Skip to main content
MENU
Subscribe
  • Login
  • My Account
  • Logout
  • Register For Free
  • Subscribe
  • Topics
    • Alternatives
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • CIOs
    • Consultants
    • Defined Contribution
    • ESG
    • Face to Face
    • Hedge Funds
    • Industry Voices
    • Investing
    • Money Management
    • Partner Content
    • Private Credit
    • Pension Funds
    • Private Equity
    • Real Estate
    • Regulation
    • Special Reports
    • Washington
    • White Papers
  • International
    • U.K.
    • Canada
    • Europe
    • Asia
    • Australia - New Zealand
    • Middle East
    • Latin America
    • Africa
  • Rankings & Awards
    • 1,000 Largest Retirement Plans
    • Top-Performing Managers
    • Largest Money Managers
    • DC Money Managers
    • DC Record Keepers
    • Largest Hedge Fund Managers
    • World's Largest Retirement Funds
    • Best Places to Work in Money Management
    • Excellence & Innovation Awards
    • WPS Innovation Awards
    • Influential Women in Institutional Investing 2024
    • Eddy Awards
  • Resource Guides
    • Active Thematic Global Equities
    • Retirement Income
    • Fixed Income
    • Pension Risk Transfer
    • Pooled Employer Plans (PEPs)
  • ETFs
    • Latest ETF News
    • Fund Screener
    • Education Center
    • Equities
    • Fixed Income
    • Commodities
    • Actively Managed
    • Alternatives
    • ESG Rated
  • ESG
    • Latest ESG News
    • The Institutional Investor’s Guide to ESG Investing
    • ESG Sustainability - Gaining Momentum
    • ESG Investing | Industry Brief
    • Innovation in ESG Investing
    • ESG Rated ETFs
    • Divestment Database
  • Defined Contribution
    • Latest DC News
    • The Plan Sponsor's Guide to Retirement Income
    • DC Money Manager Rankings
    • DC Record Keeper Rankings
    • Innovations in DC
    • DC Plan Design: Improving Participant Outcomes
  • Searches & Hires
    • Latest Searches & Hires News
    • Searches & Hires Database
    • RFPs
  • Research Center
    • The P&I Research Center
    • Earnings Tracker
    • Endowment Returns Tracker
    • Corporate Pension Contribution Tracker
    • Pension Fund Returns Tracker
    • Pension Risk Transfer Database
  • Careers
  • Events
    • View All Conferences
    • View All Webinars
  • Print
Breadcrumb
  1. Home
  2. MONEY MANAGEMENT
October 17, 2016 01:00 AM

To succeed, Janus/Henderson merger will need to counter decline of active management

  • Tweet
  • Share
  • Share
  • Email
  • More
    Reprints Print
    Andrew Formica, left, and Richard Weil will be co-CEOs after the merger is done.

    The merger of Denver-based Janus Capital Group and London-based Henderson Group will create a global money management firm with more than $320 billion in combined assets, but for the new company to prosper, it will have to counter headwinds that are buffeting active managers, analysts say.

    Both Janus CEO Richard Weil and Henderson CEO Andrew Formica — who will be co-CEOs of the new entity — announced the consolidation deal Oct. 3 in London, touting a new global distribution footprint that will give Janus, with $195 billion in assets under management as of June 30, greater access to the U.K. and European markets while giving Henderson, with £95 billion ($127 billion), June 30, greater reach in the U.S.

    The all-stock deal is expected to close in the second quarter of 2017.

    The resulting firm will be renamed Janus Henderson Global Investors PLC and will be based in London. But regardless of the newly combined company's reach, Janus and Henderson are active managers in an investment world that is embracing passive strategies.

    “Increasingly, assets are going toward passive strategies,” said Todd Rosenbluth, director of ETF and mutual fund research at S&P Global Market Intelligence. “The challenge Janus, Henderson and other active managers have is to counter that.”

    Mr. Formica said in a conference call and meeting with analysts that he and Mr. Weil were in strong agreement that active management can still flourish, ”if you've got a high quality product and investment team that does what it says, and, through the cycle adds value.”

    Mr. Rosenbluth said he agrees that strong investment performance would be the best counter to passive headwinds, which have been strengthened by investors' appetite for lower-cost options. He noted that Janus also bought an ETF company in 2014, VS Holdings Inc., the parent company of VelocityShares LLC. Velocity Shares specializes in institutionally-focused exchange-traded funds, and, at the time of the deal, had raised $2 billion in assets. Velocity Shares data shows it had $3.7 billion in 17 funds as of Oct. 13.

    Janus has struggled with inflows since the tech bubble burst.

    The last time Janus reported a full year of net inflows was 2009, with company financial data showing net inflows of $900 million. From 2010 through 2015, the company saw a total of $62. 6 billion in net outflows, Janus data shows.

    Outflows have slowed recently. In the first six months of 2016 through June 30, Janus reported $1.7 billion in net outflows.

    Henderson Group has had stronger history of recent inflows, with $22.9 billion in net inflows between 2010 and 2015, shows Morningstar data, which includes mutual funds but not institutional separate accounts.

    More recently the firm has struggled. In June, July and August of this year, Henderson reported $2.9 billion in net outflows, though it still had net inflows of $1.6 billion for the first eight months of 2016 through Aug. 31, according to Morningstar.

    Investment teams and distribution personnel are not expected to be affected in a major way by the merger, analysts said.

    Institutional market

    In an interview Oct. 7 with Pensions & Investments, Mr. Formica said that, while it is still early days, client reaction to the combination has been encouraging, citing one wealth manager who recently reconfirmed its commitment to a large allocation to the manager.

    Henderson also has a “relatively large pipeline of pension and institutional clients for the fourth quarter, which have all reiterated their commitment to fund,” and Janus has received further wins and commitments post-announcement, he said.

    “It is the institutional market that is most likely...to pause and consider what it means, and on both sides we have seen very strong endorsement in just a few days,” Mr. Formica added.

    Mr. Weil said in a conference call with analysts that “from the Janus side, a majority of our institutional assets are with INTECH (Janus' quantitative equity division) and it's clear in the transaction that INTECH is going to continue largely as is.”

    Janus officials said that INTECH and its Perkins equity investment subsidiary in Chicago will continue to be run independently with their own leadership teams and will be unaffected by the merger other than having increased distribution.

    Janus holds $68.2 billion in global institutional assets, show company statistics as of June 30. INTECH reported $49 billion in assets of as June 30, but Janus does not report what percentage of those assets are institutional.

    Thirty-eight percent of Henderson's $127 billion in assets is institutional, according to company data.

    The deal between the two managers is expected to produce $110 million in cost savings over a three-year period.

    Consolidation of middle and back offices is expected to produce savings, as will the ability to deal with necessary regulatory spend.

    “If you take MiFID II as an example: the MiFID II costs are independent of the size of asset management firm or how many assets you have. Janus has to do it, Henderson has to do it, so we were doing it twice. We are now doing it once,'' Mr. Formica told P&I.

    Mr. Formica and Mr. Weil, in the P&I interview, said one potential benefit of savings from the merger may allow the combined firm to take on new investment capabilities.

    “That additional saving allows us to invest in new ideas, new investment capabilities, they may be team hires, or they may be just fund structures built out of the existing capabilities,'' Mr. Formica said.

    “So, for example, as the market is looking for more absolute-return products, more bond-like return, but away from the duration-led products of fixed-income markets, we can create those sorts of products, often with the teams that are in place,“ he added.

    Scale matters

    Mr. Weil cited the benefits of new distribution channels for both Henderson and Janus. “Henderson has wonderful client relationships across the U.K. and Europe that are in many ways deeper than we can build from the Janus side,“ he said. “In the U.S. and Japan, we have some relationships that are special and would be challenging for Henderson to build. And combined we create a roster of clients and relationships and distribution resources that are terrific.”

    He also said that size matters in the asset management industry, which should give the combined entity an advantage.

    “Scale matters in this business, in terms of the ability to create positive returns for your clients, operate more efficiently with better operating leverage,” Mr. Weil said. “To be able to afford the necessary investments to keep up with the changing regulatory environment. To invest in new products. All those things come out of the financial stability and strength, and combined we are stronger than either one of us would be separate.”

    Data from Janus and Henderson show only small overlaps among investment strategies. Henderson has large European equity as well as alternative investment strategies, an area where Janus has only a small focus. Janus' large quantitative investment division, INTECH, specializes in institutional accounts and U.S.-centric fixed-income teams.

    Overlaps include global equity strategies — Janus manages $20 billion in global equity strategies while Henderson has $34 billion in such strategies, data from the firms show. In 2014, Henderson acquired Milwaukee-based Geneva Capital Management, a growth equity investment firm with approximately $5 billion in assets under management, as of June 30, 2016. Janus also runs about $12 billion in growth equity strategies.

    Mr. Formica said during the conference call on Oct. 3 that “the current expectation is that both investment processes (at Janus and Geneva) will remain separate.” Mr. Formica also said Janus and Henderson senior portfolio managers had not signed exclusive agreements that prevent them from leaving.

    Robert Lee, a managing director and equity analyst at Keefe, Bruyette & Woods in New York, said the co-CEO's structure was “unusual and rare and is probably not the long-term solution.”

    Mr. Weil and Mr. Henderson said in investor calls that the current management structure will be kept for at least two years but will be reviewed by the Janus Henderson board after that.

    London Bureau Chief Sophie Baker contributed.

    Related Articles
    Janus chooses a builder to become its newest CEO
    Janus Capital Group slashes CEO's compensation
    Co-CEOs tout London as best location for merged firm's global headquarters
    Janus AUM gains 2.2% in quarter despite more outflows
    Henderson Group's AUM gains 6.2% in quarter on market, FX movements
    Moody's negative on money management industry for 2017, but positive over long …
    Recommended for You
    Etihad Towers and Emirates Palace Hotel in Abu Dhabi at dusk.
    Fortress Investment appoints head of Middle East as it opens new office in Abu Dhabi
    Headshot of Michael Chang
    Eastspring Investments Berhad appoints head of investments
    Headshot of Ryan Gordon
    Quinbrook Infrastructure Partners names head of APAC
    Sponsored
    White Papers
    The State of Lifetime Income Report
    The Next Wave of LDI Evolution
    Retirement security to future income wins, TIAA brings you the latest financial…
    U.S. Public Funds Top Performers: Q2 2024
    Generative AI Investing: Opportunities at a Key Tech Inflection Point
    Research for Institutional Money Management: Advancing Physical Risk Modelling,…
    View More
    Sponsored Content
    Partner Content
    The Industrialization of ESG Investment
    For institutional investors, ETFs can make meeting liquidity needs easier
    Gold: the most effective commodity investment
    2021 Investment Outlook | Investing Beyond the Pandemic: A Reset for Portfolios
    Ten ways retirement plan professionals add value to plan sponsors
    Gold: an efficient hedge
    View More
    E-MAIL NEWSLETTERS

    Sign up and get the best of News delivered straight to your email inbox, free of charge. Choose your news – we will deliver.

    Subscribe Today
    October 23, 2023 page one

    Get access to the news, research and analysis of events affecting the retirement and institutional money management businesses from a worldwide network of reporters and editors.

    Subscribe
    Connect With Us
    • RSS
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn

    Our Mission

    To consistently deliver news, research and analysis to the executives who manage the flow of funds in the institutional investment market.

    About Us

    Main Office
    685 Third Avenue
    Tenth Floor
    New York, NY 10017-4036

    Chicago Office
    130 E. Randolph St.
    Suite 3200
    Chicago, IL 60601

    Contact Us

    Careers at Crain

    About Pensions & Investments

     

    Advertising
    • Media Kit
    • P&I Custom Content
    • P&I Careers | Post a Job
    • Reprints & Permissions
    Resources
    • Subscribe
    • Newsletters
    • FAQ
    • P&I Research Center
    • Site map
    • Staff Directory
    Legal
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Request
    Pensions & Investments
    Copyright © 1996-2025. Crain Communications, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
    • Topics
      • Alternatives
      • Artificial Intelligence
      • CIOs
      • Consultants
      • Defined Contribution
      • ESG
      • Face to Face
      • Hedge Funds
      • Industry Voices
      • Investing
      • Money Management
      • Partner Content
      • Private Credit
      • Pension Funds
      • Private Equity
      • Real Estate
      • Regulation
      • Special Reports
      • Washington
      • White Papers
    • International
      • U.K.
      • Canada
      • Europe
      • Asia
      • Australia - New Zealand
      • Middle East
      • Latin America
      • Africa
    • Rankings & Awards
      • 1,000 Largest Retirement Plans
      • Top-Performing Managers
      • Largest Money Managers
      • DC Money Managers
      • DC Record Keepers
      • Largest Hedge Fund Managers
      • World's Largest Retirement Funds
      • Best Places to Work in Money Management
      • Excellence & Innovation Awards
      • WPS Innovation Awards
      • Influential Women in Institutional Investing 2024
      • Eddy Awards
    • Resource Guides
      • Active Thematic Global Equities
      • Retirement Income
      • Fixed Income
      • Pension Risk Transfer
      • Pooled Employer Plans (PEPs)
    • ETFs
      • Latest ETF News
      • Fund Screener
      • Education Center
      • Equities
      • Fixed Income
      • Commodities
      • Actively Managed
      • Alternatives
      • ESG Rated
    • ESG
      • Latest ESG News
      • The Institutional Investor’s Guide to ESG Investing
      • ESG Sustainability - Gaining Momentum
      • ESG Investing | Industry Brief
      • Innovation in ESG Investing
      • ESG Rated ETFs
      • Divestment Database
    • Defined Contribution
      • Latest DC News
      • The Plan Sponsor's Guide to Retirement Income
      • DC Money Manager Rankings
      • DC Record Keeper Rankings
      • Innovations in DC
      • DC Plan Design: Improving Participant Outcomes
    • Searches & Hires
      • Latest Searches & Hires News
      • Searches & Hires Database
      • RFPs
    • Research Center
      • The P&I Research Center
      • Earnings Tracker
      • Endowment Returns Tracker
      • Corporate Pension Contribution Tracker
      • Pension Fund Returns Tracker
      • Pension Risk Transfer Database
    • Careers
    • Events
      • View All Conferences
      • View All Webinars
    • Print