Public pension plans worldwide should be run as "private and autonomous institutions" that more closely resemble corporate pension plans, according to a study released today by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. The OECD study found that governments should introduce partly or fully funded pension plans, rather than relying on pay-as-you inflows from taxpayers, and should submit "to the same regulatory and supervisory framework as applied to private sector workers." This would "insulate pension funds' decisions from political pressure and inappropriate interference from the government," the study concluded. Public sector pensions are more likely to be mismanaged when not run like corporate plans, since investments are more likely to be based on political, rather than economical, reasons, according to the study. That leaves taxpayers to pay for unfunded liabilities. To alleviate funding shortfalls, the study also suggested that more defined contribution plans be introduced.
The semi-annual repor examined six major public sector pension plans in Australia, Canada, Japan, the Netherlands and the United States. Among the plans studied were the $193.3 billion California Public Employees' Retirement System, Sacramento, and the e187 billion ($220 billion) Stichting Pensioenfonds ABP, Heerlen, Netherlands.