Skip to main content
MENU
Subscribe
  • Sign Up Free
  • LOGIN
  • Subscribe
  • Topics
    • Alternatives
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Consultants
    • Defined Contribution
    • ESG
    • ETFs
    • Face to Face
    • Hedge Funds
    • Industry Voices
    • Investing
    • Money Management
    • Partner Content
    • Pension Funds
    • Private Equity
    • Real Estate
    • Regulation
    • SECURE 2.0
    • Special Reports
    • Washington
    • White Papers
  • Rankings & Awards
    • 1,000 Largest Retirement Plans
    • Top-Performing Managers
    • Largest Money Managers
    • DC Money Managers
    • DC Record Keepers
    • Largest Hedge Fund Managers
    • World's Largest Retirement Funds
    • Best Places to Work in Money Management
    • Excellence & Innovation Awards
    • WPS Innovation Awards
    • Influential Women in Institutional Investing 2023
    • Eddy Awards
  • ETFs
    • Latest ETF News
    • Fund Screener
    • Education Center
    • Equities
    • Fixed Income
    • Commodities
    • Actively Managed
    • Alternatives
    • ESG Rated
  • ESG
    • Latest ESG News
    • The Institutional Investor’s Guide to ESG Investing
    • ESG Sustainability - Gaining Momentum
    • ESG Investing | Industry Brief
    • Innovation in ESG Investing
    • 2023 ESG Investing Conference
    • ESG Rated ETFs
    • Divestment Database
  • Defined Contribution
    • Latest DC News
    • The Plan Sponsor's Guide to Retirement Income
    • DC Money Manager Rankings
    • DC Record Keeper Rankings
    • Innovations in DC
    • DC Plan Design: Improving Participant Outcomes
    • 2023 Defined Contribution East Conference
  • Searches & Hires
    • Latest Searches & Hires News
    • Searches & Hires Database
    • RFPs
  • Research Center
    • The P&I Research Center
    • Earnings Tracker
    • Endowment Returns Tracker
    • Corporate Pension Contribution Tracker
    • Pension Fund Returns Tracker
    • Pension Risk Transfer Database
  • Careers
  • Events
    • View All Conferences
    • View All Webinars
  • Print
Breadcrumb
  1. Home
  2. INDUSTRY VOICES
August 26, 2020 08:00 AM

Commentary: Disgorgement considerations for pension and other funds after Liu vs. SEC

Kelley Howes and Haimavathi V. Marlier
  • Tweet
  • Share
  • Share
  • Email
  • More
    Kelley Howes and Haimavathi Marlier

    Kelley Howes and Haimavathi V. Marlier

    In June the Supreme Court in Liu vs. SEC conditionally preserved the Securities and Exchange Commission's ability to collect disgorgement to deprive wrongdoers of the "ill-gotten gains" resulting from illegal conduct. Although the SEC has express statutory authority to collect disgorgement in its in-house administrative proceedings, the agency's ability to seek disgorgement as "equitable relief" awarded by federal courts under the Securities Exchange Act was under attack. The court held that disgorgement that "does not exceed a wrongdoer's net profits and is awarded for victims is equitable relief permissible under Section 78(u)(d)(5)."

    The parties in Liu focused on the threshold question of whether the SEC could seek disgorgement. Accordingly, the Supreme Court remanded the case for the District Court to measure the disgorgement award. In doing so, however, the court provided guidance as to when such awards are appropriate. The Supreme Court observed that some courts had "test(ed) the bounds of equity" in three ways: by ordering that disgorged funds be deposited directly into the Treasury instead of returned to victims; imposing joint and several disgorgement awards; and refusing to deduct valid business expenses from the fraudulent proceeds. All three observations engender important considerations of how disgorgement awards will operate in the pension and investment funds space.

    As to the first observation, the court did not address the issue of what equitable principles govern when it may be difficult for the SEC to disburse disgorgement proceeds to victims, as is often the case in matters involving investment funds that include pension funds and other institutional investors. Rather, the court instructed lower courts to fashion disgorgement awards "for the benefit of investors" and "consistent with equitable principles." And the court noted that "SEC's equitable, profits-based remedy must do more than simply benefit the public at large by virtue of depriving a wrongdoer of ill-gotten gains."

    In the fund context, determining the individual victims of wrongdoing can be challenging, particularly if investors hold interests in a widely distributed fund through a broker-dealer, retirement account or other intermediary. For example, in the case of an open-end fund with redeemable securities, ownership changes daily and may be held through various types of intermediaries. Funds often do not have transparency into their underlying beneficial owners and therefore may have difficulty identifying actual victims of wrongdoing. Accordingly, determining how best to return an award to victims may be impossible without the input of intermediaries. Under these circumstances, the court's order casts doubt on whether the SEC can seek disgorgement in federal court proceedings where victims cannot be practicably identified.

    With respect to the second observation, the court disfavored blanket joint and several disgorgement awards with no analysis of the nature of the relationship between the parties and their respective efforts to further the illegal conduct. The court allowed that certain relationships (marriage in the case of the Liu petitioners) permitted a consideration of whether there was concerted wrongdoing of a nature where joint and several disgorgement may be equitable.

    The government introduced evidence that Mr. Liu formed the entity, solicited investments and misappropriated funds and that his wife, Ms. Wang, held herself out as the entity's president and as a management team member of the entity which received the misappropriated funds. By contrast, the Liu petitioners failed to introduce evidence that either spouse was a passive recipient of the ill-gotten gains, that their finances were not commingled, "that one spouse did not enjoy the fruits of the scheme, or that other circumstances would render a joint-and-several disgorgement order unjust."

    In light of the highly intermediated distribution of registered funds, such funds and their intermediaries should carefully evaluate their contractual and business relationships to determine if their relationships may expand potential exposure to joint and several awards. Indeed, registrants should expect that courts and the SEC will consider this issue when formulating disgorgement awards. Registrants and their intermediaries would therefore be well served to fully understand and document the nature of current business relationships that could impact future joint and several liability.

    Finally, and as to the third observation, the court concluded that there can be expenses that have "value independent of fueling a fraudulent scheme" and allowed that it could be consistent with equitable principles for a lower court to permit deduction of such expenses. In other words, legitimate business expenses may be accounted for in determining the amount of disgorgement. Funds and their intermediaries should therefore ensure that they fully understand and document expenses incurred in various lines of business and distribution relationships. Being able to justify legitimate business expenses may enable a registrant to exclude such expenses from disgorgement in a future federal court enforcement matter.

    The Supreme Court's decision makes clear that disgorgement that does not exceed a wrongdoer's net profits and that is awarded for the benefit of victims of the wrongdoing constitutes equitable relief. Left unresolved, however, is how SEC disgorgement might be structured to be for the "benefit of investors" if it is not structured to be returned to individual victims of the wrongdoing. Additionally, the level and type of relationships that may give rise to joint and several liability and the types of expenses that could be considered to be legitimate business expenses has been left to the lower courts to determine. Thus, although the Liu decision preserved the SEC's ability to seek disgorgement as a remedy in federal court, and registrants should expect that the agency's enforcement staff will continue to do so, the decision reveals key considerations for pensions and funds.

    Kelley Howes is counsel at Morrison & Foerster LLP and vice chairwoman of the investment management group based in Denver, and Haimavathi V. Marlier is a partner in the firm's securities litigation, enforcement and white-collar practice group based in New York. This content represents the views of the authors. It was submitted and edited under Pensions & Investments guidelines, but is not a product of P&I's editorial team.

    Related Articles
    Supreme Court backs SEC disgorgement practices
    House passes bill to reverse Supreme Court decision on SEC disgorgement
    Supreme Court to hear challenge to SEC disgorgement
    Recommended for You
    Photo of Los Angeles Capital Management's Hal Reynolds and Sidharth Madan
    Commentary: What's next for high-quality growth stocks?
    Photo of Global Endowment Management's Matt Bank
    Commentary: Art of effective governance — helping investment committees avoid common pitfalls
    Photo of Schroders' Marina Severinovsky
    Commentary: Human capital management has quantifiable implications for investors
    Open Window of Opportunity in Real Estate
    Sponsored Content: Open Window of Opportunity in Real Estate
    Sponsored
    White Papers
    A Guide to Home Equity Investments: The Untapped Real Estate Asset Class
    Modernize your K-12 retirement plan with vendor consolidation
    Q4 2023 Credit Outlook: Price Is What You Pay, Value Is What You Get
    There's More Than One Way to Be a Climate Investor
    Exploring the Commercial Application of Artificial Intelligence
    Private Credit Insights: Every Problem Is an Opportunity in Disguise
    View More
    Sponsored Content
    Partner Content
    The Industrialization of ESG Investment
    For institutional investors, ETFs can make meeting liquidity needs easier
    Gold: the most effective commodity investment
    2021 Investment Outlook | Investing Beyond the Pandemic: A Reset for Portfolios
    Ten ways retirement plan professionals add value to plan sponsors
    Gold: an efficient hedge
    View More
    E-MAIL NEWSLETTERS

    Sign up and get the best of News delivered straight to your email inbox, free of charge. Choose your news – we will deliver.

    Subscribe Today
    October 23, 2023 page one

    Get access to the news, research and analysis of events affecting the retirement and institutional money management businesses from a worldwide network of reporters and editors.

    Subscribe
    Connect With Us
    • RSS
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn

    Our Mission

    To consistently deliver news, research and analysis to the executives who manage the flow of funds in the institutional investment market.

    About Us

    Main Office
    685 Third Avenue
    Tenth Floor
    New York, NY 10017-4036

    Chicago Office
    130 E. Randolph St.
    Suite 3200
    Chicago, IL 60601

    Contact Us

    Careers at Crain

    About Pensions & Investments

     

    Advertising
    • Media Kit
    • P&I Custom Content
    • P&I Careers | Post a Job
    • Reprints & Permissions
    Resources
    • Subscribe
    • Newsletters
    • FAQ
    • P&I Research Center
    • Site map
    • Staff Directory
    Legal
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Request
    Pensions & Investments
    Copyright © 1996-2023. Crain Communications, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
    • Topics
      • Alternatives
      • Artificial Intelligence
      • Consultants
      • Defined Contribution
      • ESG
      • ETFs
      • Face to Face
      • Hedge Funds
      • Industry Voices
      • Investing
      • Money Management
      • Partner Content
      • Pension Funds
      • Private Equity
      • Real Estate
      • Regulation
      • SECURE 2.0
      • Special Reports
      • Washington
      • White Papers
    • Rankings & Awards
      • 1,000 Largest Retirement Plans
      • Top-Performing Managers
      • Largest Money Managers
      • DC Money Managers
      • DC Record Keepers
      • Largest Hedge Fund Managers
      • World's Largest Retirement Funds
      • Best Places to Work in Money Management
      • Excellence & Innovation Awards
      • WPS Innovation Awards
      • Influential Women in Institutional Investing 2023
      • Eddy Awards
    • ETFs
      • Latest ETF News
      • Fund Screener
      • Education Center
      • Equities
      • Fixed Income
      • Commodities
      • Actively Managed
      • Alternatives
      • ESG Rated
    • ESG
      • Latest ESG News
      • The Institutional Investor’s Guide to ESG Investing
      • ESG Sustainability - Gaining Momentum
      • ESG Investing | Industry Brief
      • Innovation in ESG Investing
      • 2023 ESG Investing Conference
      • ESG Rated ETFs
      • Divestment Database
    • Defined Contribution
      • Latest DC News
      • The Plan Sponsor's Guide to Retirement Income
      • DC Money Manager Rankings
      • DC Record Keeper Rankings
      • Innovations in DC
      • DC Plan Design: Improving Participant Outcomes
      • 2023 Defined Contribution East Conference
    • Searches & Hires
      • Latest Searches & Hires News
      • Searches & Hires Database
      • RFPs
    • Research Center
      • The P&I Research Center
      • Earnings Tracker
      • Endowment Returns Tracker
      • Corporate Pension Contribution Tracker
      • Pension Fund Returns Tracker
      • Pension Risk Transfer Database
    • Careers
    • Events
      • View All Conferences
      • View All Webinars
    • Print