Skip to main content
MENU
Subscribe
  • Sign Up Free
  • LOGIN
  • Subscribe
  • Topics
    • Alternatives
    • Consultants
    • Courts
    • Defined Contribution
    • ESG
    • ETFs
    • Face to Face
    • Hedge Funds
    • Industry Voices
    • Investing
    • Money Management
    • Partner Content
    • Pension Funds
    • Private Equity
    • Real Estate
    • Regulation
    • SECURE 2.0
    • Special Reports
    • Washington
    • White Papers
  • Rankings & Awards
    • 1,000 Largest Retirement Plans
    • Top-Performing Managers
    • Largest Money Managers
    • DC Money Managers
    • DC Record Keepers
    • Largest Hedge Fund Managers
    • World's Largest Retirement Funds
    • Best Places to Work in Money Management
    • Excellence & Innovation Awards
    • WPS Innovation Awards
    • Eddy Awards
  • ETFs
    • Latest ETF News
    • Fund Screener
    • Education Center
    • Equities
    • Fixed Income
    • Commodities
    • Actively Managed
    • Alternatives
    • ESG Rated
  • ESG
    • Latest ESG News
    • The Institutional Investor’s Guide to ESG Investing
    • ESG Sustainability - Gaining Momentum
    • ESG Investing | Industry Brief
    • Innovation in ESG Investing
    • 2023 ESG Investing Conference
    • ESG Rated ETFs
  • Defined Contribution
    • Latest DC News
    • The Plan Sponsor's Guide to Retirement Income
    • DC Money Manager Rankings
    • DC Record Keeper Rankings
    • Innovations in DC
    • Trends in DC: Focus on Retirement Income
    • 2023 Defined Contribution East Conference
  • Searches & Hires
    • Latest Searches & Hires News
    • Searches & Hires Database
    • RFPs
  • Research Center
    • The P&I Research Center
    • Earnings Tracker
    • Endowment Returns Tracker
    • Corporate Pension Contribution Tracker
    • Pension Fund Returns Tracker
    • Pension Risk Transfer Database
  • Careers
  • Events
    • View All Conferences
    • View All Webinars
    • 2023 Canadian Pension Risk Strategies
    • 2023 Retirement Income
Breadcrumb
  1. Home
  2. Print
May 16, 2011 01:00 AM

Saying what on pay?

  • Tweet
  • Share
  • Share
  • Email
  • More
    Reprints Print
    Roger Schillerstrom

    Given the opportunity to give their opinions about corporate compensation, shareholders have expressed some disenchantment with the current practices.

    So far this proxy season, a majority of shareholders at 16 companies have voted against the executive compensation plans. The number is small, considering voting has taken place at 383 companies, but is relatively large when compared with such negative votes at companies in other countries.

    In general, shareholders in other countries — such as the United Kingdom, the Netherlands or Australia — might vote in the majority against executive compensation at one or two companies a year, according to Paul Hodgson, senior research associate, GovernanceMetrics International LLC. Shareholders in those countries have had such votes for a number of years. In the U.S., “say-on-pay” votes became a requirement only in January for all companies, although a relatively few voluntarily offered such votes for the last year or so.

    It is too early to tell the meaning of the U.S. “say-on-pay voting” as the proxy season is still well under way. At the companies where a majority of shareholders rejected the executive compensation, the situations are all different, making it difficult to draw any general conclusion about the reasons.

    Clearly, the boards of directors at those companies where the compensation packages were rejected have to examine the votes to see who voted against, and then engage with the shareholders to understand why, and what changes should be made.

    Even though most corporations won majority shareholder approval of their executive compensation schemes, they should not be complacent that they have dodged shareholder concern and that their pay-for-performance models are working.

    The votes require further analysis of the level of shareholder support for the executive pay. It has averaged 89.5% in support and 8.6% against with 1.9% abstentions, according to ISS Governance, a corporate governance research firm. The level of support is one measure companies should use to determine how well they have aligned executive pay with the interests of shareholders.

    With “say on pay” so new, companies appear to be unprepared to measure its impact, and unsure how to interpret the meaning of the voting in developing or modifying executive compensation arrangements.

    Only 51% of the companies have defined how they will evaluate success, according to a Towers Watson survey. Of those companies, 19.6% believe that a favorable shareholder vote of at least 90% would be considered successful, while 37.2% believe a vote of at least 80% would be considered successful; 27.5% believe at least 70%; 13.7% believe at least 60%; and 2% believe at least 50%.

    Only 8% of companies surveyed have a process in place for developing plans to respond to potential shareholder concerns on executive compensation, the Towers Watson survey found.

    The voting process should encourage companies to engage in dialogue with shareholders to understand the implications of the voting.

    The shareholder support at most companies for executive compensation has not come because executive compensation has declined at them. In fact, total executive compensation of CEOs at the largest U.S. corporations rose a median 9% in 2010, according to another Towers Watson study.

    The voting indicates shareholders don't necessarily oppose rising executive compensation, so long as it appears to align with shareholder interests. With the stock market up double digits in the past year, companies that won support from shareholders might believe they have achieved the goal of aligning pay for performance, although a high level of disenchantment might make such a conclusion difficult to draw. For example, at Goldman Sachs Group Inc.'s annual meeting, a majority of shareholders approved the executive compensation structure, yet 27% of shareholders voted against it.

    Judging by the voting so far, shareholders appear to be paying close attention to executive pay arrangements, even though the voting is only advisory. The best outcome would be for companies to redesign executive incentive compensation systems to align the long-term interests of the corporation, and hence the shareholders, with fair compensation for key executives.

    Ideally, such systems should encourage some risk taking, because that is the only way a company can prosper and thrive, but with checks and balances so that excessive risk does not threaten the existence of the company.

    Related Articles
    Say-on-pay shifting proxy focus
    Unease with say on pay
    Recommended for You
    Read the print edition of P&I
    Read the print edition of P&I
    Targeting millennials: Author, niece put his latest book to music
    Targeting millennials: Author, niece put his latest book to music
    How low is low? Projections say it's not low enough
    How low is low? Projections say it's not low enough
    Quest for Quality Amid Market Turmoil
    Sponsored Content: Quest for Quality Amid Market Turmoil

    Reader Poll

    May 1, 2023
     
    SEE MORE POLLS >
    Sponsored
    White Papers
    Middle market credit: We’re gonna need a bigger boat
    Alternative Credit: Differences and Opportunities in CLOs and Credit Risk Shari…
    Fixed Income is Attractive, but Beware of "Fake" Yield
    Counting on a Crisis: A Catalyst for Investment Innovation?
    A Strategic Allocator's Guide to Productivity and Profits
    Research for Institutional Money Management
    View More
    Sponsored Content
    Partner Content
    The Industrialization of ESG Investment
    For institutional investors, ETFs can make meeting liquidity needs easier
    Gold: the most effective commodity investment
    2021 Investment Outlook | Investing Beyond the Pandemic: A Reset for Portfolios
    Ten ways retirement plan professionals add value to plan sponsors
    Gold: an efficient hedge
    View More
    E-MAIL NEWSLETTERS

    Sign up and get the best of News delivered straight to your email inbox, free of charge. Choose your news – we will deliver.

    Subscribe Today
    December 12, 2022 page one

    Get access to the news, research and analysis of events affecting the retirement and institutional money management businesses from a worldwide network of reporters and editors.

    Subscribe
    Connect With Us
    • RSS
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn

    Our Mission

    To consistently deliver news, research and analysis to the executives who manage the flow of funds in the institutional investment market.

    About Us

    Main Office
    685 Third Avenue
    Tenth Floor
    New York, NY 10017-4036

    Chicago Office
    130 E. Randolph St.
    Suite 3200
    Chicago, IL 60601

    Contact Us

    Careers at Crain

    About Pensions & Investments

     

    Advertising
    • Media Kit
    • P&I Custom Content
    • P&I Careers | Post a Job
    • Reprints & Permissions
    Resources
    • Subscribe
    • Newsletters
    • FAQ
    • P&I Research Center
    • Site map
    • Staff Directory
    Legal
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Request
    Pensions & Investments
    Copyright © 1996-2023. Crain Communications, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
    • Topics
      • Alternatives
      • Consultants
      • Courts
      • Defined Contribution
      • ESG
      • ETFs
      • Face to Face
      • Hedge Funds
      • Industry Voices
      • Investing
      • Money Management
      • Partner Content
      • Pension Funds
      • Private Equity
      • Real Estate
      • Regulation
      • SECURE 2.0
      • Special Reports
      • Washington
      • White Papers
    • Rankings & Awards
      • 1,000 Largest Retirement Plans
      • Top-Performing Managers
      • Largest Money Managers
      • DC Money Managers
      • DC Record Keepers
      • Largest Hedge Fund Managers
      • World's Largest Retirement Funds
      • Best Places to Work in Money Management
      • Excellence & Innovation Awards
      • WPS Innovation Awards
      • Eddy Awards
    • ETFs
      • Latest ETF News
      • Fund Screener
      • Education Center
      • Equities
      • Fixed Income
      • Commodities
      • Actively Managed
      • Alternatives
      • ESG Rated
    • ESG
      • Latest ESG News
      • The Institutional Investor’s Guide to ESG Investing
      • ESG Sustainability - Gaining Momentum
      • ESG Investing | Industry Brief
      • Innovation in ESG Investing
      • 2023 ESG Investing Conference
      • ESG Rated ETFs
    • Defined Contribution
      • Latest DC News
      • The Plan Sponsor's Guide to Retirement Income
      • DC Money Manager Rankings
      • DC Record Keeper Rankings
      • Innovations in DC
      • Trends in DC: Focus on Retirement Income
      • 2023 Defined Contribution East Conference
    • Searches & Hires
      • Latest Searches & Hires News
      • Searches & Hires Database
      • RFPs
    • Research Center
      • The P&I Research Center
      • Earnings Tracker
      • Endowment Returns Tracker
      • Corporate Pension Contribution Tracker
      • Pension Fund Returns Tracker
      • Pension Risk Transfer Database
    • Careers
    • Events
      • View All Conferences
      • View All Webinars
      • 2023 Canadian Pension Risk Strategies
      • 2023 Retirement Income