Ecological investing is following a similar path as climate change in gaining institutional interest, but there's a lot of work to be done to reach the same level of awareness and urgency, investors say.
"Compared to the advanced understanding of climate-related risks and opportunities, the discussions on the nature side are behind," said Martin Berg, CIO of the nature-based carbon strategy at Climate Asset Management in London, a money management joint venture of HSBC and Pollination Group, a climate change investment and advisory firm, to address natural capital strategies.
With an estimated 50% of global economic value generation dependent on nature, according to the World Economic Forum, most economic sectors are in danger as biodiversity — the variety of life on the planet, including genes, ecosystems, plants and animals — continues to decline, sometimes rapidly.
Biodiversity "is something that a lot of investors are starting to get their arms around," said Olga Hancock, deputy head of responsible investment in London for Church Commissioners for England. It manages the Church of England's £9.2 billion ($12.5 billion) endowment that has long prioritized land stewardship, and as climate change gets taken seriously, "there is more awareness around the ecological crisis and impacts. Ecological issues are cropping up all over the world," said Ms. Hancock.
For investors, threats to natural capital can particularly impact sectors like agriculture, forestry, pharmaceuticals, mining and hydroelectric power, but biodiversity by definition touches all sectors. In addition to a company's direct uses of natural capital, many other companies — with their own biodiversity issues — are involved in supplying energy, materials, goods and services to them. As a result, "the key issue is supply chains. A lot of investors are looking at that now," Ms. Hancock said.