Skip to main content
MENU
Subscribe
  • Subscribe
  • Account
  • LOGIN
  • Topics
    • Alternatives
    • Consultants
    • Coronavirus
    • Courts
    • Defined Contribution
    • ESG
    • ETFs
    • Hedge Funds
    • Industry Voices
    • Investing
    • Money Management
    • Opinion
    • Partner Content
    • Pension Funds
    • Private Equity
    • Real Estate
    • Russia-Ukraine War
    • SECURE Act 2.0
    • Special Reports
    • White Papers
  • Rankings & Awards
    • 1,000 Largest Retirement Plans
    • Top-Performing Managers
    • Largest Money Managers
    • DC Money Managers
    • DC Record Keepers
    • Largest Hedge Fund Managers
    • World's Largest Retirement Funds
    • Best Places to Work in Money Management
    • Excellence & Innovation Awards
    • WPS Innovation Awards
    • Eddy Awards
  • ETFs
    • Latest ETF News
    • Fund Screener
    • Education Center
    • Equities
    • Fixed Income
    • Commodities
    • Actively Managed
    • Alternatives
    • ESG Rated
  • ESG
    • Latest ESG News
    • The Institutional Investor’s Guide to ESG Investing
    • ESG Sustainability - Gaining Momentum
    • Climate Change: The Inescapable Opportunity
    • Impact Investing
    • 2022 ESG Investing Conference
    • ESG Rated ETFs
  • Defined Contribution
    • Latest DC News
    • DC Money Manager Rankings
    • DC Record Keeper Rankings
    • Innovations in DC
    • Trends in DC: Focus on Retirement Income
    • 2022 Defined Contribution East Conference
    • 2022 DC Investment Lineup Conference
  • Searches & Hires
    • Latest Searches & Hires News
    • Searches & Hires Database
    • RFPs
  • Performance Data
    • P&I Research Center
    • Earnings Tracker
    • Endowment Returns Tracker
    • Corporate Pension Contribution Tracker
    • Pension Fund Returns Tracker
    • Pension Risk Transfer Database
    • Future of Investments Research Series
    • Charts & Infographics
    • Polls
  • Careers
  • Events
    • View All Conferences
    • View All Webinars
    • 2022 Retirement Income Conference
    • 2022 Managing Pension Risk & Liabilities
    • 2022 WorldPensionSummit
Breadcrumb
  1. Home
  2. INVESTING & PORTFOLIO STRATEGIES
October 22, 2015 01:00 AM

Adapting to the unknown

Aref Karim
  • Tweet
  • Share
  • Share
  • Email
  • More
    Reprints Print
    Aref Karim

    Working with pre-defined rules, systematic investing requires at the outset that we understand a portfolio's sources of risk and reward. To make a process robust and sustainable, a strategy should not depend excessively on market parameters or past price behavior. A degree of freedom is best left to take care of unseen markets or events. Allowing for this will make the strategy more effective in dealing with risks. The problem is that the outcome of this action cannot be quantified from past data. The alternative of buying an expensive hedge to cover all scenarios is not viable either.

    'Average' vs.'tail' risk

    A different perspective on risk can be helpful in getting to a more effective solution to deal with this unknown.

    We believe it is better to separate (i) “average,” or “normalized” risk, from one that is (ii) unpredictable, random and of a “tail” nature. Average risk, to be clear, arises from the normal operation of economic systems leading to changes of asset prices over time. While also used to price the risk premium of an asset, it represents the asset's volatility as demand and supply conditions look to find its fundamental valuation. Put another way, it is the uncertainty premium around the natural process of market adjustments.

    Unpredictable or tail risk, on the other hand, cannot be averaged and therefore is different. It carries an uncertainty premium that is (i) large in magnitude, (ii) infrequent, offering no predictability on the timing, and is (iii) relatively short in duration. It tends to be orthogonal and therefore mutually independent of the factors that ordinarily determine the average risk behind an asset.

    Worth noting is that a tail event can influence the average risk in asset pricing over time, depending on the nature and magnitude of the impact. Tail risk could be seen as the uncertainty around a violent tsunami that leaves in its wake a trail of destruction. The shock is usually unpredictable, short-lived, devastating in impact and random in timing. The global financial crisis of 2008 created havoc and led to the Great Recession, which we are still struggling to get out of.

    Separation of risks

    When crafting a strategy it is therefore worth considering (i) how we use average risk for generating long-term reward; and quite separately (ii) how we deal with tail risk. Separating the actions for each is likely to make the strategy more robust. Mixing them dilutes power and can lead to a loss of skew or profit potential in the strategy.

    In a quantitative model, one can unknowingly penalize overall portfolio returns by overestimating large tail risk compared to lower average risk if both are treated in the same way. It is much like carrying an umbrella whether it be on a bright day or one that is cloudy, just in case it rains. The tail risk event that sees a market plummet unexpectedly is distinctly different from an average lowering of the mean leading to a short trade.

    Fundamentals can result in downward drift in a market, thus taking a position short. This would be the result of an average risk adjustment, not a tail risk event. To deal with a tail is to buy insurance. One assumes there is little or no predictability in the loss from a potential calamity both in magnitude and timing, and yet it is needed. Tail protection is therefore better dealt with in a different way. Directional strategies such as commodity trading advisers and macros often offer optionality in crisis periods, not by design but as an output. However, this crisis alpha is not to be taken for granted. It is hence more effective to bring this insurance into the strategy as a separate part.

    When designing a risk strategy, it pays to allow for a reasonable margin of error. This buffer for being wrong increases the strategy's robustness and makes it less fitted to past conditions. There is less straight-jacketing and more room to maneuver. A narrow margin of error can result in mispricing both tail and average risk. A wider margin of error in setting parameters generally helps in facing new challenges.

    Static vs. dynamic risk allocation

    Risk allocation methodologies for a portfolio generally take two directions: static or dynamic. The static approach relies mainly on individual market timing for returns. The methodology silos risk capital by market. Average risk measure is used to decide on capital allocated to a market and, when desired, market correlations also are considered. With such methodology, long run volatility and correlations are expected to hold and market-timing becomes the driving force for returns. The sum total of the individual market rewards gives the total portfolio alpha and the approach is somewhat linear.

    The second is a dynamic approach. Such an allocation methodology generates alpha from shifting capital between various risk factors. The process has a greater portfolio feel. Such dynamic allocations can adapt to fundamental changes in asset volatility and correlations. They are less dependent on market timing, placing greater emphasis on the portfolio, and carry a wider margin of error. Relative positioning of one market against others in the portfolio drives the alpha rather than market timing.

    While the choice between the two styles is down to individual preference, the dynamic approach is likely more robust. Designed effectively, it not only can avoid dependency on market timing to generate main portfolio returns, but also reduce cost of errors from noise. Using average risk in considering the relationship of one asset with another, the dynamic approach is better equipped to align the portfolio to changing macroeconomic themes. While market direction is not unique to each macro theme, the proportion of the portfolio risk allocated is different and rarely the same. As such, if say a deflationary environment is brought by cyclical low growth and demand, the portfolio positioning can be different from that which comes from supply-side fixes such as those seen from monetary authorities in recent years.

    Conclusion

    In conclusion, a dynamic risk allocation process that is able to separate average risk from tail risk without relying on predictability from past data, is likely to yield more reliable results in the long run. It can be fundamentally intuitive and yet offer the rigor of systematic execution. In this context, the greater the separation of the two risks, the better is the ability of the strategy to perform as environments evolve. Action for dealing with tail risk, in our opinion, is greatly enhanced when brought in orthogonal to the average risk of the portfolio, much like the separate purchase of an insurance. With a wider margin of error, this holistic approach prepares a systematic strategy to gain from most market environments including dealing with those rare but devastating market tsunamis.

    Aref Karim is CEO and chief investment officer of Quality Capital Management Ltd., London.

    Recommended for You
    More funds testing water on crypto-related assets
    More funds testing water on crypto-related assets
    Money managers eager to make leap to opportunity zone investing
    Money managers eager to make leap to opportunity zone investing
    Index investing: Not as passive as you might think
    Index investing: Not as passive as you might think
    Private Markets
    Sponsored Content: Private Markets

    Reader Poll

    August 10, 2022
    SEE MORE POLLS >
    Sponsored
    White Papers
    Gaining Momentum: Where Next for Trend-Following?
    The market opportunity in U.S. residential mortgage-backed securities
    Credit Indices Evolve with Enhanced Data Inputs
    Hedge Funds 2.0: Back to the future
    How Has 2022's Carnage Reshaped Global Stock and Bond Markets?
    Crossroads: Politics, Inflation, & Bonds
    View More
    Sponsored Content
    Partner Content
    The Industrialization of ESG Investment
    For institutional investors, ETFs can make meeting liquidity needs easier
    Gold: the most effective commodity investment
    2021 Investment Outlook | Investing Beyond the Pandemic: A Reset for Portfolios
    Ten ways retirement plan professionals add value to plan sponsors
    Gold: an efficient hedge
    View More
    E-MAIL NEWSLETTERS

    Sign up and get the best of News delivered straight to your email inbox, free of charge. Choose your news – we will deliver.

    Subscribe Today
    August 1, 2022 page one

    Get access to the news, research and analysis of events affecting the retirement and institutional money management businesses from a worldwide network of reporters and editors.

    Subscribe
    Connect With Us
    • RSS
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn

    Our Mission

    To consistently deliver news, research and analysis to the executives who manage the flow of funds in the institutional investment market.

    About Us

    Main Office
    685 Third Avenue
    Tenth Floor
    New York, NY 10017-4036

    Chicago Office
    130 E. Randolph St.
    Suite 3200
    Chicago, IL 60601

    Contact Us

    Careers at Crain

    About Pensions & Investments

     

    Advertising
    • Media Kit
    • P&I Content Solutions
    • P&I Careers | Post a Job
    • Reprints & Permissions
    Resources
    • Subscribe
    • Newsletters
    • FAQ
    • P&I Research Center
    • Site map
    • Staff Directory
    Legal
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Request
    Pensions & Investments
    Copyright © 1996-2022. Crain Communications, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
    • Topics
      • Alternatives
      • Consultants
      • Coronavirus
      • Courts
      • Defined Contribution
      • ESG
      • ETFs
      • Hedge Funds
      • Industry Voices
      • Investing
      • Money Management
      • Opinion
      • Partner Content
      • Pension Funds
      • Private Equity
      • Real Estate
      • Russia-Ukraine War
      • SECURE Act 2.0
      • Special Reports
      • White Papers
    • Rankings & Awards
      • 1,000 Largest Retirement Plans
      • Top-Performing Managers
      • Largest Money Managers
      • DC Money Managers
      • DC Record Keepers
      • Largest Hedge Fund Managers
      • World's Largest Retirement Funds
      • Best Places to Work in Money Management
      • Excellence & Innovation Awards
      • WPS Innovation Awards
      • Eddy Awards
    • ETFs
      • Latest ETF News
      • Fund Screener
      • Education Center
      • Equities
      • Fixed Income
      • Commodities
      • Actively Managed
      • Alternatives
      • ESG Rated
    • ESG
      • Latest ESG News
      • The Institutional Investor’s Guide to ESG Investing
      • ESG Sustainability - Gaining Momentum
      • Climate Change: The Inescapable Opportunity
      • Impact Investing
      • 2022 ESG Investing Conference
      • ESG Rated ETFs
    • Defined Contribution
      • Latest DC News
      • DC Money Manager Rankings
      • DC Record Keeper Rankings
      • Innovations in DC
      • Trends in DC: Focus on Retirement Income
      • 2022 Defined Contribution East Conference
      • 2022 DC Investment Lineup Conference
    • Searches & Hires
      • Latest Searches & Hires News
      • Searches & Hires Database
      • RFPs
    • Performance Data
      • P&I Research Center
      • Earnings Tracker
      • Endowment Returns Tracker
      • Corporate Pension Contribution Tracker
      • Pension Fund Returns Tracker
      • Pension Risk Transfer Database
      • Future of Investments Research Series
      • Charts & Infographics
      • Polls
    • Careers
    • Events
      • View All Conferences
      • View All Webinars
      • 2022 Retirement Income Conference
      • 2022 Managing Pension Risk & Liabilities
      • 2022 WorldPensionSummit