Skip to main content
MENU
Subscribe
  • Sign Up Free
  • LOGIN
  • Subscribe
  • Topics
    • Alternatives
    • Consultants
    • Coronavirus
    • Courts
    • Defined Contribution
    • ESG
    • ETFs
    • Face to Face
    • Hedge Funds
    • Industry Voices
    • Investing
    • Money Management
    • Opinion
    • Partner Content
    • Pension Funds
    • Private Equity
    • Real Estate
    • Russia-Ukraine War
    • SECURE 2.0
    • Special Reports
    • White Papers
  • Rankings & Awards
    • 1,000 Largest Retirement Plans
    • Top-Performing Managers
    • Largest Money Managers
    • DC Money Managers
    • DC Record Keepers
    • Largest Hedge Fund Managers
    • World's Largest Retirement Funds
    • Best Places to Work in Money Management
    • Excellence & Innovation Awards
    • WPS Innovation Awards
    • Eddy Awards
  • ETFs
    • Latest ETF News
    • Fund Screener
    • Education Center
    • Equities
    • Fixed Income
    • Commodities
    • Actively Managed
    • Alternatives
    • ESG Rated
  • ESG
    • Latest ESG News
    • The Institutional Investor’s Guide to ESG Investing
    • ESG Sustainability - Gaining Momentum
    • ESG Investing | Industry Brief
    • Innovation in ESG Investing
    • 2023 ESG Investing Conference
    • ESG Rated ETFs
  • Defined Contribution
    • Latest DC News
    • DC Money Manager Rankings
    • DC Record Keeper Rankings
    • Innovations in DC
    • Trends in DC: Focus on Retirement Income
    • 2023 Defined Contribution East Conference
  • Searches & Hires
    • Latest Searches & Hires News
    • Searches & Hires Database
    • RFPs
  • Research Center
    • The P&I Research Center
    • Earnings Tracker
    • Endowment Returns Tracker
    • Corporate Pension Contribution Tracker
    • Pension Fund Returns Tracker
    • Pension Risk Transfer Database
  • Careers
  • Events
    • View All Conferences
    • View All Webinars
    • 2023 ESG Investing
    • 2023 Private Markets
Breadcrumb
  1. Home
  2. DEFINED BENEFIT
July 01, 2015 01:00 AM

It's time to bust the myth that assumptions drive pension costs

Brian M. Septon, Terry Group
  • Tweet
  • Share
  • Share
  • Email
  • More
    Reprints Print
    Brian M. Septon is a principal at The Terry Group, Chicago.

    There’s a lot of talk these days about public pension plans, the size of their unfunded liabilities and the level of their costs. It’s appropriate that policymakers and policy influencers focus their attention on, “What to do?”

    But when these conversations turn to actuarial assumptions, you can bet there’s something amiss. The woefully misguided — and dangerous — idea that assumptions drive costs leads decision-makers down a perilous path. Cost management is not achieved by “managing” actuarial assumptions.

    Costs are determined by what actually happens, not by what we assume or predict will happen.

    Assumptions don’t drive pension costs

    That assumptions don’t drive pension costs goes against everything we’ve always thought, right?

    Here’s the truth. The cost of a pension plan, paid by making contributions over time, is a function of the pensions paid out and of the investment earnings of the fund. Period. Costs are not a function of assumptions.

    Real management of a pension plan involves setting the level of pensions and deciding how to invest the assets. The cost of the plan — again, paid by making contributions over time — is unaffected by assumptions. It is simply the sum total of the pension payments to plan members, offset by the pension fund’s investment earnings.

    What does drive pension costs?

    Raising or lowering the formula used to determine employees' pensions does drive costs. And, how long those pensions are paid also drives costs — so actual longevity matters.

    But, here’s a trap. The recent mortality tables from the Society of Actuaries, reflecting significantly improved life expectancy, provoked this typical response: “The new tables will increase plan costs — perhaps by as much as 8%.”

    That is, of course, not true. Because people in real life are living longer, pension costs already have increased. The new tables simply recognize that fact. Plans using “old” mortality assumptions that do not take into account recent improvements in mortality or projections of further improvements in the future are generally underestimating what recent research and wisdom tell us about life expectancy and trends in improving life expectancy.

    The point is this: Assumptions don’t drive costs. Reality drives costs.

    The same is true for investment returns. Pension costs are affected by the actual investment earnings on assets in pension funds, not by what we assume the earnings will be. Higher actual investment earnings means smaller contributions are necessary. However, merely assuming a higher investment return does not, unfortunately, translate to smaller contributions.

    By the way, a stricter view of “cost” is that the cost of pensions is determined when the pensions are earned and does not change as investment earnings materialize. Any reduction or increase in contributions due to investment earnings comes from the risk/rewards of investing in a particular asset portfolio, not from the cost of the pension promise.

    So, then actuarial assumptions don’t matter?

    Well, of course they matter. But let’s be very clear about where they matter and where they don’t. Too often, discussions about how to deal with significant unfunded liabilities or about how to maintain a sustainable level of cost steer toward the topic of actuarial assumptions.

    Although assumptions don’t drive costs, they do absolutely affect the allocation of that cost over time — the pattern of contributions through the years. This is an important distinction, one that too often clouds the discussion of important issues such as how to achieve a sustainable level of costs.

    The whole topic of accelerating costs vs. deferring costs is a topic for another day. For now, let’s just say that an unaffordable plan doesn’t become more affordable just because you change assumptions in order to defer contributions.

    Summary

    How can pension costs be reduced? How should pension costs be managed?

    The only ways to cure an underfunded situation are to contribute more, earn more or reduce pension payouts. And, we all know (we hope!) that earning your way out of an underfunded situation involves risk. It’s a crapshoot. And you certainly can’t earn your way out merely by managing the actuarial assumptions. That’s a failed strategy.

    Over-attention to assumptions can lead — and has led — to bad decision-making. If we pay too much attention to assumptions, we’ll overlook what’s really driving costs and what can put a troubled pension plan back onto a path toward sustainability.

    Let's be clear on what we’re talking about in order to move forward toward responsible management of public pensions. It’s important to use good actuarial assumptions, but “managing assumptions” as a means of managing true pension costs just doesn’t work. Let's make sure we listen with a discerning ear so we don't confuse the two.

    Brian M. Septon is a principal at The Terry Group, Chicago.

    Related Articles
    Taking a wide-angle view of the outsourced CIO
    Solutions to the pension crisis
    Estimating future costs at public pension plans: Setting the discount rate
    Recommended for You
    R.I. treasurer seeks transparency laws for church plans
    R.I. treasurer seeks transparency laws for church plans
    Public pension funds adopt cost-sharing mechanisms to stem volatility
    Public pension funds adopt cost-sharing mechanisms to stem volatility
    Avery Dennison to terminate U.S. pension plan
    Avery Dennison to terminate U.S. pension plan
    The Plan Sponsor's Guide to Pension Risk Transfer
    Sponsored Content: The Plan Sponsor's Guide to Pension Risk Transfer

    Reader Poll

    March 22, 2023
    SEE MORE POLLS >
    Sponsored
    White Papers
    The Need for Speed in Trend-Following Strategies
    Global Fixed Income: Volatility and Uncertainty Here to Stay
    Morningstar Indexes' Annual ESG Risk/Return Analysis
    2023 Outlook: The Top Five Trends to Monitor in the Year Ahead
    Show Me the Income: Discovering plan sponsor and participant preferences for cr…
    The Future of Infrastructure: Building a Better Tomorrow
    View More
    Sponsored Content
    Partner Content
    The Industrialization of ESG Investment
    For institutional investors, ETFs can make meeting liquidity needs easier
    Gold: the most effective commodity investment
    2021 Investment Outlook | Investing Beyond the Pandemic: A Reset for Portfolios
    Ten ways retirement plan professionals add value to plan sponsors
    Gold: an efficient hedge
    View More
    E-MAIL NEWSLETTERS

    Sign up and get the best of News delivered straight to your email inbox, free of charge. Choose your news – we will deliver.

    Subscribe Today
    December 12, 2022 page one

    Get access to the news, research and analysis of events affecting the retirement and institutional money management businesses from a worldwide network of reporters and editors.

    Subscribe
    Connect With Us
    • RSS
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn

    Our Mission

    To consistently deliver news, research and analysis to the executives who manage the flow of funds in the institutional investment market.

    About Us

    Main Office
    685 Third Avenue
    Tenth Floor
    New York, NY 10017-4036

    Chicago Office
    130 E. Randolph St.
    Suite 3200
    Chicago, IL 60601

    Contact Us

    Careers at Crain

    About Pensions & Investments

     

    Advertising
    • Media Kit
    • P&I Content Solutions
    • P&I Careers | Post a Job
    • Reprints & Permissions
    Resources
    • Subscribe
    • Newsletters
    • FAQ
    • P&I Research Center
    • Site map
    • Staff Directory
    Legal
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Request
    Pensions & Investments
    Copyright © 1996-2023. Crain Communications, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
    • Topics
      • Alternatives
      • Consultants
      • Coronavirus
      • Courts
      • Defined Contribution
      • ESG
      • ETFs
      • Face to Face
      • Hedge Funds
      • Industry Voices
      • Investing
      • Money Management
      • Opinion
      • Partner Content
      • Pension Funds
      • Private Equity
      • Real Estate
      • Russia-Ukraine War
      • SECURE 2.0
      • Special Reports
      • White Papers
    • Rankings & Awards
      • 1,000 Largest Retirement Plans
      • Top-Performing Managers
      • Largest Money Managers
      • DC Money Managers
      • DC Record Keepers
      • Largest Hedge Fund Managers
      • World's Largest Retirement Funds
      • Best Places to Work in Money Management
      • Excellence & Innovation Awards
      • WPS Innovation Awards
      • Eddy Awards
    • ETFs
      • Latest ETF News
      • Fund Screener
      • Education Center
      • Equities
      • Fixed Income
      • Commodities
      • Actively Managed
      • Alternatives
      • ESG Rated
    • ESG
      • Latest ESG News
      • The Institutional Investor’s Guide to ESG Investing
      • ESG Sustainability - Gaining Momentum
      • ESG Investing | Industry Brief
      • Innovation in ESG Investing
      • 2023 ESG Investing Conference
      • ESG Rated ETFs
    • Defined Contribution
      • Latest DC News
      • DC Money Manager Rankings
      • DC Record Keeper Rankings
      • Innovations in DC
      • Trends in DC: Focus on Retirement Income
      • 2023 Defined Contribution East Conference
    • Searches & Hires
      • Latest Searches & Hires News
      • Searches & Hires Database
      • RFPs
    • Research Center
      • The P&I Research Center
      • Earnings Tracker
      • Endowment Returns Tracker
      • Corporate Pension Contribution Tracker
      • Pension Fund Returns Tracker
      • Pension Risk Transfer Database
    • Careers
    • Events
      • View All Conferences
      • View All Webinars
      • 2023 ESG Investing
      • 2023 Private Markets