Skip to main content
MENU
Subscribe
  • Sign Up Free
  • LOGIN
  • Subscribe
  • Topics
    • Alternatives
    • Consultants
    • Coronavirus
    • Courts
    • Defined Contribution
    • ESG
    • ETFs
    • Face to Face
    • Hedge Funds
    • Industry Voices
    • Investing
    • Money Management
    • Opinion
    • Partner Content
    • Pension Funds
    • Private Equity
    • Real Estate
    • Russia-Ukraine War
    • SECURE 2.0
    • Special Reports
    • White Papers
  • Rankings & Awards
    • 1,000 Largest Retirement Plans
    • Top-Performing Managers
    • Largest Money Managers
    • DC Money Managers
    • DC Record Keepers
    • Largest Hedge Fund Managers
    • World's Largest Retirement Funds
    • Best Places to Work in Money Management
    • Excellence & Innovation Awards
    • WPS Innovation Awards
    • Eddy Awards
  • ETFs
    • Latest ETF News
    • Fund Screener
    • Education Center
    • Equities
    • Fixed Income
    • Commodities
    • Actively Managed
    • Alternatives
    • ESG Rated
  • ESG
    • Latest ESG News
    • The Institutional Investor’s Guide to ESG Investing
    • ESG Sustainability - Gaining Momentum
    • Climate Change: The Inescapable Opportunity
    • Impact Investing
    • 2022 ESG Investing Conference
    • ESG Rated ETFs
  • Defined Contribution
    • Latest DC News
    • DC Money Manager Rankings
    • DC Record Keeper Rankings
    • Innovations in DC
    • Trends in DC: Focus on Retirement Income
    • 2022 Defined Contribution East Conference
    • 2022 DC Investment Lineup Conference
  • Searches & Hires
    • Latest Searches & Hires News
    • Searches & Hires Database
    • RFPs
  • Performance Data
    • P&I Research Center
    • Earnings Tracker
    • Endowment Returns Tracker
    • Corporate Pension Contribution Tracker
    • Pension Fund Returns Tracker
    • Pension Risk Transfer Database
    • Future of Investments Research Series
    • Charts & Infographics
    • Polls
  • Careers
  • Events
    • View All Conferences
    • View All Webinars
    • 2023 Defined Contribution East
    • 2023 ESG Investing
Breadcrumb
  1. Home
  2. Online
September 07, 2009 01:00 AM

Finding the right risk measure for glidepaths

Ronald J. Surz
  • Tweet
  • Share
  • Share
  • Email
  • More
    Reprints Print

    Traditional risk measures are wealth agnostic. An individual losing $1,000 on his $10,000 portfolio is treated the same as one losing $1 million on a $10 million portfolio. Most say that these losses are equally as painful, though it may well be the $10,000 investor suffers the greater pain.

    This might be true for different investors, but what if we're talking about the same investor at different stages in his or her life, who is invested in a target-date fund? Here's the point. A wealthy individual feels more pain today losing $1 million on a $10 million portfolio than he or she did losing $10,000 on a $100,000 portfolio 20 years earlier. Similarly a less wealthy person feels more pain losing $1,000 today on a $10,000 portfolio than he or she felt 20 years earlier losing $10 on a $100 portfolio. Risk in this context is not wealth agnostic.

    Anup Basu and Michael Drew in their “Portfolio Size Effects in Retirement Accounts: What Does it Imply for Lifecycle Asset Allocation.” published in the spring 2009 issue of the Journal of Portfolio Management, contend that a glidepath that increases equity exposure through time dominates the traditional glidepath, which has decreasing equity exposures. This contrarian path delivers greater ending wealth 90% of the time, with about the same risk, they found, leading to a characterization called “almost statistical dominance.” ASD means the contrarian path is better most of the time in both risk and reward.

    So what is wrong with this picture? Few if any would recommend 100% equity exposure at retirement. Yet traditional risk and reward measures indicate that a glidepath with increasing — rather than decreasing — equities results in greater wealth with about the same risk. It's a significant winner. In other words, our intuition tells us that retirees can't “afford” that much risk taking, but traditional unweighted risk measures argue otherwise. I believe the problem lies in the unweighted risk measure.

    We need an alternative risk measure that captures the importance of protecting account balances near retirement, if for no other reason than retirees have limited opportunities to make up losses by working longer. That is, we need a risk measure that is weighted by either account value and/or time remaining to retirement.

    There is a disconnect between ending wealth, which is very much dependent on the “size effect” described by Messrs. Basu and Drew, and risk measures that do not reflect the size effect. As Thomas Klepsch, vice president, State Street Bank & Trust Co., Boston, puts it, we need a risk metric that captures the “path dependency of a recurring investment with time variant objectives.” For example, a dollar-weighted risk measure reveals that the contrarian glide path is in fact 75% riskier than the traditional glide path.

    In a recent article, “Should Investors Hold More Equities Near Retirement, or Less?” published in August by Advisor Perspectives, an online publication, I measure risk as dollar-weighted downside deviation, where the dollar weights are account balances through time. This captures the size effect. In that article I find that the contrarian approach of increasing equity exposures has a dollar-weighted downside deviation of 7% per year on average over the 44 40-year periods that I examined. By contrast, the downside deviation of the traditional glidepath, with its decreasing equity allocation, is 4.2%. In other words, the contrarian glidepath is 75% riskier than the traditional. Not surprisingly, average ending wealth of the contrarian glidepath is also higher, averaging $631,000 vs. $516,000 for the traditional path. So the contrarian produces 22% more wealth. Reward-to-risk ratios using these results are $90,000 per unit of risk for contrarian, which compares with $123,000 for traditional. So I conclude that traditional is 37% more “efficient” than contrarian, defining efficiency as reward per unit of risk. So much for ASD.

    Hurdle: Creating a risk measure for a glidepath

    The challenge is to create a risk measure for an entire glidepath, which by definition is changing risk through time. So what I'm doing is estimating risk along the path, and averaging these estimates using dollar weights. The dollar weights are account balances across the path. If I don't dollar weight, but instead equal weight, the contrarian and typical approaches have roughly the same risk. I believe Messrs. Basu and Drew are using something like this equal-weighted risk measure. So they conclude that the contrarian produces more reward for the same risk — a free lunch.

    Bottom line: I think it's important to weight the risk estimate in some way that captures the importance to the investor, and one way to do this is size of the account through time.

    Although the unweighted volatility of returns for the contrarian path is similar to that of the declining equity tradition, the volatility of wealth along the glidepath is quite different. We know that the contrarian approach is a higher risk wealth path because it exposes assets to more risk when account balances are high. Unweighted return volatility does not capture this fact; dollar-weighted does.

    In my simple way of thinking, I get used to having $500,000, if that's roughly what I've had for the past five to 10 years as retirement approaches. So I plan around that number. If the number is 20% higher at $600,000, I'm probably not that much happier because I haven't been assessing my situation relative to the $500,000 alternative path. Rather, I deal with the current reality, and adapt to it. But in either case, a 20% loss is devastating, much more devastating than a 20% loss would have been 30 years earlier. The challenge is to create a risk measure that captures this spirit and I think that dollar-weighted downside deviation accomplishes this, because account balances are higher as retirement nears.

    Ronald J. Surz is principal of Target Date Analytics LLC, a firm specializing in target-date fund investing and benchmarking, and president of PPCA Inc., specializing in analytical tools for institutional investors and their consultants. Both are based in San Clemente, Calif.

    Related Articles
    The need to look at more than just age
    Seeing a standard of living, not just a pot of assets
    The debate over target-date funds
    The need to look at more than just age
    Seeing a standard of living, not just a pot of assets
    Recommended for You
    martin_luther_king_day_generic_i.jpg
    No P&I Daily on Martin Luther King Jr. Day
    Closed sign
    No P&I Daily over the holidays
    Happy_Thanksgiving_i.jpg
    No P&I Daily for Thanksgiving holiday
    The Institutional Investor's Guide to ESG Investing
    Sponsored Content: The Institutional Investor's Guide to ESG Investing

    Reader Poll

    January 25, 2023
    SEE MORE POLLS >
    Sponsored
    White Papers
    Show Me the Income: Discovering plan sponsor and participant preferences for cr…
    Morningstar Indexes' Annual ESG Risk/Return Analysis
    The Future of Infrastructure: Building a Better Tomorrow
    Outlook 2023: Opportunity in a volatile world
    Research for Institutional Money Management
    View More
    Sponsored Content
    Partner Content
    The Industrialization of ESG Investment
    For institutional investors, ETFs can make meeting liquidity needs easier
    Gold: the most effective commodity investment
    2021 Investment Outlook | Investing Beyond the Pandemic: A Reset for Portfolios
    Ten ways retirement plan professionals add value to plan sponsors
    Gold: an efficient hedge
    View More
    E-MAIL NEWSLETTERS

    Sign up and get the best of News delivered straight to your email inbox, free of charge. Choose your news – we will deliver.

    Subscribe Today
    December 12, 2022 page one

    Get access to the news, research and analysis of events affecting the retirement and institutional money management businesses from a worldwide network of reporters and editors.

    Subscribe
    Connect With Us
    • RSS
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn

    Our Mission

    To consistently deliver news, research and analysis to the executives who manage the flow of funds in the institutional investment market.

    About Us

    Main Office
    685 Third Avenue
    Tenth Floor
    New York, NY 10017-4036

    Chicago Office
    130 E. Randolph St.
    Suite 3200
    Chicago, IL 60601

    Contact Us

    Careers at Crain

    About Pensions & Investments

     

    Advertising
    • Media Kit
    • P&I Content Solutions
    • P&I Careers | Post a Job
    • Reprints & Permissions
    Resources
    • Subscribe
    • Newsletters
    • FAQ
    • P&I Research Center
    • Site map
    • Staff Directory
    Legal
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Request
    Pensions & Investments
    Copyright © 1996-2023. Crain Communications, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
    • Topics
      • Alternatives
      • Consultants
      • Coronavirus
      • Courts
      • Defined Contribution
      • ESG
      • ETFs
      • Face to Face
      • Hedge Funds
      • Industry Voices
      • Investing
      • Money Management
      • Opinion
      • Partner Content
      • Pension Funds
      • Private Equity
      • Real Estate
      • Russia-Ukraine War
      • SECURE 2.0
      • Special Reports
      • White Papers
    • Rankings & Awards
      • 1,000 Largest Retirement Plans
      • Top-Performing Managers
      • Largest Money Managers
      • DC Money Managers
      • DC Record Keepers
      • Largest Hedge Fund Managers
      • World's Largest Retirement Funds
      • Best Places to Work in Money Management
      • Excellence & Innovation Awards
      • WPS Innovation Awards
      • Eddy Awards
    • ETFs
      • Latest ETF News
      • Fund Screener
      • Education Center
      • Equities
      • Fixed Income
      • Commodities
      • Actively Managed
      • Alternatives
      • ESG Rated
    • ESG
      • Latest ESG News
      • The Institutional Investor’s Guide to ESG Investing
      • ESG Sustainability - Gaining Momentum
      • Climate Change: The Inescapable Opportunity
      • Impact Investing
      • 2022 ESG Investing Conference
      • ESG Rated ETFs
    • Defined Contribution
      • Latest DC News
      • DC Money Manager Rankings
      • DC Record Keeper Rankings
      • Innovations in DC
      • Trends in DC: Focus on Retirement Income
      • 2022 Defined Contribution East Conference
      • 2022 DC Investment Lineup Conference
    • Searches & Hires
      • Latest Searches & Hires News
      • Searches & Hires Database
      • RFPs
    • Performance Data
      • P&I Research Center
      • Earnings Tracker
      • Endowment Returns Tracker
      • Corporate Pension Contribution Tracker
      • Pension Fund Returns Tracker
      • Pension Risk Transfer Database
      • Future of Investments Research Series
      • Charts & Infographics
      • Polls
    • Careers
    • Events
      • View All Conferences
      • View All Webinars
      • 2023 Defined Contribution East
      • 2023 ESG Investing