Skip to main content
MENU
Subscribe
  • Subscribe
  • Account
  • LOGIN
  • Topics
    • Alternatives
    • Consultants
    • Coronavirus
    • Courts
    • Defined Contribution
    • ESG
    • ETFs
    • Hedge Funds
    • Industry Voices
    • Investing
    • Money Management
    • Opinion
    • Partner Content
    • Pension Funds
    • Private Equity
    • Real Estate
    • Russia-Ukraine War
    • SECURE Act 2.0
    • Special Reports
    • White Papers
  • Rankings & Awards
    • 1,000 Largest Retirement Plans
    • Top-Performing Managers
    • Largest Money Managers
    • DC Money Managers
    • DC Record Keepers
    • Largest Hedge Fund Managers
    • World's Largest Retirement Funds
    • Best Places to Work in Money Management
    • Excellence & Innovation Awards
    • Eddy Awards
  • ETFs
    • Latest ETF News
    • Fund Screener
    • Education Center
    • Equities
    • Fixed Income
    • Commodities
    • Actively Managed
    • Alternatives
    • ESG Rated
  • ESG
    • Latest ESG News
    • The Institutional Investor’s Guide to ESG Investing
    • Climate Change: The Inescapable Opportunity
    • Impact Investing
    • 2022 ESG Investing Conference
    • ESG Rated ETFs
  • Defined Contribution
    • Latest DC News
    • DC Money Manager Rankings
    • DC Record Keeper Rankings
    • Innovations in DC
    • Trends in DC: Focus on Retirement Income
    • 2022 Defined Contribution East Conference
    • 2022 DC Investment Lineup Conference
  • Searches & Hires
    • Latest Searches & Hires News
    • Searches & Hires Database
    • RFPs
  • Performance Data
    • P&I Research Center
    • Earnings Tracker
    • Endowment Returns Tracker
    • Corporate Pension Contribution Tracker
    • Pension Fund Returns Tracker
    • Pension Risk Transfer Database
    • Future of Investments Research Series
    • Charts & Infographics
    • Polls
  • Careers
  • Events
    • View All Conferences
    • View All Webinars
    • 2022 Innovation Investing Conference
    • 2022 Defined Contribution East Conference
    • 2022 ESG Investing Conference
    • 2022 DC Investment Lineup Conference
    • 2022 Alternatives Investing Conference
Breadcrumb
  1. Home
  2. Print
November 26, 2001 12:00 AM

MARYLAND DISPUTE: Pension losses spur call for fund to use TUCS

Lawmakers criticize equity allocation, drop of $3.6 billion; fund execs question rankings

Ricki Fulman
  • Tweet
  • Share
  • Share
  • Email
  • More
    Reprints Print

    BALTIMORE - Trustees at the State Retirement and Pension System of Maryland were stunned last month when they learned their pension fund had placed last in the Trust Universe Comparison Service's ranking of 38 funds with assets of more than $1 billion. The system lost $3.6 billion in the fiscal year ended June 30, sliding 9.6% for the period.

    The system, which had $29.4 billion in assets as of Nov. 13, does not use the TUCS rankings as a benchmark because not enough information is available about the other 37 funds against which it was being compared, said Peter Vaughn, executive director at the Maryland fund. Instead, Maryland measures its performance against a weighted average of its managers' benchmarks and its 8% assumption rate.

    As a result of the multibillion loss and its poor performance in fiscal 2001, the system has come under fire from the state's Joint Pension Committee, a legislative panel that oversees the system. In its annual report on the system's performance, the committee publicly announced the poor ranking and called for SRPS to start using the TUCS ranking system. It also criticized the system for having too high an allocation to equities.

    As of June 30, the equity allocation had swelled to 72% of assets, including 5% in real estate. But by Oct. 31, as the stock market rallied, the allocation had fallen to 64% of assets, including 5% in real estate, which was closer to what other funds have, Mr. Vaughn said. According to Pensions & Investments' 2001 sponsor directory, for the year ended Sept. 30, 2000, the average public pension fund had 46.9% of total assets allocated to domestic equities, 14.3% to international equities and 3.4% to real estate, for a total of 64.6%.

    He added that in the last year the poor performance of international equities hurt overall performance the most. The international stock component had surged to 23.6% of total assets by the end of June, and has since been reduced to 20% of assets. "But we lost less than EAFE, our benchmark, which was down 23%, while we were down 21% in the period," Mr. Vaughn noted.

    Not enough information

    He argued that it doesn't make sense to use the TUCS rankings because too little is known about the other pension funds in the TUCS $1 billion-plus universe. "We used to get their reports at our planning conferences and decided in 1996 that it was not relevant because it was comparing apples and oranges, and we'd rather compare apples and apples. Some funds in there were around $1 billion in assets. Others were near $150 billion. We didn't know who they were, their asset allocation, what their risk parameters were, or on what basis they were measuring. The board directed staff not to provide it any more, so we didn't."

    Many large public pension funds use the TUCS ranking service as a benchmark, and fund officials see the reports even if they don't make specific use of the information, because its clients are the banks that serve as the custodians of the pension funds. TUCS, a subsidiary of Wilshire Associates, Santa Monica, Calif., is highly secretive about its ranking strategy and which pension funds it ranks. Kim Shepherd, spokeswoman for TUCS, said, "Our clients won't allow us to say anything about it to anyone."

    Internal benchmarks

    Many public funds, like Maryland, prefer to use internal benchmarks. Lisa Mazzocco, principal officer for equities at the $26 billion Los Angeles County Employees Retirement Association, Pasadena, Calif., said LACERA measures its total fund performance against customized benchmarks. "Different funds have different allocations, which makes comparisons difficult. In addition, some custodians don't get the information on all of the asset classes such as private equity or real estate, so you can't really compare them."

    Because of the joint pension committee's recommendation, the TUCS issue will be revisited and discussed at the system's next investment committee meeting on Dec. 14. Said Mr. Vaughn: "If the joint pension committee insists that we use it, we will."

    The joint pension committee has other complaints. It is asking the system to consider hiring its first outside consultant and to redo its asset allocation policy, which was set in March 2000. Staff also is studying these issues and will report on them at the December meeting.

    Mr. Vaughn observed SRPS had never felt the need to use an outside consultant. "We have three voting members on our investment committee who have financial expertise, who serve as consultants. We call them the `three wise men,' and they help us with our investment strategy. When we need expertise on a certain issue, we get it issue by issue. We have always felt that consultants don't add much value, especially considering that we have had only two bad years out of 17, always without an investment consultant. The board hasn't thought there was any value to them before this, either."

    Maryland has a long-term outlook, Mr. Vaughn emphasized, pointing out that as a result of increasing equity exposure from 35% in 1991 to 67% in 2001, the system's underfunded status dropped considerably. "In 1991, it was underfunded by $6.5 billion, compared to 2001, when it was underfunded by $750 million." The increased equity allocation also accounted for a surge in size, growing from $12.6 billion in 1991 to $29.5 billion in 2001.

    "Many others (other funds) were in the same boat last year. Others might have been more conservative, but history has showed that by being in stocks over time, you're rewarded if you're in it for the long term. The board's risk appetite can change. We have to decide if we're comfortable taking the risk. We do an analysis (of the asset allocation policy) every spring. But in the end, I don't think the board wants to make a knee-jerk reaction to short-term events, since we're long-term investors."

    Arthur Caple, chairman of the investment committee and executive director of the state's supplemental retirement plan, said the 64% allocation to equities is in line with equity allocations at other public funds in the system's peer group, those with assets from $20 billion to $50 billion. "Staff is doing a comparative analysis of those pension funds, which is to be presented at the December meeting."

    But making frequent changes to the asset allocation is not a prudent move, Mr. Caple asserted.

    "The system reviews its managers every year, and none of them are exactly setting the world on fire. But we're in it for the long term, and have to base our review of them on three to five years of performance. If we make short-term bets, we'll be firing people, which costs money. It will mean that we're selling our assets low and buying high. My opinion is that we should stick with what we have," he said.

    Current allocation

    The current asset allocation policy was essentially the work of Richard Dixon, state treasurer and chairman of the board, said Frank Cappiello, president of McCullough, Andrews, Cappiello, Baltimore, an investment firm that advises wealthy clients and small institutions. Mr. Cappiello served on the investment committee for 17 years until 1996, and he still follows the fund. Mr. Cappiello thinks Mr. Dixon should have cut back on equities in the last year as the stock market started to slide. "Moving to an allocation of over 72% was extremely aggressive, at a time when the market was selling at an all-time high. During my time at the system, when we did increase stocks, we never approached anything like 70%."

    Mr. Dixon defended the high stock allocation. "It's been very successful for us," he said. He has no plans to lower the exposure.

    One trustee who opposed the high allocation was Carl Lancaster, a retired teacher. "Equities had been at a range of 50% to 70%, and in March 2000, the board approved letting it go up to 80%. I thought that with the current high valuations, it didn't merit increasing it," he recalled. "But I was the only person to vote against it.

    "We haven't changed the asset allocation since that time, although we review it on an ongoing basis. I have concerns about the allocation, but I also agree with the investment committee's decision not to sell now, because we'd be losing money," Mr. Lancaster said.

    Recommended for You
    Read the print edition of P&I
    Read the print edition of P&I
    How low is low? Projections say it's not low enough
    How low is low? Projections say it's not low enough
    FINRA honors Wharton's Olivia Mitchell with Ketchum Prize
    FINRA honors Wharton's Olivia Mitchell with Ketchum Prize
    OCIO, Anchor in Rough Seas
    Sponsored Content: OCIO, Anchor in Rough Seas

    Reader Poll

    May 23, 2022
    SEE MORE POLLS >
    Sponsored
    White Papers
    Crossroads: Politics, Inflation, & Bonds
    Credit Indices: Closing the Fixed Income Evolutionary Gap
    Forever in Style: Benchmarking with the Morningstar® Broad Style Indexes℠
    Q2 2022 Credit Outlook: Carry On
    Leverage does not equal risk
    Is there a mid-cap gap in your DC plan?
    View More
    Sponsored Content
    Partner Content
    The Industrialization of ESG Investment
    For institutional investors, ETFs can make meeting liquidity needs easier
    Gold: the most effective commodity investment
    2021 Investment Outlook | Investing Beyond the Pandemic: A Reset for Portfolios
    Ten ways retirement plan professionals add value to plan sponsors
    Gold: an efficient hedge
    View More
    E-MAIL NEWSLETTERS

    Sign up and get the best of News delivered straight to your email inbox, free of charge. Choose your news – we will deliver.

    Subscribe Today
    May 23, 2022 page one

    Get access to the news, research and analysis of events affecting the retirement and institutional money management businesses from a worldwide network of reporters and editors.

    Subscribe
    Connect With Us
    • RSS
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn

    Our Mission

    To consistently deliver news, research and analysis to the executives who manage the flow of funds in the institutional investment market.

    About Us

    Main Office
    685 Third Avenue
    Tenth Floor
    New York, NY 10017-4036

    Chicago Office
    130 E. Randolph St.
    Suite 3200
    Chicago, IL 60601

    Contact Us

    Careers at Crain

    About Pensions & Investments

     

    Advertising
    • Media Kit
    • P&I Content Solutions
    • P&I Careers | Post a Job
    • Reprints & Permissions
    Resources
    • Subscribe
    • Newsletters
    • FAQ
    • P&I Research Center
    • Site map
    • Staff Directory
    Legal
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Request
    Pensions & Investments
    Copyright © 1996-2022. Crain Communications, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
    • Topics
      • Alternatives
      • Consultants
      • Coronavirus
      • Courts
      • Defined Contribution
      • ESG
      • ETFs
      • Hedge Funds
      • Industry Voices
      • Investing
      • Money Management
      • Opinion
      • Partner Content
      • Pension Funds
      • Private Equity
      • Real Estate
      • Russia-Ukraine War
      • SECURE Act 2.0
      • Special Reports
      • White Papers
    • Rankings & Awards
      • 1,000 Largest Retirement Plans
      • Top-Performing Managers
      • Largest Money Managers
      • DC Money Managers
      • DC Record Keepers
      • Largest Hedge Fund Managers
      • World's Largest Retirement Funds
      • Best Places to Work in Money Management
      • Excellence & Innovation Awards
      • Eddy Awards
    • ETFs
      • Latest ETF News
      • Fund Screener
      • Education Center
      • Equities
      • Fixed Income
      • Commodities
      • Actively Managed
      • Alternatives
      • ESG Rated
    • ESG
      • Latest ESG News
      • The Institutional Investor’s Guide to ESG Investing
      • Climate Change: The Inescapable Opportunity
      • Impact Investing
      • 2022 ESG Investing Conference
      • ESG Rated ETFs
    • Defined Contribution
      • Latest DC News
      • DC Money Manager Rankings
      • DC Record Keeper Rankings
      • Innovations in DC
      • Trends in DC: Focus on Retirement Income
      • 2022 Defined Contribution East Conference
      • 2022 DC Investment Lineup Conference
    • Searches & Hires
      • Latest Searches & Hires News
      • Searches & Hires Database
      • RFPs
    • Performance Data
      • P&I Research Center
      • Earnings Tracker
      • Endowment Returns Tracker
      • Corporate Pension Contribution Tracker
      • Pension Fund Returns Tracker
      • Pension Risk Transfer Database
      • Future of Investments Research Series
      • Charts & Infographics
      • Polls
    • Careers
    • Events
      • View All Conferences
      • View All Webinars
      • 2022 Innovation Investing Conference
      • 2022 Defined Contribution East Conference
      • 2022 ESG Investing Conference
      • 2022 DC Investment Lineup Conference
      • 2022 Alternatives Investing Conference