Skip to main content
MENU
Subscribe
  • Subscribe
  • Account
  • LOGIN
  • Topics
    • Alternatives
    • Consultants
    • Coronavirus
    • Courts
    • Defined Contribution
    • ESG
    • ETFs
    • Hedge Funds
    • Industry Voices
    • Investing
    • Money Management
    • Opinion
    • Partner Content
    • Pension Funds
    • Private Equity
    • Real Estate
    • Russia-Ukraine War
    • SECURE Act 2.0
    • Special Reports
    • White Papers
  • Rankings & Awards
    • 1,000 Largest Retirement Plans
    • Top-Performing Managers
    • Largest Money Managers
    • DC Money Managers
    • DC Record Keepers
    • Largest Hedge Fund Managers
    • World's Largest Retirement Funds
    • Best Places to Work in Money Management
    • Excellence & Innovation Awards
    • Eddy Awards
  • ETFs
    • Latest ETF News
    • Fund Screener
    • Education Center
    • Equities
    • Fixed Income
    • Commodities
    • Actively Managed
    • Alternatives
    • ESG Rated
  • ESG
    • Latest ESG News
    • The Institutional Investor’s Guide to ESG Investing
    • Climate Change: The Inescapable Opportunity
    • Impact Investing
    • 2022 ESG Investing Conference
    • ESG Rated ETFs
  • Defined Contribution
    • Latest DC News
    • DC Money Manager Rankings
    • DC Record Keeper Rankings
    • Innovations in DC
    • Trends in DC: Focus on Retirement Income
    • 2022 Defined Contribution East Conference
    • 2022 DC Investment Lineup Conference
  • Searches & Hires
    • Latest Searches & Hires News
    • Searches & Hires Database
    • RFPs
  • Performance Data
    • P&I Research Center
    • Earnings Tracker
    • Endowment Returns Tracker
    • Corporate Pension Contribution Tracker
    • Pension Fund Returns Tracker
    • Pension Risk Transfer Database
    • Future of Investments Research Series
    • Charts & Infographics
    • Polls
  • Careers
  • Events
    • View All Conferences
    • View All Webinars
    • 2022 Innovation Investing Conference
    • 2022 Defined Contribution East Conference
    • 2022 ESG Investing Conference
    • 2022 DC Investment Lineup Conference
    • 2022 Alternatives Investing Conference
Breadcrumb
  1. Home
  2. Print
February 19, 2001 12:00 AM

LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

  • Tweet
  • Share
  • Share
  • Email
  • More
    Reprints Print

    Flanigan responds

    Denise L. Nappier's Jan. 22 letter to P&I ("Defending dismissal"), in response to your Jan. 8 editorial, is disingenuous at the very least. Ms. Nappier has not responded to a similar editorial by The Hartford Courant, but the facts, in my opinion, are exactly the same. In fact, ironically, the problem between Ms. Nappier and I was caused because of perfect communications between us, although the media did question her own general communications skills.

    My letters to Ms. Nappier, dated Dec. 10, and to Steven Hart, chairman of the Investment Advisory Council, dated Jan. 3, both covered by the media, continue to directly counteract Ms. Nappier's statements.

    As stated in my letter especially to Mr. Hart, there was only one issue that raised a disagreement between Ms. Nappier and myself. There were two sets of corporate bonds in the fund: one from Mitchell Hutchins, a management firm that retreated from its own business, and Triumph Capital, a Boston firm that was under federal indictment. Very shortly after my arrival as chief investment officer, Ms. Nappier insisted that certain bonds be sold, and the assets deployed to a new minority manager program.

    I disagreed because the market for corporate bonds was in decline and most likely could have caused serious losses to the fund. My fiduciary obligations demanded that I protect the interests of the beneficiaries and taxpayers, many thousands of whom are working-class minorities. Plus the strict due-diligence policies and processes to hire any new managers, which I was developing, were not possible to be put fully in place in so few weeks at a highly troubled fund, which also suffers currently and for the foreseeable future from a negative cash flow problem.

    I was stunned to discover that Triumph Capital had sold a significant amount of bonds, and immediately started an investigation as to the source of the instructions. In discussion with the court-appointed receiver for Triumph Capital, we considered issuing a subpoena for the records and a profit-and-loss statement from Triumph. Additionally, I requested detailed information from the treasurer's office regarding all persons who were being compensated, directly or indirectly, through the pension fund management budget.

    Within a matter of days, and before any of this critical information was received, Ms. Nappier summarily dismissed me, without notice, warning, cause, or any explanation that made any sense whatsoever. Dismissing me without any reasonable explanation defeats her claims to personnel discretion, and some officials have been known to use the umbrella of personnel policies to try to mask their wrongful actions, and then cast innuendoes about others.

    Thomas E. Flanigan

    Albany, N.Y.

    Sharpe's real view

    In a Jan. 8 letter to the editor, Ron Surz stated, "According to William F. Sharpe ... point-in-time style analysis is superior to the method he created." As you might imagine, this blanket statement came as a surprise to me since it misrepresents my thoughts on the issue.

    My consistent position concerning various methods of style analysis has been that different questions may call for different technologies and that a method is only as good as its underlying economic model and the estimation of its relevant parameters. In a great many applications, returns-based style analysis proves superior to a point-in-time analysis based on composition data, given the difficulty of identifying the underlying economic influences on a security-by-security basis. This is especially true when the focus is on the choice of investing with a fund or manager for a future period of more than a very few months.

    I covered these matters in substantial detail in a 1995 interview published in the Dow Jones Fee Advisor, "Setting the Record Straight on Style Analysis." It is available on my website at www.wsharpe.com/art/fa/fa.htm.

    I examined the slides from that presentation and have reiterated my thesis directly to Ron. He has indicated that he was indeed mistaken and apologized for the error. I thank him for doing so.

    William F. Sharpe

    STANCO 25 professor emeritus

    Stanford University

    chairman

    Financial Engines Inc.

    Palo Alto, Calif.

    Surz mistaken

    I was mistaken in my Jan. 8 letter to the editor in writing that William F. Sharpe had stated that point-in-time style analysis is superior to the returns-based method he created. My sincerest apologies.

    Ronald J. Surz

    president

    PPCA Inc.

    San Clemente, Calif.

    Free-float adjustment

    As the effect of prospective changes in international index composition are now being debated, it may be a good time to reassess the wisdom of indexation as an international equity strategy (Pensions & Investments, Nov. 27, "MSCI's proposed index changes could roil stock markets").

    Domestically the case for passive management is clear, though not necessarily agreed, and index turnover is modest. Internationally factors such as free-float treatment are causing a reassessment of the composition of some indexes.

    The theory behind the passive approach argues that the index is the market. This makes certain assumptions that, although arguably reasonable domestically, do not stand up internationally. The most obvious fracture is the free-float adjustment. How can parts of the market be there one moment and not the next? Beyond this, though, are such factors as the extent of free flow of capital and economic management in different countries. If global market participants have to play by different and changing rules, the theoretical underpinning of the passive approach seems to weaken.

    Active management, focused on individual company selection, can add value, not only in the evaluation of companies but also in the avoidance of inefficiencies in international index construction. It is an active manager's dream that "fundamentally overvalued" companies with large index weightings be reduced in size in the index. Who buys the shares that must be sold? It is admirable that changes are introduced in stages, but what sense did it make in the first place to be forced to buy more stock than was actually available?

    Robin Norton

    manager, institutional marketing

    Harding, Loevner Management LP

    Somerville, N.J.

    Recommended for You
    Read the print edition of P&I
    Read the print edition of P&I
    How low is low? Projections say it's not low enough
    How low is low? Projections say it's not low enough
    FINRA honors Wharton's Olivia Mitchell with Ketchum Prize
    FINRA honors Wharton's Olivia Mitchell with Ketchum Prize
    Alternatives: Investing Across the Spectrum
    Sponsored Content: Alternatives: Investing Across the Spectrum

    Reader Poll

    May 9, 2022
    SEE MORE POLLS >
    Sponsored
    White Papers
    Are Factors a Thing of the Past?
    Q2 2022 Credit Outlook: Carry On
    Leverage does not equal risk
    Is there a mid-cap gap in your DC plan?
    Out of the Shadows: The Revolution in Shadow Accounting
    The pivotal role of fixed income markets in the ESG revolution
    View More
    Sponsored Content
    Partner Content
    The Industrialization of ESG Investment
    For institutional investors, ETFs can make meeting liquidity needs easier
    Gold: the most effective commodity investment
    2021 Investment Outlook | Investing Beyond the Pandemic: A Reset for Portfolios
    Ten ways retirement plan professionals add value to plan sponsors
    Gold: an efficient hedge
    View More
    E-MAIL NEWSLETTERS

    Sign up and get the best of News delivered straight to your email inbox, free of charge. Choose your news – we will deliver.

    Subscribe Today
    May 9, 2022 page one

    Get access to the news, research and analysis of events affecting the retirement and institutional money management businesses from a worldwide network of reporters and editors.

    Subscribe
    Connect With Us
    • RSS
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn

    Our Mission

    To consistently deliver news, research and analysis to the executives who manage the flow of funds in the institutional investment market.

    About Us

    Main Office
    685 Third Avenue
    Tenth Floor
    New York, NY 10017-4036

    Chicago Office
    130 E. Randolph St.
    Suite 3200
    Chicago, IL 60601

    Contact Us

    Careers at Crain

    About Pensions & Investments

     

    Advertising
    • Media Kit
    • P&I Content Solutions
    • P&I Careers | Post a Job
    • Reprints & Permissions
    Resources
    • Subscribe
    • Newsletters
    • FAQ
    • P&I Research Center
    • Site map
    • Staff Directory
    Legal
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Request
    Pensions & Investments
    Copyright © 1996-2022. Crain Communications, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
    • Topics
      • Alternatives
      • Consultants
      • Coronavirus
      • Courts
      • Defined Contribution
      • ESG
      • ETFs
      • Hedge Funds
      • Industry Voices
      • Investing
      • Money Management
      • Opinion
      • Partner Content
      • Pension Funds
      • Private Equity
      • Real Estate
      • Russia-Ukraine War
      • SECURE Act 2.0
      • Special Reports
      • White Papers
    • Rankings & Awards
      • 1,000 Largest Retirement Plans
      • Top-Performing Managers
      • Largest Money Managers
      • DC Money Managers
      • DC Record Keepers
      • Largest Hedge Fund Managers
      • World's Largest Retirement Funds
      • Best Places to Work in Money Management
      • Excellence & Innovation Awards
      • Eddy Awards
    • ETFs
      • Latest ETF News
      • Fund Screener
      • Education Center
      • Equities
      • Fixed Income
      • Commodities
      • Actively Managed
      • Alternatives
      • ESG Rated
    • ESG
      • Latest ESG News
      • The Institutional Investor’s Guide to ESG Investing
      • Climate Change: The Inescapable Opportunity
      • Impact Investing
      • 2022 ESG Investing Conference
      • ESG Rated ETFs
    • Defined Contribution
      • Latest DC News
      • DC Money Manager Rankings
      • DC Record Keeper Rankings
      • Innovations in DC
      • Trends in DC: Focus on Retirement Income
      • 2022 Defined Contribution East Conference
      • 2022 DC Investment Lineup Conference
    • Searches & Hires
      • Latest Searches & Hires News
      • Searches & Hires Database
      • RFPs
    • Performance Data
      • P&I Research Center
      • Earnings Tracker
      • Endowment Returns Tracker
      • Corporate Pension Contribution Tracker
      • Pension Fund Returns Tracker
      • Pension Risk Transfer Database
      • Future of Investments Research Series
      • Charts & Infographics
      • Polls
    • Careers
    • Events
      • View All Conferences
      • View All Webinars
      • 2022 Innovation Investing Conference
      • 2022 Defined Contribution East Conference
      • 2022 ESG Investing Conference
      • 2022 DC Investment Lineup Conference
      • 2022 Alternatives Investing Conference