Skip to main content
MENU
Subscribe
  • Login
  • My Account
  • Logout
  • Register For Free
  • Subscribe
  • Topics
    • Alternatives
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • CIOs
    • Consultants
    • Defined Contribution
    • ESG
    • Face to Face
    • Hedge Funds
    • Industry Voices
    • Investing
    • Money Management
    • Partner Content
    • Private Credit
    • Pension Funds
    • Private Equity
    • Real Estate
    • Regulation
    • Special Reports
    • Washington
    • White Papers
  • International
    • U.K.
    • Canada
    • Europe
    • Asia
    • Australia - New Zealand
    • Middle East
    • Latin America
    • Africa
  • Rankings & Awards
    • 1,000 Largest Retirement Plans
    • Top-Performing Managers
    • Largest Money Managers
    • DC Money Managers
    • DC Record Keepers
    • Largest Hedge Fund Managers
    • World's Largest Retirement Funds
    • Best Places to Work in Money Management
    • Excellence & Innovation Awards
    • WPS Innovation Awards
    • Influential Women in Institutional Investing 2024
    • Eddy Awards
  • Resource Guides
    • Active Thematic Global Equities
    • Retirement Income
    • Fixed Income
    • Pension Risk Transfer
    • Pooled Employer Plans (PEPs)
  • ETFs
    • Latest ETF News
    • Fund Screener
    • Education Center
    • Equities
    • Fixed Income
    • Commodities
    • Actively Managed
    • Alternatives
    • ESG Rated
  • ESG
    • Latest ESG News
    • The Institutional Investor’s Guide to ESG Investing
    • ESG Sustainability - Gaining Momentum
    • ESG Investing | Industry Brief
    • Innovation in ESG Investing
    • ESG Rated ETFs
    • Divestment Database
  • Defined Contribution
    • Latest DC News
    • The Plan Sponsor's Guide to Retirement Income
    • DC Money Manager Rankings
    • DC Record Keeper Rankings
    • Innovations in DC
    • DC Plan Design: Improving Participant Outcomes
  • Searches & Hires
    • Latest Searches & Hires News
    • Searches & Hires Database
    • RFPs
  • Research Center
    • The P&I Research Center
    • Earnings Tracker
    • Endowment Returns Tracker
    • Corporate Pension Contribution Tracker
    • Pension Fund Returns Tracker
    • Pension Risk Transfer Database
  • Careers
  • Events
    • View All Conferences
    • View All Webinars
  • Print
Breadcrumb
  1. Home
  2. DEFINED BENEFIT
December 21, 2015 12:00 AM

Majority of DB plans should question the traditional derisking glidepath

David Druley, global head of pension practice, Cambridge Associates
  • Tweet
  • Share
  • Share
  • Email
  • More
    Reprints Print
    David Druley

    Conventional wisdom would suggest that most U.S. defined benefit pension plans are “hard frozen” — closed to new participants and not accruing liabilities. This common perception is informed in part by regular media coverage of high-profile plan freezes and buyouts. As a result, the pension community tends to focus on risk management strategies that are tailored to the needs of these plans. Pension conferences abound with discussions of the one-size-fits-all “glidepath” approach, which promises to manage portfolio risk responsibly — but perhaps overly simplistically for most pension plans.

    Yet in reality, frozen plans account for a minority of U.S. defined benefit plans — and the glidepath approach that's best suited for them is often suboptimal and even painful for plans that are still accepting new participants and/or accruing obligations to existing ones.

    Those still-accruing — either open plans, or those closed to new participants — account for approximately 70% of U.S. defined benefit plans, according to data from the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp. We call them the “Forgotten 70%” because of the pension community's tendency to overlook their needs. Instead of the mechanistic glidepath, these plans might be better off considering a more flexible and holistic approach to risk that maximizes returns based on the plan's unique circumstances and tolerance for risk.

    The limitations of the traditional glidepath

    The typical glidepath is a mechanistic approach that formulaically moves a plan's assets away from growth-oriented assets and toward liability-hedging fixed-income allocations as the plan's funded status increases. For frozen plans, which will not experience future increases in the obligations they must pay out to participants, the glidepath can be an effective way to reduce surplus risk although, even in this case, a more flexible approach might result in superior outcomes.

    But the Forgotten 70% have different characteristics, different risk profiles and different investment needs. For them, implementing the wrong glidepath might actually lead to lower returns at a higher level of risk, locking in higher required contributions down the road.

    For plans to meet their obligations, they must eventually pay out to participants in two ways: asset returns or sponsor contributions. Unlike frozen plans, the liabilities of an open or closed plan continue to grow over time as employees earn additional benefits. Consequently, these plans have clear incentives to achieve excess returns, however, they might need to think more creatively about their risk budgets beyond simply taking on more surplus risk.

    A holistic approach to risk management is ideal for most plans

    The Forgotten 70% might be better served by building efficient portfolios that reflect their individual risk profiles, and which they can alter as circumstances and risk tolerance change.

    Plans can start by defining their unique tolerance for funded status risk. This is informed by several variables: current funded status, the size of the plan relative to the sponsor's balance sheet, the size of potential contributions relative to the sponsor's expected free cash flow, and the correlation of the sponsor's operating risks with the pension plan's assets.

    Portfolio construction can then begin. It should focus on controlling risk both within and between the growth and liability-hedging portfolios. Many successful plans work to diversify growth assets among non-traditional sources of beta and high-alpha-potential investments, an approach that can help them achieve a higher expected return than the typical glidepath approach — with a comparable (or in some cases, lower) level of risk.

    More specifically, hedge funds and active long-only strategies can play a powerful role in the Forgotten 70%'s portfolios. Alpha-focused hedge funds that are less directly correlated with equity market returns can be especially useful for some pension plans. (Of course, stringent due diligence and manager selection are key when evaluating and allocating to hedge funds.)

    In addition, plans with longer time horizons and lower current liquidity needs might benefit from growth-oriented strategies such as private equity, venture capital and opportunistic credit, which can generate returns well in excess of public equities.

    For instance, a defined benefit plan that implements a passive equity and liability hedge approach — as often used by mechanistic glidepaths — might need to have a 50% allocation to low-returning liability hedging assets to balance a 50% allocation to passive equities to stay within its risk tolerance.

    Unfortunately, this strategy might result in returns below a plan sponsor's performance goals, and the return gap could become larger as the sponsor adheres to the typical glidepath over time. For example, for a hypothetical $1 billion plan, the return gap of 150 basis points between a 6% and 7.5% expected return translates into $270 million shortfall over 10 years. This is the pain of the mechanistic glidepath approach, and this gap would have to be covered by increased contributions.

    Using a holistic risk management approach, plans integrate high value-add managers and strategies into their growth portfolio, diversifying directional equity beta exposure and therefore allowing a higher overall allocation to growth assets. Critically, despite higher allocations to growth assets relative to the mechanistic approach, it is possible for resulting allocations to produce higher expected returns with lower expected risk.

    In short, holistic risk management strategies provide additional levers to control surplus risk and generate excess returns. For the 70% of U.S. defined benefit pension plans that are accruing benefits or accepting new participants, it's worth keeping this in mind — and remembering that the one-size-fits-all glidepath approach could be a dangerous cop-out.

    David Druley is the global head of pension practice at Cambridge Associates, based in the Boston office.

    Related Articles
    The coming crunch for pension plans: Derisking despite supply, low-rate issues
    Derisking retirement with a federal longevity agency
    Working toward an integrated pension industry network
    Recommended for You
    YWCA Building in Boston, July 20, 1922.
    YWCA Retirement Fund celebrates 100 years of empowering women through financial security
    A canal path in Huddersfield, West Yorkshire
    West Yorkshire Pension names incoming CIO
    U.K. regulator rejects ACCESS pool's request for authorization; government pushes for merger
    U.K. regulator rejects ACCESS pool's request for authorization; government pushes for merger
    OCIO: A Specialized Landscape
    Sponsored Content: OCIO: A Specialized Landscape
    Sponsored
    White Papers
    The State of Lifetime Income Report
    The Next Wave of LDI Evolution
    Retirement security to future income wins, TIAA brings you the latest financial…
    U.S. Public Funds Top Performers: Q2 2024
    Generative AI Investing: Opportunities at a Key Tech Inflection Point
    Research for Institutional Money Management: Advancing Physical Risk Modelling,…
    View More
    Sponsored Content
    Partner Content
    The Industrialization of ESG Investment
    For institutional investors, ETFs can make meeting liquidity needs easier
    Gold: the most effective commodity investment
    2021 Investment Outlook | Investing Beyond the Pandemic: A Reset for Portfolios
    Ten ways retirement plan professionals add value to plan sponsors
    Gold: an efficient hedge
    View More
    E-MAIL NEWSLETTERS

    Sign up and get the best of News delivered straight to your email inbox, free of charge. Choose your news – we will deliver.

    Subscribe Today
    October 23, 2023 page one

    Get access to the news, research and analysis of events affecting the retirement and institutional money management businesses from a worldwide network of reporters and editors.

    Subscribe
    Connect With Us
    • RSS
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn

    Our Mission

    To consistently deliver news, research and analysis to the executives who manage the flow of funds in the institutional investment market.

    About Us

    Main Office
    685 Third Avenue
    Tenth Floor
    New York, NY 10017-4036

    Chicago Office
    130 E. Randolph St.
    Suite 3200
    Chicago, IL 60601

    Contact Us

    Careers at Crain

    About Pensions & Investments

     

    Advertising
    • Media Kit
    • P&I Custom Content
    • P&I Careers | Post a Job
    • Reprints & Permissions
    Resources
    • Subscribe
    • Newsletters
    • FAQ
    • P&I Research Center
    • Site map
    • Staff Directory
    Legal
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Request
    Pensions & Investments
    Copyright © 1996-2025. Crain Communications, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
    • Topics
      • Alternatives
      • Artificial Intelligence
      • CIOs
      • Consultants
      • Defined Contribution
      • ESG
      • Face to Face
      • Hedge Funds
      • Industry Voices
      • Investing
      • Money Management
      • Partner Content
      • Private Credit
      • Pension Funds
      • Private Equity
      • Real Estate
      • Regulation
      • Special Reports
      • Washington
      • White Papers
    • International
      • U.K.
      • Canada
      • Europe
      • Asia
      • Australia - New Zealand
      • Middle East
      • Latin America
      • Africa
    • Rankings & Awards
      • 1,000 Largest Retirement Plans
      • Top-Performing Managers
      • Largest Money Managers
      • DC Money Managers
      • DC Record Keepers
      • Largest Hedge Fund Managers
      • World's Largest Retirement Funds
      • Best Places to Work in Money Management
      • Excellence & Innovation Awards
      • WPS Innovation Awards
      • Influential Women in Institutional Investing 2024
      • Eddy Awards
    • Resource Guides
      • Active Thematic Global Equities
      • Retirement Income
      • Fixed Income
      • Pension Risk Transfer
      • Pooled Employer Plans (PEPs)
    • ETFs
      • Latest ETF News
      • Fund Screener
      • Education Center
      • Equities
      • Fixed Income
      • Commodities
      • Actively Managed
      • Alternatives
      • ESG Rated
    • ESG
      • Latest ESG News
      • The Institutional Investor’s Guide to ESG Investing
      • ESG Sustainability - Gaining Momentum
      • ESG Investing | Industry Brief
      • Innovation in ESG Investing
      • ESG Rated ETFs
      • Divestment Database
    • Defined Contribution
      • Latest DC News
      • The Plan Sponsor's Guide to Retirement Income
      • DC Money Manager Rankings
      • DC Record Keeper Rankings
      • Innovations in DC
      • DC Plan Design: Improving Participant Outcomes
    • Searches & Hires
      • Latest Searches & Hires News
      • Searches & Hires Database
      • RFPs
    • Research Center
      • The P&I Research Center
      • Earnings Tracker
      • Endowment Returns Tracker
      • Corporate Pension Contribution Tracker
      • Pension Fund Returns Tracker
      • Pension Risk Transfer Database
    • Careers
    • Events
      • View All Conferences
      • View All Webinars
    • Print