make meeting liquidity needs easier
    Gold: the most effective commodity investment
    2021 Investment Outlook | Investing Beyond the Pandemic: A Reset for Portfolios
    Ten ways retirement plan professionals add value to plan sponsors
    Gold: an efficient hedge
    View More
    E-MAIL NEWSLETTERS

    Sign up and get the best of News delivered straight to your email inbox, free of charge. Choose your news – we will deliver.

    Subscribe Today
    December 12, 2022 page one

    Get access to the news, research and analysis of events affecting the retirement and institutional money management businesses from a worldwide network of reporters and editors.

    Subscribe
    Connect With Us
    • RSS
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn

    Our Mission

    To consistently deliver news, research and analysis to the executives who manage the flow of funds in the institutional investment market.

    About Us

    Main Office
    685 Third Avenue
    Tenth Floor
    New York, NY 10017-4036

    Chicago Office
    130 E. Randolph St.
    Suite 3200
    Chicago, IL 60601

    Contact Us

    Careers at Crain

    About Pensions & Investments

     

    Advertising
    • Media Kit
    • P&I Content Solutions
    • P&I Careers | Post a Job
    • Reprints & Permissions
    Resources
    • Subscribe
    • Newsletters
    • FAQ
    • P&I Research Center
    • Site map
    • Staff Directory
    Legal
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Request
    Pensions & Investments
    Copyright © 1996-2023. Crain Communications, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
    • Topics
      • Alternatives
      • Consultants
      • Coronavirus
      • Courts
      • Defined Contribution
      • ESG
      • ETFs
      • Face to Face
      • Hedge Funds
      • Industry Voices
      • Investing
      • Money Management
      • Opinion
      • Partner Content
      • Pension Funds
      • Private Equity
      • Real Estate
      • Russia-Ukraine War
      • SECURE 2.0
      • Special Reports
      • White Papers
    • Rankings & Awards
      • 1,000 Largest Retirement Plans
      • Top-Performing Managers
      • Largest Money Managers
      • DC Money Managers
      • DC Record Keepers
      • Largest Hedge Fund Managers
      • World's Largest Retirement Funds
      • Best Places to Work in Money Management
      • Excellence & Innovation Awards
      • WPS Innovation Awards
      • Eddy Awards
    • ETFs
      • Latest ETF News
      • Fund Screener
      • Education Center
      • Equities
      • Fixed Income
      • Commodities
      • Actively Managed
      • Alternatives
      • ESG Rated
    • ESG
      • Latest ESG News
      • The Institutional Investor’s Guide to ESG Investing
      • ESG Sustainability - Gaining Momentum
      • Climate Change: The Inescapable Opportunity
      • Impact Investing
      • 2022 ESG Investing Conference
      • ESG Rated ETFs
    • Defined Contribution
      • Latest DC News
      • DC Money Manager Rankings
      • DC Record Keeper Rankings
      • Innovations in DC
      • Trends in DC: Focus on Retirement Income
      • 2022 Defined Contribution East Conference
      • 2022 DC Investment Lineup Conference
    • Searches & Hires
      • Latest Searches & Hires News
      • Searches & Hires Database
      • RFPs
    • Performance Data
      • P&I Research Center
      • Earnings Tracker
      • Endowment Returns Tracker
      • Corporate Pension Contribution Tracker
      • Pension Fund Returns Tracker
      • Pension Risk Transfer Database
      • Future of Investments Research Series
      • Charts & Infographics
      • Polls
    • Careers
    • Events
      • View All Conferences
      • View All Webinars
      • 2023 Defined Contribution East
      • 2023 ESG Investing