Most investors are focusing on the energy transition in some way. Nuveen's annual EQuilibrium Global Institutional Investor Survey released March 21 found that of the more than 800 global institutional investors overseeing $18 trillion in assets, a scant 7% did not plan to address it and a few contrarians were sticking with fossil fuels. Survey respondents included decision-makers at corporate as well as public pension funds, insurance companies, and endowments and foundations, as well as sovereign wealth funds and central banks.
On the flip side, 55% think they can “significantly influence” the energy transition’s rate of progress. More than half, 57%, already have or are seeking exposure to alternative energy, including renewables, nuclear and hydrogen power, and 51% want to allocate to new infrastructure projects, including new energy storage projects, grids and battery storage.
The rate of progress was mixed, with 9% considered first movers, 23% just getting started and 19% meeting regulatory requirements, the Nuveen survey found.
There were also big regional differences, with corporate pension funds in the Asia-Pacific region showing more interest in nature-based solutions while pension funds in Germany favored carbon credit markets, and North American public pensions leaned toward legacy infrastructure upgrades, Nuveen found.
The IEA projects a lot happening in the next five years. By 2028, nearly 3,700 gigawatts of new renewable capacity will come online, and renewable energy sources will account for more than 42% of global electricity generation. For context, one gigawatt is the equivalent of 1 billion watts. In 2023, new global annual renewable capacity reached nearly 510 gigawatts.
Solar photovoltaic and wind will make up 95% of that growth, thanks to supportive policy environments and their “improving economic attractiveness,” the IEA said, with new solar PV and onshore wind additions more than doubling in the United States, the European Union, India and Brazil by 2028. Meanwhile, wind and solar PV will generate more electricity than hydropower, coal and nuclear before then, it projected.
Other technologies including batteries, heat pumps and nuclear power have helped, but “solar is the star performer,” the IEA said, with more than $1 billion per day expected to have been invested in 2023, overtaking spending in upstream oil for the first time.
Ontario Teachers’ will keep investing in wind and solar, but also continue to explore a wide range of technologies, including energy storage solutions, hydrogen technology, advanced nuclear energy and renewable fuels, Ireland said.
For the $259.9 billion New York State Common Retirement Fund, Albany, roughly 70% of its sustainable investments program has a climate orientation — including renewable energy generation, transmission, distribution and storage — across seven asset classes: public and private equity, public and private debt, real estate, real assets and opportunistic. An initial goal of $20 billion recently was doubled to $40 billion invested by 2035.
For the $494.6 billion California Public Employees’ Retirement System, Sacramento, a plan to be net zero by 2030 calls for nearly doubling climate-solutions investments to $100 billion by 2030, with new investments across asset classes in climate control strategies and transitioning away from fossil fuels.
CalPERS officials caution that they could even underweight or exit an investment at some point if a company’s failure to present a credible net zero plan or invest in the energy transition poses a financial risk.
And it’s not just the biggest asset owners jumping in. In December, the $2.7 billion Stanislaus County Employees' Retirement Association, Modesto, Calif., committed $20 million to a renewable and sustainable energy non-core infrastructure fund managed by Carlyle Group.
“The demand for that capital is growing and higher than I have ever seen. We seem to be at a tipping point,” said Steven Porto, a partner with Ares Management Corp.’s infrastructure opportunities. “I think the story right now on climate infrastructure and energy transition is a story about capital and the cost of that capital,” said Porto, whose background includes clean energy development.