Skip to main content
MENU
Subscribe
  • Subscribe
  • Account
  • LOGIN
  • Topics
    • Alternatives
    • Consultants
    • Coronavirus
    • Courts
    • Defined Contribution
    • ESG
    • ETFs
    • Hedge Funds
    • Industry Voices
    • Investing
    • Money Management
    • Opinion
    • Partner Content
    • Pension Funds
    • Private Equity
    • Real Estate
    • Russia-Ukraine War
    • SECURE Act 2.0
    • Special Reports
    • White Papers
  • Rankings & Awards
    • 1,000 Largest Retirement Plans
    • Top-Performing Managers
    • Largest Money Managers
    • DC Money Managers
    • DC Record Keepers
    • Largest Hedge Fund Managers
    • World's Largest Retirement Funds
    • Best Places to Work in Money Management
    • Excellence & Innovation Awards
    • WPS Innovation Awards
    • Eddy Awards
  • ETFs
    • Latest ETF News
    • Fund Screener
    • Education Center
    • Equities
    • Fixed Income
    • Commodities
    • Actively Managed
    • Alternatives
    • ESG Rated
  • ESG
    • Latest ESG News
    • The Institutional Investor’s Guide to ESG Investing
    • ESG Sustainability - Gaining Momentum
    • Climate Change: The Inescapable Opportunity
    • Impact Investing
    • 2022 ESG Investing Conference
    • ESG Rated ETFs
  • Defined Contribution
    • Latest DC News
    • DC Money Manager Rankings
    • DC Record Keeper Rankings
    • Innovations in DC
    • Trends in DC: Focus on Retirement Income
    • 2022 Defined Contribution East Conference
    • 2022 DC Investment Lineup Conference
  • Searches & Hires
    • Latest Searches & Hires News
    • Searches & Hires Database
    • RFPs
  • Performance Data
    • P&I Research Center
    • Earnings Tracker
    • Endowment Returns Tracker
    • Corporate Pension Contribution Tracker
    • Pension Fund Returns Tracker
    • Pension Risk Transfer Database
    • Future of Investments Research Series
    • Charts & Infographics
    • Polls
  • Careers
  • Events
    • View All Conferences
    • View All Webinars
    • 2022 Retirement Income Conference
    • 2022 Managing Pension Risk & Liabilities
    • 2022 WorldPensionSummit
Breadcrumb
  1. Home
  2. Print
April 15, 2002 01:00 AM

Accounting trick: Companies under fire for incentive pay calculations

Pension computations boost bottom line, so executives reap greater 'performance' pay

Vineeta Anand
  • Tweet
  • Share
  • Share
  • Email
  • More
    Reprints Print

    WASHINGTON - Verizon Communications Inc.'s pension fund lost $3.1 billion in 2001, but reported $1.85 billion in pension income that boosted the company's pre-tax operating profit to $2.77 billion.

    Verizon's trick? An accounting rule lets companies take their assumed rate of returns on their pension assets into account in calculating the fund's financial impact on its bottom line. Then, the company used this inflated net income as the basis for calculating incentive pay for top management.

    Verizon wasn't the only blue-chip company to pull this off. But the jig may be up for Verizon, as well as for Qwest Communications International, International Business Machines Corp. and General Electric Co. This quartet of big companies is facing the ire of angry employee and retiree shareholders demanding an end to this practice.

    Angry employee and retiree shareholders have filed proposals at these companies demanding they stop including pension income in bottom-line calculations for determining "performance" pay for top management.

    McDermott assents

    McDermott International Inc., which faced a similar shareholder proposal this year, already has agreed to exclude pension income from the computations for top management's incentive pay.

    In their battle, the disgruntled shareholders have the support of most investment analysts and pension actuaries who maintain that Financial Accounting Standard 87, the accounting rule that governs pensions, is flawed, and companies should not be allowed to include earnings on pension assets in operating income.

    "In principle, the resolutions that the stockholders are making is correct. Earnings upon which executive compensation is based should be operating earnings, absent (pension income)," said Douglas A. Love, chief investment officer and treasurer at Investors Guaranty Fund Ltd., Hamilton, Bermuda. Executives, Mr. Love said, should be rewarded for managing companies, not managing pension assets.

    Jeremy Gold, an independent New York-based actuary, concurs. "It is not in the shareholders' interest to pay management to generate pension earnings," he said.

    Retiree shareholders, in particular, are incensed that top executives at these companies have been collecting hundreds of millions in bonuses and incentive pay based on the fattened pension surpluses and distorted earnings, instead of using a portion of the surplus pension assets to give cost-of-living increases to beneficiaries.

    Some also are concerned that the companies are using pension income to disguise that income from underlying operations has dropped, and the stocks are flailing.

    Plus, the collapse of Enron Corp. has focused investors' attention on accounting shenanigans, and drawn the scrutiny of investment analysts who pitch these companies to investors.

    Dwindling surpluses

    Many companies can expect dwindling pension surpluses in coming years, thanks to the downdraft in the stock market and lower interest rates, and face the very real possibility of the pension income morphing into a pension cost - which then could penalize executives' pay.

    "If they have a pension expense, are they going to include it in the computations of net income on which executive pay is based? Of course not," said Nelson Philips, president of the Denver-based Association of US WEST Retirees, which is presenting the proposal at Qwest's June 4 annual shareholder meeting. (US WEST merged with Qwest on June 30, 2000, and took the Qwest name.)

    Paul R. Edwards, chairman of the Springfield, Mass., Coalition for Retirement Security, calls the inclusion of pension income for calculating executives' performance pay an "obscene" practice.

    The shareholders' campaign at Verizon also has spurred Institutional Shareholder Services, an influential Bethesda, Md., firm that advises some of the nation's largest public and corporate pension funds on proxy voting, to recommend a vote for the proposal by a member of the Association of BellTel Retirees seeking to exclude pension income from executive pay determinations.

    "Since the company would have reported a significant and material net loss for fiscal 2001 had it not included over $1.8 billion in pension income in its calculation of net income, and since earnings per share is one of the factors used by the company to determine the at-risk portion of executive pay, we believe this proposal warrants shareholder support," the ISS analysis stated.

    ISS recommended shareholders vote against the proposals last year when they first appeared on the ballots at Verizon and Qwest. In 2001, the proposal received around 19% of votes at Verizon and 16% at Qwest, where insiders control more than 20% of the outstanding shares.

    The Council of Institutional Investors, the powerful Washington-based activist shareholder group, does not have a policy on the issue, according to Ann Yerger, director of research service.

    Verizon rebuttal

    In its rebuttal of the shareholders' proposal, Verizon noted that in order to determine incentive executive pay, the company compares actual performance, including financial results, to the corresponding targets. The pension fund lost $3.1 billion in 2001 instead of earning the $4.8 billion it had anticipated earning, based on a 9.25% assumed rate of return. Still, said Mark Menchin, managing director of risk management at Verizon Investment Management Corp., which manages the pension fund, the incentive pay to executives was justified because the pension fund outperformed its benchmarks by one to two percentage points.

    Shareholders last year failed to get a similar proposal on the ballot at IBM after the company successfully convinced the SEC that the proposal was a matter of "ordinary business" that could be excluded from the proxy. Big Blue reported surplus pension assets of $956 million, and pension income of $1 billion in 2001, on pre-tax income of $10.95 billion, or just under 10% of its earnings. Assuming a 10% return, the computer company had anticipated earning $4.2 billion on its pension assets, but in fact, lost $2.4 billion in 2001.

    (The proposal was sponsored by Donald S. Parry, a member of the IBM Employee Benefits Action Coalition. It was rewritten this year as a more obvious executive compensation proposal. The SEC has said executive compensation is a policy issue that doesn't fall under the rubric of ordinary business.)

    Carol Makovich, a company spokeswoman, declined to comment on the shareholder proposal, other than to refer to the company's rebuttal in the proxy. Contrary to the shareholders' contention, "IBM does not manipulate its pension plan to create profits for the company or to enrich its executives," according to the company's statement asking shareholders to vote against the proposal.

    Reduced loss

    At Qwest, the company's pension income of $360 million actually helped reduce the company's pre-tax loss to $3.95 billion. The pension fund lost $851 million on its investments, instead of the expected gain of $1.1 billion, based on a 9.4% assumed rate of return. In its recommendation to investors to vote against the shareholder proposal, Qwest noted "we believe that our assumptions on investment returns are realistic, and are consistent with those utilized by other large communication companies and S&P 500 companies."

    At General Electric, the shareholder proposal is being offered by the Communications Workers of America Pension Fund, which owns 91,000 shares. The conglomerate's pension fund had a surplus of $14.6 billion at the end of 2001, and reported pension income of $2.1 billion that was included in the company's bottom line. Its assumed rate of return was $4.3 billion, assuming a 9.5% return, but in fact lost $2.9 billion last year.

    While it agrees with the proposal that pension income should not be used to boost executive pay, ISS recommended shareholders vote against this proposal, noting the pension income contributed only 11.43% of pre-tax earnings, slightly less than the average 12% contribution to S&P companies.

    Recommended for You
    Read the print edition of P&I
    Read the print edition of P&I
    How low is low? Projections say it's not low enough
    How low is low? Projections say it's not low enough
    FINRA honors Wharton's Olivia Mitchell with Ketchum Prize
    FINRA honors Wharton's Olivia Mitchell with Ketchum Prize
    Private Markets
    Sponsored Content: Private Markets

    Reader Poll

    July 29, 2022
    SEE MORE POLLS >
    Sponsored
    White Papers
    Gaining Momentum: Where Next for Trend-Following?
    The market opportunity in U.S. residential mortgage-backed securities
    Credit Indices Evolve with Enhanced Data Inputs
    Hedge Funds 2.0: Back to the future
    How Has 2022's Carnage Reshaped Global Stock and Bond Markets?
    Crossroads: Politics, Inflation, & Bonds
    View More
    Sponsored Content
    Partner Content
    The Industrialization of ESG Investment
    For institutional investors, ETFs can make meeting liquidity needs easier
    Gold: the most effective commodity investment
    2021 Investment Outlook | Investing Beyond the Pandemic: A Reset for Portfolios
    Ten ways retirement plan professionals add value to plan sponsors
    Gold: an efficient hedge
    View More
    E-MAIL NEWSLETTERS

    Sign up and get the best of News delivered straight to your email inbox, free of charge. Choose your news – we will deliver.

    Subscribe Today
    August 1, 2022 page one

    Get access to the news, research and analysis of events affecting the retirement and institutional money management businesses from a worldwide network of reporters and editors.

    Subscribe
    Connect With Us
    • RSS
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn

    Our Mission

    To consistently deliver news, research and analysis to the executives who manage the flow of funds in the institutional investment market.

    About Us

    Main Office
    685 Third Avenue
    Tenth Floor
    New York, NY 10017-4036

    Chicago Office
    130 E. Randolph St.
    Suite 3200
    Chicago, IL 60601

    Contact Us

    Careers at Crain

    About Pensions & Investments

     

    Advertising
    • Media Kit
    • P&I Content Solutions
    • P&I Careers | Post a Job
    • Reprints & Permissions
    Resources
    • Subscribe
    • Newsletters
    • FAQ
    • P&I Research Center
    • Site map
    • Staff Directory
    Legal
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Request
    Pensions & Investments
    Copyright © 1996-2022. Crain Communications, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
    • Topics
      • Alternatives
      • Consultants
      • Coronavirus
      • Courts
      • Defined Contribution
      • ESG
      • ETFs
      • Hedge Funds
      • Industry Voices
      • Investing
      • Money Management
      • Opinion
      • Partner Content
      • Pension Funds
      • Private Equity
      • Real Estate
      • Russia-Ukraine War
      • SECURE Act 2.0
      • Special Reports
      • White Papers
    • Rankings & Awards
      • 1,000 Largest Retirement Plans
      • Top-Performing Managers
      • Largest Money Managers
      • DC Money Managers
      • DC Record Keepers
      • Largest Hedge Fund Managers
      • World's Largest Retirement Funds
      • Best Places to Work in Money Management
      • Excellence & Innovation Awards
      • WPS Innovation Awards
      • Eddy Awards
    • ETFs
      • Latest ETF News
      • Fund Screener
      • Education Center
      • Equities
      • Fixed Income
      • Commodities
      • Actively Managed
      • Alternatives
      • ESG Rated
    • ESG
      • Latest ESG News
      • The Institutional Investor’s Guide to ESG Investing
      • ESG Sustainability - Gaining Momentum
      • Climate Change: The Inescapable Opportunity
      • Impact Investing
      • 2022 ESG Investing Conference
      • ESG Rated ETFs
    • Defined Contribution
      • Latest DC News
      • DC Money Manager Rankings
      • DC Record Keeper Rankings
      • Innovations in DC
      • Trends in DC: Focus on Retirement Income
      • 2022 Defined Contribution East Conference
      • 2022 DC Investment Lineup Conference
    • Searches & Hires
      • Latest Searches & Hires News
      • Searches & Hires Database
      • RFPs
    • Performance Data
      • P&I Research Center
      • Earnings Tracker
      • Endowment Returns Tracker
      • Corporate Pension Contribution Tracker
      • Pension Fund Returns Tracker
      • Pension Risk Transfer Database
      • Future of Investments Research Series
      • Charts & Infographics
      • Polls
    • Careers
    • Events
      • View All Conferences
      • View All Webinars
      • 2022 Retirement Income Conference
      • 2022 Managing Pension Risk & Liabilities
      • 2022 WorldPensionSummit