Skip to main content
MENU
Subscribe
  • Subscribe
  • Account
  • LOGIN
  • Topics
    • Alternatives
    • Consultants
    • Coronavirus
    • Courts
    • Defined Contribution
    • ESG
    • ETFs
    • Hedge Funds
    • Industry Voices
    • Investing
    • Money Management
    • Opinion
    • Partner Content
    • Pension Funds
    • Private Equity
    • Real Estate
    • Russia-Ukraine War
    • SECURE Act 2.0
    • Special Reports
    • White Papers
  • Rankings & Awards
    • 1,000 Largest Retirement Plans
    • Top-Performing Managers
    • Largest Money Managers
    • DC Money Managers
    • DC Record Keepers
    • Largest Hedge Fund Managers
    • World's Largest Retirement Funds
    • Best Places to Work in Money Management
    • Excellence & Innovation Awards
    • Eddy Awards
  • ETFs
    • Latest ETF News
    • Fund Screener
    • Education Center
    • Equities
    • Fixed Income
    • Commodities
    • Actively Managed
    • Alternatives
    • ESG Rated
  • ESG
    • Latest ESG News
    • The Institutional Investor’s Guide to ESG Investing
    • Climate Change: The Inescapable Opportunity
    • Impact Investing
    • 2022 ESG Investing Conference
    • ESG Rated ETFs
  • Defined Contribution
    • Latest DC News
    • DC Money Manager Rankings
    • DC Record Keeper Rankings
    • Innovations in DC
    • Trends in DC: Focus on Retirement Income
    • 2022 Defined Contribution East Conference
    • 2022 DC Investment Lineup Conference
  • Searches & Hires
    • Latest Searches & Hires News
    • Searches & Hires Database
    • RFPs
  • Performance Data
    • P&I Research Center
    • Earnings Tracker
    • Endowment Returns Tracker
    • Corporate Pension Contribution Tracker
    • Pension Fund Returns Tracker
    • Pension Risk Transfer Database
    • Future of Investments Research Series
    • Charts & Infographics
    • Polls
  • Careers
  • Events
    • View All Conferences
    • View All Webinars
    • 2022 Innovation Investing Conference
    • 2022 Defined Contribution East Conference
    • 2022 ESG Investing Conference
    • 2022 DC Investment Lineup Conference
    • 2022 Alternatives Investing Conference
Breadcrumb
  1. Home
  2. INDUSTRY VOICES
November 20, 2019 10:00 AM

Commentary: Plan sponsors, do you know your credit risk?

As interest rates appear set to decline, they underscore the value of a liability-driven, dual portfolio framework

Gordon Latter, Timur Kaya Yontar and Frank Benham
  • Tweet
  • Share
  • Share
  • Email
  • More
    Reprints Print
    Gordon Latter, Timur Kaya Yontar and Frank Benham
    Gordon Latter, Timur Kaya Yontar and Frank Benham

    The historic relationship between fixed income and equities has been put to the test in recent years. Since 2005, for instance, the correlation between investment-grade spreads to equity returns has exceeded 70%, while high-yield spreads showed even more correlation to equities, surpassing 80% over the same time period. This may not seem like it matters in the 10th year of an extended bull market, but when the cycle does turn — exposing institutional investors to risks that transcend both the equity and credit markets — those who haven't adequately diversified may be more exposed than they realize. This is particularly the case for plan sponsors that have overweighted their allocations to credit in search of additional yield. These adjustments, which may be tactical in nature, come at the expense of the hedging characteristics that would traditionally make fixed income appealing amid the later stages of a cycle.

    In many ways, the challenges today are no different than the challenges faced by investors throughout time. Investors simply have to find the optimal trade-off between maximizing their long-term returns while accounting for the most prominent near-term risks. Plan sponsors have the added complexity of managing other considerations such as spending needs, liquidity and solvency requirements, which only become that much more difficult to map out amid interest rate volatility.

    A dual portfolio framework, one that seeks to recast existing positions into either risk-mitigating or return-seeking portfolios, can allow plan sponsors to customize their strategy based on their unique profile. It also facilitates a better understanding of the overall credit risk (across bonds and equities), while allowing plans to avoid specific fixed-income securities and strategies that might upset the balance of their desired risk tolerance.

    A return-seeking portfolio, as the name implies, seeks to maximize performance through tilting exposures toward equities and other high-risk, high-reward securities. A risk-mitigating portfolio, alternatively, will invest in strategies that provide protection against equity market downturns and widening credit spreads. It could encompass long-duration fixed income, alternative risk premium, managed futures and tail-risk hedging strategies. But the objective, even in a worst-case scenario, is to obviate the need for cash contributions to meet future obligations.

    Facilitating customization

    A key advantage of the dual portfolio framework is that it is not a one-size-fits-all model. Given the nuanced but distinct differences between plans, this is an important feature. Certain plans are more cut and dried in their approach to risk. Endowments and foundations view fixed-income assets primarily as an "anchor to windward;" public pension funds consider long Treasuries as a left tail or crisis hedge, and private foundations are focused on meeting the IRS' minimum 5% distribution requirements plus inflation. More customization, however, may be required for a multiemployer plan, which may demonstrate relatively high negative cash flow. A risk-mitigating portfolio in this scenario can balance near-term payments and longer-term goals. A property and casualty insurer, on the other hand, will generally position its risk-mitigating portfolio as a hedge against their liabilities and deploy its return-seeking portfolio to maximize the value of surplus assets.

    The point is that a broad-based allocation to fixed income, such as a portfolio that resembles the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond index, is often too blunt of an approach to meet these unique demands even though it's appropriate for more traditional investors. Consider, for instance, that the duration of a fixed-income portfolio that mirrors the aggregate index has a duration of roughly six years — far shorter than the typical pension liability and, in some cases, far longer than the requirements of a typical property insurer.

    Applying the right tool for the right job

    Another drawback of the aggregate bond index or a similarly constructed fixed-income allocation is the negative convexity. These characteristics stem from exposure to the callable features of certain corporate bonds or securitized loans (such as mortgage-backed securities and commercial mortgage-backed securities). The Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond index, for instance, can be split roughly 50/50 between callable and non-callable bonds, meaning that when plans most require protection — as interest rates fall — the fixed-income basket actually gets weaker.

    This is because bonds are likely to be called or prepaid, which produces a dynamic in which the more interest rates decline, the slower the price of callable bonds increases (creating a negative convexity that contrasts with the behavior of Treasuries in a similar scenario).

    Treasuries, on the other hand, exhibit positive convexity, providing plans with a win-win scenario in which the more rates decline, the faster Treasury prices increase, and conversely, the more rates increase, the slower prices decrease.

    In a year in which the Federal Reserve has vacillated between raising and lowering rates, a dual portfolio framework, or the risk-mitigating portfolio in particular, benefits from addition by subtraction. Through customizing exposures vs. mimicking the more comprehensive Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond index, the dual portfolio framework effectively allows plans to avoid or minimize the proportion of callable bonds in their fixed-income allocation or structure the portfolio with a duration profile that avoids the "belly of the curve."

    Bringing clarity to credit risk

    Starting in 2007, when the Fed first began lowering rates, and the seven years that followed in which rates remained near zero, plan sponsors have struggled to find reliable and adequate yield. This has driven investors to overweight credit to compensate for the shortfall. Corporate balance sheets, given the low cost of debt, have also taken on increasing levels of debt, often to help fund share buybacks or dividends. As of Jan. 1, S&P Global tallied $9.3 trillion in outstanding U.S. corporate debt, over a quarter of which S&P cited was speculative-grade debt. The impact, as mentioned, has been far more exposure to credit risk than most plans may recognize.

    Thus, the equity and bond portfolios are simultaneously exposed to correlated equity and credit risks. To avoid or mitigate this "doubling down" effect, the dual portfolio framework simply allows for a more deliberate approach to credit decisions. More specifically, it separates the choice to take on interest rate exposure from the credit risk embedded in equities or bonds.

    Conclusion

    Plan sponsors are always thinking about risk and outlining a whole range of market scenarios that could affect their ability to fund existing and future obligations. Oftentimes, however, plans won't consider a liability-driven investing strategy until the risks of not doing so become more acute. Many, for instance, are unwilling to lower their return targets believing they may be leaving money on the table in rotating to fixed income from equities. Others believe that a risk-mitigating portfolio implies owning long-duration bonds. Both misgivings, however, overlook derivative/overlay strategies to increase the hedge ratio while maintaining long-term return objectives. They also fail to consider that a dual portfolio framework can open the door to more dynamic hedging strategies while tracking performance through customized benchmarks.

    Ultimately, though, it's about understanding the mission of the organization, the unique objectives and challenges to fulfill it, and the role and ability of the investment program to meet the organization's long-term goals. A dual portfolio framework, through providing transparency into credit risk; allowing plans to steer clear of fixed-income investments that don't provide protection in a bear market scenario; and allowing for customization based on a plan's specific needs and obligations, can provide comfort for plans even against an uncertain backdrop.


    Gordon Latter is a principal and consultant at Meketa Investment Group Inc., Chicago; Timur Kaya Yontar is a senior vice president in Meketa's consulting and research group, Boston; and Frank Benham is a managing principal and director of research at Meketa, Boston. This content represents the views of the authors. It was submitted and edited under Pensions & Investments guidelines, but is not a product of P&I's editorial team.

    Related Articles
    LDI proves its worth in era of interest rate volatility
    LDI is behind improved funding of corporate DB plans, NEPC says
    Graphic: Lowering risk with LDI
    Recommended for You
    Charles E.F. Millard
    Commentary: Finding common ground politically with ESG
    Jo Holden
    Commentary: Inflation looms large over investor sentiment
    Eng Teck Tan
    Commentary: New opportunities emerge as China transitions
    Alternatives: Investing Across the Spectrum
    Sponsored Content: Alternatives: Investing Across the Spectrum

    Reader Poll

    May 23, 2022
    SEE MORE POLLS >
    Sponsored
    White Papers
    Crossroads: Politics, Inflation, & Bonds
    Credit Indices: Closing the Fixed Income Evolutionary Gap
    Forever in Style: Benchmarking with the Morningstar® Broad Style Indexes℠
    Q2 2022 Credit Outlook: Carry On
    Leverage does not equal risk
    Is there a mid-cap gap in your DC plan?
    View More
    Sponsored Content
    Partner Content
    The Industrialization of ESG Investment
    For institutional investors, ETFs can make meeting liquidity needs easier
    Gold: the most effective commodity investment
    2021 Investment Outlook | Investing Beyond the Pandemic: A Reset for Portfolios
    Ten ways retirement plan professionals add value to plan sponsors
    Gold: an efficient hedge
    View More
    E-MAIL NEWSLETTERS

    Sign up and get the best of News delivered straight to your email inbox, free of charge. Choose your news – we will deliver.

    Subscribe Today
    May 23, 2022 page one

    Get access to the news, research and analysis of events affecting the retirement and institutional money management businesses from a worldwide network of reporters and editors.

    Subscribe
    Connect With Us
    • RSS
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn

    Our Mission

    To consistently deliver news, research and analysis to the executives who manage the flow of funds in the institutional investment market.

    About Us

    Main Office
    685 Third Avenue
    Tenth Floor
    New York, NY 10017-4036

    Chicago Office
    130 E. Randolph St.
    Suite 3200
    Chicago, IL 60601

    Contact Us

    Careers at Crain

    About Pensions & Investments

     

    Advertising
    • Media Kit
    • P&I Content Solutions
    • P&I Careers | Post a Job
    • Reprints & Permissions
    Resources
    • Subscribe
    • Newsletters
    • FAQ
    • P&I Research Center
    • Site map
    • Staff Directory
    Legal
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Request
    Pensions & Investments
    Copyright © 1996-2022. Crain Communications, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
    • Topics
      • Alternatives
      • Consultants
      • Coronavirus
      • Courts
      • Defined Contribution
      • ESG
      • ETFs
      • Hedge Funds
      • Industry Voices
      • Investing
      • Money Management
      • Opinion
      • Partner Content
      • Pension Funds
      • Private Equity
      • Real Estate
      • Russia-Ukraine War
      • SECURE Act 2.0
      • Special Reports
      • White Papers
    • Rankings & Awards
      • 1,000 Largest Retirement Plans
      • Top-Performing Managers
      • Largest Money Managers
      • DC Money Managers
      • DC Record Keepers
      • Largest Hedge Fund Managers
      • World's Largest Retirement Funds
      • Best Places to Work in Money Management
      • Excellence & Innovation Awards
      • Eddy Awards
    • ETFs
      • Latest ETF News
      • Fund Screener
      • Education Center
      • Equities
      • Fixed Income
      • Commodities
      • Actively Managed
      • Alternatives
      • ESG Rated
    • ESG
      • Latest ESG News
      • The Institutional Investor’s Guide to ESG Investing
      • Climate Change: The Inescapable Opportunity
      • Impact Investing
      • 2022 ESG Investing Conference
      • ESG Rated ETFs
    • Defined Contribution
      • Latest DC News
      • DC Money Manager Rankings
      • DC Record Keeper Rankings
      • Innovations in DC
      • Trends in DC: Focus on Retirement Income
      • 2022 Defined Contribution East Conference
      • 2022 DC Investment Lineup Conference
    • Searches & Hires
      • Latest Searches & Hires News
      • Searches & Hires Database
      • RFPs
    • Performance Data
      • P&I Research Center
      • Earnings Tracker
      • Endowment Returns Tracker
      • Corporate Pension Contribution Tracker
      • Pension Fund Returns Tracker
      • Pension Risk Transfer Database
      • Future of Investments Research Series
      • Charts & Infographics
      • Polls
    • Careers
    • Events
      • View All Conferences
      • View All Webinars
      • 2022 Innovation Investing Conference
      • 2022 Defined Contribution East Conference
      • 2022 ESG Investing Conference
      • 2022 DC Investment Lineup Conference
      • 2022 Alternatives Investing Conference