Skip to main content
MENU
Subscribe
  • Sign Up Free
  • LOGIN
  • Subscribe
  • Topics
    • Alternatives
    • Consultants
    • Courts
    • Defined Contribution
    • ESG
    • ETFs
    • Face to Face
    • Hedge Funds
    • Industry Voices
    • Investing
    • Money Management
    • Partner Content
    • Pension Funds
    • Private Equity
    • Real Estate
    • Regulation
    • SECURE 2.0
    • Special Reports
    • Washington
    • White Papers
  • Rankings & Awards
    • 1,000 Largest Retirement Plans
    • Top-Performing Managers
    • Largest Money Managers
    • DC Money Managers
    • DC Record Keepers
    • Largest Hedge Fund Managers
    • World's Largest Retirement Funds
    • Best Places to Work in Money Management
    • Excellence & Innovation Awards
    • WPS Innovation Awards
    • Eddy Awards
  • ETFs
    • Latest ETF News
    • Fund Screener
    • Education Center
    • Equities
    • Fixed Income
    • Commodities
    • Actively Managed
    • Alternatives
    • ESG Rated
  • ESG
    • Latest ESG News
    • The Institutional Investor’s Guide to ESG Investing
    • ESG Sustainability - Gaining Momentum
    • ESG Investing | Industry Brief
    • Innovation in ESG Investing
    • 2023 ESG Investing Conference
    • ESG Rated ETFs
  • Defined Contribution
    • Latest DC News
    • The Plan Sponsor's Guide to Retirement Income
    • DC Money Manager Rankings
    • DC Record Keeper Rankings
    • Innovations in DC
    • Trends in DC: Focus on Retirement Income
    • 2023 Defined Contribution East Conference
  • Searches & Hires
    • Latest Searches & Hires News
    • Searches & Hires Database
    • RFPs
  • Research Center
    • The P&I Research Center
    • Earnings Tracker
    • Endowment Returns Tracker
    • Corporate Pension Contribution Tracker
    • Pension Fund Returns Tracker
    • Pension Risk Transfer Database
  • Careers
  • Events
    • View All Conferences
    • View All Webinars
    • 2023 Canadian Pension Risk Strategies
    • 2023 Retirement Income
Breadcrumb
  1. Home
  2. Print
July 12, 2004 01:00 AM

Letters to the Editor

  • Tweet
  • Share
  • Share
  • Email
  • More
    Reprints Print
    Unlimited actuarial liability impractical

    In my view, you overlooked a couple of key points in your "Unsuitable limits" editorial in the June 28 issue. Let me preface my comments by stating that my fund's actuary (a major firm) has not proposed liability limitations on their work.

    The first point overlooked is that the insurance coverage available would not make much of a dent in the potential claims a plan sponsor of a large fund might pursue but, even at low levels of coverage, the premiums have become egregious.

    The second, and far more important, point is that implied limits may exist even if express limits are not stipulated. For example, if a plan sponsor is dealing with someone who is effectively a sole proprietor incorporated as an LLC, the assets of the firm might consist of a desk, a phone and a personal computer. Would a plan sponsor be better off having unlimited liability with such a firm or with a large firm that restricts liability exposure to X times their annual fee? I believe the answer to that should be self-evident.

    Unless plan sponsors and actuaries are able to come to reasonable agreements on this subject, I could easily envision actuaries migrating to sole-proprietor arrangements. Under such arrangements, I fear that plan sponsors would be relegated to dealing with individuals who have no meaningful corporate assets and severely limited depth in terms of staff resources. In my opinion this would dramatically increase risk to the plan even though it would likely comport with some people's view of unlimited liability.

    Preventive maintenance through periodic due diligence exercises, such as actuarial reviews (audits), seems to me to be far preferable to finger pointing related to errors that may have been allowed to go undetected for protracted periods. Proactive due diligence is very much a part of many of the relationships fund officials have with outside service providers — in my view, actuaries should be no exception.

    Gary Findlay

    executive director

    Missouri State Employees' Retirement System

    Jefferson City

    Defining liability scope

    The editorial "Unsuitable limits" in the June 28 Pensions & Investments makes some good points, but misses a few essential ones.

    Actuarial firms are not unique in their desire to limit liability for damages stemming from mistakes made by their employees. Physicians, hospitals, dentists and some governments do this as well. Summer camps will often not accept children whose parents refuse to sign liability waivers.

    The editorial cites examples of firms being sued for amounts exceeding $1 billion. Indeed, a mere 1% mistake in a $50 billion actuarial calculation results in a $500 million alleged loss. These are enormous sums of money that very few, if any, actuarial firms can afford to pay. Insurance for amounts such as that will likely be either prohibitively expensive or impossible to obtain. Liability insurance for unlimited amounts is definitely impossible to obtain.

    Actuarial calculations are imprecise to begin with, based upon assumptions and judgment. The editorial mentions mistakes, negligence and fraud. While fraud is, in my view, another matter, determining whether or not "mistakes" or "negligence" have occurred is a subjective matter. Determining the potential amount of damage associated with a particular mistake can be equally subjective.

    A solo practitioner who offers contracts without limitation of liability is offering less protection to clients than a larger firm that offers contracts that do involve a limitation.

    Refusal to accept reasonable liability limits is likely to lead to a reduction in the number of actuarial firms willing to serve pension plans, and an increase in the costs of providing such actuarial services should they continue to be offered.

    I have permitted surgeons to operate on my children knowing full well that a significant surgical error could produce death, and that no one could undo that effect. In such an eventuality, I might have sued the surgeon, but I would not expect the result to be the financial ruin of the surgeon, the hospital wherein the surgery was performed, and all of the people who work there, many of whom may not have known the surgeon, and most of whom would have had no involvement with my child's surgery. A $1 billion judgment against most actuarial firms would have such a result and could not be paid anyway.

    The editorial encourages plan sponsors to refuse to accept "unreasonable liability limits" and "to make sure actuarial firms have the insurance and other support to cover appropriate damages." Basically, I agree with that point of view. I think the debate needs to center around the meaning of "unreasonable liability limits" and "appropriate damages," as well as on the availability and affordability of insurance (the cost of which ultimately falls on the clients).

    Brian B. Murphy

    Gabriel, Roeder, Smith & Co.

    Southfield, Mich.

    Recommended for You
    Read the print edition of P&I
    Read the print edition of P&I
    Gender diversity is improving on FTSE 350 boards
    Gender diversity is improving on FTSE 350 boards
    FINRA honors Wharton's Olivia Mitchell with Ketchum Prize
    FINRA honors Wharton's Olivia Mitchell with Ketchum Prize
    ESG: Seeking Alignment with Climate Change
    Sponsored Content: ESG: Seeking Alignment with Climate Change

    Reader Poll

    May 1, 2023
     
    SEE MORE POLLS >
    Sponsored
    White Papers
    Middle market credit: We’re gonna need a bigger boat
    Alternative Credit: Differences and Opportunities in CLOs and Credit Risk Shari…
    Fixed Income is Attractive, but Beware of "Fake" Yield
    Counting on a Crisis: A Catalyst for Investment Innovation?
    A Strategic Allocator's Guide to Productivity and Profits
    Research for Institutional Money Management
    View More
    Sponsored Content
    Partner Content
    The Industrialization of ESG Investment
    For institutional investors, ETFs can make meeting liquidity needs easier
    Gold: the most effective commodity investment
    2021 Investment Outlook | Investing Beyond the Pandemic: A Reset for Portfolios
    Ten ways retirement plan professionals add value to plan sponsors
    Gold: an efficient hedge
    View More
    E-MAIL NEWSLETTERS

    Sign up and get the best of News delivered straight to your email inbox, free of charge. Choose your news – we will deliver.

    Subscribe Today
    December 12, 2022 page one

    Get access to the news, research and analysis of events affecting the retirement and institutional money management businesses from a worldwide network of reporters and editors.

    Subscribe
    Connect With Us
    • RSS
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn

    Our Mission

    To consistently deliver news, research and analysis to the executives who manage the flow of funds in the institutional investment market.

    About Us

    Main Office
    685 Third Avenue
    Tenth Floor
    New York, NY 10017-4036

    Chicago Office
    130 E. Randolph St.
    Suite 3200
    Chicago, IL 60601

    Contact Us

    Careers at Crain

    About Pensions & Investments

     

    Advertising
    • Media Kit
    • P&I Custom Content
    • P&I Careers | Post a Job
    • Reprints & Permissions
    Resources
    • Subscribe
    • Newsletters
    • FAQ
    • P&I Research Center
    • Site map
    • Staff Directory
    Legal
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Request
    Pensions & Investments
    Copyright © 1996-2023. Crain Communications, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
    • Topics
      • Alternatives
      • Consultants
      • Courts
      • Defined Contribution
      • ESG
      • ETFs
      • Face to Face
      • Hedge Funds
      • Industry Voices
      • Investing
      • Money Management
      • Partner Content
      • Pension Funds
      • Private Equity
      • Real Estate
      • Regulation
      • SECURE 2.0
      • Special Reports
      • Washington
      • White Papers
    • Rankings & Awards
      • 1,000 Largest Retirement Plans
      • Top-Performing Managers
      • Largest Money Managers
      • DC Money Managers
      • DC Record Keepers
      • Largest Hedge Fund Managers
      • World's Largest Retirement Funds
      • Best Places to Work in Money Management
      • Excellence & Innovation Awards
      • WPS Innovation Awards
      • Eddy Awards
    • ETFs
      • Latest ETF News
      • Fund Screener
      • Education Center
      • Equities
      • Fixed Income
      • Commodities
      • Actively Managed
      • Alternatives
      • ESG Rated
    • ESG
      • Latest ESG News
      • The Institutional Investor’s Guide to ESG Investing
      • ESG Sustainability - Gaining Momentum
      • ESG Investing | Industry Brief
      • Innovation in ESG Investing
      • 2023 ESG Investing Conference
      • ESG Rated ETFs
    • Defined Contribution
      • Latest DC News
      • The Plan Sponsor's Guide to Retirement Income
      • DC Money Manager Rankings
      • DC Record Keeper Rankings
      • Innovations in DC
      • Trends in DC: Focus on Retirement Income
      • 2023 Defined Contribution East Conference
    • Searches & Hires
      • Latest Searches & Hires News
      • Searches & Hires Database
      • RFPs
    • Research Center
      • The P&I Research Center
      • Earnings Tracker
      • Endowment Returns Tracker
      • Corporate Pension Contribution Tracker
      • Pension Fund Returns Tracker
      • Pension Risk Transfer Database
    • Careers
    • Events
      • View All Conferences
      • View All Webinars
      • 2023 Canadian Pension Risk Strategies
      • 2023 Retirement Income