Skip to main content
MENU
Subscribe
  • Subscribe
  • Account
  • LOGIN
  • Topics
    • Alternatives
    • Consultants
    • Coronavirus
    • Courts
    • Defined Contribution
    • ESG
    • ETFs
    • Hedge Funds
    • Industry Voices
    • Investing
    • Money Management
    • Opinion
    • Partner Content
    • Pension Funds
    • Private Equity
    • Real Estate
    • Russia-Ukraine War
    • SECURE Act 2.0
    • Special Reports
    • White Papers
  • Rankings & Awards
    • 1,000 Largest Retirement Plans
    • Top-Performing Managers
    • Largest Money Managers
    • DC Money Managers
    • DC Record Keepers
    • Largest Hedge Fund Managers
    • World's Largest Retirement Funds
    • Best Places to Work in Money Management
    • Excellence & Innovation Awards
    • Eddy Awards
  • ETFs
    • Latest ETF News
    • Fund Screener
    • Education Center
    • Equities
    • Fixed Income
    • Commodities
    • Actively Managed
    • Alternatives
    • ESG Rated
  • ESG
    • Latest ESG News
    • The Institutional Investor’s Guide to ESG Investing
    • Climate Change: The Inescapable Opportunity
    • Impact Investing
    • 2022 ESG Investing Conference
    • ESG Rated ETFs
  • Defined Contribution
    • Latest DC News
    • DC Money Manager Rankings
    • DC Record Keeper Rankings
    • Innovations in DC
    • Trends in DC: Focus on Retirement Income
    • 2022 Defined Contribution East Conference
    • 2022 DC Investment Lineup Conference
  • Searches & Hires
    • Latest Searches & Hires News
    • Searches & Hires Database
    • RFPs
  • Performance Data
    • P&I Research Center
    • Earnings Tracker
    • Endowment Returns Tracker
    • Corporate Pension Contribution Tracker
    • Pension Fund Returns Tracker
    • Pension Risk Transfer Database
    • Future of Investments Research Series
    • Charts & Infographics
    • Polls
  • Careers
  • Events
    • View All Conferences
    • View All Webinars
    • 2022 Innovation Investing Conference
    • 2022 Defined Contribution East Conference
    • 2022 ESG Investing Conference
    • 2022 DC Investment Lineup Conference
    • 2022 Alternatives Investing Conference
Breadcrumb
  1. Home
  2. INDUSTRY VOICES
March 12, 2020 10:00 AM

Commentary: As factor-based investing grows, beware the combo platter

Michael Hunstad
  • Tweet
  • Share
  • Share
  • Email
  • More
    Reprints Print
    Michael Hunstad

    Michael Hunstad

    Factor investing is projected to grow to $3.4 trillion by 2022, up from $1.9 trillion as of Sept. 30, 2017, according to BlackRock. While enthusiasm for factor-based investing continues to grow, so too does a risk: piling on individual factor exposures to achieve an expensive form of beta.

    Call it the combo-platter conundrum. The early days of factor-based investing were marked by traditional a la carte selection of individual factors such as size, value, momentum, quality and low volatility. Now it's increasingly common to see combination approaches that purport to provide exposure to several factors in a single product, often under the generic moniker "multifactor."

    While we strongly support a multifactor approach, we have serious reservations about the ability of some so-called multifactor products to deliver on their promise of multifactor exposure. Some providers appear to have simply cobbled together existing single-factor products in various combinations to create new suites of multifactor strategies. We believe many of these hastily developed products suffer from the effects of dilution, or the unintentional offsetting of individual factor exposures. Dilution attenuates the total factor content of the multifactor strategy, often resulting in multifactor products with little or no net factor exposure. Investors essentially end up investing in an index, at a higher cost.

    Dilution's root cause

    As an example, consider a simple multifactor portfolio of just two exposures: quality and value. To gain these exposures, suppose we invest half of our assets in a single-factor quality-only strategy and the other half in a value-only strategy. Note, however, that it is not unusual for value stocks, which for various reasons are trading at a lower price relative to fundamentals, to be of lower quality, while higher-quality stocks tend to be relatively more expensive. When these two groups of stocks are placed side by side in a multifactor construct, you can see how dilution ensues: high quality/expensive stocks offset low quality/cheap stocks. At the extreme, the stocks receiving an overweight in the value portfolio can be precisely those stocks that receive an underweight in the quality portfolio. If we don't explicitly control for these offsets by eliminating the low-quality orientation of the value product and the low-value orientation of the quality product, then it is clear how a simple quality-value multifactor strategy ends up with little or no aggregate exposure to quality or value.

    The root cause of dilution is the failure to eliminate unintentional, disadvantageous exposures in the single-factor components of a multifactor portfolio. Correlations among factors are rarely zero and frequently strongly negative. That means corrective action needs to be taken to avoid dilution.

    Dilution solution

    Perhaps ironically, the solution to the dilution problem has always been at hand. A 2016 paper by Steven Thorley, Roger Clarke, Harindra de Silva said that the fatal flaw with multifactor investing often lies predominately in the use of aggregated single-factor components which, owing to dilution, are not collectively efficient from a risk-reward standpoint. They find that a combination of four single-factor component portfolios — low beta, size, value and momentum — captures only half of the risk-adjusted return of a portfolio formed from individual stocks that are simultaneously low beta, small size, high value and high momentum. The latter is sometimes referred to as a "bottom-up" factor implementation and addresses the dilution problem directly, as stocks with disadvantageous exposures are not allowed in the portfolio or are given below benchmark weights. In this manner, more factor content is maintained as dilution is minimized. The resultant portfolio is also naturally less sensitive to changing correlations.

    In a 2017 paper, Scientific Beta CEO Noel Amenc and others argue that the bottom-up approach promotes undue concentration as there are few stocks that are simultaneously low beta, small size, high value and high momentum. These authors suggest the resultant bottom-up portfolio would have very few names and thus potentially high levels of individual, sector and country risk. We feel this conclusion misses the point, as the benefit of a bottom-up approach is not necessarily the total elimination of dilution but rather the intelligent management and minimization of this malady. While no tactics will be perfect, the benefits of multifactor investing will be realized to a far greater extent.

    To help evaluate efficiency and dilution, a conceptually simple metric can be used: the percentage of a factor-based strategy's total active risk that comes from the intended factors rather than extraneous noise. A more efficient strategy achieves more intended factor exposure per unit of unintended exposure, such as security, sector, region concentration or unintended factor tilts. We've shown that strategies that score high on the metric tend to have correspondingly higher risk-adjusted returns. This is not surprising and adds to the mounting evidence, including in a 2017 paper by Columbia University finance professor Kent Daniel showing that unintended exposures such as from sectors add to risk but not necessarily to return.

    Conclusion

    Dilution is an affliction that has caused many multifactor equity products to fail at their stated task. Instead of delivering robust multifactor exposures, these products have been shown to produce little, if any, net factor content. The problem of dilution stems from poor product design, usually in the form of an insistence on single-factor components that are naturally prone to dilution and sensitive to changing factor correlations. Although providers of multifactor products constructed with single factors have defended their approach, research supporting a stock-level or "bottom-up" implementation is gaining strength. Regardless of how one pursues factor-based investing programs, acknowledging, evaluating and controlling for efficiency and dilution are crucial to success, by ensuring that one's factor portfolio is indeed composed of factors.

    In other words, not all combo platters are alike.

    Michael Hunstad is head of quantitative strategies at Northern Trust Asset Management, Chicago. This content represents the views of the author. It was submitted and edited under Pensions & Investments guidelines, but is not a product of P&I's editorial team.

    Related Articles
    Quants reboot factor investing as ebbing demand bites at ETFs
    Learning robots are hottest weapon in investing arms race
    Commentary: Machine learning in quantitative investing – revolution or evolution?
    Recommended for You
    Charles E.F. Millard
    Commentary: Finding common ground politically with ESG
    Jo Holden
    Commentary: Inflation looms large over investor sentiment
    Eng Teck Tan
    Commentary: New opportunities emerge as China transitions
    OCIO, Anchor in Rough Seas
    Sponsored Content: OCIO, Anchor in Rough Seas

    Reader Poll

    May 23, 2022
    SEE MORE POLLS >
    Sponsored
    White Papers
    Crossroads: Politics, Inflation, & Bonds
    Credit Indices: Closing the Fixed Income Evolutionary Gap
    Forever in Style: Benchmarking with the Morningstar® Broad Style Indexes℠
    Q2 2022 Credit Outlook: Carry On
    Leverage does not equal risk
    Is there a mid-cap gap in your DC plan?
    View More
    Sponsored Content
    Partner Content
    The Industrialization of ESG Investment
    For institutional investors, ETFs can make meeting liquidity needs easier
    Gold: the most effective commodity investment
    2021 Investment Outlook | Investing Beyond the Pandemic: A Reset for Portfolios
    Ten ways retirement plan professionals add value to plan sponsors
    Gold: an efficient hedge
    View More
    E-MAIL NEWSLETTERS

    Sign up and get the best of News delivered straight to your email inbox, free of charge. Choose your news – we will deliver.

    Subscribe Today
    May 23, 2022 page one

    Get access to the news, research and analysis of events affecting the retirement and institutional money management businesses from a worldwide network of reporters and editors.

    Subscribe
    Connect With Us
    • RSS
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn

    Our Mission

    To consistently deliver news, research and analysis to the executives who manage the flow of funds in the institutional investment market.

    About Us

    Main Office
    685 Third Avenue
    Tenth Floor
    New York, NY 10017-4036

    Chicago Office
    130 E. Randolph St.
    Suite 3200
    Chicago, IL 60601

    Contact Us

    Careers at Crain

    About Pensions & Investments

     

    Advertising
    • Media Kit
    • P&I Content Solutions
    • P&I Careers | Post a Job
    • Reprints & Permissions
    Resources
    • Subscribe
    • Newsletters
    • FAQ
    • P&I Research Center
    • Site map
    • Staff Directory
    Legal
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Request
    Pensions & Investments
    Copyright © 1996-2022. Crain Communications, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
    • Topics
      • Alternatives
      • Consultants
      • Coronavirus
      • Courts
      • Defined Contribution
      • ESG
      • ETFs
      • Hedge Funds
      • Industry Voices
      • Investing
      • Money Management
      • Opinion
      • Partner Content
      • Pension Funds
      • Private Equity
      • Real Estate
      • Russia-Ukraine War
      • SECURE Act 2.0
      • Special Reports
      • White Papers
    • Rankings & Awards
      • 1,000 Largest Retirement Plans
      • Top-Performing Managers
      • Largest Money Managers
      • DC Money Managers
      • DC Record Keepers
      • Largest Hedge Fund Managers
      • World's Largest Retirement Funds
      • Best Places to Work in Money Management
      • Excellence & Innovation Awards
      • Eddy Awards
    • ETFs
      • Latest ETF News
      • Fund Screener
      • Education Center
      • Equities
      • Fixed Income
      • Commodities
      • Actively Managed
      • Alternatives
      • ESG Rated
    • ESG
      • Latest ESG News
      • The Institutional Investor’s Guide to ESG Investing
      • Climate Change: The Inescapable Opportunity
      • Impact Investing
      • 2022 ESG Investing Conference
      • ESG Rated ETFs
    • Defined Contribution
      • Latest DC News
      • DC Money Manager Rankings
      • DC Record Keeper Rankings
      • Innovations in DC
      • Trends in DC: Focus on Retirement Income
      • 2022 Defined Contribution East Conference
      • 2022 DC Investment Lineup Conference
    • Searches & Hires
      • Latest Searches & Hires News
      • Searches & Hires Database
      • RFPs
    • Performance Data
      • P&I Research Center
      • Earnings Tracker
      • Endowment Returns Tracker
      • Corporate Pension Contribution Tracker
      • Pension Fund Returns Tracker
      • Pension Risk Transfer Database
      • Future of Investments Research Series
      • Charts & Infographics
      • Polls
    • Careers
    • Events
      • View All Conferences
      • View All Webinars
      • 2022 Innovation Investing Conference
      • 2022 Defined Contribution East Conference
      • 2022 ESG Investing Conference
      • 2022 DC Investment Lineup Conference
      • 2022 Alternatives Investing Conference