Skip to main content
MENU
Subscribe
  • Sign Up Free
  • LOGIN
  • Subscribe
  • Topics
    • Alternatives
    • Consultants
    • Courts
    • Defined Contribution
    • ESG
    • ETFs
    • Face to Face
    • Hedge Funds
    • Industry Voices
    • Investing
    • Money Management
    • Partner Content
    • Pension Funds
    • Private Equity
    • Real Estate
    • Regulation
    • SECURE 2.0
    • Special Reports
    • Washington
    • White Papers
  • Rankings & Awards
    • 1,000 Largest Retirement Plans
    • Top-Performing Managers
    • Largest Money Managers
    • DC Money Managers
    • DC Record Keepers
    • Largest Hedge Fund Managers
    • World's Largest Retirement Funds
    • Best Places to Work in Money Management
    • Excellence & Innovation Awards
    • WPS Innovation Awards
    • Eddy Awards
  • ETFs
    • Latest ETF News
    • Fund Screener
    • Education Center
    • Equities
    • Fixed Income
    • Commodities
    • Actively Managed
    • Alternatives
    • ESG Rated
  • ESG
    • Latest ESG News
    • The Institutional Investor’s Guide to ESG Investing
    • ESG Sustainability - Gaining Momentum
    • ESG Investing | Industry Brief
    • Innovation in ESG Investing
    • 2023 ESG Investing Conference
    • ESG Rated ETFs
  • Defined Contribution
    • Latest DC News
    • The Plan Sponsor's Guide to Retirement Income
    • DC Money Manager Rankings
    • DC Record Keeper Rankings
    • Innovations in DC
    • Trends in DC: Focus on Retirement Income
    • 2023 Defined Contribution East Conference
  • Searches & Hires
    • Latest Searches & Hires News
    • Searches & Hires Database
    • RFPs
  • Research Center
    • The P&I Research Center
    • Earnings Tracker
    • Endowment Returns Tracker
    • Corporate Pension Contribution Tracker
    • Pension Fund Returns Tracker
    • Pension Risk Transfer Database
  • Careers
  • Events
    • View All Conferences
    • View All Webinars
    • 2023 Canadian Pension Risk Strategies
    • 2023 Retirement Income
Breadcrumb
  1. Home
  2. REGULATION AND LEGISLATION
November 28, 2016 12:00 AM

Repeal and replace DOL rule on fiduciary conflict of interest

Michael Barry
  • Tweet
  • Share
  • Share
  • Email
  • More
    Reprints Print

    Last April the Department of Labor finalized its massive fiduciary conflict of interest rule, restricting severely the ability of financial institutions to compensate employees who are providing advice to retirement plan and individual retirement account participants. It might be an overstatement to say the rule effectively bans brokers and call center operators from providing specific guidance on investments and rollovers, but not by much.

    The rule has been incredibly controversial. A significant part of the financial services industry was strongly opposed to it. Indeed, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the Financial Services Institute Inc. and other trade associations have a pending lawsuit challenging the validity of the rule under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, the Administrative Procedure Act and the Constitution.

    It was generally understood that the Obama administration wanted to get this rule in place before a new president, new secretary of labor and new head of the Employee Benefits Security Administration take office in 2017. Although it was finalized last April, the new regulation doesn't take effect until April 10 to give the private sector time to revise current systems and business models.

    Repeal and replace

    The Trump administration should repeal and replace the rule.

    The precedent for such an action was set by the Obama administration. In a memorandum issued Jan. 20, 2009, President Barack Obama's then-Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel instructed all agencies, including the Department of Labor, that no proposed or final regulation be sent to the Office of the Federal Register for publication “unless and until it has been reviewed and approved by a department or agency head appointed or designated by the president after noon on Jan. 20, 2009.”

    Pursuant to that memorandum, the Obama DOL reopened the Bush administration's final, although not yet printed in the Federal Register, advice regulation interpreting the new Pension Protection Act safe harbor for level fee and model driven advice. The Obama DOL then reproposed in 2010 and refinalized in 2011 that regulation, adding, among other things, a requirement that protected advice “[t]ake into account investment management and other fees and expenses attendant to the recommended investments.”

    The incoming Trump administration can, and should, similarly extend the effective date of the conflict of interest rule and reopen the comment period.

    More importantly, the piece of this rule that deals with individual retirement accounts should reflect the view of the Securities and Exchange Commission on broker practices generally.

    Finally, the DOL should begin work on an infrastructure that will facilitate a money-follows-the-participant regime for the accounts of qualified retirement plan participants changing jobs. If we had such an infrastructure in place today, concern that brokers are inappropriately encouraging participants to roll over their accounts to IRAs — the concern that to a large extent drove this entire regulation project — wouldn't exist. And the lack of such an infrastructure makes the DOL's new rule intensely problematic.

    IRAs outside DOL

    Am I overreacting? I don't think so. The DOL has no business regulating IRAs

    None of the basic fiduciary rules the DOL is imposing on IRA advisers are supported by ERISA. That is why the DOL had to get creative and impose an incredibly complicated contract requirement on them, via an again creative application of the IRA prohibited-transaction rules.

    For most of us, and for most brokers, there's not a lot of difference between an IRA and a regular brokerage account — the kind regulated by the SEC and securities industry organizations. But the DOL took the position that defined contribution assets that have been rolled over to an IRA are, quoting Assistant Secretary of Labor for the EBSA Phyllis C. Borzi, “sacred assets” because they are tax favored. Thus the DOL's proposal stated: “The distinction between IRAs and other retail accounts ... is a direct result of a statutory structure that draws a sensible distinction between tax-favored IRAs and other retail investment accounts.”

    I don't agree with any of that — and I defy you to find anything in ERISA's legislative history supporting the imposition of ERISA's basic fiduciary standards on IRA fiduciaries.

    If there's something wrong with the way brokers advise IRA holders, then that same thing is wrong with the way they advise retail accounts. And the SEC should deal with it. And, in fact, the SEC has a project under way to do just that.

    DOL's magical thinking

    The DOL is replacing brokers with magical thinking.

    The Employee Benefit Research Institute has found that money leaking out of the retirement savings system when employees change jobs is preventing a significant number of participants from meeting minimum retirement savings goals.

    Right now, with few exceptions, the only persons advising terminating retirement plan participants about what to do with their money — the only ones advising them not to cash out of the retirement savings system — are brokers and “conflicted” call-center operators. When challenged about who will advise participants if brokers and call-center operators are kicked out of the system, supporters of the DOL's new rule say, more or less — if we tear it down, they will come. Thus, in written testimony submitted to the DOL, Alicia H. Munnell, director, and Anthony Webb, then senior research economist, of the Center for Retirement Research at Boston College said it was “simply not credible ... that the terms of the (DOL regulation) exemption are so onerous that the industry will choose to walk away from $1.7 trillion of assets and perhaps $17 billion of revenue rather than comply with them.”

    Right now, the easiest thing terminating participants in a retirement plan can do with their money is cash it out. The hardest thing to do is to roll it over to a new employer's plan. A plan-to-plan rollover, if it can be done at all, generally requires that the participant hand-carry the rollover check to their new employer.

    Financial services companies that offer IRAs have (thank goodness) done a lot of work to make the plan-to-IRA rollover process as easy as possible. It may well be — in fact, I believe — that rolling over to the participant's new plan is a better option. But the infrastructure for doing that is woefully inadequate.

    Waving your hands and saying “someone will fix this” is not a plan.

    A money-follow-the-participant policy

    The DOL and IRS should be working to facilitate a money-follows-the-participant policy.

    The right solution to this challenge— job-change leakage — is a mandatory money-follows-the-participant regime. Just making it easier for participants to move money from their old employer's plan to their new employer's plan would be a huge step in the right direction. And if that were the default, we wouldn't need brokers and call-center operators coaching participants on IRA rollovers.

    In that regard, there's a lot that needs to be fixed. Some of it, maybe most of it, at the IRS.

    There's a serious private-sector effort to build a clearinghouse for plan-to-plan transfers. That process works well when a participant affirmatively consents to the transfer. But many participants simply don't respond to authorization requests, leaving negative consent the only option and raising issues, e.g., with respect to the extent to which plan fiduciaries can rely on negative elections, that the DOL, with some thoughtful clarification and guidance, could solve. And in the process give a much-needed boost to a plan-to-plan solution.

    That the DOL has spent a vast amount of energy and creativity trashing the brokerage industry while doing nothing to aid in building a plan-to-plan infrastructure says a lot about the way we've been making law in this area. A change in that style of rulemaking from the new Trump administration would be hugely refreshing.

    Keeping parts of the new standard

    There may be significant pieces of the regulation that can be saved.

    Let me be clear: I am not saying this entire effort on the DOL's part has been a waste of time. The DOL does have authority to regulate advice to ERISA plan participants about investments. But investment advice is yesterday's solution to the problem of improved participant asset allocations: while a participant is in a plan, the focus should be on building appropriate and efficient investment defaults. So, for me at least, arguments about the rules for investment advice aren't that critical.

    Moreover, as I understand it, the industry is prepared to live with a general “best interests” advice standard of conduct — the core of the DOL rule.

    What they, and, frankly, I, find over-the-top is the DOL's decision to, for instance, issue guidance on what kind of vacation bonus programs financial services companies can maintain. And to require that those companies publish comprehensive price and compensation information and (more or less) make their business model and market strategies a public commodity.

    So to the Trump administration, please put the DOL conflict of interest regulation on your list of things to repeal and replace.


    Michael Barry is president of Plan Advisory Services Ltd., Chicago.

    Related Articles
    Another federal court rules against delaying fiduciary rule
    Trump picks Mnuchin as treasury secretary, Ross for commerce
    DOL rules clear cities to start private-sector retirement programs
    Don't junk the DOL fiduciary rule; make it better
    IRS proposes updated mortality tables
    Congressman introduces bill to delay fiduciary rule
    How President Obama changed investing forever
    Recommended for You
    Standards-of-conduct rules approved along party lines
    Standards-of-conduct rules approved along party lines
    Investors hail SEC guidelines on exchanges
    Investors hail SEC guidelines on exchanges
    U.K. regulator watching manager over Woodford fund freeze
    U.K. regulator watching manager over Woodford fund freeze
    ESG: Seeking Alignment with Climate Change
    Sponsored Content: ESG: Seeking Alignment with Climate Change

    Reader Poll

    May 1, 2023
     
    SEE MORE POLLS >
    Sponsored
    White Papers
    Middle market credit: We’re gonna need a bigger boat
    Alternative Credit: Differences and Opportunities in CLOs and Credit Risk Shari…
    Fixed Income is Attractive, but Beware of "Fake" Yield
    Counting on a Crisis: A Catalyst for Investment Innovation?
    A Strategic Allocator's Guide to Productivity and Profits
    Research for Institutional Money Management
    View More
    Sponsored Content
    Partner Content
    The Industrialization of ESG Investment
    For institutional investors, ETFs can make meeting liquidity needs easier
    Gold: the most effective commodity investment
    2021 Investment Outlook | Investing Beyond the Pandemic: A Reset for Portfolios
    Ten ways retirement plan professionals add value to plan sponsors
    Gold: an efficient hedge
    View More
    E-MAIL NEWSLETTERS

    Sign up and get the best of News delivered straight to your email inbox, free of charge. Choose your news – we will deliver.

    Subscribe Today
    December 12, 2022 page one

    Get access to the news, research and analysis of events affecting the retirement and institutional money management businesses from a worldwide network of reporters and editors.

    Subscribe
    Connect With Us
    • RSS
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn

    Our Mission

    To consistently deliver news, research and analysis to the executives who manage the flow of funds in the institutional investment market.

    About Us

    Main Office
    685 Third Avenue
    Tenth Floor
    New York, NY 10017-4036

    Chicago Office
    130 E. Randolph St.
    Suite 3200
    Chicago, IL 60601

    Contact Us

    Careers at Crain

    About Pensions & Investments

     

    Advertising
    • Media Kit
    • P&I Custom Content
    • P&I Careers | Post a Job
    • Reprints & Permissions
    Resources
    • Subscribe
    • Newsletters
    • FAQ
    • P&I Research Center
    • Site map
    • Staff Directory
    Legal
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Request
    Pensions & Investments
    Copyright © 1996-2023. Crain Communications, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
    • Topics
      • Alternatives
      • Consultants
      • Courts
      • Defined Contribution
      • ESG
      • ETFs
      • Face to Face
      • Hedge Funds
      • Industry Voices
      • Investing
      • Money Management
      • Partner Content
      • Pension Funds
      • Private Equity
      • Real Estate
      • Regulation
      • SECURE 2.0
      • Special Reports
      • Washington
      • White Papers
    • Rankings & Awards
      • 1,000 Largest Retirement Plans
      • Top-Performing Managers
      • Largest Money Managers
      • DC Money Managers
      • DC Record Keepers
      • Largest Hedge Fund Managers
      • World's Largest Retirement Funds
      • Best Places to Work in Money Management
      • Excellence & Innovation Awards
      • WPS Innovation Awards
      • Eddy Awards
    • ETFs
      • Latest ETF News
      • Fund Screener
      • Education Center
      • Equities
      • Fixed Income
      • Commodities
      • Actively Managed
      • Alternatives
      • ESG Rated
    • ESG
      • Latest ESG News
      • The Institutional Investor’s Guide to ESG Investing
      • ESG Sustainability - Gaining Momentum
      • ESG Investing | Industry Brief
      • Innovation in ESG Investing
      • 2023 ESG Investing Conference
      • ESG Rated ETFs
    • Defined Contribution
      • Latest DC News
      • The Plan Sponsor's Guide to Retirement Income
      • DC Money Manager Rankings
      • DC Record Keeper Rankings
      • Innovations in DC
      • Trends in DC: Focus on Retirement Income
      • 2023 Defined Contribution East Conference
    • Searches & Hires
      • Latest Searches & Hires News
      • Searches & Hires Database
      • RFPs
    • Research Center
      • The P&I Research Center
      • Earnings Tracker
      • Endowment Returns Tracker
      • Corporate Pension Contribution Tracker
      • Pension Fund Returns Tracker
      • Pension Risk Transfer Database
    • Careers
    • Events
      • View All Conferences
      • View All Webinars
      • 2023 Canadian Pension Risk Strategies
      • 2023 Retirement Income