Skip to main content
MENU
Subscribe
  • Sign Up Free
  • LOGIN
  • Subscribe
  • Topics
    • Alternatives
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Consultants
    • Defined Contribution
    • ESG
    • ETFs
    • Face to Face
    • Hedge Funds
    • Industry Voices
    • Investing
    • Money Management
    • Partner Content
    • Pension Funds
    • Private Equity
    • Real Estate
    • Regulation
    • SECURE 2.0
    • Special Reports
    • Washington
    • White Papers
  • Rankings & Awards
    • 1,000 Largest Retirement Plans
    • Top-Performing Managers
    • Largest Money Managers
    • DC Money Managers
    • DC Record Keepers
    • Largest Hedge Fund Managers
    • World's Largest Retirement Funds
    • Best Places to Work in Money Management
    • Excellence & Innovation Awards
    • WPS Innovation Awards
    • Influential Women in Institutional Investing 2023
    • Eddy Awards
  • ETFs
    • Latest ETF News
    • Fund Screener
    • Education Center
    • Equities
    • Fixed Income
    • Commodities
    • Actively Managed
    • Alternatives
    • ESG Rated
  • ESG
    • Latest ESG News
    • The Institutional Investor’s Guide to ESG Investing
    • ESG Sustainability - Gaining Momentum
    • ESG Investing | Industry Brief
    • Innovation in ESG Investing
    • 2023 ESG Investing Conference
    • ESG Rated ETFs
    • Divestment Database
  • Defined Contribution
    • Latest DC News
    • The Plan Sponsor's Guide to Retirement Income
    • DC Money Manager Rankings
    • DC Record Keeper Rankings
    • Innovations in DC
    • DC Plan Design: Improving Participant Outcomes
    • 2023 Defined Contribution East Conference
  • Searches & Hires
    • Latest Searches & Hires News
    • Searches & Hires Database
    • RFPs
  • Research Center
    • The P&I Research Center
    • Earnings Tracker
    • Endowment Returns Tracker
    • Corporate Pension Contribution Tracker
    • Pension Fund Returns Tracker
    • Pension Risk Transfer Database
  • Careers
  • Events
    • View All Conferences
    • View All Webinars
  • Print
Breadcrumb
  1. Home
  2. INDUSTRY VOICES
September 10, 2019 10:00 AM

Commentary: 4 key questions to help investors avoid greenwashing

Masja Zandbergen
  • Tweet
  • Share
  • Share
  • Email
  • More
    Masja Zandbergen
    Masja Zandbergen

    With the sharply rising interest in sustainable investing around the world, and the proliferation of sustainable funds, investors face a serious challenge. How do they determine a fund is truly managed according to responsible criteria vs. one whose sustainability principles are superficial, inconsistent or poorly construed — a situation known as "greenwashing?"

    The Global Sustainable Investment Alliance estimates sustainable assets under management in key regions have grown 34% during the past two years, reaching $30.7 trillion in 2018. To capture this demand, investment managers have launched more than 100 sustainable funds in the U.S. alone during the past three years.

    Despite — or perhaps because of — its growing popularity among institutional and retail investors, sustainable investing can be defined in many different ways. Also called socially responsible investing, it can encompass impact investing; the application of environmental, social and governance criteria; negative screening; and other strategies. There are more than 150 providers of research, ratings, rankings, indexes and labels used to determine whether specific investments qualify as sustainable. Accordingly, SRI ratings of investments can be inconsistent due to differences in data collection, analysis and reporting.

    We believe investors should consider four key questions to cut through the sustainable investing confusion and avoid greenwashing.

    1) Does the investment manager subscribe to integrated thinking?

    We believe a strategy can be sustainable only if it is well integrated into a manager's entire investment process, and not segregated to SRI portfolios alone. ESG investing no longer is as simple as reducing an investment universe to the "best-scoring" names. It means thinking about how sustainability affects all companies and investment strategies. Fund managers should ask how long-term ESG trends and external costs, such as climate change, loss of biodiversity and rising inequality, are reflected in a company's business model.

    Such integrated thinking requires rigorous analysis and the ability to "look under the hood" of potential investments. For example, in comparing the carbon footprint of two mobile phone companies, imagine that one company has outsourced all of its operations, while the other is vertically integrated. The first company would thus appear to have a lower carbon footprint than the second, even though making a mobile phone creates more or less the same carbon footprint. This is not visible in the data, but requires knowledge and judgment to see what is there. If a fund has no resources committed to looking at this, and analysts do not have access to in-depth research or an understanding of these issues, the manager will not be able to structurally integrate sustainability.

    2) Is the manager engaged with portfolio companies to drive change related to sustainability?

    Assets managers must look beyond ratings and labels, and actively engage with the companies in which they invest. The most effective engagement process takes place over many years, allowing analysts to track and measure the progress of companies over time.

    For example, Robeco and other institutional investors engaged with a leading international oil and gas company, which had already expressed a willingness to reduce the net carbon footprint of its energy products. Following its engagement with the investor group, the company went further and agreed to several specific commitments, including, among other things, setting three- to five-year net carbon footprint targets, aligning executive remuneration with energy transition practices, and seeking third-party assessment of its efforts.

    3) Is the fund manager ‘walking the talk?’

    Even if a fund manager offers a selection of SRI funds, it is important to determine whether the manager credibly applies sustainable principles in its own business. Investors should examine how a manager describes its mission, work environment, employment practices and approach to the community, and decide whether this is truly consistent with sustainable investing. As noted earlier, voting behavior is also a major clue to a manager's level of commitment to sustainability.

    One way a manager can "walk the talk" of sustainable principles is through its voting behavior. Larger passive investors often vote with a board's recommendation, even on shareholder proposals relating to environmental and social issues. Managers should be willing to support shareholder proposals relating to ESG issues.

    4) What's the true meaning of SRI labels applied to a fund?

    While SRI labels provided by private or government entities might offer a stamp of approval for a fund, label standards vary from provider to provider, and from country to country. The SRI label established by the French Finance Ministry assesses factors such as a fund's ESG analysis methodology, engagement and transparency. It is externally verified (including an analysis of regulatory filings), so a fund must demonstrate that it has the necessary data, processes and procedures to obtain the French label. The Belgian label, on the other hand, is much more prescriptive, specifically on what not to invest in. The Morningstar Sustainability Rating uses a historical holdings-based calculation factoring in company-level ESG analytics. The MSCI ESG Fund Quality Score measures the ESG characteristics of portfolio holdings and ranks funds based on such factors as sustainable impact, values alignment and ESG risks.

    Although such labels attempt to independently certify a fund's SRI principles and practices, the variety of methodologies makes it hard for investors to really know the nature of the funds in which they are investing. Thus, asset managers need to be transparent and clearly show what is — and what is not — part of the strategy of their funds.

    Today, investing sustainably is a difficult and demanding process. Past approaches — based on excluding tobacco, gambling, alcohol, fossil fuel or defense industry stocks — are overly simplistic. Ratings and labels are helpful but are not a substitute for independent analysis by investors. The market is now distinguishing among different ways of defining and implementing sustainability. To avoid greenwashing, investors must do the same — by asking the right questions and reaching their own conclusions.

    Masja Zandbergen is head of ESG integration at Robeco, Rotterdam, Netherlands. This content represents the views of the author. It was submitted and edited under Pensions & Investments guidelines, but is not a product of P&I's editorial team.

    Related Articles
    Disclosure requirement for asset owners, money managers approved by EU
    Demand for green bonds crimped by lack of supply
    Hedge funds making progress, but slow to adopt ESG
    Recommended for You
    Photo of Los Angeles Capital Management's Hal Reynolds and Sidharth Madan
    Commentary: What's next for high-quality growth stocks?
    Photo of Global Endowment Management's Matt Bank
    Commentary: Art of effective governance — helping investment committees avoid common pitfalls
    Photo of Schroders' Marina Severinovsky
    Commentary: Human capital management has quantifiable implications for investors
    Private Markets: A Thriving Space
    Sponsored Content: Private Markets: A Thriving Space
    Sponsored
    White Papers
    A Guide to Home Equity Investments: The Untapped Real Estate Asset Class
    Modernize your K-12 retirement plan with vendor consolidation
    Q4 2023 Credit Outlook: Price Is What You Pay, Value Is What You Get
    There's More Than One Way to Be a Climate Investor
    Exploring the Commercial Application of Artificial Intelligence
    Private Credit Insights: Every Problem Is an Opportunity in Disguise
    View More
    Sponsored Content
    Partner Content
    The Industrialization of ESG Investment
    For institutional investors, ETFs can make meeting liquidity needs easier
    Gold: the most effective commodity investment
    2021 Investment Outlook | Investing Beyond the Pandemic: A Reset for Portfolios
    Ten ways retirement plan professionals add value to plan sponsors
    Gold: an efficient hedge
    View More
    E-MAIL NEWSLETTERS

    Sign up and get the best of News delivered straight to your email inbox, free of charge. Choose your news – we will deliver.

    Subscribe Today
    October 23, 2023 page one

    Get access to the news, research and analysis of events affecting the retirement and institutional money management businesses from a worldwide network of reporters and editors.

    Subscribe
    Connect With Us
    • RSS
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn

    Our Mission

    To consistently deliver news, research and analysis to the executives who manage the flow of funds in the institutional investment market.

    About Us

    Main Office
    685 Third Avenue
    Tenth Floor
    New York, NY 10017-4036

    Chicago Office
    130 E. Randolph St.
    Suite 3200
    Chicago, IL 60601

    Contact Us

    Careers at Crain

    About Pensions & Investments

     

    Advertising
    • Media Kit
    • P&I Custom Content
    • P&I Careers | Post a Job
    • Reprints & Permissions
    Resources
    • Subscribe
    • Newsletters
    • FAQ
    • P&I Research Center
    • Site map
    • Staff Directory
    Legal
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Request
    Pensions & Investments
    Copyright © 1996-2023. Crain Communications, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
    • Topics
      • Alternatives
      • Artificial Intelligence
      • Consultants
      • Defined Contribution
      • ESG
      • ETFs
      • Face to Face
      • Hedge Funds
      • Industry Voices
      • Investing
      • Money Management
      • Partner Content
      • Pension Funds
      • Private Equity
      • Real Estate
      • Regulation
      • SECURE 2.0
      • Special Reports
      • Washington
      • White Papers
    • Rankings & Awards
      • 1,000 Largest Retirement Plans
      • Top-Performing Managers
      • Largest Money Managers
      • DC Money Managers
      • DC Record Keepers
      • Largest Hedge Fund Managers
      • World's Largest Retirement Funds
      • Best Places to Work in Money Management
      • Excellence & Innovation Awards
      • WPS Innovation Awards
      • Influential Women in Institutional Investing 2023
      • Eddy Awards
    • ETFs
      • Latest ETF News
      • Fund Screener
      • Education Center
      • Equities
      • Fixed Income
      • Commodities
      • Actively Managed
      • Alternatives
      • ESG Rated
    • ESG
      • Latest ESG News
      • The Institutional Investor’s Guide to ESG Investing
      • ESG Sustainability - Gaining Momentum
      • ESG Investing | Industry Brief
      • Innovation in ESG Investing
      • 2023 ESG Investing Conference
      • ESG Rated ETFs
      • Divestment Database
    • Defined Contribution
      • Latest DC News
      • The Plan Sponsor's Guide to Retirement Income
      • DC Money Manager Rankings
      • DC Record Keeper Rankings
      • Innovations in DC
      • DC Plan Design: Improving Participant Outcomes
      • 2023 Defined Contribution East Conference
    • Searches & Hires
      • Latest Searches & Hires News
      • Searches & Hires Database
      • RFPs
    • Research Center
      • The P&I Research Center
      • Earnings Tracker
      • Endowment Returns Tracker
      • Corporate Pension Contribution Tracker
      • Pension Fund Returns Tracker
      • Pension Risk Transfer Database
    • Careers
    • Events
      • View All Conferences
      • View All Webinars
    • Print