Skip to main content
MENU
Subscribe
  • Sign Up Free
  • LOGIN
  • Subscribe
  • Topics
    • Alternatives
    • Consultants
    • Coronavirus
    • Courts
    • Defined Contribution
    • ESG
    • ETFs
    • Face to Face
    • Hedge Funds
    • Industry Voices
    • Investing
    • Money Management
    • Opinion
    • Partner Content
    • Pension Funds
    • Private Equity
    • Real Estate
    • Russia-Ukraine War
    • SECURE 2.0
    • Special Reports
    • White Papers
  • Rankings & Awards
    • 1,000 Largest Retirement Plans
    • Top-Performing Managers
    • Largest Money Managers
    • DC Money Managers
    • DC Record Keepers
    • Largest Hedge Fund Managers
    • World's Largest Retirement Funds
    • Best Places to Work in Money Management
    • Excellence & Innovation Awards
    • WPS Innovation Awards
    • Eddy Awards
  • ETFs
    • Latest ETF News
    • Fund Screener
    • Education Center
    • Equities
    • Fixed Income
    • Commodities
    • Actively Managed
    • Alternatives
    • ESG Rated
  • ESG
    • Latest ESG News
    • The Institutional Investor’s Guide to ESG Investing
    • ESG Sustainability - Gaining Momentum
    • Climate Change: The Inescapable Opportunity
    • Impact Investing
    • 2022 ESG Investing Conference
    • ESG Rated ETFs
  • Defined Contribution
    • Latest DC News
    • DC Money Manager Rankings
    • DC Record Keeper Rankings
    • Innovations in DC
    • Trends in DC: Focus on Retirement Income
    • 2022 Defined Contribution East Conference
    • 2022 DC Investment Lineup Conference
  • Searches & Hires
    • Latest Searches & Hires News
    • Searches & Hires Database
    • RFPs
  • Performance Data
    • P&I Research Center
    • Earnings Tracker
    • Endowment Returns Tracker
    • Corporate Pension Contribution Tracker
    • Pension Fund Returns Tracker
    • Pension Risk Transfer Database
    • Future of Investments Research Series
    • Charts & Infographics
    • Polls
  • Careers
  • Events
    • View All Conferences
    • View All Webinars
    • 2023 Defined Contribution East
    • 2023 ESG Investing
Breadcrumb
  1. Home
  2. INDUSTRY VOICES
December 29, 2021 11:00 AM

Commentary: ‘Do no harm' is not nearly enough

Karen Barr
  • Tweet
  • Share
  • Share
  • Email
  • More
    Reprints Print
    Karen Barr
    Karen Barr

    Retirement plan sponsors are an essential component of the U.S. retirement system. Plan sponsors oversee the operations of virtually all retirement plans, hiring the service providers who perform work for the plans, selecting the investments that generate returns and generally helping to ensure that plan participants can meet their retirement goals.

    But for plan sponsors to do their critically important work, they need to be appropriately and completely informed of their role and duties. Unfortunately, recent writing on the responsibilities of plan sponsors has failed to accurately portray the duty that sponsors have to act in plan participants' best interests.

    A recent example of this problematic approach is "Defined Contribution Plans: Challenges and Opportunities for Plan Sponsors."This guidance for plan sponsors, written by Jeffery Bailey and Kurt Winkelmann, has recently been published by the CFA Institute Research Foundation.

    Messrs. Bailey and Winkelmann inaccurately summarize a plan sponsor's role as follows: "An investment committee's first responsibility is to do no harm." In their view, plan sponsors both fulfill their responsibilities and make their work less complicated by reflexively favoring passively managed investments over actively managed ones.

    However, while "do no harm" is the core of the Hippocratic Oath that doctors take, plan sponsors are held to an even higher standard. Under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, plan sponsors are fiduciaries who have both a duty of care and a duty of loyalty to plan participants and their beneficiaries. This is one of the highest standards in the law, and it requires that fiduciaries act in the best interest of their clients at all times.

    Under the fiduciary standard, plan sponsors can't default to simplistic rules of thumb when selecting investments for a retirement plan.

    So, what's a plan sponsor to do?

    Related Article
    Firms eye the prize: wooing and winning retail investors
    Benefits to plan participants, not litigation risk or convenience, should be focus

    As Alison Douglass and Christina Hennecken of the law firm Goodwin Procter LLP and authors of "Selecting, Evaluating, and Monitoring Investments in DC Plans: A Legal Perspective" explain, part of the fiduciary responsibility is evaluating the needs of the plan and having "a clear understanding of the range of options available in the marketplace."

    Litigation risk should not be a factor in this evaluation. "While litigation may be top of mind," cautions Ms. Douglass, "it has no place in fiduciary decision-making."

    Nor should the administrative convenience drive the decision-making process. Avoiding investments solely because they are "time consuming" for plan sponsors, as Messrs. Bailey and Winkelmann suggest, is not consistent with the best interests of participants.

    Active or passive, plan sponsors have the same responsibility

    The fact is, focusing on passively managed funds doesn't reduce the need for thorough analysis of potential investments. Passively managed doesn't equate to "not risky."

    Passively managed funds can also be quite complicated, as Messrs. Bailey and Winkelmann themselves note. "Investors have literally thousands of indexes to choose from," they explain, which creates significant challenges in matching index to investment objective.

    And plan sponsors still need to look under the hood of passively managed funds. As several research papers have pointed out, the recipe for many index funds involves a heavy dose of active decision-making.

    Active and passive are not diametrically opposed

    Instead, active and passive coexist, with virtually every investment having some aspect of both.

    The difficulty of disentangling active and passive is perhaps best illustrated by the example of target-date funds. Messrs. Bailey and Winkelmann recommend that plan sponsors focus on passively managed target-date funds — but fail to recognize that these funds involve a high level of active decision-making and monitoring by the investment manager.

    That's because, while these funds may use index funds as building blocks to create exposure to particular asset classes, the allocation among those asset classes requires research and analysis of economic and market conditions over both the short and long term.


    Related Article
    PEP lookalikes launched to reduce costs, headaches
    Active investments add value

    A wide range of actively managed strategies can add value in helping plan participants meet their goals. Indeed, only active management is equipped to evaluate the potential financial impact of long-term trends such as climate change — the type of trends that can have an enormous impact on planning for long-term goals, such as retirement.

    And there are well-established and well-researched road maps that plan sponsors can follow to help them identify good active managers. Recent papers by K.J. Martijn Cremers, Jon A. Fulkerson and Timothy B. Riley and by Nicolas P.B. Bollen, Juha Joenvaara and Mikko Kauppila (both published in the CFA Institute's Financial Analysts Journal) discuss the indicators that plan sponsors can use in this process.

    Plan sponsors should focus on "value for cost" of specific investments

    Plan sponsors should weigh the risks of possible investments against their potential rewards, considering the costs associated with those investments. In other words, as legal experts Ms. Douglass and Ms. Hennecken explain, "fiduciaries should focus on the value-for-cost proposition."

    In a recent blog post, Messrs. Bailey and Winkelmann opine that their discussion of the value of active management has been misinterpreted and clarify that "do no harm" was intended as a "policy guideline, not a legal standard."

    Having acknowledged that their guidance has been so misunderstood, it is imperative that the authors amend their paper so that plan sponsors accurately understand their legal duties. In sum, plan sponsors should be seeking the best outcomes for plan participants based on the participants' goals, not their own.

    It's time to stop perpetuating old myths about active and passive management and recognize the important role that both active and passive strategies play in helping investors meet their goals.

    Karen Barr is president and CEO of the Investment Adviser Association, an organization for fiduciary investment advisers, based in Washington. This content represents the views of the author. It was submitted and edited under P&I guidelines but is not a product of P&I's editorial team.

    Related Articles
    Commentary: Catch your drift — how to stay in your private credit investment lane
    Commentary: Beyond COVID-19, health-care investing will be forever changed
    Commentary: Getting over the finish line — how pension funds can increase their chances of reaching full funding
    Recommended for You
    Claire J. Rauscher and Sarah Motley Stone
    Commentary: Expecting the unexpected — preparing for a pension fund investigation
    Maelle Gavet
    Commentary: Go broad, go early: Why scale and diversification are the answer to venture market turbulence
    John Bowman
    Commentary: Why, and how, our industry must renew its commitment to a fiduciary mindset
    The Institutional Investor's Guide to ESG Investing
    Sponsored Content: The Institutional Investor's Guide to ESG Investing

    Reader Poll

    January 25, 2023
    SEE MORE POLLS >
    Sponsored
    White Papers
    Show Me the Income: Discovering plan sponsor and participant preferences for cr…
    The Future of Infrastructure: Building a Better Tomorrow
    Outlook 2023: Opportunity in a volatile world
    Research for Institutional Money Management
    View More
    Sponsored Content
    Partner Content
    The Industrialization of ESG Investment
    For institutional investors, ETFs can make meeting liquidity needs easier
    Gold: the most effective commodity investment
    2021 Investment Outlook | Investing Beyond the Pandemic: A Reset for Portfolios
    Ten ways retirement plan professionals add value to plan sponsors
    Gold: an efficient hedge
    View More
    E-MAIL NEWSLETTERS

    Sign up and get the best of News delivered straight to your email inbox, free of charge. Choose your news – we will deliver.

    Subscribe Today
    December 12, 2022 page one

    Get access to the news, research and analysis of events affecting the retirement and institutional money management businesses from a worldwide network of reporters and editors.

    Subscribe
    Connect With Us
    • RSS
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn

    Our Mission

    To consistently deliver news, research and analysis to the executives who manage the flow of funds in the institutional investment market.

    About Us

    Main Office
    685 Third Avenue
    Tenth Floor
    New York, NY 10017-4036

    Chicago Office
    130 E. Randolph St.
    Suite 3200
    Chicago, IL 60601

    Contact Us

    Careers at Crain

    About Pensions & Investments

     

    Advertising
    • Media Kit
    • P&I Content Solutions
    • P&I Careers | Post a Job
    • Reprints & Permissions
    Resources
    • Subscribe
    • Newsletters
    • FAQ
    • P&I Research Center
    • Site map
    • Staff Directory
    Legal
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Request
    Pensions & Investments
    Copyright © 1996-2023. Crain Communications, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
    • Topics
      • Alternatives
      • Consultants
      • Coronavirus
      • Courts
      • Defined Contribution
      • ESG
      • ETFs
      • Face to Face
      • Hedge Funds
      • Industry Voices
      • Investing
      • Money Management
      • Opinion
      • Partner Content
      • Pension Funds
      • Private Equity
      • Real Estate
      • Russia-Ukraine War
      • SECURE 2.0
      • Special Reports
      • White Papers
    • Rankings & Awards
      • 1,000 Largest Retirement Plans
      • Top-Performing Managers
      • Largest Money Managers
      • DC Money Managers
      • DC Record Keepers
      • Largest Hedge Fund Managers
      • World's Largest Retirement Funds
      • Best Places to Work in Money Management
      • Excellence & Innovation Awards
      • WPS Innovation Awards
      • Eddy Awards
    • ETFs
      • Latest ETF News
      • Fund Screener
      • Education Center
      • Equities
      • Fixed Income
      • Commodities
      • Actively Managed
      • Alternatives
      • ESG Rated
    • ESG
      • Latest ESG News
      • The Institutional Investor’s Guide to ESG Investing
      • ESG Sustainability - Gaining Momentum
      • Climate Change: The Inescapable Opportunity
      • Impact Investing
      • 2022 ESG Investing Conference
      • ESG Rated ETFs
    • Defined Contribution
      • Latest DC News
      • DC Money Manager Rankings
      • DC Record Keeper Rankings
      • Innovations in DC
      • Trends in DC: Focus on Retirement Income
      • 2022 Defined Contribution East Conference
      • 2022 DC Investment Lineup Conference
    • Searches & Hires
      • Latest Searches & Hires News
      • Searches & Hires Database
      • RFPs
    • Performance Data
      • P&I Research Center
      • Earnings Tracker
      • Endowment Returns Tracker
      • Corporate Pension Contribution Tracker
      • Pension Fund Returns Tracker
      • Pension Risk Transfer Database
      • Future of Investments Research Series
      • Charts & Infographics
      • Polls
    • Careers
    • Events
      • View All Conferences
      • View All Webinars
      • 2023 Defined Contribution East
      • 2023 ESG Investing