Skip to main content
MENU
Subscribe
  • Sign Up Free
  • LOGIN
  • Subscribe
  • Topics
    • Alternatives
    • Consultants
    • Courts
    • Defined Contribution
    • ESG
    • ETFs
    • Face to Face
    • Hedge Funds
    • Industry Voices
    • Investing
    • Money Management
    • Partner Content
    • Pension Funds
    • Private Equity
    • Real Estate
    • Regulation
    • SECURE 2.0
    • Special Reports
    • Washington
    • White Papers
  • Rankings & Awards
    • 1,000 Largest Retirement Plans
    • Top-Performing Managers
    • Largest Money Managers
    • DC Money Managers
    • DC Record Keepers
    • Largest Hedge Fund Managers
    • World's Largest Retirement Funds
    • Best Places to Work in Money Management
    • Excellence & Innovation Awards
    • WPS Innovation Awards
    • Eddy Awards
  • ETFs
    • Latest ETF News
    • Fund Screener
    • Education Center
    • Equities
    • Fixed Income
    • Commodities
    • Actively Managed
    • Alternatives
    • ESG Rated
  • ESG
    • Latest ESG News
    • The Institutional Investor’s Guide to ESG Investing
    • ESG Sustainability - Gaining Momentum
    • ESG Investing | Industry Brief
    • Innovation in ESG Investing
    • 2023 ESG Investing Conference
    • ESG Rated ETFs
  • Defined Contribution
    • Latest DC News
    • The Plan Sponsor's Guide to Retirement Income
    • DC Money Manager Rankings
    • DC Record Keeper Rankings
    • Innovations in DC
    • Trends in DC: Focus on Retirement Income
    • 2023 Defined Contribution East Conference
  • Searches & Hires
    • Latest Searches & Hires News
    • Searches & Hires Database
    • RFPs
  • Research Center
    • The P&I Research Center
    • Earnings Tracker
    • Endowment Returns Tracker
    • Corporate Pension Contribution Tracker
    • Pension Fund Returns Tracker
    • Pension Risk Transfer Database
  • Careers
  • Events
    • View All Conferences
    • View All Webinars
    • 2023 Canadian Pension Risk Strategies
    • 2023 Retirement Income
Breadcrumb
  1. Home
  2. Print
March 22, 2010 01:00 AM

401(k) matches slowly reinstated by companies

Contributions key to participation and employee retention

Robert Steyer
  • Tweet
  • Share
  • Share
  • Email
  • More
    Reprints Print
    Vital: Dean Kohmann said the match was 'the most important feature' of a 401(k).

    Companies are slowly starting to reinstate their 401(k) matches, balancing the prospect of economic recovery with their ability to pay for an important employee benefit.

    Corporate executives hope to restore the suspended or reduced matches as quickly as possible to raise morale, encourage greater retirement savings and offer a competitive advantage against their peers.

    Reinstating the match was “both a financial and morale decision,” said Richard M. Popp, director of employee benefits at Ford Motor Co., Dearborn, Mich.

    Bringing back the match also contained “a moral element because we want to encourage savings by our employees,” said Mr. Popp, whose company reinstated the match for its $6 billion salaried employees' 401(k) plan in January after a 12-month suspension.

    “It's a pretty tough decision to get rid of the corporate match,” said Lori Lucas, executive vice president and defined contribution practice leader at Callan Associates Inc., San Francisco. “The match is an important anchor.” Bringing back the match takes on greater importance as companies “start transitioning from layoff mode to retaining talent,” she added.

    Dean Kohmann, vice president of 401(k) services at Charles Schwab Corp., San Francisco, was more emphatic: “It is the most important feature in a 401(k) plan.”

    As the economy improves, some plan sponsors have reinstated matches at previous levels, some have made downward adjustments and some are evaluating reinstatement — but haven't acted.

    “Certainly, if the economy weakens, the resolution of plan sponsors to reinstate the employer matching contribution might also waver,” Ms. Lucas said. “However, my experience is that plan sponsors who begin to get the wheels in motion to reinstate the match are highly committed.”

    The Pension Rights Center, Washington, keeps a running count of employers that reduce, suspend and/or reinstate corporate matches. Since October 2008, the center counted 320 match suspensions and reductions, of which 36 have been reinstated. (The center acknowledges its list may not be comprehensive because it relies on news releases, news accounts or other sources.)

    According to the PRC, companies that have reinstated their matches recently include Regions Financial Corp., FedEx Corp., 7-Eleven Inc. and Eastman Kodak Co., as well Black & Decker Corp. and Stanley Works Co. which recently combined to form Stanley Black & Decker Inc. AARP also reinstated its match.

    Company executives like the 401(k) match because they believe it affects employee savings behavior. Results of several studies show “the presence of a match increases participation by five to 10 percentage points,” according to a February report by Boston College's Center for Retirement Research. “Several studies have also documented a positive relationship between the level of the employer match and the 401(k) participation.”

    More difficult

    But the impact of suspending a match is more difficult to pin down. For example, Schwab's Mr. Kohmann said an anecdotal review of clients indicated that a 10-percentage-point drop in participation rates was common after the match had been suspended for a year. However, the Center for Retirement Research report said “inertia suggests” most enrollees won't leave, and inertia “is also likely to result in unchanged employee contributions.”

    The center's report noted that most large companies reinstated their matches after the 2001 recession. If the current match suspensions are considered temporary as in 2001, “the effects will probably be modest,” the report said.

    Of course, participation is affected by more than matches. Usually, when a company suspends or reduces its corporate match, it has taken, or is taking concurrently, other cost-cutting actions ranging from salary freezes to buyouts to terminations.

    For example, in addition to suspending its 401(k) match, Ford suspended annual merit-pay raises, bonuses for two years and tuition assistance (which was reinstated this month). It also reduced life insurance for retirees, and it laid off workers.

    Ford brought back the employer match — 60 cents for each $1 of employee contribution up to 5% of base pay — to the level that existed before the suspension. “To add anything back before we were completely out of the woods was a hard decision,” said Mr. Popp, “We still have one heck of a challenge” as a corporation.

    Rival automaker General Motors Co., Detroit, suspended the employer match for salaried workers in November 2008. It also suspended bonuses, reduced salaries, offered early retirements, agreed to buyouts and laid off workers, said Tom Wilkinson, director of news relations. The company declared bankruptcy in June 2009 but emerged a month later.

    The company reinstated the employer match in the salaried employees' plan on Oct. 1 at the same level as before: 100% of the employee contribution up to 4% of base salary.

    “We had told employees these were temporary measures,” Mr. Wilkinson said. “We wanted to get the company back to normal. We wanted to retain employees and improve morale.”

    He declined to discuss employee participation rates or the amount of DC assets. According to Pensions & Investments' most recent directory of the 1,000 largest retirement funds, GM had $13.3 billion in DC assets as of Sept. 30, 2009.

    Unsettled outlook

    At Sonoco Products Co., Hartsville, S.C., the unsettled economic outlook caused the company to reduce its match.

    The original match, suspended in June, was 100% up to 3% of salary. When it was reinstated in January, the match dropped to 50 cents on the dollar up to 4% of pay.

    “We chose not to reinstate the 401(k) program at the full match because of the ongoing uncertainty of the economy,” spokesman Robin Montgomery said in an e-mail message response to questions.

    “While there have been indications that the economy is rebounding, we want to be cautious in our approach so that we can continue evaluating the economy and our business in the months ahead.” Sonoco has about $500 million in DC assets, Mr. Montgomery said.

    The weak economy and a liquidity issue prompted Worthington Industries Inc., Columbus, Ohio, to suspend its match last June 1, said Eric Smolenski, vice president of human resources. “We were in a deteriorating market,” said Mr. Smolenski. Worthington's DC plan has approximately $280 million in assets.

    Suspending the match was part of a cost-cutting effort that enabled Worthington to meet the terms of a debt covenant, he said. June 1 was the first day of Worthington's first quarter of its current fiscal year, and this quarter's performance “was critical” in making sure the company didn't have to restructure its debt, Mr. Smolenski said.

    “We did better than we had expected,” he said.

    The match was reinstated Sept. 1 at the same level: 50% of the employee contribution up to 4% of compensation.

    “We are comfortable we can afford it,” Mr. Smolenski said.

    In addition, Worthington continues to contribute 3% of an employee's pay to the 401(k) plan even if the employee doesn't contribute. This payment wasn't affected by the match suspension. “We want to make sure employees are as prepared as possible” for retirement, he said.

    Match suspensions can offer companies a chance to revise the structure or strategy of their DC plans, according to consultants.

    RF Micro Devices Inc., Greensboro, N.C., used the suspension to change its 401(k) match formula as well as the plan's design, said Ralph Knupp, vice president of human resources at RF, a designer and manufacturer of components for semiconductors.

    The company, which has about $100 million in DC assets, suspended its match in December 2008 as “our industry went into a deep slump,” Mr. Knupp said.

    RF Micro Devices also froze salaries and put in a hiring freeze.

    By the time company executives decided to restore the match in January 2010, “we felt comfortable this was a step that we can continue to afford.” The old match was $1 for each $1 employee contribution up to 3% of base salary. The new match is 100% up to 1% of base pay, plus 50 cents for each employee dollar for the next 5% of base salary.

    Related Articles
    88% of corporate DC plans kept employer match through financial crisis — survey
    Recommended for You
    Read the print edition of P&I
    Read the print edition of P&I
    Targeting millennials: Author, niece put his latest book to music
    Targeting millennials: Author, niece put his latest book to music
    How low is low? Projections say it's not low enough
    How low is low? Projections say it's not low enough
    Retirement Income | Industry Brief
    Sponsored Content: Retirement Income | Industry Brief

    Reader Poll

    May 1, 2023
     
    SEE MORE POLLS >
    Sponsored
    White Papers
    Counting on a Crisis: A Catalyst for Investment Innovation?
    A Strategic Allocator's Guide to Productivity and Profits
    Biodiversity: why investors should care
    Quantifying sustainability – the numbers, the data, and the people
    Valuing Banks: Hidden Losses Versus Assets
    Research for Institutional Money Management
    View More
    Sponsored Content
    Partner Content
    The Industrialization of ESG Investment
    For institutional investors, ETFs can make meeting liquidity needs easier
    Gold: the most effective commodity investment
    2021 Investment Outlook | Investing Beyond the Pandemic: A Reset for Portfolios
    Ten ways retirement plan professionals add value to plan sponsors
    Gold: an efficient hedge
    View More
    E-MAIL NEWSLETTERS

    Sign up and get the best of News delivered straight to your email inbox, free of charge. Choose your news – we will deliver.

    Subscribe Today
    December 12, 2022 page one

    Get access to the news, research and analysis of events affecting the retirement and institutional money management businesses from a worldwide network of reporters and editors.

    Subscribe
    Connect With Us
    • RSS
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn

    Our Mission

    To consistently deliver news, research and analysis to the executives who manage the flow of funds in the institutional investment market.

    About Us

    Main Office
    685 Third Avenue
    Tenth Floor
    New York, NY 10017-4036

    Chicago Office
    130 E. Randolph St.
    Suite 3200
    Chicago, IL 60601

    Contact Us

    Careers at Crain

    About Pensions & Investments

     

    Advertising
    • Media Kit
    • P&I Content Solutions
    • P&I Careers | Post a Job
    • Reprints & Permissions
    Resources
    • Subscribe
    • Newsletters
    • FAQ
    • P&I Research Center
    • Site map
    • Staff Directory
    Legal
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Request
    Pensions & Investments
    Copyright © 1996-2023. Crain Communications, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
    • Topics
      • Alternatives
      • Consultants
      • Courts
      • Defined Contribution
      • ESG
      • ETFs
      • Face to Face
      • Hedge Funds
      • Industry Voices
      • Investing
      • Money Management
      • Partner Content
      • Pension Funds
      • Private Equity
      • Real Estate
      • Regulation
      • SECURE 2.0
      • Special Reports
      • Washington
      • White Papers
    • Rankings & Awards
      • 1,000 Largest Retirement Plans
      • Top-Performing Managers
      • Largest Money Managers
      • DC Money Managers
      • DC Record Keepers
      • Largest Hedge Fund Managers
      • World's Largest Retirement Funds
      • Best Places to Work in Money Management
      • Excellence & Innovation Awards
      • WPS Innovation Awards
      • Eddy Awards
    • ETFs
      • Latest ETF News
      • Fund Screener
      • Education Center
      • Equities
      • Fixed Income
      • Commodities
      • Actively Managed
      • Alternatives
      • ESG Rated
    • ESG
      • Latest ESG News
      • The Institutional Investor’s Guide to ESG Investing
      • ESG Sustainability - Gaining Momentum
      • ESG Investing | Industry Brief
      • Innovation in ESG Investing
      • 2023 ESG Investing Conference
      • ESG Rated ETFs
    • Defined Contribution
      • Latest DC News
      • The Plan Sponsor's Guide to Retirement Income
      • DC Money Manager Rankings
      • DC Record Keeper Rankings
      • Innovations in DC
      • Trends in DC: Focus on Retirement Income
      • 2023 Defined Contribution East Conference
    • Searches & Hires
      • Latest Searches & Hires News
      • Searches & Hires Database
      • RFPs
    • Research Center
      • The P&I Research Center
      • Earnings Tracker
      • Endowment Returns Tracker
      • Corporate Pension Contribution Tracker
      • Pension Fund Returns Tracker
      • Pension Risk Transfer Database
    • Careers
    • Events
      • View All Conferences
      • View All Webinars
      • 2023 Canadian Pension Risk Strategies
      • 2023 Retirement Income