Skip to main content
MENU
Subscribe
  • Sign Up Free
  • LOGIN
  • Subscribe
  • Topics
    • Alternatives
    • Consultants
    • Coronavirus
    • Courts
    • Defined Contribution
    • ESG
    • ETFs
    • Face to Face
    • Hedge Funds
    • Industry Voices
    • Investing
    • Money Management
    • Opinion
    • Partner Content
    • Pension Funds
    • Private Equity
    • Real Estate
    • Russia-Ukraine War
    • SECURE 2.0
    • Special Reports
    • White Papers
  • Rankings & Awards
    • 1,000 Largest Retirement Plans
    • Top-Performing Managers
    • Largest Money Managers
    • DC Money Managers
    • DC Record Keepers
    • Largest Hedge Fund Managers
    • World's Largest Retirement Funds
    • Best Places to Work in Money Management
    • Excellence & Innovation Awards
    • WPS Innovation Awards
    • Eddy Awards
  • ETFs
    • Latest ETF News
    • Fund Screener
    • Education Center
    • Equities
    • Fixed Income
    • Commodities
    • Actively Managed
    • Alternatives
    • ESG Rated
  • ESG
    • Latest ESG News
    • The Institutional Investor’s Guide to ESG Investing
    • ESG Sustainability - Gaining Momentum
    • Climate Change: The Inescapable Opportunity
    • Impact Investing
    • 2022 ESG Investing Conference
    • ESG Rated ETFs
  • Defined Contribution
    • Latest DC News
    • DC Money Manager Rankings
    • DC Record Keeper Rankings
    • Innovations in DC
    • Trends in DC: Focus on Retirement Income
    • 2022 Defined Contribution East Conference
    • 2022 DC Investment Lineup Conference
  • Searches & Hires
    • Latest Searches & Hires News
    • Searches & Hires Database
    • RFPs
  • Performance Data
    • P&I Research Center
    • Earnings Tracker
    • Endowment Returns Tracker
    • Corporate Pension Contribution Tracker
    • Pension Fund Returns Tracker
    • Pension Risk Transfer Database
    • Future of Investments Research Series
    • Charts & Infographics
    • Polls
  • Careers
  • Events
    • View All Conferences
    • View All Webinars
    • 2023 Defined Contribution East
    • 2023 ESG Investing
Breadcrumb
  1. Home
  2. Print
November 01, 2010 01:00 AM

Survey explores DC execs' idea of the perfect plan

Auto enrollment, auto escalation, mandatory participation top list

Timothy Inklebarger
  • Tweet
  • Share
  • Share
  • Email
  • More
    Reprints Print

    The perfect defined contribution plan would feature automatic enrollment and auto escalation, with no more than 15 investment options and a target-date fund as the default option, if plan executives and consultants had their druthers.

    Those are the findings of a survey of 50 corporate defined contribution plan executives and five consultants by Greenwich Associates, on a commission from Northern Trust Corp.

    All but one of those interviewed said automatic enrollment would be a key feature of the ideal DC plan; 63% of the plan executives and four of the five consultants said DC plans should be mandatory for employees; and three-quarters of the plan executives and all of the consultants surveyed also support automatic escalation to work in tandem with the automatic enrollment.

    Jim Danaher, senior investment product manager for defined contribution solutions at Northern Trust Global Investments, Chicago, and author of the report, said in a telephone interview that for decades DC plans were considered supplemental to defined benefit plans, but they since have become the primary retirement vehicle for many employees. The move from DB plans and a declining savings rate in DC plans over the past decade has created a retirement savings gap for many retirees, Mr. Danaher said.

    “Defined benefit plans were created to say, "We are going to provide this benefit for you at retirement. It's a given. You don't need to have any say on how you invest that pool of money,' ” he said. “Defined contribution plans shifted (to employees) the responsibility of participation, how much you're saving, where you're investing and cost. I don't know if (employees) knew where the shift was occurring.”

    "Paternalistic' concepts

    The report notes that while consultants have consistently expressed the desire to take decisions on enrollment, contribution levels and investment options out of the hands of employees, many plan sponsors have viewed these concepts as “paternalistic.”

    “Forced savings for both the employee and the employer runs counter to our culture,” one consultant was quoted as saying in the report. “But if people want to retire, we have to get our arms around this. We can't have our cake and eat it, too. We can't have this be optional and expect the population in any way, shape or form to be ready for retirement. Too many people in America think Social Security is a retirement program. It's not — it's a safety net.” (None of the respondents quoted in the report was identified.)

    Dev Clifford, managing director of Greenwich Associates, Stamford, Conn., said he sees more plan sponsors accepting the concepts of automatic enrollment and mandatory participation.

    “The compelling logic here is the recognition that there is no other retirement benefit absent Social Security,” he said in a telephone interview.

    He noted, however, that he believes some plan sponsors oppose automatic escalation because of the view that “personal responsibility is part of managing your own life and funds.”

    “There is a perspective that they ought to be involved in this,” Mr. Clifford said. “But they don't want to put them in a position that causes them financial distress.”

    The one-quarter of corporate plan executives who oppose automatic escalation cite a greater cost for employers and infringement on employee freedom, according to the report.

    “The reality is that some significant segment of the population lives paycheck to paycheck and it's easy to say you should be saving more, but it's hard for folks in the bottom quartile from a compensation perspective to actually make that happen,” one plan executive said in the report.

    Mr. Danaher acknowledged that while some employers are concerned about administrative and other costs associated with automatic enrollment, taxpayers could end up footing the bill through government assistance programs.

    “We're all going to end up paying in some way or the other,” he said.

    Less agreement

    While there is some consensus on automatic enrollment and escalation, there was less agreement among plan executives on the ideal default contribution for employees.

    About 41% of plan executives said the ideal default contribution for auto enrollment should be 5% to 6%, while 26% favored a contribution of 3% to 4%, and 21% of the plan executives said 7% or more.

    Eleven percent said the ideal default contribution should be 1% to 2%.

    One consultant noted in the survey that a contribution of 10% is not enough to reach a full replacement benefit ratio. Several consultants suggested that contributions escalate up to 15% of salary.

    Consultants and plan executives also expressed divergent opinions on the amount of control employees should have over the management of their accounts.

    Sixty percent of the consultants supported the idea of plan sponsors controlling investment decisions such as asset allocation, while 20% each supported participant-led decision making and shared decision making.

    Sixty-four percent of plan executives preferred shared decision making, while 26% supported participant-led decision making and 10% supported plan sponsor-led decision making.

    Mr. Danaher said the vast majority of employees could be lured toward hot investments such as emerging markets and long-term bond funds because of the direction of the economy and the attention they receive in the financial press. Despite the fact that such investments could decline rapidly in a volatile economy, some plan sponsors are still averse to limiting participant decision making.

    “Plan sponsors are playing a balancing act,” he said. “They understand the consultants but (they've) got a pool of employees to deal with, too.”

    Many plan executives supported a “less-is-more approach” to investment options, including a “limited number of investment alternatives, including some annuity-type component and some minimum cash payment choices.”

    One suggested that the ideal plan have “three doors”: “The first door would be a balanced/target date fund. The second would enable the employee to set up his or her own investments from a menu of not-too-complicated options from broad categories like equities, fixed income and alternative investments,” the unnamed survey respondent suggested. “The third door would be a brokerage option in which employees could buy individual stocks and use individual managers.”

    Forty-four percent of plan executives suggested a menu of 11 to 15 investment options; 28% said six to 10; only 4% opted for the extreme of more than 30 options. (The remaining responses were split evenly among other ranges.)

    Consultants were more conservative in the number of investment options they would offer employees. Forty percent each said three to five and six to 10 options should be offered, while 20% of consultants supported 11 to 15 options.

    None of the consultants supported fewer than three options or more than 15.

    Plan sponsors also overwhelmingly (76%) supported target-date funds as the best default option for auto enrollment.

    Mr. Clifford said he is encouraged by the rapidity with which target-date funds have come to be considered the “de facto default option.”

    “Target-date funds mitigate the destructive behavior individuals exhibit in their own management of their retirement,” he said. “Target date funds allow individuals to focus on what they should be worried about, which is the outcome rather than the selection of investment managers.”

    Recommended for You
    Read the print edition of P&I
    Read the print edition of P&I
    Citadel's Ken Griffin gives $125 million to Chicago museum; name will change
    Citadel's Ken Griffin gives $125 million to Chicago museum; name will change
    Gender diversity is improving on FTSE 350 boards
    Gender diversity is improving on FTSE 350 boards
    The Institutional Investor's Guide to ESG Investing
    Sponsored Content: The Institutional Investor's Guide to ESG Investing

    Reader Poll

    January 25, 2023
    SEE MORE POLLS >
    Sponsored
    White Papers
    Show Me the Income: Discovering plan sponsor and participant preferences for cr…
    The Future of Infrastructure: Building a Better Tomorrow
    Outlook 2023: Opportunity in a volatile world
    Research for Institutional Money Management
    View More
    Sponsored Content
    Partner Content
    The Industrialization of ESG Investment
    For institutional investors, ETFs can make meeting liquidity needs easier
    Gold: the most effective commodity investment
    2021 Investment Outlook | Investing Beyond the Pandemic: A Reset for Portfolios
    Ten ways retirement plan professionals add value to plan sponsors
    Gold: an efficient hedge
    View More
    E-MAIL NEWSLETTERS

    Sign up and get the best of News delivered straight to your email inbox, free of charge. Choose your news – we will deliver.

    Subscribe Today
    December 12, 2022 page one

    Get access to the news, research and analysis of events affecting the retirement and institutional money management businesses from a worldwide network of reporters and editors.

    Subscribe
    Connect With Us
    • RSS
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn

    Our Mission

    To consistently deliver news, research and analysis to the executives who manage the flow of funds in the institutional investment market.

    About Us

    Main Office
    685 Third Avenue
    Tenth Floor
    New York, NY 10017-4036

    Chicago Office
    130 E. Randolph St.
    Suite 3200
    Chicago, IL 60601

    Contact Us

    Careers at Crain

    About Pensions & Investments

     

    Advertising
    • Media Kit
    • P&I Content Solutions
    • P&I Careers | Post a Job
    • Reprints & Permissions
    Resources
    • Subscribe
    • Newsletters
    • FAQ
    • P&I Research Center
    • Site map
    • Staff Directory
    Legal
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Request
    Pensions & Investments
    Copyright © 1996-2023. Crain Communications, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
    • Topics
      • Alternatives
      • Consultants
      • Coronavirus
      • Courts
      • Defined Contribution
      • ESG
      • ETFs
      • Face to Face
      • Hedge Funds
      • Industry Voices
      • Investing
      • Money Management
      • Opinion
      • Partner Content
      • Pension Funds
      • Private Equity
      • Real Estate
      • Russia-Ukraine War
      • SECURE 2.0
      • Special Reports
      • White Papers
    • Rankings & Awards
      • 1,000 Largest Retirement Plans
      • Top-Performing Managers
      • Largest Money Managers
      • DC Money Managers
      • DC Record Keepers
      • Largest Hedge Fund Managers
      • World's Largest Retirement Funds
      • Best Places to Work in Money Management
      • Excellence & Innovation Awards
      • WPS Innovation Awards
      • Eddy Awards
    • ETFs
      • Latest ETF News
      • Fund Screener
      • Education Center
      • Equities
      • Fixed Income
      • Commodities
      • Actively Managed
      • Alternatives
      • ESG Rated
    • ESG
      • Latest ESG News
      • The Institutional Investor’s Guide to ESG Investing
      • ESG Sustainability - Gaining Momentum
      • Climate Change: The Inescapable Opportunity
      • Impact Investing
      • 2022 ESG Investing Conference
      • ESG Rated ETFs
    • Defined Contribution
      • Latest DC News
      • DC Money Manager Rankings
      • DC Record Keeper Rankings
      • Innovations in DC
      • Trends in DC: Focus on Retirement Income
      • 2022 Defined Contribution East Conference
      • 2022 DC Investment Lineup Conference
    • Searches & Hires
      • Latest Searches & Hires News
      • Searches & Hires Database
      • RFPs
    • Performance Data
      • P&I Research Center
      • Earnings Tracker
      • Endowment Returns Tracker
      • Corporate Pension Contribution Tracker
      • Pension Fund Returns Tracker
      • Pension Risk Transfer Database
      • Future of Investments Research Series
      • Charts & Infographics
      • Polls
    • Careers
    • Events
      • View All Conferences
      • View All Webinars
      • 2023 Defined Contribution East
      • 2023 ESG Investing