Skip to main content
MENU
Subscribe
  • Sign Up Free
  • LOGIN
  • Subscribe
  • Topics
    • Alternatives
    • Consultants
    • Coronavirus
    • Courts
    • Defined Contribution
    • ESG
    • ETFs
    • Face to Face
    • Hedge Funds
    • Industry Voices
    • Investing
    • Money Management
    • Opinion
    • Partner Content
    • Pension Funds
    • Private Equity
    • Real Estate
    • Russia-Ukraine War
    • SECURE 2.0
    • Special Reports
    • White Papers
  • Rankings & Awards
    • 1,000 Largest Retirement Plans
    • Top-Performing Managers
    • Largest Money Managers
    • DC Money Managers
    • DC Record Keepers
    • Largest Hedge Fund Managers
    • World's Largest Retirement Funds
    • Best Places to Work in Money Management
    • Excellence & Innovation Awards
    • WPS Innovation Awards
    • Eddy Awards
  • ETFs
    • Latest ETF News
    • Fund Screener
    • Education Center
    • Equities
    • Fixed Income
    • Commodities
    • Actively Managed
    • Alternatives
    • ESG Rated
  • ESG
    • Latest ESG News
    • The Institutional Investor’s Guide to ESG Investing
    • ESG Sustainability - Gaining Momentum
    • ESG Investing | Industry Brief
    • Innovation in ESG Investing
    • 2023 ESG Investing Conference
    • ESG Rated ETFs
  • Defined Contribution
    • Latest DC News
    • DC Money Manager Rankings
    • DC Record Keeper Rankings
    • Innovations in DC
    • Trends in DC: Focus on Retirement Income
    • 2023 Defined Contribution East Conference
  • Searches & Hires
    • Latest Searches & Hires News
    • Searches & Hires Database
    • RFPs
  • Research Center
    • The P&I Research Center
    • Earnings Tracker
    • Endowment Returns Tracker
    • Corporate Pension Contribution Tracker
    • Pension Fund Returns Tracker
    • Pension Risk Transfer Database
  • Careers
  • Events
    • View All Conferences
    • View All Webinars
    • 2023 ESG Investing
    • 2023 Private Markets
Breadcrumb
  1. Home
  2. INDUSTRY VOICES
January 17, 2019 12:00 AM

Commentary: Limited partners need to be aware of GP-led deal pitfalls

Kishore Kansal
  • Tweet
  • Share
  • Share
  • Email
  • More
    Reprints Print

    "GP-led deals" is a term coined to group together a number of existing techniques that have been used by general partners for many years to engineer secondary market transactions in their favor.

    There are two main types of GP-led deals: tender offers and fund restructurings.

    Tender offers entail a buyer putting forward an offer to all investors in a fund to purchase their stakes. Such transactions are almost always "stapled" transactions, meaning the buyer will reward the general partner with new primary commitments to a separate fund, in direct proportion to the uptake of its tender offer. Quite simply, the more investors who sell their stakes in the old fund, the more money the GP is able to raise for its new fund. Fund restructurings involve a more fundamental change in the older vehicle. Essentially reopening these funds, the objective is to raise new primary commitments which then may be used to make new investments or inject fresh capital into older assets.

    Importantly, in both types of transaction, there is almost always some element whereby the GP benefits, either by raising fresh primary capital or having their economics reset.

    A key concern is that GP-led deals give managers a second bite of the cherry. This has potentially serious implications for the way funds are managed. Managers are free to take risks and if they pay off then they get the upside, but if they don't pay off they can nevertheless "restructure" or use a stapling process to raise another vehicle. This possibly gives managers an incentive to take far bigger risks for their investments.

    Thus, there is a balance that limited partners must consider between solving near-term fund-specific problems today and creating a precedent that leads to more of these transactions in the future.

    The incentive to take advantage of LPs

    Last year, the Securities and Exchange Commission fined Veronis Suhler Stevenson for its handling of a GP-led deal. The allegation was the GP had knowingly undervalued VS&A Communications Partners III such that stakes in the fund were sold at below true market value. Blackstreet Capital Management LLC also was fined by the SEC under similar allegations. The recent secondaries process for Charterhouse Capital Partners IX — where a buyer emerged that revealed the true economic value of Comexposium, the fund's main underlying asset. This resulted in the GP-led process being derailed and Comexposium being sold separately.

    The problem that limited partners have in these transactions is their utter reliance on the honesty and integrity of the GP. The general partner is relied upon to disclose and deal with all alternatives to their own GP-led process, even where that is not necessarily in their economic interests.

    Crucially, GPs set the net asset value of the fund. There is very wide scope and discretion for GPs in determining the valuation. They have the potential means to significantly influence LP investment decision-making by altering (perhaps to their advantage) the basic valuation of the assets in question.

    Setting the NAV lower than the true market value likely would lead to an increase in the optical secondary price a buyer was paying. This, in turn, would encourage further sellers. It is a well-accepted feature of the secondaries market that many LPs simply do not sell at below an optical level, often par value (100% of NAV). If the GP were presented with a situation where the secondary price would likely be 90% of NAV, they could simply reduce the NAV, creating the impression the buyer was paying par value. Many of the SEC fines issued to date against GPs have been exactly in relation to the undervaluing of fund interests in GP-led processes.

    A lack of impartiality

    Investors might consider the following question: Is the intermediary motivated to act in the best interests of the LP or the best interests of the GP? Once this point is appreciated, it can be seen that the intermediaries promoting GP-led deals are neither impartial nor do they have an incentive in any legal or commercial sense to act in the best interests of the investors. In fact, quite the opposite. Fees paid to these groups are ultimately extracted from the value of limited partners' stakes. We suggest this fundamental point ought to be a non-starter for any LP considering a GP-led offering.

    In our view, LPs ought to receive the benefit of any placement/intermediary fee in a stapled transaction, not pay it.

    LPs ought to be compensated because the GP would not be able to raise fresh primary capital without stapling the sales of existing LP interests.

    The pool of limited partners in any fund is a valuable resource. If the GP is able to tap into and extract from that resource a commercial benefit, it is odd that LPs have to pay for that, whether directly or indirectly. Rather, LPs (particular those that actually participated in the process) should receive a fee for being used in that way.

    Let's say secondaries in Scandinavian Fund VI were being stapled to help raise a new Asian fund for the GP. If Pension Fund A sells a €100 million position in this fund that would potentially allow the GP to raise €100 million for the Asian fund. The argument would be: Given that the GP would not have been able to raise this money but for Pension Fund A, that ought to create an obligation upon the GP to compensate Pension Fund A for that commercial benefit.

    Whichever way this issue is considered, it is inescapable that the GP is using existing LPs to gain a commercial advantage and it is odd that this does not attract a reciprocal fee.

    Kishore Kansal is managing partner at PEFOX LLP, London. This content represents the views of the author. It was submitted and edited under Pensions & Investments guidelines, but is not a product of P&I's editorial team.

    Related Articles
    VSS settles with SEC over failing to disclose increased valuation of a fund to …
    Private equity investors revamping portfolios in anticipation of slowdown – sur…
    Neuberger settles with SEC over improper expenses in Dyal funds
    New firms, more minority stakes possible in 2019
    Recommended for You
    Adam Watson
    Commentary: Asia as a source of diversification for global investors
    Sean Paylor
    Commentary: Enhanced competition for retail orders promotes transparency, better prices
    Tyler Gellasch
    Commentary: SEC's proposed regulation best execution isn't the best for institutional investors
    The Plan Sponsor's Guide to Pension Risk Transfer
    Sponsored Content: The Plan Sponsor's Guide to Pension Risk Transfer

    Reader Poll

    March 22, 2023
    SEE MORE POLLS >
    Sponsored
    White Papers
    The Need for Speed in Trend-Following Strategies
    Global Fixed Income: Volatility and Uncertainty Here to Stay
    Morningstar Indexes' Annual ESG Risk/Return Analysis
    2023 Outlook: The Top Five Trends to Monitor in the Year Ahead
    Show Me the Income: Discovering plan sponsor and participant preferences for cr…
    The Future of Infrastructure: Building a Better Tomorrow
    View More
    Sponsored Content
    Partner Content
    The Industrialization of ESG Investment
    For institutional investors, ETFs can make meeting liquidity needs easier
    Gold: the most effective commodity investment
    2021 Investment Outlook | Investing Beyond the Pandemic: A Reset for Portfolios
    Ten ways retirement plan professionals add value to plan sponsors
    Gold: an efficient hedge
    View More
    E-MAIL NEWSLETTERS

    Sign up and get the best of News delivered straight to your email inbox, free of charge. Choose your news – we will deliver.

    Subscribe Today
    December 12, 2022 page one

    Get access to the news, research and analysis of events affecting the retirement and institutional money management businesses from a worldwide network of reporters and editors.

    Subscribe
    Connect With Us
    • RSS
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn

    Our Mission

    To consistently deliver news, research and analysis to the executives who manage the flow of funds in the institutional investment market.

    About Us

    Main Office
    685 Third Avenue
    Tenth Floor
    New York, NY 10017-4036

    Chicago Office
    130 E. Randolph St.
    Suite 3200
    Chicago, IL 60601

    Contact Us

    Careers at Crain

    About Pensions & Investments

     

    Advertising
    • Media Kit
    • P&I Content Solutions
    • P&I Careers | Post a Job
    • Reprints & Permissions
    Resources
    • Subscribe
    • Newsletters
    • FAQ
    • P&I Research Center
    • Site map
    • Staff Directory
    Legal
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Request
    Pensions & Investments
    Copyright © 1996-2023. Crain Communications, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
    • Topics
      • Alternatives
      • Consultants
      • Coronavirus
      • Courts
      • Defined Contribution
      • ESG
      • ETFs
      • Face to Face
      • Hedge Funds
      • Industry Voices
      • Investing
      • Money Management
      • Opinion
      • Partner Content
      • Pension Funds
      • Private Equity
      • Real Estate
      • Russia-Ukraine War
      • SECURE 2.0
      • Special Reports
      • White Papers
    • Rankings & Awards
      • 1,000 Largest Retirement Plans
      • Top-Performing Managers
      • Largest Money Managers
      • DC Money Managers
      • DC Record Keepers
      • Largest Hedge Fund Managers
      • World's Largest Retirement Funds
      • Best Places to Work in Money Management
      • Excellence & Innovation Awards
      • WPS Innovation Awards
      • Eddy Awards
    • ETFs
      • Latest ETF News
      • Fund Screener
      • Education Center
      • Equities
      • Fixed Income
      • Commodities
      • Actively Managed
      • Alternatives
      • ESG Rated
    • ESG
      • Latest ESG News
      • The Institutional Investor’s Guide to ESG Investing
      • ESG Sustainability - Gaining Momentum
      • ESG Investing | Industry Brief
      • Innovation in ESG Investing
      • 2023 ESG Investing Conference
      • ESG Rated ETFs
    • Defined Contribution
      • Latest DC News
      • DC Money Manager Rankings
      • DC Record Keeper Rankings
      • Innovations in DC
      • Trends in DC: Focus on Retirement Income
      • 2023 Defined Contribution East Conference
    • Searches & Hires
      • Latest Searches & Hires News
      • Searches & Hires Database
      • RFPs
    • Research Center
      • The P&I Research Center
      • Earnings Tracker
      • Endowment Returns Tracker
      • Corporate Pension Contribution Tracker
      • Pension Fund Returns Tracker
      • Pension Risk Transfer Database
    • Careers
    • Events
      • View All Conferences
      • View All Webinars
      • 2023 ESG Investing
      • 2023 Private Markets