Skip to main content
MENU
Subscribe
  • Sign Up Free
  • LOGIN
  • Subscribe
  • Topics
    • Alternatives
    • Consultants
    • Coronavirus
    • Courts
    • Defined Contribution
    • ESG
    • ETFs
    • Face to Face
    • Hedge Funds
    • Industry Voices
    • Investing
    • Money Management
    • Opinion
    • Partner Content
    • Pension Funds
    • Private Equity
    • Real Estate
    • Russia-Ukraine War
    • SECURE 2.0
    • Special Reports
    • White Papers
  • Rankings & Awards
    • 1,000 Largest Retirement Plans
    • Top-Performing Managers
    • Largest Money Managers
    • DC Money Managers
    • DC Record Keepers
    • Largest Hedge Fund Managers
    • World's Largest Retirement Funds
    • Best Places to Work in Money Management
    • Excellence & Innovation Awards
    • WPS Innovation Awards
    • Eddy Awards
  • ETFs
    • Latest ETF News
    • Fund Screener
    • Education Center
    • Equities
    • Fixed Income
    • Commodities
    • Actively Managed
    • Alternatives
    • ESG Rated
  • ESG
    • Latest ESG News
    • The Institutional Investor’s Guide to ESG Investing
    • ESG Sustainability - Gaining Momentum
    • Climate Change: The Inescapable Opportunity
    • Impact Investing
    • 2022 ESG Investing Conference
    • ESG Rated ETFs
  • Defined Contribution
    • Latest DC News
    • DC Money Manager Rankings
    • DC Record Keeper Rankings
    • Innovations in DC
    • Trends in DC: Focus on Retirement Income
    • 2022 Defined Contribution East Conference
    • 2022 DC Investment Lineup Conference
  • Searches & Hires
    • Latest Searches & Hires News
    • Searches & Hires Database
    • RFPs
  • Performance Data
    • P&I Research Center
    • Earnings Tracker
    • Endowment Returns Tracker
    • Corporate Pension Contribution Tracker
    • Pension Fund Returns Tracker
    • Pension Risk Transfer Database
    • Future of Investments Research Series
    • Charts & Infographics
    • Polls
  • Careers
  • Events
    • View All Conferences
    • View All Webinars
    • 2023 Defined Contribution East
    • 2023 ESG Investing
Breadcrumb
  1. Home
  2. COURTS
February 29, 2012 12:00 AM

What asset managers should know about 'toxic' securities

H. Bradford Glassman and Melissa M. Price
  • Tweet
  • Share
  • Share
  • Email
  • More
    Reprints Print

    This is a critical time for investment professionals who still hold “toxic” securities associated with the 2007-‘09 financial crisis to take stock of their options.

    Many investment managers wrote these assets down, or wrote them off, some years ago. Many, we suspect, will not act to realize the potential value in them before the impending expiration of limitations periods — in particular, the important six-year window for fraud and misrepresentation claims under New York common law. That will leave a windfall for issuers, many of which made fortunes constructing and marketing defective securities to their customers, betting against them for their own account, and now evading accountability.

    Asset managers holding these mortgage-backed securities are therefore well advised to review their portfolios carefully to determine whether they might be sitting on potentially valuable legal claims with a limited shelf life. A partial recovery of value, after all, is better than a complete write-off. And the process of recouping value need not be onerous, although it will require some attention from management at certain stages.

    The financial crisis spawned a number of different types of litigation, based on the various financial products and the roles of various players in bringing them to market. We focus here on the most common and straightforward types of mortgage-backed-securities litigation: those involving collateralized debt obligations, credit default swaps and shares in entities investing in these securities, often using leverage.

    Claims based on MBS

    As is the case with most securities, CDOs and CDSs were designed to deter and withstand litigation. And as is the case with all securities, they do so only imperfectly, because those who sell investments to third parties, and do so with superior information, invite judicial scrutiny if they mislead. A critical variable affecting litigation prospects is the quality of the risk disclosures in the relevant subscription agreement, prospectus or other legal instrument. Broad, general risk disclosures are generally not effective. Specific disclosures that identify and fairly characterize the risks that actually emerged and caused the loss do tend to be effective. But even with such disclosures, evidence of other communications, including informal ones, might strengthen the claim, because courts understand that investors pay greater heed to real communications from the promoter of the investment than to “boilerplate” legal wording in a prospectus. Similarly, non-reliance clauses tend to be effective when they are not broad or boilerplate, but rather reflect actual negotiation between the parties as to the representations that are agreed as not having been relied upon in making the investment. “Special knowledge,” for example, risks disclosed to investors as merely possible when in fact they were known to be actual, might also lead to a finding of securities fraud.

    These principles are useful, along with other variables, in predicting the outcome of claims in court, and therefore also their settlement value. In U.S. litigation, a critical threshold for a legal claim is the motion to dismiss — analogous to a strike-out application in the U.K. and similar legal systems. A defendant that does not succeed in having the claim dismissed faces the very considerable expense and distraction of U.S. discovery. Denial of the motion to dismiss also might change the handicapping for the other major pre-trial motion, the motion for summary judgment, which is usually filed at the close of discovery. It is therefore not unusual for a claim to settle after surviving a motion to dismiss. The parties at that point have tested the claim for legal sufficiency, it is headed for trial absent summary judgment, and significant expense and risk lie ahead for the defendant. Some other factors affecting settlement value include the solvency of the defendant(s), the availability and extent of insurance coverage and adverse enforcement actions and related publicity — for example, where the defendant was investigated by the Department of Justice, the Securities and Exchange Commission, or Congress — in some cases, with incriminating e-mails and documents laid bare.

    A key legal issue that might result in permanent dismissal of claims is the expiration of the applicable limitations periods. Among the longest and most-often applicable limitations periods are the six-year periods that apply to fraud and misrepresentation claims under New York common law. The expiration of a limitations period can be a complete bar to bringing a claim, and hence it is extremely important to pay attention to this time-sensitive issue and to seek timely advice. A limitations analysis should not be undertaken by non-experts, as there are complicated rules for when a cause of action accrues; what factors may “toll” or stop the clock; which among different potentially applicable statutes actually apply; whether “borrowing” statutes or other special provisions may change the applicable period; and other issues that may determine whether a claim is untimely. An error can be costly: a time bar might nullify the claim and, even where there are arguable bases for extending the limitations period, the risk of dismissal is increased and the settlement value of a claim is accordingly diminished.

    The experience to date with claims based on toxic securities is fairly typical of securities claims: according to one informal survey, nearly half survive a motion to dismiss. Available data suggest that settlement values are also fairly typical, albeit within a very broad range. Each case, of course, turns on its own facts, and a general overview is not a substitute for a thorough examination of the circumstances of the actual investment in light of applicable legal standards. We have learned that some securities were constructed precisely because of their poor quality, as an instrument to bet against; others were deliberately mispriced; and still others were intentionally misdescribed to potential investors.

    What is important for a money manager holding CDOs, CDSs and/or shares in corporate vehicles that invested in these securities is to seek advice, without delay, to determine whether valuable claims may exist and what limitations periods apply. There is little risk in obtaining an evaluation of potential claims, a significant potential upside, and the possibility of a closed window if too much time is allowed to pass.

    H. Bradford Glassman is a partner and Melissa M. Price is an associate with Lewis Baach PLLC, in Washington.

    Related Articles
    ABP sues Credit Suisse over mortgage losses
    Dutch fund giant ABP sues Goldman Sachs over RMBS statements
    Shareholder litigation finds growing foothold overseas
    Chicago police pension fund sues Bank of America, U.S. Bancorp
    Recommended for You
    Microsoft_Logo_i.jpg
    Judge deletes ERISA lawsuit against Microsoft for offering a BlackRock target-date series
    Eli_Lilly_logo_i.jpg
    Federal judge dismisses ERISA complaint against Eli Lilly
    Trader Joes_i.jpg
    Plaintiffs bag ERISA lawsuit against Trader Joe's
    The Institutional Investor's Guide to ESG Investing
    Sponsored Content: The Institutional Investor's Guide to ESG Investing

    Reader Poll

    January 25, 2023
    SEE MORE POLLS >
    Sponsored
    White Papers
    Show Me the Income: Discovering plan sponsor and participant preferences for cr…
    Morningstar Indexes' Annual ESG Risk/Return Analysis
    The Future of Infrastructure: Building a Better Tomorrow
    Outlook 2023: Opportunity in a volatile world
    Research for Institutional Money Management
    View More
    Sponsored Content
    Partner Content
    The Industrialization of ESG Investment
    For institutional investors, ETFs can make meeting liquidity needs easier
    Gold: the most effective commodity investment
    2021 Investment Outlook | Investing Beyond the Pandemic: A Reset for Portfolios
    Ten ways retirement plan professionals add value to plan sponsors
    Gold: an efficient hedge
    View More
    E-MAIL NEWSLETTERS

    Sign up and get the best of News delivered straight to your email inbox, free of charge. Choose your news – we will deliver.

    Subscribe Today
    December 12, 2022 page one

    Get access to the news, research and analysis of events affecting the retirement and institutional money management businesses from a worldwide network of reporters and editors.

    Subscribe
    Connect With Us
    • RSS
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn

    Our Mission

    To consistently deliver news, research and analysis to the executives who manage the flow of funds in the institutional investment market.

    About Us

    Main Office
    685 Third Avenue
    Tenth Floor
    New York, NY 10017-4036

    Chicago Office
    130 E. Randolph St.
    Suite 3200
    Chicago, IL 60601

    Contact Us

    Careers at Crain

    About Pensions & Investments

     

    Advertising
    • Media Kit
    • P&I Content Solutions
    • P&I Careers | Post a Job
    • Reprints & Permissions
    Resources
    • Subscribe
    • Newsletters
    • FAQ
    • P&I Research Center
    • Site map
    • Staff Directory
    Legal
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Request
    Pensions & Investments
    Copyright © 1996-2023. Crain Communications, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
    • Topics
      • Alternatives
      • Consultants
      • Coronavirus
      • Courts
      • Defined Contribution
      • ESG
      • ETFs
      • Face to Face
      • Hedge Funds
      • Industry Voices
      • Investing
      • Money Management
      • Opinion
      • Partner Content
      • Pension Funds
      • Private Equity
      • Real Estate
      • Russia-Ukraine War
      • SECURE 2.0
      • Special Reports
      • White Papers
    • Rankings & Awards
      • 1,000 Largest Retirement Plans
      • Top-Performing Managers
      • Largest Money Managers
      • DC Money Managers
      • DC Record Keepers
      • Largest Hedge Fund Managers
      • World's Largest Retirement Funds
      • Best Places to Work in Money Management
      • Excellence & Innovation Awards
      • WPS Innovation Awards
      • Eddy Awards
    • ETFs
      • Latest ETF News
      • Fund Screener
      • Education Center
      • Equities
      • Fixed Income
      • Commodities
      • Actively Managed
      • Alternatives
      • ESG Rated
    • ESG
      • Latest ESG News
      • The Institutional Investor’s Guide to ESG Investing
      • ESG Sustainability - Gaining Momentum
      • Climate Change: The Inescapable Opportunity
      • Impact Investing
      • 2022 ESG Investing Conference
      • ESG Rated ETFs
    • Defined Contribution
      • Latest DC News
      • DC Money Manager Rankings
      • DC Record Keeper Rankings
      • Innovations in DC
      • Trends in DC: Focus on Retirement Income
      • 2022 Defined Contribution East Conference
      • 2022 DC Investment Lineup Conference
    • Searches & Hires
      • Latest Searches & Hires News
      • Searches & Hires Database
      • RFPs
    • Performance Data
      • P&I Research Center
      • Earnings Tracker
      • Endowment Returns Tracker
      • Corporate Pension Contribution Tracker
      • Pension Fund Returns Tracker
      • Pension Risk Transfer Database
      • Future of Investments Research Series
      • Charts & Infographics
      • Polls
    • Careers
    • Events
      • View All Conferences
      • View All Webinars
      • 2023 Defined Contribution East
      • 2023 ESG Investing