Skip to main content
MENU
Subscribe
  • Login
  • My Account
  • Logout
  • Register For Free
  • Subscribe
  • Topics
    • Alternatives
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • CIOs
    • Consultants
    • Defined Contribution
    • ESG
    • Face to Face
    • Hedge Funds
    • Industry Voices
    • Investing
    • Money Management
    • Partner Content
    • Private Credit
    • Pension Funds
    • Private Equity
    • Real Estate
    • Regulation
    • Special Reports
    • Washington
    • White Papers
  • International
    • U.K.
    • Canada
    • Europe
    • Asia
    • Australia - New Zealand
    • Middle East
    • Latin America
    • Africa
  • Rankings & Awards
    • 1,000 Largest Retirement Plans
    • Top-Performing Managers
    • Largest Money Managers
    • DC Money Managers
    • DC Record Keepers
    • Largest Hedge Fund Managers
    • World's Largest Retirement Funds
    • Best Places to Work in Money Management
    • Excellence & Innovation Awards
    • WPS Innovation Awards
    • Influential Women in Institutional Investing 2024
    • Eddy Awards
  • Resource Guides
    • Active Thematic Global Equities
    • Retirement Income
    • Fixed Income
    • Pension Risk Transfer
    • Pooled Employer Plans (PEPs)
  • ETFs
    • Latest ETF News
    • Fund Screener
    • Education Center
    • Equities
    • Fixed Income
    • Commodities
    • Actively Managed
    • Alternatives
    • ESG Rated
  • ESG
    • Latest ESG News
    • The Institutional Investor’s Guide to ESG Investing
    • ESG Sustainability - Gaining Momentum
    • ESG Investing | Industry Brief
    • Innovation in ESG Investing
    • ESG Rated ETFs
    • Divestment Database
  • Defined Contribution
    • Latest DC News
    • The Plan Sponsor's Guide to Retirement Income
    • DC Money Manager Rankings
    • DC Record Keeper Rankings
    • Innovations in DC
    • DC Plan Design: Improving Participant Outcomes
  • Searches & Hires
    • Latest Searches & Hires News
    • Searches & Hires Database
    • RFPs
  • Research Center
    • The P&I Research Center
    • Earnings Tracker
    • Endowment Returns Tracker
    • Corporate Pension Contribution Tracker
    • Pension Fund Returns Tracker
    • Pension Risk Transfer Database
  • Careers
  • Events
    • View All Conferences
    • View All Webinars
  • Print
Breadcrumb
  1. Home
  2. INDUSTRY VOICES
January 20, 2020 10:00 AM

Commentary: Support ILPA's standard fund documents project

Jeffrey E. Horvitz
  • Tweet
  • Share
  • Share
  • Email
  • More
    Reprints Print
    Jeffrey E. Horvitz
    Jeffrey E. Horvitz


    Limited partnership agreements have been in a long-term trend to the detriment of limited partners.

    The trend is being pushed by "big law" and denied by placement agents as just "market." The Institutional Limited Partners Association would like to change things.

    The passivity of the institutional investor community has made limited partners like the proverbial frog put in water that is slowly raised to a boil before the frog knows to get out. According to an ILPA survey, half or more of all LPs do not negotiate the fund documents and others may not read the documents at all, presumably rationalizing that the agreements must be fair if everyone is signing.

    Many general partners claim not to have read their own limited partnership agreements, saying they left it up to their lawyers. Yet when they read their agreements, many will agree that terms are unfair, even abusive.

    Most of the resistance to eliminating such terms has not been from the GPs, but from their lawyers who seem to be more concerned about impressing their GP clients as "tough" than helping to create symbiotic partner relations. The drafting is clearly adversarial.

    The myth persists that the carried interest aligns the interests of the GP and LPs; but that profits interest is a call option that misaligns interests (in effect, the LPs grant a call option as partial compensation because if investments lose money, LPs bear 100% of the loss but get only 80% of the profits). Both the economics and legal terms seriously misalign GP and LP interests.

    Early attempts to create coordinated "best practices" terms and documents were met with threats of antitrust litigation. In 2010, the Institutional Limited Partners Association developed a set of principles focused primarily on GP compensation. The Wall Street Journal reported "at least three large private-equity firms have retained outside counsel to examine potential antitrust issues." No litigation was filed, but the threat had the expected chilling effect.

    Here is a partial list of what an investor can expect to see in proposed limited partner agreements:


    • Portfolio company monitoring fees without offset to the management fee.
    • Prepayment of carried interest, for example by taking profits on unrealized investments.
    • Clawback of overpayment of carried interest net of presumed income tax.
    • Several, but not joint liability for GP obligations.
    • Recourse lines of credit used to artificially boost internal rates of return and overcome the hurdle rate.
    • No GP removal, even for cause, until final non-appealable judgment.
    • Sole discretion for any kind of investment.
    • No- or low-fee co-investments for large investors only, not pro rata.
    • No requirement to share limited partner list among LPs.
    • Extreme exculpation language.
    • Waivers of fiduciary duty and near total indemnifications.

    The last two points are particularly troubling. In a fiduciary duty survey conducted by the ILPA, 54% have seen worse language in limited partner agreements on fiduciary duty issues as compared with a few years ago. LPs should rightly wonder why GPs require so many kinds of protection.

    GPs have no incentive to control the legal costs because fees are included in fund formation costs typically borne by the LPs. In other words, LPs are paying for both their own legal fees and the GP legal fees. Multiply this by the number of LPs across multiple funds and clearly a lot of investor money is being wasted. It is not just general partners' lawyers that may resist adoption of industry-standard forms; even some of the law firms that represent LPs resist because it will reduce their own fee income.

    The adoption of best practices industry-standardized fund documents is long overdue. These should be fair and evenhanded agreements. This would be a major change from today's GP-generated agreements and will not be well-received by GPs or attorneys because it will kill the cash cow.

    Various professional groups have long had their own standard contract documents, but to my knowledge none of these have run afoul of antitrust regulators. Some industry standard form contracts have alternative provisions that give the ability to modify them with a sort of "slide in and slide out" of specific provisions, such as multiple options for choices about how to handle specific topics, thereby allowing partial customization. ILPA should consider such an approach rather than a single set of terms, to allow for fair and reasonable alternatives to fit specific fund circumstances.

    LPAs are like prenuptial agreements: The parties go into arrangement hoping for the best but preparing for the worst. Fund problems do not arise often, but when they do, today's LPs will have limited rights and remedies without reformation of what is "market" terms and conditions. There is an adage: "Either read it or sign it, but not both." It is a Hobson's choice and not how fiduciaries must act.

    There is an enormous economy of scale to be had with template documents. If each limited partner must individually review and negotiate the terms and conditions, the cumulative costs are huge and largely unnecessary. Individually borne costs discourage many investors from actively resisting unfair terms.

    Even for investors that are not ILPA members, it would be in their interests to be publicly supportive of ILPA's efforts. The effort is long overdue and sorely needed.


    Jeffrey E. Horvitz is CEO of Moreland Wealth Services Corp., Beverly Farms, Mass. This content represents the views of the author. It was submitted and edited under Pensions & Investments guidelines, but is not a product of P&I's editorial team.

    Related Articles
    ILPA expands on fiduciary duty in latest update of best practices
    Congressional private equity critics propose sweeping reforms
    ILPA asks SEC for action on fiduciary duty protections
    Recommended for You
    Russ Ivinjack (left) and Daniel Ingram
    Commentary: Why responsible investors should embrace version 2.0
    Charles E.F. Millard
    Commentary: In-plan lifetime income solutions should be the default
    Singh Balaj
    Commentary: Expanding the playbook — private equity’s evolving opportunities in sports
    Sponsored
    White Papers
    The State of Lifetime Income Report
    The Next Wave of LDI Evolution
    Retirement security to future income wins, TIAA brings you the latest financial…
    U.S. Public Funds Top Performers: Q2 2024
    Generative AI Investing: Opportunities at a Key Tech Inflection Point
    Research for Institutional Money Management: Advancing Physical Risk Modelling,…
    View More
    Sponsored Content
    Partner Content
    The Industrialization of ESG Investment
    For institutional investors, ETFs can make meeting liquidity needs easier
    Gold: the most effective commodity investment
    2021 Investment Outlook | Investing Beyond the Pandemic: A Reset for Portfolios
    Ten ways retirement plan professionals add value to plan sponsors
    Gold: an efficient hedge
    View More
    E-MAIL NEWSLETTERS

    Sign up and get the best of News delivered straight to your email inbox, free of charge. Choose your news – we will deliver.

    Subscribe Today
    October 23, 2023 page one

    Get access to the news, research and analysis of events affecting the retirement and institutional money management businesses from a worldwide network of reporters and editors.

    Subscribe
    Connect With Us
    • RSS
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn

    Our Mission

    To consistently deliver news, research and analysis to the executives who manage the flow of funds in the institutional investment market.

    About Us

    Main Office
    685 Third Avenue
    Tenth Floor
    New York, NY 10017-4036

    Chicago Office
    130 E. Randolph St.
    Suite 3200
    Chicago, IL 60601

    Contact Us

    Careers at Crain

    About Pensions & Investments

     

    Advertising
    • Media Kit
    • P&I Custom Content
    • P&I Careers | Post a Job
    • Reprints & Permissions
    Resources
    • Subscribe
    • Newsletters
    • FAQ
    • P&I Research Center
    • Site map
    • Staff Directory
    Legal
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Request
    Pensions & Investments
    Copyright © 1996-2025. Crain Communications, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
    • Topics
      • Alternatives
      • Artificial Intelligence
      • CIOs
      • Consultants
      • Defined Contribution
      • ESG
      • Face to Face
      • Hedge Funds
      • Industry Voices
      • Investing
      • Money Management
      • Partner Content
      • Private Credit
      • Pension Funds
      • Private Equity
      • Real Estate
      • Regulation
      • Special Reports
      • Washington
      • White Papers
    • International
      • U.K.
      • Canada
      • Europe
      • Asia
      • Australia - New Zealand
      • Middle East
      • Latin America
      • Africa
    • Rankings & Awards
      • 1,000 Largest Retirement Plans
      • Top-Performing Managers
      • Largest Money Managers
      • DC Money Managers
      • DC Record Keepers
      • Largest Hedge Fund Managers
      • World's Largest Retirement Funds
      • Best Places to Work in Money Management
      • Excellence & Innovation Awards
      • WPS Innovation Awards
      • Influential Women in Institutional Investing 2024
      • Eddy Awards
    • Resource Guides
      • Active Thematic Global Equities
      • Retirement Income
      • Fixed Income
      • Pension Risk Transfer
      • Pooled Employer Plans (PEPs)
    • ETFs
      • Latest ETF News
      • Fund Screener
      • Education Center
      • Equities
      • Fixed Income
      • Commodities
      • Actively Managed
      • Alternatives
      • ESG Rated
    • ESG
      • Latest ESG News
      • The Institutional Investor’s Guide to ESG Investing
      • ESG Sustainability - Gaining Momentum
      • ESG Investing | Industry Brief
      • Innovation in ESG Investing
      • ESG Rated ETFs
      • Divestment Database
    • Defined Contribution
      • Latest DC News
      • The Plan Sponsor's Guide to Retirement Income
      • DC Money Manager Rankings
      • DC Record Keeper Rankings
      • Innovations in DC
      • DC Plan Design: Improving Participant Outcomes
    • Searches & Hires
      • Latest Searches & Hires News
      • Searches & Hires Database
      • RFPs
    • Research Center
      • The P&I Research Center
      • Earnings Tracker
      • Endowment Returns Tracker
      • Corporate Pension Contribution Tracker
      • Pension Fund Returns Tracker
      • Pension Risk Transfer Database
    • Careers
    • Events
      • View All Conferences
      • View All Webinars
    • Print