Skip to main content
pilogo-NEW
Subscribe
  • Subscribe
  • My Account
  • login
  • NEWS
    • Alternatives
    • Consultants
    • Defined Contribution
    • Frontlines
    • Hedge Funds
    • Investing / Portfolio Strategies
    • Money Management
    • Pension Funds
    • People Moves
    • Private Equity
    • Real Estate
    • Searches & Hires News
    • Special Reports
    • H.I.G. Capital promotes 2 to co-president
      Pantheon hires global head for private debt
      Silver Lake reorganizes leadership
      Hamilton Lane promotes 3 to global investment team
    • Mercer appoints global alternatives leader for wealth business
      KPMG offloads pension advisory unit to private equity firm
      Ascensus snaps up Nyhart in latest deal
      Willis Towers Watson exec promoted to lead retirement unit
    • No uptick in hardship withdrawals seen in wake of IRS rule revamp
      Michael Hadley
      IRS hardship rules force change to plan documents
      Nancy Ross
      Sponsors take steps to reduce company-stock litigation risk
      Mike Francis
      Plan sponsors jump to meet changes over withdrawals
    • McGill Challenge winners
      HEC students win C$25,000 for sustainable investment strategy
      Warrick Dunn
      Former professional athletes want to make a different kind of impact
      Nareit diversity winners
      Nareit award winners stress diversity work isn't done yet
      Brian Collins
      Illinois Muni pension fund wins Baldrige quality award
    • Macro hedge fund Stone Milliner shutting down
      James Medeiros
      Hedge fund managers are warming up to custom funds
      Louis Bacon
      Moore Capital's Louis Bacon to quit money management business
      James Yeh
      Citadel promotes James Yeh to president and co-CIO
    • CalPERS slashes equity emerging managers program
      Canadian multiemployer plan invests in cannabis company WeedMD
      Franklin Regional Retirement launches small-cap equity search
      To cheap large-caps go the spoils
    • Investor checks on manager sexual harassment are improving, but still too low
      Apollo Global taps Bain Capital veteran to lead its Japan business
      Managers struggle to understand blockchain technology
      BlackRock's Mark Wiseman departs after failing to disclose relationship
    • CalPERS slashes equity emerging managers program
      Canadian multiemployer plan invests in cannabis company WeedMD
      South African state pension fund looks to expand unlisted assets
      Church of England Pensions Board CIO resigns
    • Mercer appoints global alternatives leader for wealth business
      Apollo Global taps Bain Capital veteran to lead its Japan business
      Realdania picks new CIO
      BlackRock's Mark Wiseman departs after failing to disclose relationship
    • Investindustrial raises €3.75 billion with seventh European buyout fund
      Sightway Capital closes first fund with $1.2 billion
      Private equity practices aired at House hearing
      Asia-focused NewQuest closes fourth dedicated secondaries fund at $1 billion
    • Schroders appoints real estate capital partners head
      CBRE acquires U.K. real estate debt investment business Laxfield Capital
      USAA to sell controlling interest in real estate unit
      Cold storage
      A hot time for those seeking the cold
    • Westfield Contributory looks to allocate to private equity, real estate funds
      Franklin Regional Retirement launches small-cap equity search
      Texas Muni assigns $50 million to private equity
      Northfield Bancorp taps Principal as record keeper for 401(k) plan
    • Investment Consultants
      The 2019 Excellence & Innovation Awards
      Top-performing managers Q3 2019
      The world's largest asset managers
  • Data
    • Research Center
    • Searches & Hires Database
    • Searches & Hires News
    • RFPs
    • Charts / Infographics
    • Sponsored Research
    • Trackers
    • Q3 2019 money manager M&A activity summary
      Q3 2019 legal overview report
      Q3 2019 searches and hires overview report
      P&I resources can give a leg up in winning new business
    • Westfield Contributory looks to allocate to private equity, real estate funds
      Franklin Regional Retirement launches small-cap equity search
      Texas Muni assigns $50 million to private equity
      Northfield Bancorp taps Principal as record keeper for 401(k) plan
    • Westfield Contributory looks to allocate to private equity, real estate funds
      Franklin Regional Retirement launches small-cap equity search
      Texas Muni assigns $50 million to private equity
      Northfield Bancorp taps Principal as record keeper for 401(k) plan
    • In-Kind Distribution Management Services (Private Markets) Provider Search
      Defined Contribution Consultant
      Consulting Services
      Technology Firms
    • To cheap large-caps go the spoils
      Only place to go is ... down
      Equity leads DC exodus amid rising markets
      Hedge fund performance fees down 11% in 2019
    • Institutional Investors: Shared Expectations, Divergent Paths
      Global Investor Study 2016
      Workplace Financial Wellness
    • U.S. Endowment Returns Tracker
      Pension Fund Returns Tracker
      Earnings Tracker
      Corporate Pension Contribution Tracker
  • Insights
    • Opinion
    • White Papers
    • Industry Voices
    • Other Views
    • Partner Content
    • Publisher's Update
    • SEC cartoon
      SEC rules need measured response
      High hopes for consistency and guidance from Scalia
      DC West poster
      Financial wellness gets spot at the table
      Times change, and that's a good thing
    • Strengthen Your Core: Flexible Multi-Sector Strategies for a Low-Yield World
      WisdomTree Yield Enhanced U.S. Aggregate Bond Fund
      Automation, lower fees driving institutional interest in factor investing and smart beta strategies
      A Great Time to Be Agnostic?
    • Gerald Cooper
      Commentary: Single-asset deals – a structure benefiting GPs and LPs alike
      Gordon Latter, Timur Kaya Yontar and Frank Benham
      Commentary: Plan sponsors, do you know your credit risk?
      Timothy Boomer
      Commentary: For plan sponsors, derivatives shouldn’t be a dirty word
      Martin Vogt
      Commentary: Renewables investing makes inroads in the Caribbean, Central America
    • Commentary: Revised statement on corporate purpose misses the mark
      Commentary: Stronger partnership needed between shareholders, managers
      Commentary: The associated costs of DB terminations
      Commentary: Support the Butch Lewis Act
    • P&I Content Solutions
      The Changing Face of Emerging Markets Investing
      P&I Content Solutions
      How ICMA-RC Creates Diversity and Investment Talent
      P&I Content Solutions
      Three conversations DC plan sponsors need to have in 2020
      P&I Content Solutions
      Automation, lower fees driving institutional interest in factor investing and smart beta strategies
    • Everything Must Change
      Tomatoes & Investments
      Baby, it’s hot outside!
  • Multimedia
    • Videos
    • Webinars
    • Polls
    • Slideshows
    • Charts / Infographics
    • Excellence & Innovation Awards 2019: Laura Mittelstaedt
      DC West 2019
      Excellence & Innovation Awards 2019: Lisa Joe
      DC West 2019: Empower Retirement's Doug Peterson on cybersecurity
    • Finding the Positive in Negative Interest Rates
      How to Position Institutional Portfolios to Capitalize on China’s Growth
      Financial Wellness: Gaining an edge with plan sponsors
      Trends in Hedge Fund Investing
    • POLL: Shared values between money managers and plan sponsors
      POLL: Climate change's impact on investing
      POLL: Ultralong-term U.S. Treasury bonds
      POLL: The best benchmark for private equity
    • view gallery
      21 photos
      The world's 20 largest retirement funds
      view gallery
      11 photos
      Top 10 DC money managers
      Top 15 managers by worldwide institutional AUM
      The 1,000 Largest Retirement Funds
    • To cheap large-caps go the spoils
      Only place to go is ... down
  • Events
    • Conferences
    • Webinars
    • East Coast DC Conference
      Fixed Income & Credit
      DC Investment Lineup
      ESG Investing
    • Finding the Positive in Negative Interest Rates
      How to Position Institutional Portfolios to Capitalize on China’s Growth
      Financial Wellness: Gaining an edge with plan sponsors
      Trends in Hedge Fund Investing
  • Careers
  • Research Center
MENU
Breadcrumb
  1. Home
  2. Print
November 14, 2016 12:00 AM

A better way to structure investment management fees

Matthew R. Adams
  • Tweet
  • Share
  • Share
  • Email
  • More
    Reprints Print

    Few issues in investment management are more contentious than fees. Asset owners are understandably pushing back against entrenched fee structures that have served them poorly for decades, while managers are quick to defend the business models that have traditionally made the industry so lucrative. Fresh thinking is desperately needed to break the impasse.

    The two most common fee structures — fixed fees and performance-based fees with high-water marks — both suffer from serious flaws. A better structure is a performance-based fee with a symmetrical refund mechanism that better aligns incentives and also increases the likelihood that the fees paid reflect the value added for clients.

    The trouble with fixed fees

    It's not hard to understand why fixed fees have become the dominant model in the industry. In addition to their operational simplicity, fixed fees provide managers with a predictable and highly scalable stream of revenue that grows in linear fashion with assets under management. Because of the high degree of operating leverage — i.e., the manager's costs grow far more slowly than the pace of revenue growth — the incremental profitability achieved from additional assets can be extremely high.

    The key problem with fixed fees is ultimately one of incentives. The temptation to pursue asset growth is almost irresistible — even if it means growing beyond the manager's capacity to outperform. Even more powerful than the temptation to gather assets is the imperative to avoid losing them by being different and wrong.

    The industry is full of very smart and highly competitive people. But the forces of human nature are simply too overwhelming to resist. The random nature of investment returns is such that there is some probability that even the best managers will perform poorly enough over short-term periods to be fired. Since they cannot control either the measurement period over which clients assess their performance and cannot upgrade their skill level — at least in the short term — the only option left to reduce the probability of getting fired is to reduce tracking error.

    The rational strategy for an investment manager running a business with fixed fees is therefore to build a strong distribution platform, avoid making big mistakes by staying close to the benchmark, and grow without bound, even at the expense of investment returns.

    The trouble with performance-based fees

    Performance-based fees would seem to be an obvious solution. They greatly reduce the temptation to pursue unbridled growth, while also discouraging benchmark hugging. But the predominant performance-based fee structure in use today, which uses a high-water mark, simply introduces another form of incentive misalignment. Clients pay a base fee plus a share of any outperformance, and if performance subsequently suffers, the manager must recover the prior peak before again earning performance fees. While this sounds like a good deal for investors, it's really a “heads we win, tails you lose” proposition. For the manager, the payoff to investment performance is essentially a call option in which the high-water mark is akin to the strike price and the client bears the full downside if things go poorly.

    With this in mind, how does the manager maximize this option value? He can't really change the time to expiration; clients will redeem when they want to. He can't change the strike price; the high-water mark is set. And he probably can't change his skill level; if he could, he already would have done so. The only thing left to change is the volatility of the portfolio, even if doing so is not in the client's interest. Indeed, research has shown that even a manager with negative skill is better off increasing portfolio risk under such a fee structure, despite the fact that this is, by definition, a worse outcome for clients.

    High-water-mark performance fees are also flawed due to their path dependence. Unless an investor redeems while at their high-water mark, they will have paid a greater portion of the return in fees than the stated sharing ratio. For instance, if the manager produces strong returns in the first few years, and subsequently underperforms, the client will have paid substantial performance fees in those first years, despite a potentially negative cumulative total return. Because very few clients would redeem while at their high-water mark, it is very likely that a client will pay a substantially larger portion of their returns in fees than the headline sharing ratio implies.

    Is there a better way?

    It is clear that both fixed and performance-based fee structures do a poor job aligning the interests of managers with those of their clients. Any solution should focus on value-for-money, or the ratio of fees paid to the value added, after fees and expenses, and on maximizing net-of-fee returns.

    So what would an ideal structure look like? A practical solution is a refundable performance fee in which the manager shares equally in both good and bad performance. Rather than flowing directly to the manager, performance fees flow instead to a fee reserve, available to be refunded should the manager subsequently underperform. In periods of underperformance, fees are refunded to the client from the reserve at the same rate they are earned. The manager is only able to draw from the fee reserve once it has reached a designated proportion of the client's assets.

    While this structure is undeniably less favorable for the manager, the symmetrical nature of a refundable performance fee substantially mitigates the major flaws of both fixed fees and performance fees with high-water marks. First, the refundable fee focuses a manager on achieving superior returns, while discouraging the benchmark hugging and asset gathering that are natural outcomes of fixed fees. Second, it reduces the incentive to take unjustified risks, which can occur with a traditional performance fee. It reduces path dependence and increases the likelihood that the fees paid are proportional to the value added. This refundable fee structure has the added benefit of smoothing clients' experienced returns, thereby reducing the likelihood that they capitulate on their managers at exactly the wrong time.

    Matthew R Adams is a San Francisco-based director of U.S. research at Orbis Investment Management (U.S.) LLC.

    Related Articles
    A simpler way to structure performance-based fees
    Recommended for You
    sponsored content
    Events
     
     
    Advertisement
    White Papers
    A Great Time to Be Agnostic?
    Shedding the Home-Country Bias
    Automation, lower fees driving institutional interest in factor investing and s…
    WisdomTree Yield Enhanced U.S. Aggregate Bond Fund
    Strengthen Your Core: Flexible Multi-Sector Strategies for a Low-Yield World
    View More
    Sponsored Content
    Partner Content
    How Big Data Delivers Solutions to ESG Investors
    How a Multisector Credit Approach Can Lower Risk, Increase Diversification
    ESG Investing Supplement
    Know Your DB Plan’s ‘Persona’ to Help Make the Right Strategy Choices
    Leveling the playing field for public employee retirement security
    View More
    E-MAIL NEWSLETTERS

    Sign up and get the best of News delivered straight to your email inbox, free of charge. Choose your news – we will deliver.

    Subscribe Today

    Get access to the news, research and analysis of events affecting the retirement and institutional money management businesses from a worldwide network of reporters and editors.

    Subscribe
    Connect With Us
    • RSS
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn

    Our Mission

    To consistently deliver news, research and analysis to the executives who manage the flow of funds in the institutional investment market.

    pilogo-NEW
    About Us

    Main Office
    685 Third Avenue
    Tenth Floor
    New York, NY 10017-4036

    Chicago Office
    150 N. Michigan Ave.
    Chicago, IL 60601

    Contact Us

    About Pensions & Investments

     

    Advertising
    • Media Kit
    • P&I Content Solutions
    • P&I Careers | Post a Job
    • Reprints & Permissions
    Resources
    • Subscribe
    • Newsletters
    • FAQ
    • P&I Research Center
    • Site map
    • Staff Directory
    Legal
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions
    Pensions & Investments
    Copyright © 1996-2019. Crain Communications, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
    • NEWS
      • Alternatives
      • Consultants
      • Defined Contribution
      • Frontlines
      • Hedge Funds
      • Investing / Portfolio Strategies
      • Money Management
      • Pension Funds
      • People Moves
      • Private Equity
      • Real Estate
      • Searches & Hires News
      • Special Reports
    • Data
      • Research Center
      • Searches & Hires Database
      • Searches & Hires News
      • RFPs
      • Charts / Infographics
      • Sponsored Research
      • Trackers
    • Insights
      • Opinion
      • White Papers
      • Industry Voices
      • Other Views
      • Partner Content
      • Publisher's Update
    • Multimedia
      • Videos
      • Webinars
      • Polls
      • Slideshows
      • Charts / Infographics
    • Events
      • Conferences
      • Webinars
    • Careers
    • Research Center