Skip to main content
MENU
Subscribe
  • Sign Up Free
  • LOGIN
  • Subscribe
  • Topics
    • Alternatives
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Consultants
    • Defined Contribution
    • ESG
    • ETFs
    • Face to Face
    • Hedge Funds
    • Industry Voices
    • Investing
    • Money Management
    • Partner Content
    • Pension Funds
    • Private Equity
    • Real Estate
    • Regulation
    • SECURE 2.0
    • Special Reports
    • Washington
    • White Papers
  • Rankings & Awards
    • 1,000 Largest Retirement Plans
    • Top-Performing Managers
    • Largest Money Managers
    • DC Money Managers
    • DC Record Keepers
    • Largest Hedge Fund Managers
    • World's Largest Retirement Funds
    • Best Places to Work in Money Management
    • Excellence & Innovation Awards
    • WPS Innovation Awards
    • Influential Women in Institutional Investing 2023
    • Eddy Awards
  • ETFs
    • Latest ETF News
    • Fund Screener
    • Education Center
    • Equities
    • Fixed Income
    • Commodities
    • Actively Managed
    • Alternatives
    • ESG Rated
  • ESG
    • Latest ESG News
    • The Institutional Investor’s Guide to ESG Investing
    • ESG Sustainability - Gaining Momentum
    • ESG Investing | Industry Brief
    • Innovation in ESG Investing
    • 2023 ESG Investing Conference
    • ESG Rated ETFs
    • Divestment Database
  • Defined Contribution
    • Latest DC News
    • The Plan Sponsor's Guide to Retirement Income
    • DC Money Manager Rankings
    • DC Record Keeper Rankings
    • Innovations in DC
    • DC Plan Design: Improving Participant Outcomes
    • 2023 Defined Contribution East Conference
  • Searches & Hires
    • Latest Searches & Hires News
    • Searches & Hires Database
    • RFPs
  • Research Center
    • The P&I Research Center
    • Earnings Tracker
    • Endowment Returns Tracker
    • Corporate Pension Contribution Tracker
    • Pension Fund Returns Tracker
    • Pension Risk Transfer Database
  • Careers
  • Events
    • View All Conferences
    • View All Webinars
  • Print
Breadcrumb
  1. Home
  2. REGULATION AND LEGISLATION
October 27, 2014 01:00 AM

The market is ready for proxy access

Adopting a rule would enhance accountability and performance

Matt Orsagh
  • Tweet
  • Share
  • Share
  • Email
  • More
    CFA Institute
    Matt Orsagh is the New York-based director of capital markets policy, CFA Institute, Charlottesville, Va.

    It is time for the Securities and Exchange Commission to propose proxy access again.

    Since the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in 2011 invalidated the proxy access rule the SEC adopted, neither the SEC nor anyone else has addressed the questions raised in the decision.

    In the intervening years, proxy access has moved to the back burner of the agenda for both the SEC, which did not appeal the ruling, and those in the corporate governance community who had once championed proxy access.

    However, evidence has piled up in support of proxy access in the U.S., calling into question whether it is time for the SEC to repropose the rule. The evidence includes:



    • the equity markets like proxy access;

    • proxy access increases board accountability;

    • abuse by special interest groups difficult and highly unlikely; and

    • the kind of ex-ante cost-benefit analysis the court asked for is nearly impossible.

    The SEC's rule the court struck down would have given a shareowner or group of shareholders who held 3% of a company's shares for three years access to corporate proxy materials to place a limited number of nominees on the corporate proxy ballot.

    In striking down the rule, the court stated that the SEC had failed to adequately assess the economic costs of the proposed rule.

    Markets in the U.S. favor proxy access, as was shown in the aftermath of the court's decision.

    A number of studies came about due to the passing of the rule in 2010 and the subsequent overturning, assessing the impact of the event on the value of a company. A majority of these studies showed that shares of companies that would have benefited from proxy access (those with poor-performing boards) generally gained when the markets were surprised by news that looked like proxy access was coming, and declined when the court shot down proxy access.

    It is self-evident that proxy access would increase board accountability.

    If shareowners have the ability to add their own members if they feel a board is performing poorly, boards are going to ensure that they serve the interests of shareowners. There is a current debate in the corporate governance world about what exactly the ideal level of turnover on corporate boards should be. Since the financial crisis, board turnover has slowed and boards have become more entrenched. An article last April in the Harvard Business Review, “How Much Board Turnover Is Best,” found that boards that replace board members at a greater rate — generally around one new board member a year on average — outperform their peers.

    The argument that proxy access would be used for narrow reasons by special interest groups rings hollow.

    In non-U.S. markets that have some form of proxy access, such a shareholder nomination process is rarely used. Further, getting a nominee on the corporate ballot is the easy part. The nominating party still needs to persuade other shareowners, more than 50%, that the nominee's ideas are better than those of the current board members. The proposed SEC rule would have allowed nominating shareowners to nominate board members who could at most represent only 25% of the board. This is hardly a recipe for revolution when you consider that the largest pension funds — the ones most likely to use proxy access given their long-term investment horizons — hardly ever own 3% of any company.

    It is unlikely that corporate raiders or quick-buck activist investors will abuse proxy access. It wasn't made for them. Few corporate raiders will wait the three years required by the proposed SEC rule to gain only at maximum 25% of the board seats. They would typically prefer to run their own slate of directors in a full-fledged proxy contest, which is done outside corporate proxy materials, to quickly change company boards.

    Finally, the kind of ex-ante or forecast in advance of the outcome cost-benefit analysis the court asked for was relatively impossible for the SEC to provide. The “commission inconsistently and opportunistically framed the costs and benefits of the rule, failed adequately to quantify the certain costs or to explain why those costs could not be quantified,” the ruling states.

    Too few examples of proxy access usage exist to draw meaningful conclusions, and costs related to a full proxy contest in which an investor wishes to replace an entire board offer a poor analogue. It took the court striking down proxy access to provide a “surprise” to the market that enabled studies proving that market participants think proxy access is beneficial. However, passing laws and then striking them down to surprise the market and see how it reacts is a poor way to legislate and regulate.


    The great promise of proxy access is that it will hardly ever be used. That may sound counterintuitive, but we can already see what a world with proxy access would look like in the U.S. market when we observe what has happened in recent years due to annual say-on-pay votes and majority voting for directors.

    The threat of negative votes on say on pay — or non-binding shareholder voting on the pay of the CEO and other top executives — and majority voting on director elections — requiring nominees to achieve a majority of the shareholder vote to win election to the board — has driven companies and their boards to increasingly engage with institutional investors.

    No matter the cause, increased engagement between investors and companies and their boards is a positive development. Such increased engagement has led to more dialogue about investor concerns and in recent years has led to record levels of resolution withdrawals, signaling greater bargaining and compromise between both parties. According to “Proxy Voting Analytics,“ a joint report released in September by the U.S. Conference Board and FactSet Research Systems Inc., shareowners withdrew about 12% of their annual shareholder meeting proposals in the 2014 proxy season. An earlier report from Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. showed that in 2012 and 2013, record levels of such withdrawals were more than 25% each year.

    A proxy access rule in the U.S. is a tool that will increase board accountability, will encourage better performance at poorly governed companies and will drive more engagement between long-term shareowners and companies.

    The structure of the rule itself and the need to gain 50% support for nominees will keep the rule from being hijacked by those with interests that are only narrow and short term.

    Access to the corporate proxy is something taken for granted in most developed markets. The United States is an outlier by not allowing shareowners to place their nominees on the annual corporate proxy. That can change if the SEC again proposes proxy access.


    Matt Orsagh is the New York-based director of capital markets policy, CFA Institute, Charlottesville, Va.

    Related Articles
    We're all activists now: unlocking the stewardship potential of investors
    Former SEC chairman calls agency's proxy guidance a 'positive first step'
    Pay way up, stock way down
    Recommended for You
    Investors hail SEC guidelines on exchanges
    Investors hail SEC guidelines on exchanges
    Standards-of-conduct rules approved along party lines
    Standards-of-conduct rules approved along party lines
    SEC passes Reg BI package by 3-1 vote
    SEC passes Reg BI package by 3-1 vote
    Sustainability Strategies: Evolving Perspectives
    Sponsored Content: Sustainability Strategies: Evolving Perspectives
    Sponsored
    White Papers
    A Guide to Home Equity Investments: The Untapped Real Estate Asset Class
    Modernize your K-12 retirement plan with vendor consolidation
    Q4 2023 Credit Outlook: Price Is What You Pay, Value Is What You Get
    There's More Than One Way to Be a Climate Investor
    Exploring the Commercial Application of Artificial Intelligence
    Private Credit Insights: Every Problem Is an Opportunity in Disguise
    View More
    Sponsored Content
    Partner Content
    The Industrialization of ESG Investment
    For institutional investors, ETFs can make meeting liquidity needs easier
    Gold: the most effective commodity investment
    2021 Investment Outlook | Investing Beyond the Pandemic: A Reset for Portfolios
    Ten ways retirement plan professionals add value to plan sponsors
    Gold: an efficient hedge
    View More
    E-MAIL NEWSLETTERS

    Sign up and get the best of News delivered straight to your email inbox, free of charge. Choose your news – we will deliver.

    Subscribe Today
    October 23, 2023 page one

    Get access to the news, research and analysis of events affecting the retirement and institutional money management businesses from a worldwide network of reporters and editors.

    Subscribe
    Connect With Us
    • RSS
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn

    Our Mission

    To consistently deliver news, research and analysis to the executives who manage the flow of funds in the institutional investment market.

    About Us

    Main Office
    685 Third Avenue
    Tenth Floor
    New York, NY 10017-4036

    Chicago Office
    130 E. Randolph St.
    Suite 3200
    Chicago, IL 60601

    Contact Us

    Careers at Crain

    About Pensions & Investments

     

    Advertising
    • Media Kit
    • P&I Custom Content
    • P&I Careers | Post a Job
    • Reprints & Permissions
    Resources
    • Subscribe
    • Newsletters
    • FAQ
    • P&I Research Center
    • Site map
    • Staff Directory
    Legal
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Request
    Pensions & Investments
    Copyright © 1996-2023. Crain Communications, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
    • Topics
      • Alternatives
      • Artificial Intelligence
      • Consultants
      • Defined Contribution
      • ESG
      • ETFs
      • Face to Face
      • Hedge Funds
      • Industry Voices
      • Investing
      • Money Management
      • Partner Content
      • Pension Funds
      • Private Equity
      • Real Estate
      • Regulation
      • SECURE 2.0
      • Special Reports
      • Washington
      • White Papers
    • Rankings & Awards
      • 1,000 Largest Retirement Plans
      • Top-Performing Managers
      • Largest Money Managers
      • DC Money Managers
      • DC Record Keepers
      • Largest Hedge Fund Managers
      • World's Largest Retirement Funds
      • Best Places to Work in Money Management
      • Excellence & Innovation Awards
      • WPS Innovation Awards
      • Influential Women in Institutional Investing 2023
      • Eddy Awards
    • ETFs
      • Latest ETF News
      • Fund Screener
      • Education Center
      • Equities
      • Fixed Income
      • Commodities
      • Actively Managed
      • Alternatives
      • ESG Rated
    • ESG
      • Latest ESG News
      • The Institutional Investor’s Guide to ESG Investing
      • ESG Sustainability - Gaining Momentum
      • ESG Investing | Industry Brief
      • Innovation in ESG Investing
      • 2023 ESG Investing Conference
      • ESG Rated ETFs
      • Divestment Database
    • Defined Contribution
      • Latest DC News
      • The Plan Sponsor's Guide to Retirement Income
      • DC Money Manager Rankings
      • DC Record Keeper Rankings
      • Innovations in DC
      • DC Plan Design: Improving Participant Outcomes
      • 2023 Defined Contribution East Conference
    • Searches & Hires
      • Latest Searches & Hires News
      • Searches & Hires Database
      • RFPs
    • Research Center
      • The P&I Research Center
      • Earnings Tracker
      • Endowment Returns Tracker
      • Corporate Pension Contribution Tracker
      • Pension Fund Returns Tracker
      • Pension Risk Transfer Database
    • Careers
    • Events
      • View All Conferences
      • View All Webinars
    • Print