Skip to main content
MENU
Subscribe
  • Sign Up Free
  • LOGIN
  • Subscribe
  • Topics
    • Alternatives
    • Consultants
    • Coronavirus
    • Courts
    • Defined Contribution
    • ESG
    • ETFs
    • Face to Face
    • Hedge Funds
    • Industry Voices
    • Investing
    • Money Management
    • Opinion
    • Partner Content
    • Pension Funds
    • Private Equity
    • Real Estate
    • Russia-Ukraine War
    • SECURE 2.0
    • Special Reports
    • White Papers
  • Rankings & Awards
    • 1,000 Largest Retirement Plans
    • Top-Performing Managers
    • Largest Money Managers
    • DC Money Managers
    • DC Record Keepers
    • Largest Hedge Fund Managers
    • World's Largest Retirement Funds
    • Best Places to Work in Money Management
    • Excellence & Innovation Awards
    • WPS Innovation Awards
    • Eddy Awards
  • ETFs
    • Latest ETF News
    • Fund Screener
    • Education Center
    • Equities
    • Fixed Income
    • Commodities
    • Actively Managed
    • Alternatives
    • ESG Rated
  • ESG
    • Latest ESG News
    • The Institutional Investor’s Guide to ESG Investing
    • ESG Sustainability - Gaining Momentum
    • Climate Change: The Inescapable Opportunity
    • Impact Investing
    • 2022 ESG Investing Conference
    • ESG Rated ETFs
  • Defined Contribution
    • Latest DC News
    • DC Money Manager Rankings
    • DC Record Keeper Rankings
    • Innovations in DC
    • Trends in DC: Focus on Retirement Income
    • 2022 Defined Contribution East Conference
    • 2022 DC Investment Lineup Conference
  • Searches & Hires
    • Latest Searches & Hires News
    • Searches & Hires Database
    • RFPs
  • Performance Data
    • P&I Research Center
    • Earnings Tracker
    • Endowment Returns Tracker
    • Corporate Pension Contribution Tracker
    • Pension Fund Returns Tracker
    • Pension Risk Transfer Database
    • Future of Investments Research Series
    • Charts & Infographics
    • Polls
  • Careers
  • Events
    • View All Conferences
    • View All Webinars
    • 2023 Defined Contribution East
    • 2023 ESG Investing
Breadcrumb
  1. Home
  2. DEFINED BENEFIT
December 28, 2015 12:00 AM

Mythbuster

  • Tweet
  • Share
  • Share
  • Email
  • More
    Reprints Print
    Roger Schillerstrom

    Public retirement systems have been lowering their assumed long-term rates of return on investments in recent years. But those reductions are not enough, and will continue to make funded levels appear higher than they really are and, therefore, lead to insufficient contributions.

    The public pension plans use their assumed long-term rates of return to value their pension liabilities, but those rates don't reflect real economics. Instead, they should use a lower, risk-free rate matched to the duration or maturity of the projected benefit payments.

    The California Public Employees' Retirement System is among the pension funds that recently decided to lower their assumed rates. In doing so, CalPERS has become, unintentionally, its own myth-buster, challenging the “myths vs. facts” section of its website that seeks to defend its 7.5% assumed annual rate of return on investment.

    The section states, “Myth: CalPERS 7.5% assumed annual rate of investment return is too high and cannot be achieved.” The website dismisses that, noting CalPERS has earned an average annual 7.6% return over the past 20 years and 9.4% over the past 30 years, while in the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, it returned 13.2%.

    As it turns out, the fact is less real and more myth, while the myth is more reality.

    CalPERS no longer believes in its 7.5% assumed return and, on Nov. 18, approved a plan that could reduce its expected return to 6.5%. However, under the methodology adopted, the reduction could take more than 20 years to occur.

    Richard Gillihan, CalPERS board member, opposed the gradual approach, contending it would take too long to achieve the reduction. He called for an immediate reduction to 6.5%. Although even his proposal is too modest, he is correct in wanting to move immediately to the lower rate. Unfortunately, the majority of the board prevailed against his recommendation.

    But the board's move doesn't go far enough; the 6.5% rate is still too high.

    Like many public retirement plans, CalPERS' pension benefits are default free, or free of risk of non-payment to participants and their beneficiaries, as recent California municipal bankruptcy cases have concluded.

    San Bernardino, for example, under its plan to exit from bankruptcy, will pay CalPERS in full for public employee retirement benefits, while reducing payments to other creditors, such as bondholders. While payments of benefits might be riskless to participants, they are not riskless for taxpayers, who ultimately must fund the contributions to pay for the pensions.

    Robert Novy-Marx, professor of business administration at the Simon Business School, University of Rochester, N.Y., in a September 2013 research paper, explained why risk-free benefits should be discounted in value at risk-free rates.

    “Payment streams should be valued using discount rates that reflect the cash flows' risks,” Mr. Novy-Marx wrote. The research paper was written for the Pension Research Council of the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania and posted on the website of the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp.

    The economic concept is not new, even if it has been ignored by public pension systems.

    Donald L. Kohn, then-vice chairman of the Federal Reserve Board of Governors, said in a 2008 speech to the National Conference on Public Employee Retirement Systems, that “public pension benefits are essentially bullet-proof promises to pay.” In the public sector, unlike in the private sector, “accrued benefits have turned out to be riskless obligations,” Mr. Kohn said. Among economists, the “only appropriate way to calculate the present value of a very-low-risk liability is to use a very-low-risk discount rate.”

    CalPERS' approach to reduce gradually its assumed return upset Gov. Edmund G. Brown Jr. In a Nov. 18 statement, Mr. Brown called the approach “an irresponsible plan that will only keep the system dependent on unrealistic investment returns. This approach will expose the fund to an unacceptable level of risk in coming years.” Mr. Brown did not say it, but that means the California taxpayers are exposed to that unacceptable level of risk.

    In response, CalPERS President Rob Feckner reaffirmed the board's action.

    CalPERS' actual net return on investments for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015, was 2.4%, a rate closer to its assumed outlook than the double-digit returns it has enjoyed in other recent years.

    The use of high assumed rates of return bolsters pension funding levels, making the funds appear more robust than they actually are, while reducing the required contribution, damaging the funding of the plans.

    Denise L. Nappier, Connecticut state treasurer, on Nov. 6 objected to the Connecticut Teachers Retirement Board's lowering of its investment return assumption to 8% from 8.5%, saying that is not far enough. Ms. Nappier called for a rate of 7.5% or lower. She's correct to object, but needs to reduce her recommended assumed target a lot more.

    Illinois State Universities Retirement System on Dec. 11 reaffirmed its 7.25% investment return assumption, even though its actuarial consultant, Gabriel Roeder Smith & Co., gives SURS a 52.77% chance of reaching that rate, based on SURS' asset allocation and capital market assumptions. As a benchmark, the consulting firm considers as reasonable any rate that has at least a 50% chance of achieving the assumed return.

    The average rate of return assumption among state and local retirement systems is 7.68%, according to a report last May of the National Association of State Retirement Administrators.

    Even at a high rate, CalPERS' funding ratio is low, at 69.8%, according to its website. At a risk-free rate, the funding ratio would be lower. But even at the current funding level, CalPERS leaves to future generations the responsibility of paying more than one-third of pension benefits participants have earned. That's unacceptable. Pensions should be funded by the current generation of taxpayers who receive the services from the public employees.

    Likewise, even using current unrealistic expected rates of return, public plans in general are deeply underfunded. A report last Feb. 25 by Wilshire Associates Inc. found that of the 92 state retirement systems that reported actuarial data for 2014, 87% are underfunded with an average funding level of 73%.

    The poor funding ratios demonstrate why CalPERS and many other public retirement systems need to lower their return assumptions to the risk-free rate to boost their contributions. To avoid the shock of a sudden rise in contributions, the systems should set a plan for lowering the rate over a few years, but not as CalPERS plans to do over many years and then by only one percentage point from the current level.

    A risk-free rate will result in increased contributions and eventually strengthen the ability of the plans to reach a 100% funded status, where they should be to avoid an unfair intergenerational transfer of pension obligations earned by previous generations to newer generations. Such a rate would make plans more sustainable financially and in public support.

    Related Articles
    Connecticut Teachers' reduction in assumed rate of return not enough, treasurer…
    CalPERS approves plan to gradually reduce assumed rate of return to 6.5%
    Illinois SURS in danger of running out of money to pay retirees, CIO says
    Kentucky updates asset allocations for 5 pension funds, trims assumed rates of …
    Recommended for You
    R.I. treasurer seeks transparency laws for church plans
    R.I. treasurer seeks transparency laws for church plans
    Public pension funds adopt cost-sharing mechanisms to stem volatility
    Public pension funds adopt cost-sharing mechanisms to stem volatility
    Avery Dennison to terminate U.S. pension plan
    Avery Dennison to terminate U.S. pension plan
    Research for Institutional Money Management
    Sponsored Content: Research for Institutional Money Management

    Reader Poll

    January 25, 2023
    SEE MORE POLLS >
    Sponsored
    White Papers
    The Future of Infrastructure: Building a Better Tomorrow
    Fulcrum Issues: Equity Returns and Inflation — Choose Your Own Adventure
    What Matters Most in Considering a Private Debt Strategy
    Why pursue direct lending in the core middle market?
    Research for Institutional Money Management
    Are Factors a Thing of the Past?
    View More
    Sponsored Content
    Partner Content
    The Industrialization of ESG Investment
    For institutional investors, ETFs can make meeting liquidity needs easier
    Gold: the most effective commodity investment
    2021 Investment Outlook | Investing Beyond the Pandemic: A Reset for Portfolios
    Ten ways retirement plan professionals add value to plan sponsors
    Gold: an efficient hedge
    View More
    E-MAIL NEWSLETTERS

    Sign up and get the best of News delivered straight to your email inbox, free of charge. Choose your news – we will deliver.

    Subscribe Today
    December 12, 2022 page one

    Get access to the news, research and analysis of events affecting the retirement and institutional money management businesses from a worldwide network of reporters and editors.

    Subscribe
    Connect With Us
    • RSS
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn

    Our Mission

    To consistently deliver news, research and analysis to the executives who manage the flow of funds in the institutional investment market.

    About Us

    Main Office
    685 Third Avenue
    Tenth Floor
    New York, NY 10017-4036

    Chicago Office
    130 E. Randolph St.
    Suite 3200
    Chicago, IL 60601

    Contact Us

    Careers at Crain

    About Pensions & Investments

     

    Advertising
    • Media Kit
    • P&I Content Solutions
    • P&I Careers | Post a Job
    • Reprints & Permissions
    Resources
    • Subscribe
    • Newsletters
    • FAQ
    • P&I Research Center
    • Site map
    • Staff Directory
    Legal
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Request
    Pensions & Investments
    Copyright © 1996-2023. Crain Communications, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
    • Topics
      • Alternatives
      • Consultants
      • Coronavirus
      • Courts
      • Defined Contribution
      • ESG
      • ETFs
      • Face to Face
      • Hedge Funds
      • Industry Voices
      • Investing
      • Money Management
      • Opinion
      • Partner Content
      • Pension Funds
      • Private Equity
      • Real Estate
      • Russia-Ukraine War
      • SECURE 2.0
      • Special Reports
      • White Papers
    • Rankings & Awards
      • 1,000 Largest Retirement Plans
      • Top-Performing Managers
      • Largest Money Managers
      • DC Money Managers
      • DC Record Keepers
      • Largest Hedge Fund Managers
      • World's Largest Retirement Funds
      • Best Places to Work in Money Management
      • Excellence & Innovation Awards
      • WPS Innovation Awards
      • Eddy Awards
    • ETFs
      • Latest ETF News
      • Fund Screener
      • Education Center
      • Equities
      • Fixed Income
      • Commodities
      • Actively Managed
      • Alternatives
      • ESG Rated
    • ESG
      • Latest ESG News
      • The Institutional Investor’s Guide to ESG Investing
      • ESG Sustainability - Gaining Momentum
      • Climate Change: The Inescapable Opportunity
      • Impact Investing
      • 2022 ESG Investing Conference
      • ESG Rated ETFs
    • Defined Contribution
      • Latest DC News
      • DC Money Manager Rankings
      • DC Record Keeper Rankings
      • Innovations in DC
      • Trends in DC: Focus on Retirement Income
      • 2022 Defined Contribution East Conference
      • 2022 DC Investment Lineup Conference
    • Searches & Hires
      • Latest Searches & Hires News
      • Searches & Hires Database
      • RFPs
    • Performance Data
      • P&I Research Center
      • Earnings Tracker
      • Endowment Returns Tracker
      • Corporate Pension Contribution Tracker
      • Pension Fund Returns Tracker
      • Pension Risk Transfer Database
      • Future of Investments Research Series
      • Charts & Infographics
      • Polls
    • Careers
    • Events
      • View All Conferences
      • View All Webinars
      • 2023 Defined Contribution East
      • 2023 ESG Investing