Skip to main content
MENU
Subscribe
  • Subscribe
  • Account
  • LOGIN
  • Topics
    • Alternatives
    • Consultants
    • Coronavirus
    • Courts
    • Defined Contribution
    • ESG
    • ETFs
    • Hedge Funds
    • Industry Voices
    • Investing
    • Money Management
    • Opinion
    • Partner Content
    • Pension Funds
    • Private Equity
    • Real Estate
    • Russia-Ukraine War
    • SECURE Act 2.0
    • Special Reports
    • White Papers
  • Rankings & Awards
    • 1,000 Largest Retirement Plans
    • Top-Performing Managers
    • Largest Money Managers
    • DC Money Managers
    • DC Record Keepers
    • Largest Hedge Fund Managers
    • World's Largest Retirement Funds
    • Best Places to Work in Money Management
    • Excellence & Innovation Awards
    • Eddy Awards
  • ETFs
    • Latest ETF News
    • Fund Screener
    • Education Center
    • Equities
    • Fixed Income
    • Commodities
    • Actively Managed
    • Alternatives
    • ESG Rated
  • ESG
    • Latest ESG News
    • The Institutional Investor’s Guide to ESG Investing
    • Climate Change: The Inescapable Opportunity
    • Impact Investing
    • 2022 ESG Investing Conference
    • ESG Rated ETFs
  • Defined Contribution
    • Latest DC News
    • DC Money Manager Rankings
    • DC Record Keeper Rankings
    • Innovations in DC
    • Trends in DC: Focus on Retirement Income
    • 2022 Defined Contribution East Conference
    • 2022 DC Investment Lineup Conference
  • Searches & Hires
    • Latest Searches & Hires News
    • Searches & Hires Database
    • RFPs
  • Performance Data
    • P&I Research Center
    • Earnings Tracker
    • Endowment Returns Tracker
    • Corporate Pension Contribution Tracker
    • Pension Fund Returns Tracker
    • Pension Risk Transfer Database
    • Future of Investments Research Series
    • Charts & Infographics
    • Polls
  • Careers
  • Events
    • View All Conferences
    • View All Webinars
    • 2022 Innovation Investing Conference
    • 2022 Defined Contribution East Conference
    • 2022 ESG Investing Conference
    • 2022 DC Investment Lineup Conference
    • 2022 Alternatives Investing Conference
Breadcrumb
  1. Home
  2. INDUSTRY VOICES
October 09, 2020 07:00 AM

Commentary: Evaluating OCIO performance

Valter Viola
  • Tweet
  • Share
  • Share
  • Email
  • More
    Reprints Print
    Valter Viola
    Photo: David Chang
    Valter Viola

    When funds search for an outsourced chief investment officer, they inevitably consider past performance. Unfortunately, there are no widely accepted standards for measuring OCIO performance, and many common approaches can lead funds to draw the wrong conclusions.

    For example, they may rank a truly skilled OCIO lower than others that simply experienced better luck over a (short) time horizon; or they may penalize an OCIO for performance over which the OCIO, in fact, had no control. If funds consider past OCIO performance, it is critical that they minimize the risk of drawing wrong conclusions. Here's how.

    Evaluate (only) alpha

    Typically, funds delegate the discretion to hire and fire underlying managers to the OCIO, but retain authority over their policy portfolios. As a result, funds — not the OCIO — are accountable for policy portfolio outcomes (i.e., benchmark returns), leaving the OCIO accountable only for alpha.

    While the passive, or beta, return component is larger and riskier than alpha, OCIOs are not accountable for it because their asset mix responsibility is limited to providing prudent, non-discretionary advice. OCIOs aren't off the hook for asset allocation or risk management, of course. Instead, evaluations in these important areas should be based on the quality of OCIOs' advice, rather than the outcomes over which they have no discretion.

    Account for fees separately

    Performance analysis should start by assessing an OCIO's skill before fees are considered. Any fees included in past performance should be backed out, and replaced by the fees that will apply to accounts in the future.

    Here's why. First, fees change over time, so those that apply in the future may differ from past fees. Second, fees are negotiable, while investment skill is not. There's no point considering fees until there's evidence that an OCIO has any skill worth paying for.

    Adjust for constraints

    An OCIO's ability to add value from active management is constrained by the asset classes the fund permits and the ranges within which the portfolio must be rebalanced. To make performance comparable across OCIOs, then, we need to remove any effects that made it harder — or easier — for some OCIOs to outperform benchmarks.

    For example, it is harder to outperform the policy portfolio when:

    • Fewer asset classes are permitted.
    • Rebalancing ranges are tight.
    • Policy weights are high in markets that are more efficient.
    • Opportunities to add value are limited.

    Inflation-linked bonds might be good for funds with liabilities that rise with inflation, and are therefore included in the policy portfolio, but they offer fewer opportunities to outperform the benchmark (mainly duration) because the benchmark has few bonds and they are of similar quality (i.e., U.S. Treasuries).

    Alternatively, OCIOs add value more easily when one or more of these strategies are permitted: tactical asset allocation; active currency hedging; certain hedge fund strategies; or private equity. In these four strategies,there's typically an inverse relationship between the capital used to implement the strategy (low) and tracking error taken (high). This low/high relationship between capital/risk creates an advantage because tracking error is allocated more efficiently in this case, all else equal.

    To remove these effects, performance should first be analyzed at the asset class level and only later at the total fund level.

    Also, greater care is needed in private markets, where valuations (and therefore returns) are less reliable than public ones, benchmark quality is low and because it takes years to deploy private capital (i.e., "vintage year" plays a big role).

    Adjust for risks

    It takes time to gain confidence that "seemingly good" returns were truly due to skill, rather than luck, and it involves considering the risks taken as well. An OCIO that takes less tracking error but adds the same value as another OCIO has generated better performance on a risk-adjusted basis (other things equal). Measuring the information ratio (alpha divided by tracking error) allows us to group OCIOs into four performance categories, based on their skill/luck profile:

    1. Blessed OCIOs (skilled and lucky).
    2. Doomed (unskilled and unlucky).
    3. Forlorn (skilled, but unlucky).
    4. Insufferable (unskilled, but lucky). (Terms were developed by Richard Grinold and Ronald Kahn in their book, "Active Portfolio Management: A Quantitative Approach for Producing Superior Returns and Controlling Risk.)

    If median managers outperform half the universe, by definition, we should expect them to add zero alpha before fees (normal distribution) in a given year. Their expected information ration is zero before fees. Top quartile managers, however, are expected to add 67 basis points of value for every 100 basis points of tracking error taken (information ratio of 0.67).

    Include all types of funds

    While performance could be aggregated by client type (e.g., endowments only), funds should resist doing so because it provides less evidence of skill (or lack thereof) due to a smaller sample size. Asset class strategies pursued by an OCIO are typically similar across different client types, so there's little benefit from a focused analysis on any single investor type.

    Pull it all together

    The final step is to apply appropriate weights to OCIOs' asset class performance, along with the fees that would apply (including underlying managers' fees).

    Our OCIO search clients find "historical replays" useful, where adjusted performance figures are aggregated using the fund's policy weights to determine how performance would look had each of the OCIOs been engaged by the fund. This historical replay is easy to understand and more useful than the (unadjusted) performance against a 60/40 mix, which includes far too much noise.

    Valter Viola is managing director and principal at Cortex Applied Research in Toronto. This content represents the views of the author. It was submitted and edited under Pensions & Investments guidelines but is not a product of P&I's editorial team.

    Related Articles
    OCIO growth assisted by volatile times
    OCIO managers continue to grow assets
    Cerulli: Asset owners use specialist consultants to search for OCIO firms
    Recommended for You
    Matt Petersen
    Commentary: CITs in 403(b) plans — An idea whose time is past due
    Charles E.F. Millard
    Commentary: Finding common ground politically with ESG
    Jo Holden
    Commentary: Inflation looms large over investor sentiment
    OCIO, Anchor in Rough Seas
    Sponsored Content: OCIO, Anchor in Rough Seas

    Reader Poll

    May 23, 2022
    SEE MORE POLLS >
    Sponsored
    White Papers
    Crossroads: Politics, Inflation, & Bonds
    Credit Indices: Closing the Fixed Income Evolutionary Gap
    Forever in Style: Benchmarking with the Morningstar® Broad Style Indexes℠
    Q2 2022 Credit Outlook: Carry On
    Leverage does not equal risk
    Is there a mid-cap gap in your DC plan?
    View More
    Sponsored Content
    Partner Content
    The Industrialization of ESG Investment
    For institutional investors, ETFs can make meeting liquidity needs easier
    Gold: the most effective commodity investment
    2021 Investment Outlook | Investing Beyond the Pandemic: A Reset for Portfolios
    Ten ways retirement plan professionals add value to plan sponsors
    Gold: an efficient hedge
    View More
    E-MAIL NEWSLETTERS

    Sign up and get the best of News delivered straight to your email inbox, free of charge. Choose your news – we will deliver.

    Subscribe Today
    May 23, 2022 page one

    Get access to the news, research and analysis of events affecting the retirement and institutional money management businesses from a worldwide network of reporters and editors.

    Subscribe
    Connect With Us
    • RSS
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn

    Our Mission

    To consistently deliver news, research and analysis to the executives who manage the flow of funds in the institutional investment market.

    About Us

    Main Office
    685 Third Avenue
    Tenth Floor
    New York, NY 10017-4036

    Chicago Office
    130 E. Randolph St.
    Suite 3200
    Chicago, IL 60601

    Contact Us

    Careers at Crain

    About Pensions & Investments

     

    Advertising
    • Media Kit
    • P&I Content Solutions
    • P&I Careers | Post a Job
    • Reprints & Permissions
    Resources
    • Subscribe
    • Newsletters
    • FAQ
    • P&I Research Center
    • Site map
    • Staff Directory
    Legal
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Request
    Pensions & Investments
    Copyright © 1996-2022. Crain Communications, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
    • Topics
      • Alternatives
      • Consultants
      • Coronavirus
      • Courts
      • Defined Contribution
      • ESG
      • ETFs
      • Hedge Funds
      • Industry Voices
      • Investing
      • Money Management
      • Opinion
      • Partner Content
      • Pension Funds
      • Private Equity
      • Real Estate
      • Russia-Ukraine War
      • SECURE Act 2.0
      • Special Reports
      • White Papers
    • Rankings & Awards
      • 1,000 Largest Retirement Plans
      • Top-Performing Managers
      • Largest Money Managers
      • DC Money Managers
      • DC Record Keepers
      • Largest Hedge Fund Managers
      • World's Largest Retirement Funds
      • Best Places to Work in Money Management
      • Excellence & Innovation Awards
      • Eddy Awards
    • ETFs
      • Latest ETF News
      • Fund Screener
      • Education Center
      • Equities
      • Fixed Income
      • Commodities
      • Actively Managed
      • Alternatives
      • ESG Rated
    • ESG
      • Latest ESG News
      • The Institutional Investor’s Guide to ESG Investing
      • Climate Change: The Inescapable Opportunity
      • Impact Investing
      • 2022 ESG Investing Conference
      • ESG Rated ETFs
    • Defined Contribution
      • Latest DC News
      • DC Money Manager Rankings
      • DC Record Keeper Rankings
      • Innovations in DC
      • Trends in DC: Focus on Retirement Income
      • 2022 Defined Contribution East Conference
      • 2022 DC Investment Lineup Conference
    • Searches & Hires
      • Latest Searches & Hires News
      • Searches & Hires Database
      • RFPs
    • Performance Data
      • P&I Research Center
      • Earnings Tracker
      • Endowment Returns Tracker
      • Corporate Pension Contribution Tracker
      • Pension Fund Returns Tracker
      • Pension Risk Transfer Database
      • Future of Investments Research Series
      • Charts & Infographics
      • Polls
    • Careers
    • Events
      • View All Conferences
      • View All Webinars
      • 2022 Innovation Investing Conference
      • 2022 Defined Contribution East Conference
      • 2022 ESG Investing Conference
      • 2022 DC Investment Lineup Conference
      • 2022 Alternatives Investing Conference