Skip to main content
MENU
Subscribe
  • Sign Up Free
  • LOGIN
  • Subscribe
  • Topics
    • Alternatives
    • Consultants
    • Coronavirus
    • Courts
    • Defined Contribution
    • ESG
    • ETFs
    • Face to Face
    • Hedge Funds
    • Industry Voices
    • Investing
    • Money Management
    • Opinion
    • Partner Content
    • Pension Funds
    • Private Equity
    • Real Estate
    • Russia-Ukraine War
    • SECURE 2.0
    • Special Reports
    • White Papers
  • Rankings & Awards
    • 1,000 Largest Retirement Plans
    • Top-Performing Managers
    • Largest Money Managers
    • DC Money Managers
    • DC Record Keepers
    • Largest Hedge Fund Managers
    • World's Largest Retirement Funds
    • Best Places to Work in Money Management
    • Excellence & Innovation Awards
    • WPS Innovation Awards
    • Eddy Awards
  • ETFs
    • Latest ETF News
    • Fund Screener
    • Education Center
    • Equities
    • Fixed Income
    • Commodities
    • Actively Managed
    • Alternatives
    • ESG Rated
  • ESG
    • Latest ESG News
    • The Institutional Investor’s Guide to ESG Investing
    • ESG Sustainability - Gaining Momentum
    • Climate Change: The Inescapable Opportunity
    • Impact Investing
    • 2022 ESG Investing Conference
    • ESG Rated ETFs
  • Defined Contribution
    • Latest DC News
    • DC Money Manager Rankings
    • DC Record Keeper Rankings
    • Innovations in DC
    • Trends in DC: Focus on Retirement Income
    • 2022 Defined Contribution East Conference
    • 2022 DC Investment Lineup Conference
  • Searches & Hires
    • Latest Searches & Hires News
    • Searches & Hires Database
    • RFPs
  • Performance Data
    • P&I Research Center
    • Earnings Tracker
    • Endowment Returns Tracker
    • Corporate Pension Contribution Tracker
    • Pension Fund Returns Tracker
    • Pension Risk Transfer Database
    • Future of Investments Research Series
    • Charts & Infographics
    • Polls
  • Careers
  • Events
    • View All Conferences
    • View All Webinars
    • 2023 Defined Contribution East
    • 2023 ESG Investing
Breadcrumb
  1. Home
  2. Print
February 18, 2008 12:00 AM

Better safe than sorry, trustees say

California ruling has many walking out during votes

Arleen Jacobius
  • Tweet
  • Share
  • Share
  • Email
  • More
    Reprints Print

    A court ruling in California has public pension fund trustees in that state — and across the country — walking out of board votes rather than risk being charged with conflicts of interest.

    A state appeals court ruling created the confusion. That ruling — by the California Court of Appeal, Fourth District, San Diego, in Lexin vs. Superior Court — found that trustees, who often are participants in the retirement systems on whose boards they serve, can be criminally liable if they approve a contract that tangentially provides them a personal benefit.

    Some observers are concerned the ruling could affect a board of trustees’ ability to adopt rates of return and other assumptions underlying plans’ actuarial valuations.

    The appellate ruling let stand criminal indictments of former board members of the $4.8 billion San Diego City Employees’ Retirement System on charges that they reaped personal gain by allowing the city to underpay its contributions to the pension fund, resulting in a massive deficit. But the opinion also eliminated a “safe harbor” that exempted public board members in California from most conflict-of-interest situations, in effect extending the criminal liability to less extreme circumstances than occurred in San Diego, according to lawyers and public pension system officials.

    The case now is awaiting review by the California Supreme Court.

    In the meantime, nervous board members are declining to participate on some votes and walking out of meetings while the votes are being cast.

    “People have been recusing themselves and they have a heightened sense of disclosure. I’ve seen half of the board members have to leave a meeting,” Harvey Leiderman, San Francisco-based partner for law firm Reed Smith LLP.

    Ripple effect

    The ruling has had a ripple effect across the country, said Robert Klausner, general counsel of the National Conference on Public Employee Retirement Systems, Washington. He said he’s been at pension board meetings outside of California — including in Louisiana and Florida — in which board members declined to vote on an issue because of the Lexin opinion.

    In California, board members have been contacting their attorneys about potential conflicts before voting. Some are declining to vote.

    For example, four of the 11 members present at the San Diego City board’s Nov. 16 meeting recused themselves and left a closed session before a vote on whether to retain the formula used for participants to purchase additional service credits and to continue to amortize the pension fund’s shortfall through the existing unfunded actuarial liability. The four all are plan participants.

    When they do vote, trustees are putting lengthy disclosures of possible conflicts into meeting documents, hoping the disclosures will protect them. For example, meeting agendas for the San Diego City Employees Retirement System’s board for the last several months included almost a full page of disclosures.

    Four of the seven members of the $11.1 billion Los Angeles City Employees’ Retirement System’s board are either current or former employees and could be affected by the Lexin opinion, said Robert Aguallo Jr., general manager. So far, they have not had to walk out on a vote, he said, but that could change in the coming months when the board is asked to approve cost-of-living adjustment rates for next year.

    “The (Los Angeles) city attorney has advised us and the Los Angeles Fire and Police board to be more cautious and be aware that this decision could have an affect on their abilities to make decisions,” Mr. Aguallo said.

    A group of 17 California public pension systems — including the $244.8 billion California Public Employees’ Retirement System and the $173.7 billion California State Teachers’ Retirement System, both based in Sacramento — are preparing a friend-of-the-court brief favoring reversal of the appellate decision. NCPERS is expected to file a similar brief.

    “Trustees have to be free to make decisions without fear that some of them participate in the plan and it would leave them exposed to criminal liability,” said Mr. Klausner of NCPERS. “We think the court got it wrong.”

    National spotlight

    The case is being watched nationally. The Louisiana Legislature, for one, is wrestling with similar issues as its members debate amending the state constitution to strip pensions from board members for conflicts of interest.

    California, like other states, requires public retirement systems to include employees or retirees on their boards, explained Ashley K. Dunning, partner at San Francisco-based law firm Manatt, Phelps & Phillips LLP, who is representing the 17 pension systems. Roughly half of the members of public boards in California are or were public employees. Therefore, about half of the members of every public fund board in California as well as the retirement system’s entire executive staff, could benefit from most decisions made by the board for the benefit of plan participants and therefore, risk running afoul of criminal conflict of interest laws, even if the benefits are provided on precisely the same terms and conditions as if they were not board members or staff, Ms. Dunning explained.

    Most states impose civil penalties, not criminal ones, Mr. Klausner noted.

    If allowed to stand, the Lexin decision could make board members second-guess investment decisions, Mr. Klausner said. Board members could worry that decisions affecting returns could affect contributions, tangentially benefiting the board member.

    “These public pension boards have baked into their makeup potential conflicts of interest because, by law, they include people who are members,” he said.

    In the San Diego case, former board members including Cathy Lexin, former city human resources director, were charged in 2005 with violating their fiduciary responsibilities and, in some cases, engaging in felony conflicts of interest, by repeatedly allowing the city to underpay its contribution to the city’s pension plan. The plan had $3.2 billion in assets and an unfunded liability of at least $1.1 billion as of June 30, 2004. The system still has a $1.2 billion unfunded liability, according to the June 30 valuation updated last week.

    Making matters worse is a state Supreme Court ruling in another case that said legal advice doesn’t protect board members from potential criminal liability.

    “As a result of Lexin, board members have been asking whether they can participate in votes; but if they can’t rely on what their attorney tells them, they are in quite a quandary,” said Mr. Leiderman, who is fiduciary counsel for a number of public pension plans including the $8 billion Orange County Public Employees Retirement System, Santa Ana, Calif.

    “If every time board members do their normal job they expose themselves to criminal prosecution, you won’t be able to find anybody who wants the job.”

    “If you take Lexin to its extreme, you could bring the day-to-day operations of a system to a halt,” he said.

    At least one union is questioning whether its members should continue to sit on pension boards. For many years, at least one full and one alternate member of the $8.4 billion San Diego County Employees Retirement Association board come from the ranks of the Sheriff’s Department. (In all, six of the nine board members are plan participants.)

    Risk of prosecution

    These members “now find themselves at risk of felony prosecution for performing the very duties and responsibilities they were elected to perform,” wrote Fern M. Steiner, partner at Tosdal, Smith, Steiner & Wax, attorneys for the Sheriff’s Association of San Diego County, in a letter asking the Supreme Court to review the Lexin case. “As we explain the Lexin decision to our members, it becomes clear that deputy sheriffs and other employees of the county should decline to run for or sit on the SDCERA Board, since doing so exposes them to the risk of a devastating, life-altering felony prosecution,” Ms. Steiner wrote.

    Recommended for You
    Read the print edition of P&I
    Read the print edition of P&I
    Targeting millennials: Author, niece put his latest book to music
    Targeting millennials: Author, niece put his latest book to music
    How low is low? Projections say it's not low enough
    How low is low? Projections say it's not low enough
    The Institutional Investor's Guide to ESG Investing
    Sponsored Content: The Institutional Investor's Guide to ESG Investing

    Reader Poll

    January 25, 2023
    SEE MORE POLLS >
    Sponsored
    White Papers
    Show Me the Income: Discovering plan sponsor and participant preferences for cr…
    The Future of Infrastructure: Building a Better Tomorrow
    Outlook 2023: Opportunity in a volatile world
    Research for Institutional Money Management
    View More
    Sponsored Content
    Partner Content
    The Industrialization of ESG Investment
    For institutional investors, ETFs can make meeting liquidity needs easier
    Gold: the most effective commodity investment
    2021 Investment Outlook | Investing Beyond the Pandemic: A Reset for Portfolios
    Ten ways retirement plan professionals add value to plan sponsors
    Gold: an efficient hedge
    View More
    E-MAIL NEWSLETTERS

    Sign up and get the best of News delivered straight to your email inbox, free of charge. Choose your news – we will deliver.

    Subscribe Today
    December 12, 2022 page one

    Get access to the news, research and analysis of events affecting the retirement and institutional money management businesses from a worldwide network of reporters and editors.

    Subscribe
    Connect With Us
    • RSS
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn

    Our Mission

    To consistently deliver news, research and analysis to the executives who manage the flow of funds in the institutional investment market.

    About Us

    Main Office
    685 Third Avenue
    Tenth Floor
    New York, NY 10017-4036

    Chicago Office
    130 E. Randolph St.
    Suite 3200
    Chicago, IL 60601

    Contact Us

    Careers at Crain

    About Pensions & Investments

     

    Advertising
    • Media Kit
    • P&I Content Solutions
    • P&I Careers | Post a Job
    • Reprints & Permissions
    Resources
    • Subscribe
    • Newsletters
    • FAQ
    • P&I Research Center
    • Site map
    • Staff Directory
    Legal
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Request
    Pensions & Investments
    Copyright © 1996-2023. Crain Communications, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
    • Topics
      • Alternatives
      • Consultants
      • Coronavirus
      • Courts
      • Defined Contribution
      • ESG
      • ETFs
      • Face to Face
      • Hedge Funds
      • Industry Voices
      • Investing
      • Money Management
      • Opinion
      • Partner Content
      • Pension Funds
      • Private Equity
      • Real Estate
      • Russia-Ukraine War
      • SECURE 2.0
      • Special Reports
      • White Papers
    • Rankings & Awards
      • 1,000 Largest Retirement Plans
      • Top-Performing Managers
      • Largest Money Managers
      • DC Money Managers
      • DC Record Keepers
      • Largest Hedge Fund Managers
      • World's Largest Retirement Funds
      • Best Places to Work in Money Management
      • Excellence & Innovation Awards
      • WPS Innovation Awards
      • Eddy Awards
    • ETFs
      • Latest ETF News
      • Fund Screener
      • Education Center
      • Equities
      • Fixed Income
      • Commodities
      • Actively Managed
      • Alternatives
      • ESG Rated
    • ESG
      • Latest ESG News
      • The Institutional Investor’s Guide to ESG Investing
      • ESG Sustainability - Gaining Momentum
      • Climate Change: The Inescapable Opportunity
      • Impact Investing
      • 2022 ESG Investing Conference
      • ESG Rated ETFs
    • Defined Contribution
      • Latest DC News
      • DC Money Manager Rankings
      • DC Record Keeper Rankings
      • Innovations in DC
      • Trends in DC: Focus on Retirement Income
      • 2022 Defined Contribution East Conference
      • 2022 DC Investment Lineup Conference
    • Searches & Hires
      • Latest Searches & Hires News
      • Searches & Hires Database
      • RFPs
    • Performance Data
      • P&I Research Center
      • Earnings Tracker
      • Endowment Returns Tracker
      • Corporate Pension Contribution Tracker
      • Pension Fund Returns Tracker
      • Pension Risk Transfer Database
      • Future of Investments Research Series
      • Charts & Infographics
      • Polls
    • Careers
    • Events
      • View All Conferences
      • View All Webinars
      • 2023 Defined Contribution East
      • 2023 ESG Investing