Skip to main content
MENU
Subscribe
  • Subscribe
  • Account
  • LOGIN
  • Topics
    • Alternatives
    • Consultants
    • Coronavirus
    • Courts
    • Defined Contribution
    • ESG
    • ETFs
    • Hedge Funds
    • Industry Voices
    • Investing
    • Money Management
    • Opinion
    • Partner Content
    • Pension Funds
    • Private Equity
    • Real Estate
    • Russia-Ukraine War
    • SECURE Act 2.0
    • Special Reports
    • White Papers
  • Rankings & Awards
    • 1,000 Largest Retirement Plans
    • Top-Performing Managers
    • Largest Money Managers
    • DC Money Managers
    • DC Record Keepers
    • Largest Hedge Fund Managers
    • World's Largest Retirement Funds
    • Best Places to Work in Money Management
    • Excellence & Innovation Awards
    • Eddy Awards
  • ETFs
    • Latest ETF News
    • Fund Screener
    • Education Center
    • Equities
    • Fixed Income
    • Commodities
    • Actively Managed
    • Alternatives
    • ESG Rated
  • ESG
    • Latest ESG News
    • The Institutional Investor’s Guide to ESG Investing
    • Climate Change: The Inescapable Opportunity
    • Impact Investing
    • 2022 ESG Investing Conference
    • ESG Rated ETFs
  • Defined Contribution
    • Latest DC News
    • DC Money Manager Rankings
    • DC Record Keeper Rankings
    • Innovations in DC
    • Trends in DC: Focus on Retirement Income
    • 2022 Defined Contribution East Conference
    • 2022 DC Investment Lineup Conference
  • Searches & Hires
    • Latest Searches & Hires News
    • Searches & Hires Database
    • RFPs
  • Performance Data
    • P&I Research Center
    • Earnings Tracker
    • Endowment Returns Tracker
    • Corporate Pension Contribution Tracker
    • Pension Fund Returns Tracker
    • Pension Risk Transfer Database
    • Future of Investments Research Series
    • Charts & Infographics
    • Polls
  • Careers
  • Events
    • View All Conferences
    • View All Webinars
    • 2022 Innovation Investing Conference
    • 2022 Defined Contribution East Conference
    • 2022 ESG Investing Conference
    • 2022 DC Investment Lineup Conference
    • 2022 Alternatives Investing Conference
Breadcrumb
  1. Home
  2. TRADING
May 01, 2017 01:00 AM

Institutions at odds with retail over SEC's Order Protection Rule

Rick Baert
  • Tweet
  • Share
  • Share
  • Email
  • More
    Reprints Print
    Jennifer Bishop
    Steven Glass said there is a deep division over the SEC rule.

    For many institutional traders and analysts, getting rid of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Order Protection Rule is a no-brainer, making it easier to trade in large blocks.

    But that's not the case for retail investors, who value the rule that requires equity trades to be executed on the exchange that offers the best price.

    And that institutional vs. retail tug-of-war is being played out in the SEC's Equity Market Structure Advisory Committee.

    “I give (the rule) mixed reviews generally,” said Steven Glass, president and CEO of Zeno Consulting Group, a Bethesda, Md.-based consultant to pension funds on trading issues. “But look at the market structure committee; even they are split. I think there's a message in that. A lot of people aren't sure of doing away with OPR.”

    Members of the advisory committee, which is tasked with recommending what overall changes should be made on market structure regulation, failed to agree on whether to keep or remove OPR, also known as Rule 611, at their last meeting, April 5.

    Committee members representing predominantly retail money managers said the rule protects the smaller investor's interest in the face of larger investors like pension funds and institutional managers that crowd them out with block trades.

    Meanwhile, members from managers with institutional clients said the rule negatively affects larger investors who trade bigger blocks of securities. They say it forces managers to find the exchange with the best price, sometimes in opposition to best execution because trading at a venue based solely on best price doesn't take into account variables like venue liquidity and cost.

    The rule has been in effect since 2005 as part of Regulation National Market Structure, or Reg NMS, created at a time when equity markets were dominated by two exchanges — the New York Stock Exchange and Nasdaq. “It was a good thing initially,” said Mehmet Kinak, vice president and head of global equity market structure and electronic trading at T. Rowe Price Group Inc., Baltimore, and a member of the SEC advisory committee. “One positive was it got NYSE out of the manual process and into electronic trading. Now, 12 years later, 13 exchanges can talk to each other quickly. We're supportive of that. But we're not going to go back to manual exchanges if you get rid of OPR.”

    Added Peter Maragos, CEO of Dash Financial Technologies, a New York-based trading technology and analytics provider: “Institutions look for liquidity at the right price with minimal impact on the market. They like to put up large blocks and get fair prices on them. They shouldn't be impacted because of their large footprint. They also want to trade easier. OPR did the opposite; it caused the proliferation of more exchanges. It's the biggest cause of the fragmentation of the equity market.”

    Issues detailed

    Among the issues with OPR that negatively impact institutional investors and asset owners are its effect on block liquidity and the conflict between selecting venues based on best price vs. on broker analytics that suggest routing orders to other venues would be optimal, said David Weisberger, head of equities at ViableMarkets, a trading technology and market structure advisory firm in New York.

    “The rule makes provision of block liquidity harder, as the requirement to sweep the market and immediately print the trade allows proprietary, high-frequency traders to out the liquidity providers' position and take advantage of it,” Mr. Weisberger said.

    Also, Mr. Weisberger said, if brokers ignore their own analytics because of the best-price requirement, “The result could be inferior prices for their client, which is a violation of best execution principles, but the broker is forced to do so by the requirement of the OPR,” Mr. Weisberger said.

    Not all high-frequency trading is bad, said Zeno's Mr. Glass. “For the most part, high-frequency traders add liquidity. They just happen to trade really, really fast, but the liquidity they add is a net plus for the market. But then there are predatory traders — those who do latency arbitrage. They try to detect the largest institutional order, and then put out a price order that might be attractive in terms of luring the large trader. That's their tripwire. Now the high-frequency trader knows there's all these shares out there, and they can snap them up and then sell them at a penny more a share.”

    Active money managers also feel the sting of the rule, Mr. Weisberger said. “While there are many reasons that active is losing out to passive management, one reason is that market structure is currently biased toward passive investors, who trade mostly into the closing auction each day, and retail investors who trade in small sizes throughout the day,” Mr. Weisberger said.

    “Active managers also trade during the day, but tend to trade much larger size,” he said. “Those managers — particularly with regard to small-cap and midcap stocks — have difficulty finding liquidity.” He also said OPR's indirect effects, hampering innovation and making equity trading more complex, make finding liquidity even tougher for active managers.

    Mr. Kinak said some committee members believe “the mom-and-pop investor will be hurt” if the rule is removed, but the majority of retail orders “are market orders that go to wholesalers with a best-execution obligation. They make sure best execution is measured. We need to have that kind of transparency on the institutional level ... That allows us to lead to better conversations around best execution.”

    Maintain status quo

    There are others on the institutional side who think the rule should stay.

    “You can make this a better market without removing Rule 611,” said Joseph Saluzzi, partner, co-founder and co-head of equity trading at brokerage Themis Trading LLC, Chatham Township, N.J. “The story is adding liquidity and getting rid of the conflicts and noise, not removing the rule entirely ... There are ways to protect yourself now that weren't there 10 years ago.

    “People who want to are missing the issue here,” Mr. Saluzzi said. “They're looking for a solution to a problem, but Rule 611 isn't the problem. High-frequency traders started this argument, and the buy side is buying into it. They don't want to connect to all these venues. That means more trading costs. They think that by getting rid of (Rule) 611 that they'll save money. Someone sold them on this. The buy side is right about this, though - HFT guys put all sorts of traps out there for institutions to display their blocks and then they bang the stock in front of them. But there's already technology to get around (the impact of high-frequency traders).”

    Headline risk surrounding the removal of the rule also is a concern, said Messrs. Glass and Kinak. “Would investors get nervous if you eliminated OPR?” Mr. Glass asked. “You could make that argument.”

    Asset owners reached for comment on the story said they did not have an opinion on the rule, which Mr. Kinak said wasn't a surprise.

    “The SEC motto is, "Do no harm,'” Mr. Kinak said. “They don't want to do anything that appears to hurt the retail investor. When you look at the details of removing OPR, you'd think it wouldn't be too bad to do, but you don't want it to appear that the retail investor is being taken advantage of by the big institutional investors, but also by the sell side. They don't want the retired teacher thinking that his pension fund is taking advantage of the retail investor. So pension plans may have an opinion on the rule but they stay on the sidelines.”

    Related Articles
    Risk retention rules open opportunities for some managers
    Trump signs orders to review FSOC, tax regulations
    Keeping an eye on the prize despite uncertain 100 days
    Updated mortality tables are raising concerns
    100 days in office — what has changed?
    Trump considering moves to break up Wall Street banks
    Many convinced bond ETFs are ready for prime time
    NYSE electronic exchange gets approval for 350-microsecond speed bump
    A dream of the '90s lives on: What GSTPA teaches us about blockchain
    OCC, FDIC propose aligning rules with SEC's 2-day trade settlement cycle
    Commentary: Rebate debate misses the mark
    Recommended for You
    ONLINE_190309873_AR_0_IRPBLAZENBEB.jpg
    House approves LIBOR transition bill within spending package
    John Pucciarelli
    It's near zero hour to meet new margin rules
    TP ICAP partners with Fidelity unit for cryptoassets trading
    TP ICAP partners with Fidelity unit for cryptoassets trading
    Alternatives: Investing Across the Spectrum
    Sponsored Content: Alternatives: Investing Across the Spectrum

    Reader Poll

    May 23, 2022
    SEE MORE POLLS >
    Sponsored
    White Papers
    Crossroads: Politics, Inflation, & Bonds
    Credit Indices: Closing the Fixed Income Evolutionary Gap
    Forever in Style: Benchmarking with the Morningstar® Broad Style Indexes℠
    Q2 2022 Credit Outlook: Carry On
    Leverage does not equal risk
    Is there a mid-cap gap in your DC plan?
    View More
    Sponsored Content
    Partner Content
    The Industrialization of ESG Investment
    For institutional investors, ETFs can make meeting liquidity needs easier
    Gold: the most effective commodity investment
    2021 Investment Outlook | Investing Beyond the Pandemic: A Reset for Portfolios
    Ten ways retirement plan professionals add value to plan sponsors
    Gold: an efficient hedge
    View More
    E-MAIL NEWSLETTERS

    Sign up and get the best of News delivered straight to your email inbox, free of charge. Choose your news – we will deliver.

    Subscribe Today
    May 23, 2022 page one

    Get access to the news, research and analysis of events affecting the retirement and institutional money management businesses from a worldwide network of reporters and editors.

    Subscribe
    Connect With Us
    • RSS
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn

    Our Mission

    To consistently deliver news, research and analysis to the executives who manage the flow of funds in the institutional investment market.

    About Us

    Main Office
    685 Third Avenue
    Tenth Floor
    New York, NY 10017-4036

    Chicago Office
    130 E. Randolph St.
    Suite 3200
    Chicago, IL 60601

    Contact Us

    Careers at Crain

    About Pensions & Investments

     

    Advertising
    • Media Kit
    • P&I Content Solutions
    • P&I Careers | Post a Job
    • Reprints & Permissions
    Resources
    • Subscribe
    • Newsletters
    • FAQ
    • P&I Research Center
    • Site map
    • Staff Directory
    Legal
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Request
    Pensions & Investments
    Copyright © 1996-2022. Crain Communications, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
    • Topics
      • Alternatives
      • Consultants
      • Coronavirus
      • Courts
      • Defined Contribution
      • ESG
      • ETFs
      • Hedge Funds
      • Industry Voices
      • Investing
      • Money Management
      • Opinion
      • Partner Content
      • Pension Funds
      • Private Equity
      • Real Estate
      • Russia-Ukraine War
      • SECURE Act 2.0
      • Special Reports
      • White Papers
    • Rankings & Awards
      • 1,000 Largest Retirement Plans
      • Top-Performing Managers
      • Largest Money Managers
      • DC Money Managers
      • DC Record Keepers
      • Largest Hedge Fund Managers
      • World's Largest Retirement Funds
      • Best Places to Work in Money Management
      • Excellence & Innovation Awards
      • Eddy Awards
    • ETFs
      • Latest ETF News
      • Fund Screener
      • Education Center
      • Equities
      • Fixed Income
      • Commodities
      • Actively Managed
      • Alternatives
      • ESG Rated
    • ESG
      • Latest ESG News
      • The Institutional Investor’s Guide to ESG Investing
      • Climate Change: The Inescapable Opportunity
      • Impact Investing
      • 2022 ESG Investing Conference
      • ESG Rated ETFs
    • Defined Contribution
      • Latest DC News
      • DC Money Manager Rankings
      • DC Record Keeper Rankings
      • Innovations in DC
      • Trends in DC: Focus on Retirement Income
      • 2022 Defined Contribution East Conference
      • 2022 DC Investment Lineup Conference
    • Searches & Hires
      • Latest Searches & Hires News
      • Searches & Hires Database
      • RFPs
    • Performance Data
      • P&I Research Center
      • Earnings Tracker
      • Endowment Returns Tracker
      • Corporate Pension Contribution Tracker
      • Pension Fund Returns Tracker
      • Pension Risk Transfer Database
      • Future of Investments Research Series
      • Charts & Infographics
      • Polls
    • Careers
    • Events
      • View All Conferences
      • View All Webinars
      • 2022 Innovation Investing Conference
      • 2022 Defined Contribution East Conference
      • 2022 ESG Investing Conference
      • 2022 DC Investment Lineup Conference
      • 2022 Alternatives Investing Conference