Skip to main content
MENU
Subscribe
  • Sign Up Free
  • LOGIN
  • Subscribe
  • Topics
    • Alternatives
    • Consultants
    • Coronavirus
    • Courts
    • Defined Contribution
    • ESG
    • ETFs
    • Face to Face
    • Hedge Funds
    • Industry Voices
    • Investing
    • Money Management
    • Opinion
    • Partner Content
    • Pension Funds
    • Private Equity
    • Real Estate
    • Russia-Ukraine War
    • SECURE 2.0
    • Special Reports
    • White Papers
  • Rankings & Awards
    • 1,000 Largest Retirement Plans
    • Top-Performing Managers
    • Largest Money Managers
    • DC Money Managers
    • DC Record Keepers
    • Largest Hedge Fund Managers
    • World's Largest Retirement Funds
    • Best Places to Work in Money Management
    • Excellence & Innovation Awards
    • WPS Innovation Awards
    • Eddy Awards
  • ETFs
    • Latest ETF News
    • Fund Screener
    • Education Center
    • Equities
    • Fixed Income
    • Commodities
    • Actively Managed
    • Alternatives
    • ESG Rated
  • ESG
    • Latest ESG News
    • The Institutional Investor’s Guide to ESG Investing
    • ESG Sustainability - Gaining Momentum
    • Climate Change: The Inescapable Opportunity
    • Impact Investing
    • 2022 ESG Investing Conference
    • ESG Rated ETFs
  • Defined Contribution
    • Latest DC News
    • DC Money Manager Rankings
    • DC Record Keeper Rankings
    • Innovations in DC
    • Trends in DC: Focus on Retirement Income
    • 2022 Defined Contribution East Conference
    • 2022 DC Investment Lineup Conference
  • Searches & Hires
    • Latest Searches & Hires News
    • Searches & Hires Database
    • RFPs
  • Performance Data
    • P&I Research Center
    • Earnings Tracker
    • Endowment Returns Tracker
    • Corporate Pension Contribution Tracker
    • Pension Fund Returns Tracker
    • Pension Risk Transfer Database
    • Future of Investments Research Series
    • Charts & Infographics
    • Polls
  • Careers
  • Events
    • View All Conferences
    • View All Webinars
    • 2023 Defined Contribution East
    • 2023 ESG Investing
Breadcrumb
  1. Home
  2. MONEY MANAGEMENT
November 12, 2012 12:00 AM

Avoiding the money-market crisis

Larry Harris
  • Tweet
  • Share
  • Share
  • Email
  • More
    Reprints Print

    he next financial crisis in America probably will involve a large run on our money market funds, which now hold $2.6 trillion in assets. Regulators are well aware of the potential problem, but little has been done about it.

    Runs have occurred before. Shareholders ran from the $62 billon Reserve Primary Fund when Lehman Brothers went into Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in September 2008. Investors withdrew their money when they realized that the fund's net asset value would drop below $1. The run occurred because the first investors out expected to receive more for their shares than later investors would receive.

    To stop the run — and the potential for runs on other money market funds — the Department of the Treasury used the Exchange Stabilization Fund to temporarily guarantee the $1 share price for more than the then-$3 trillion in money market shares. The federal government indicated that it would never do this again, and in October 2008, Congress prohibited the use of this fund for this purpose.

    Such assurances are not credible given the size and importance of money market funds in our economy. In the midst of a crisis that seriously threatens financial stability, the Treasury, Federal Reserve, or even Congress might find other ways to intervene.

    The next run may occur when one or more banks fall if the European credit crisis escalates, as many observers believe likely. As of the end of August, 26.2% of assets of the top 10 U.S. prime money market funds were invested in debt issued by European banks.

    In 2010, the Securities and Exchange Commission required that the average maturity of money market fund investments be reduced and that the fraction of the portfolio invested in liquid assets be increased. These changes hardly address the problem: securities issued by failing firms drop in value regardless of how soon they mature.

    Someone must lose when securities held by money market funds depreciate. Any solution to the run problem must explicitly identify who will bear this risk.

    Money market fund investors now bear it. If the net asset value of a fund's portfolio drops below 99.5 cents per share, current regulations require that the fund must price redemptions at the actual NAV, and not at the normal $1 stable value. Expectations of these losses cause runs.

    Faced with investment losses, some investment managers that sponsor money market mutual funds have made payments to their funds to avoid “breaking the buck.” These payments prevented runs, but future payments are not guaranteed. Indeed, managers are least likely to make these payments when they are most needed.

    Two potential solutions to the run problem would require that managers guarantee the performance of their money market funds, or that the funds purchase third-party insurance to provide these guarantees. Both solutions remove the investment underperformance risk from shareholders and place it on other entities. Both would be costly to shareholders.

    Another solution would be to reorganize the funds so that they have two classes of shareholders. Most investors would obtain a guaranteed investment that performs exactly as money market mutual funds are expected to perform. The “equity” investors would bear all the risk of loss should the value of the fund investments drop during extraordinary times. For bearing this risk, they would receive a slightly higher rate of return during normal times, which would be funded by lower returns paid to the other investors. The equity investors thus would insure the other investors. Money market funds also could only invest in Treasury securities or federally insured securities. This restriction also would decrease fund returns.

    Lowering risk without lowering returns is impossible unless the government guarantees performance, which is unacceptable.

    Another solution would have money market fund investors explicitly bear the risk of underperformance by pricing deposits and redemptions at actual NAV every day. This floating NAV solution would allow the fund investors to bear more risk and thus obtain higher returns.

    Finally, money market funds could prevent their investors from redeeming all their shares during a crisis. The money held back would be used to ensure that every investor shares equally in any liquidation of fund assets, which would significantly limit runs.


    The SEC is exploring various combinations of the above solutions. The mutual fund industry believes that many of these changes would alienate investors. Much of its concern has focused on floating NAV and on holdbacks.

    Floating NAV is unattractive to investors because it changes the character of the funds. Instead of being stable value funds that operate like bank deposit accounts, the funds would be similar to equity mutual funds with NAVs that vary over time. Varying NAVs would make cash management confusing and would significantly complicate tax accounting for investors, outside of 401(k) plans and other tax-sheltered investment vehicles.

    Holdbacks are unattractive because nobody wants access to their funds to be restricted. However, some kind of holdback feature is necessary to prevent runs if shareholders are to bear the underperformance risk, and if the funds are to be stable priced at $1.

    Fortunately, a better solution exists. SEC regulations presently permit two types of mutual funds: Most equity and bond funds price deposits and redemptions daily at NAVs that reflect their current portfolio values. These funds also pay annual or quarterly dividends to shareholders of record as of a particular date, regardless of how long they have held their shares. In contrast, money market funds price deposits and redemptions at a stable $1 (if the NAV is within 0.5% of $1), and they pay dividends monthly based on the average assets in each account during the month.

    Between these two structures lies another one: Require money market funds to price deposits and redemptions internally at actual NAV, but allow them to report these transactions externally (and for tax purposes) at a stable $1 per share, and reconcile any differences when the fund pays dividends at the end of the month. For example, if a redemption occurred when NAV was less than $1, the transaction would be reported at $1 and the difference would be subtracted from the dividends paid to the investor at the end of the month, and if necessary, in future months, too. Finally, if a shareholder requested full account liquidation, the liquidation — which in a crisis might be delayed a few days — would include an adjustment to reflect the actual account value.

    During normal times, the external stable value accounting would make these accounts look exactly like deposit accounts. During extraordinary times, the internal NAV accounting would substantially reduce the incentives to run on the fund. With this proposal, everyone gets what they want.

    Any of these solutions could effectively solve the run problem. The SEC would be wise to allow funds to choose, and fully disclose, any alternative. Investors then could choose the fund structure that most appeals to them. The unacceptable alternative is the status quo: The Federal Reserve — and indirectly American taxpayers — should not bear the risk of money market fund investment failures.


    Larry Harris holds the Fred V. Keenan Chair in Finance at the USC Marshall School of Business. He served as chief economist of the SEC from 2002 to 2004.

    Recommended for You
    smits_hanneke_head-main_i.jpg
    BNY Mellon's Hanneke Smits named to lead 30% Club
    ONLINE_190229936_AR_0_KSSBNLZZEYFR.jpg
    MetLife Investment Management feathers private credit nest with Raven acquisition
    lynch_stephanie_2018_head-main_i.jpg
    Global Endowment Management elevates co-founder to managing partner
    The Institutional Investor's Guide to ESG Investing
    Sponsored Content: The Institutional Investor's Guide to ESG Investing

    Reader Poll

    January 25, 2023
    SEE MORE POLLS >
    Sponsored
    White Papers
    Show Me the Income: Discovering plan sponsor and participant preferences for cr…
    Morningstar Indexes' Annual ESG Risk/Return Analysis
    The Future of Infrastructure: Building a Better Tomorrow
    Outlook 2023: Opportunity in a volatile world
    Research for Institutional Money Management
    View More
    Sponsored Content
    Partner Content
    The Industrialization of ESG Investment
    For institutional investors, ETFs can make meeting liquidity needs easier
    Gold: the most effective commodity investment
    2021 Investment Outlook | Investing Beyond the Pandemic: A Reset for Portfolios
    Ten ways retirement plan professionals add value to plan sponsors
    Gold: an efficient hedge
    View More
    E-MAIL NEWSLETTERS

    Sign up and get the best of News delivered straight to your email inbox, free of charge. Choose your news – we will deliver.

    Subscribe Today
    December 12, 2022 page one

    Get access to the news, research and analysis of events affecting the retirement and institutional money management businesses from a worldwide network of reporters and editors.

    Subscribe
    Connect With Us
    • RSS
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn

    Our Mission

    To consistently deliver news, research and analysis to the executives who manage the flow of funds in the institutional investment market.

    About Us

    Main Office
    685 Third Avenue
    Tenth Floor
    New York, NY 10017-4036

    Chicago Office
    130 E. Randolph St.
    Suite 3200
    Chicago, IL 60601

    Contact Us

    Careers at Crain

    About Pensions & Investments

     

    Advertising
    • Media Kit
    • P&I Content Solutions
    • P&I Careers | Post a Job
    • Reprints & Permissions
    Resources
    • Subscribe
    • Newsletters
    • FAQ
    • P&I Research Center
    • Site map
    • Staff Directory
    Legal
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Request
    Pensions & Investments
    Copyright © 1996-2023. Crain Communications, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
    • Topics
      • Alternatives
      • Consultants
      • Coronavirus
      • Courts
      • Defined Contribution
      • ESG
      • ETFs
      • Face to Face
      • Hedge Funds
      • Industry Voices
      • Investing
      • Money Management
      • Opinion
      • Partner Content
      • Pension Funds
      • Private Equity
      • Real Estate
      • Russia-Ukraine War
      • SECURE 2.0
      • Special Reports
      • White Papers
    • Rankings & Awards
      • 1,000 Largest Retirement Plans
      • Top-Performing Managers
      • Largest Money Managers
      • DC Money Managers
      • DC Record Keepers
      • Largest Hedge Fund Managers
      • World's Largest Retirement Funds
      • Best Places to Work in Money Management
      • Excellence & Innovation Awards
      • WPS Innovation Awards
      • Eddy Awards
    • ETFs
      • Latest ETF News
      • Fund Screener
      • Education Center
      • Equities
      • Fixed Income
      • Commodities
      • Actively Managed
      • Alternatives
      • ESG Rated
    • ESG
      • Latest ESG News
      • The Institutional Investor’s Guide to ESG Investing
      • ESG Sustainability - Gaining Momentum
      • Climate Change: The Inescapable Opportunity
      • Impact Investing
      • 2022 ESG Investing Conference
      • ESG Rated ETFs
    • Defined Contribution
      • Latest DC News
      • DC Money Manager Rankings
      • DC Record Keeper Rankings
      • Innovations in DC
      • Trends in DC: Focus on Retirement Income
      • 2022 Defined Contribution East Conference
      • 2022 DC Investment Lineup Conference
    • Searches & Hires
      • Latest Searches & Hires News
      • Searches & Hires Database
      • RFPs
    • Performance Data
      • P&I Research Center
      • Earnings Tracker
      • Endowment Returns Tracker
      • Corporate Pension Contribution Tracker
      • Pension Fund Returns Tracker
      • Pension Risk Transfer Database
      • Future of Investments Research Series
      • Charts & Infographics
      • Polls
    • Careers
    • Events
      • View All Conferences
      • View All Webinars
      • 2023 Defined Contribution East
      • 2023 ESG Investing