Skip to main content
MENU
Subscribe
  • Sign Up Free
  • LOGIN
  • Subscribe
  • Topics
    • Alternatives
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Consultants
    • Defined Contribution
    • ESG
    • ETFs
    • Face to Face
    • Hedge Funds
    • Industry Voices
    • Investing
    • Money Management
    • Partner Content
    • Pension Funds
    • Private Equity
    • Real Estate
    • Regulation
    • SECURE 2.0
    • Special Reports
    • Washington
    • White Papers
  • Rankings & Awards
    • 1,000 Largest Retirement Plans
    • Top-Performing Managers
    • Largest Money Managers
    • DC Money Managers
    • DC Record Keepers
    • Largest Hedge Fund Managers
    • World's Largest Retirement Funds
    • Best Places to Work in Money Management
    • Excellence & Innovation Awards
    • WPS Innovation Awards
    • Influential Women in Institutional Investing 2023
    • Eddy Awards
  • ETFs
    • Latest ETF News
    • Fund Screener
    • Education Center
    • Equities
    • Fixed Income
    • Commodities
    • Actively Managed
    • Alternatives
    • ESG Rated
  • ESG
    • Latest ESG News
    • The Institutional Investor’s Guide to ESG Investing
    • ESG Sustainability - Gaining Momentum
    • ESG Investing | Industry Brief
    • Innovation in ESG Investing
    • 2023 ESG Investing Conference
    • ESG Rated ETFs
    • Divestment Database
  • Defined Contribution
    • Latest DC News
    • The Plan Sponsor's Guide to Retirement Income
    • DC Money Manager Rankings
    • DC Record Keeper Rankings
    • Innovations in DC
    • Trends in DC: Focus on Retirement Income
    • 2023 Defined Contribution East Conference
  • Searches & Hires
    • Latest Searches & Hires News
    • Searches & Hires Database
    • RFPs
  • Research Center
    • The P&I Research Center
    • Earnings Tracker
    • Endowment Returns Tracker
    • Corporate Pension Contribution Tracker
    • Pension Fund Returns Tracker
    • Pension Risk Transfer Database
  • Careers
  • Events
    • View All Conferences
    • View All Webinars
Breadcrumb
  1. Home
  2. DEFINED CONTRIBUTION
September 02, 2019 12:00 AM

Sponsors ponder power of stretch matches

DC execs wrestle with way to get participants to be saving even more

Margarida Correia
  • Tweet
  • Share
  • Share
  • Email
  • More
    Reprints Print
    Catherine Collinson
    Robert Tannenbaum
    Catherine Collinson said stretch matching doesn’t always work out.

    To stretch or not to stretch the match. That's the question plan executives often ask when redesigning their defined contribution retirement plans.

    "We do get asked a lot about our thoughts on stretch matches for our clients," said Marc Howell, vice president of custom retirement solutions at Prudential Retirement in Philadelphia. "It's definitely something that plan sponsors are thinking about."

    When employers "stretch the match," they essentially require employees to contribute more to their retirement plans in order to get the maximum employer contribution. Instead of, for example, matching employee contributions 100% up to a certain percentage of worker pay – say 4%, plan sponsors would match 50% up to 8% of pay.

    The employer's maximum contribution would remain at 4%, but the employee would have to contribute twice as much to get it. Coaxing employees to contribute more while keeping employer matching costs the same is the goal behind the approach, a tactic that can work in some organizations but backfire in others, according to industry experts.

    "Many people do think that stretch matches are helpful, and in the right situation they can be. However, they need to be designed with a lot of care to avoid accidentally hurting the very people you're trying to help," Mr. Howell said.

    The use of stretch matches as a strategy to increase employee deferral rates stems from research showing that workers will use the employer's maximum contribution as an "anchor" to set their own contribution rates.

    A paper published by the National Bureau of Economic Research in July 2012, in particular, gave momentum to the concept of a stretch match by showing the "match threshold," the rate at which employees must contribute to secure the maximum match, had a substantial impact on employee contributions, unlike the company's "match rate," which had only a small effect.

    "Providing a match of 25% on contributions up to 10% of pay will induce individuals to save more than a match of 50% up to 5% or pay at a similar or lower cost to the organization providing the match," Brigitte Madrian, dean and Marriott Distinguished Professor in the Brigham Young University School of Business in Provo, Utah, wrote in the paper.

    The match threshold, she said, likely served "as a natural reference point when individuals are deciding how much to save and may be viewed as advice from the saving program sponsor on how much to save."


    Used as an incentive

    By and large, employers implementing stretch matches appear to do so to sway employees to save more for retirement rather than to cut costs.

    "There are a lot of employers who are looking at what their people are saving and are concerned," Mr. Howell said, explaining most workers are falling short of saving the recommended 12% to 18% of salary they should be setting aside annually for retirement.

    While the motivation for stretch matches is generally well-intentioned, sources said, the move can be perceived as a negative by the workforce.

    "It creates rumbling among the employees," said Gregg Levinson, senior director of retirement at Willis Towers Watson PLC in Philadelphia. "It forces employees to defer more to get to the same match they were already getting."

    That, coupled with the fact that a stretch match might favor higher-paid workers with the means to contribute more, prevents many plan executives from moving forward on implementing match-stretching formulas.

    A Vanguard Group Inc. study last year affirmed those concerns. The study, which analyzed 328 plans with match formulas that mimic or simulate a stretch match strategy, suggested those matches lower participation and deferral rates for non-highly compensated employees.

    "The concept of a stretch match sounds good in theory. In reality, while it may be effective for some employers, it could be counterproductive for others, depending on their employees' financial ability to save," said Catherine Collinson, CEO and president of non-profit Transamerica Institute and Transamerica Center for Retirement Studies in Los Angeles.


    Not for every company

    Because of these concerns, many plan executives tend to shy away from stretching the match. In 2018, only 11.1% of plan sponsors implemented a stretch match with 13.3% planning to implement such matches this year, according to Callan LLC data. "It has to be positioned properly in the right organization, and I think then it could be incredibly successful," Mr. Levinson said. It might, for example, work in a pharmaceutical company where salaries tend to be high, but not in a highly unionized organization where there are many lower paid employees.

    Mr. Levinson, for instance, pointed to a Willis Towers Watson entertainment and retail company client that wanted to implement a stretch match as a way to both cut costs and prompt employees to save more, but officials ultimately backed away from the idea. "They thought that their employees would see this as a take-away," he said of the client whose identity he declined to disclose.

    In some instances, employers can be overly paternalistic, to the point of actually suppressing employee contributions, said Mr. Howell. He cited the example of a health-care organization that provided employees with a non-elective contribution of 5%, meaning employees would receive the 5% regardless of whether they contributed to their retirement account. In addition, the organization provided a 25% match on 4% of pay.

    Non-elective contributions can sometimes suppress employee deferral rates because employees then mistakenly assume the employer is taking care of retirement for them, according to Mr. Howell. "They may not understand that they really still need to save over and beyond what the (employer) contribution is," he said.

    The employer, which Mr. Howell declined to identify, decided to have employees put a little skin in the game to see if that would boost their savings rates. It implemented a hybrid stretch match that consisted of matching employee contributions dollar for dollar up to 3% of pay plus a 50% match on the next 7% of pay.

    The new matching formula worked wonders in raising employee contribution rates. Prior to the change, fewer than 10% of participants were contributing 10% or more of their salary to the retirement plan.

    Once the new match was in place, the percentage of employees saving 10% or more jumped to 34% within about a year, according to Mr. Howell.


    ‘Don't stretch too far'

    Mr. Howell sees potential in stretch matches, provided they "don't stretch too far."

    "When you start dipping under 50% as a match, there is a certain portion of the population that in essence throws its hands up and says it's not worth it to contribute ... for a match that is that watered down."

    Then, participation rates start to decline, according to Prudential data he cited.

    In addition, he does not advise asking employees to contribute more than 6% of salary to get the full match. Instead, he advises coupling the stretch match with auto escalation at 1% to 2% annually up to a maximum employee contribution in the 10% to 15% range.

    It's better to use auto escalation than to "rip the Band-Aid off all at once and tell people they need to double their contribution," he said.

    Related Articles
    Senate Dems float bill to allow matching contributions for workers repaying student loans
    Vanguard: Stretching company match leads to lower 401(k) participation rates
    Recommended for You
    Calculator
    U.K. defined contribution sponsors resist ESG, private markets over fees
    401k_Jar_i.jpg
    Younger workers more likely to take 401(k) plan loans as their balances grow – study
    Colorado_Maine_Combo_i.jpg
    Nation's first retirement savings interstate pact opens pathway for more state auto-IRA programs
    Multiple Tailwinds Propel Private Credit
    Sponsored Content: Multiple Tailwinds Propel Private Credit
    Sponsored
    White Papers
    2023 Hot Topics in Retirement and Financial Wellbeing
    Bonds: Shaken, but Not Stirred
    Today’s rate cycle and US equities in target date portfolios
    A Study of Allocations to Alternative Investments by Institutions and Financial…
    Unlocking Hidden Value in Japan
    The Art of the Possible in Data Automation for Institutional Investors
    View More
    Sponsored Content
    Partner Content
    The Industrialization of ESG Investment
    For institutional investors, ETFs can make meeting liquidity needs easier
    Gold: the most effective commodity investment
    2021 Investment Outlook | Investing Beyond the Pandemic: A Reset for Portfolios
    Ten ways retirement plan professionals add value to plan sponsors
    Gold: an efficient hedge
    View More
    E-MAIL NEWSLETTERS

    Sign up and get the best of News delivered straight to your email inbox, free of charge. Choose your news – we will deliver.

    Subscribe Today
    December 12, 2022 page one

    Get access to the news, research and analysis of events affecting the retirement and institutional money management businesses from a worldwide network of reporters and editors.

    Subscribe
    Connect With Us
    • RSS
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn

    Our Mission

    To consistently deliver news, research and analysis to the executives who manage the flow of funds in the institutional investment market.

    About Us

    Main Office
    685 Third Avenue
    Tenth Floor
    New York, NY 10017-4036

    Chicago Office
    130 E. Randolph St.
    Suite 3200
    Chicago, IL 60601

    Contact Us

    Careers at Crain

    About Pensions & Investments

     

    Advertising
    • Media Kit
    • P&I Custom Content
    • P&I Careers | Post a Job
    • Reprints & Permissions
    Resources
    • Subscribe
    • Newsletters
    • FAQ
    • P&I Research Center
    • Site map
    • Staff Directory
    Legal
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Request
    Pensions & Investments
    Copyright © 1996-2023. Crain Communications, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
    • Topics
      • Alternatives
      • Artificial Intelligence
      • Consultants
      • Defined Contribution
      • ESG
      • ETFs
      • Face to Face
      • Hedge Funds
      • Industry Voices
      • Investing
      • Money Management
      • Partner Content
      • Pension Funds
      • Private Equity
      • Real Estate
      • Regulation
      • SECURE 2.0
      • Special Reports
      • Washington
      • White Papers
    • Rankings & Awards
      • 1,000 Largest Retirement Plans
      • Top-Performing Managers
      • Largest Money Managers
      • DC Money Managers
      • DC Record Keepers
      • Largest Hedge Fund Managers
      • World's Largest Retirement Funds
      • Best Places to Work in Money Management
      • Excellence & Innovation Awards
      • WPS Innovation Awards
      • Influential Women in Institutional Investing 2023
      • Eddy Awards
    • ETFs
      • Latest ETF News
      • Fund Screener
      • Education Center
      • Equities
      • Fixed Income
      • Commodities
      • Actively Managed
      • Alternatives
      • ESG Rated
    • ESG
      • Latest ESG News
      • The Institutional Investor’s Guide to ESG Investing
      • ESG Sustainability - Gaining Momentum
      • ESG Investing | Industry Brief
      • Innovation in ESG Investing
      • 2023 ESG Investing Conference
      • ESG Rated ETFs
      • Divestment Database
    • Defined Contribution
      • Latest DC News
      • The Plan Sponsor's Guide to Retirement Income
      • DC Money Manager Rankings
      • DC Record Keeper Rankings
      • Innovations in DC
      • Trends in DC: Focus on Retirement Income
      • 2023 Defined Contribution East Conference
    • Searches & Hires
      • Latest Searches & Hires News
      • Searches & Hires Database
      • RFPs
    • Research Center
      • The P&I Research Center
      • Earnings Tracker
      • Endowment Returns Tracker
      • Corporate Pension Contribution Tracker
      • Pension Fund Returns Tracker
      • Pension Risk Transfer Database
    • Careers
    • Events
      • View All Conferences
      • View All Webinars