Skip to main content
MENU
Subscribe
  • Subscribe
  • Account
  • LOGIN
  • Topics
    • Alternatives
    • Consultants
    • Coronavirus
    • Courts
    • Defined Contribution
    • ESG
    • ETFs
    • Hedge Funds
    • Industry Voices
    • Investing
    • Money Management
    • Opinion
    • Partner Content
    • Pension Funds
    • Private Equity
    • Real Estate
    • Russia-Ukraine War
    • SECURE Act 2.0
    • Special Reports
    • White Papers
  • Rankings & Awards
    • 1,000 Largest Retirement Plans
    • Top-Performing Managers
    • Largest Money Managers
    • DC Money Managers
    • DC Record Keepers
    • Largest Hedge Fund Managers
    • World's Largest Retirement Funds
    • Best Places to Work in Money Management
    • Excellence & Innovation Awards
    • WPS Innovation Awards
    • Eddy Awards
  • ETFs
    • Latest ETF News
    • Fund Screener
    • Education Center
    • Equities
    • Fixed Income
    • Commodities
    • Actively Managed
    • Alternatives
    • ESG Rated
  • ESG
    • Latest ESG News
    • The Institutional Investor’s Guide to ESG Investing
    • ESG Sustainability - Gaining Momentum
    • Climate Change: The Inescapable Opportunity
    • Impact Investing
    • 2022 ESG Investing Conference
    • ESG Rated ETFs
  • Defined Contribution
    • Latest DC News
    • DC Money Manager Rankings
    • DC Record Keeper Rankings
    • Innovations in DC
    • Trends in DC: Focus on Retirement Income
    • 2022 Defined Contribution East Conference
    • 2022 DC Investment Lineup Conference
  • Searches & Hires
    • Latest Searches & Hires News
    • Searches & Hires Database
    • RFPs
  • Performance Data
    • P&I Research Center
    • Earnings Tracker
    • Endowment Returns Tracker
    • Corporate Pension Contribution Tracker
    • Pension Fund Returns Tracker
    • Pension Risk Transfer Database
    • Future of Investments Research Series
    • Charts & Infographics
    • Polls
  • Careers
  • Events
    • View All Conferences
    • View All Webinars
    • 2022 Retirement Income Conference
    • 2022 Managing Pension Risk & Liabilities
    • 2022 WorldPensionSummit
Breadcrumb
  1. Home
  2. Print
September 04, 2000 01:00 AM

INCHING FORWARD: Fast trade settlement slow going

T+1 will take at least 31/2 years to implement, SIA study predicts

Fred Williams
  • Tweet
  • Share
  • Share
  • Email
  • More
    Reprints Print

    Converting to one-day trade settlement will take at least 31/2 years -- far longer than the original goal of June 2002, according to a new study.

    The study, prepared by Andersen Consulting and The Capital Markets Co., both in New York, was commissioned by the Securities Industry Association, Washington, to serve as the industry's master plan in transitioning to T+1 from the current three-day cycle.

    The 2002 target date set by the Securities and Exchange Commission was too aggressive and was established several months ago as a "straw-man date to get the industry focused on what needs to be done," said Joseph Anastasio, partner at Capital Markets.

    And there is a lot to be done, nothing short of redesigning the securities trading and settlement process.

    "T+1 requires all parties to streamline and implement significant real-time processing to meet the compressed settlement timeframe . . . a `one-stop shop' for matching and transaction consolidation," the study said.

    Even though in many cases large-scale revamping of systems and processes will be necessary, the shortened trading cycle will enhance the efficiency of U.S. markets in the long run. The study estimates the $8 billion preparation effort will result in a system that saves the industry $2.7 billion per year.

    The study identifies 10 "building blocks" the industry must set up to prepare for T+1. Assuming a fourth quarter 2000 start on those building blocks, most should be completed by the first quarter of 2003. The next 15 months would be spent on full industry testing and stabilization, which would result in T+1 going live in June 2004.

    The building blocks -- changes in existing processing methods that must be implemented to move to T+1 from T+3 -- include: modification of firms' internal trade processes to comply with compressed settlement deadlines; submission of near-real-time trade information by the exchanges and institutions; and the development of industry matching utilities and linkages for all asset classes.

    Andersen Consulting and Capital Markets interviewed 56 major firms, representing retail and institutional broker/dealers, custodians and asset managers, via a web-based survey. The major securities exchanges, key regulators and the Depository Trust & Clearing Corp. also provided input.

    The task of implementing near-real-time trade processing appears daunting. One of the critical needs identified by the study is industry agreement on the major steps that need to be taken to meet the shortened trade cycle.

    "Recent trends in processing efficiency and capacity utilization have called into question the ability of the U.S. clearance and settlement system," according to the study. ". . . Asset managers and broker/dealers have, in some instances, indicated that capacity is a critical issue. Significant investment in new systems will be required to manage anticipated trade volume."

    Changing steps

    Currently, the institutional trade process consists of sequential and repetitive steps among trade participants. The cycle "is hampered by manual processes, a lack of cross-industry messaging standards, and difficulties of obtaining and properly utilizing customer, security and settlement data," the study says. These difficulties create "many potential break points" in the trade cycle, resulting in "multiple opportunities for failure."

    T+1 will result in seamless communications among all trading parties and involve a single electronic process. Centralized trade processing will be the "cornerstone" of the revised institutional trade process, the study says, and will replace the current confirmation and affirmation process.

    "In addition to greatly reducing the systemic risks inherent in today's trade process," the study says, "the proposed model will significantly reduce cycle times -- a critical success factor for moving to T+1 -- and dramatically increase capacity through automation, standards, and the streamlining of processes."

    The adoption of communications standards among all parties in institutional trading is also a "key concern," according to the study. Asset managers "will need to adopt communication and messaging standards that enable seamless interoperability within and outside their organizational boundaries."

    Asset managers currently use a variety of standards for communication with broker/dealers and custodians. "The lack of consistent standards forces a significant amount of human intervention and rework and introduces errors in the process," the study says.

    "Some large asset managers maintain links with over 30 to 50 custodians, each link frequently requiring its own type of connectivity and interaction."

    As a result, 47% of asset managers indicated that connectivity and interaction with custodians and broker/dealers will require improvement to comply with T+1, the study says.

    The shortened trade cycle will have "one of the most dramatic effects" on the operations of custodians, the study says, despite their "considerable progress" toward straight-through processing.

    "To ensure successful operation in the T+1 environment, custodians will have to ensure real-time or near-real-time processing of all trade instructions, and develop the ability to link seamlessly with the new utilities," the study says. "This will require re-engineering the current workflow, and eliminating batch processing cycles. The ability to measure risk on a real-time basis will be critical."

    Costs vary

    The cost of becoming T+1 compliant will require different levels of investment from each category of participants in the trading process, the study said.

    "Most of this cost is associated with enhancing or replacing existing systems to enable real-time generation and processing."

    Asset managers will be required to spend a total of $1.7 billion: $790 million to comply with the compressed settlement cycle; $195 million to establish interfaces with the new utilities; and $675 million to standardize reference data, the study says. Most of the cost to money managers is associated with "enhancing or replacing existing systems . . . and to automate and streamline the flow of transactions between front/middle and back office systems," the study says.

    Institutional brokers will need to invest $1.5 billion to meet the new requirements, the study says. Retail broker/dealers are expected to spend $1.2 billion.

    Achieving industrywide implementation of T+1 will require coordination among all participants, the study notes. "Without coordination, the pace toward implementing T+1 building blocks could vary across the industry," the study says. Fortunately, "the movement toward T+1 has already begun. Many of the building blocks are under way and firms are making investments that will enable T+1. . . . Subsequently, implementation of the individual building blocks and T+1 as a whole will be dependent on the timely publication of industry standards, specifications and testing plans."

    Recommended for You
    Read the print edition of P&I
    Read the print edition of P&I
    How low is low? Projections say it's not low enough
    How low is low? Projections say it's not low enough
    FINRA honors Wharton's Olivia Mitchell with Ketchum Prize
    FINRA honors Wharton's Olivia Mitchell with Ketchum Prize
    Strong Demand Drivers Underpin Private Credit
    Sponsored Content: Strong Demand Drivers Underpin Private Credit

    Reader Poll

    June 6, 2022
    SEE MORE POLLS >
    Sponsored
    White Papers
    Nearing the finish line: Ideas on end-state investing for corporate DB plans
    The Meaning of "Portfolio Intelligence"
    Credit Indices: Closing the Fixed Income Evolutionary Gap
    Forever in Style: Benchmarking with the Morningstar® Broad Style Indexes℠
    Crossroads: Politics, Inflation, & Bonds
    Is there a mid-cap gap in your DC plan?
    View More
    Sponsored Content
    Partner Content
    The Industrialization of ESG Investment
    For institutional investors, ETFs can make meeting liquidity needs easier
    Gold: the most effective commodity investment
    2021 Investment Outlook | Investing Beyond the Pandemic: A Reset for Portfolios
    Ten ways retirement plan professionals add value to plan sponsors
    Gold: an efficient hedge
    View More
    E-MAIL NEWSLETTERS

    Sign up and get the best of News delivered straight to your email inbox, free of charge. Choose your news – we will deliver.

    Subscribe Today
    June 20, 2022 page one

    Get access to the news, research and analysis of events affecting the retirement and institutional money management businesses from a worldwide network of reporters and editors.

    Subscribe
    Connect With Us
    • RSS
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn

    Our Mission

    To consistently deliver news, research and analysis to the executives who manage the flow of funds in the institutional investment market.

    About Us

    Main Office
    685 Third Avenue
    Tenth Floor
    New York, NY 10017-4036

    Chicago Office
    130 E. Randolph St.
    Suite 3200
    Chicago, IL 60601

    Contact Us

    Careers at Crain

    About Pensions & Investments

     

    Advertising
    • Media Kit
    • P&I Content Solutions
    • P&I Careers | Post a Job
    • Reprints & Permissions
    Resources
    • Subscribe
    • Newsletters
    • FAQ
    • P&I Research Center
    • Site map
    • Staff Directory
    Legal
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Request
    Pensions & Investments
    Copyright © 1996-2022. Crain Communications, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
    • Topics
      • Alternatives
      • Consultants
      • Coronavirus
      • Courts
      • Defined Contribution
      • ESG
      • ETFs
      • Hedge Funds
      • Industry Voices
      • Investing
      • Money Management
      • Opinion
      • Partner Content
      • Pension Funds
      • Private Equity
      • Real Estate
      • Russia-Ukraine War
      • SECURE Act 2.0
      • Special Reports
      • White Papers
    • Rankings & Awards
      • 1,000 Largest Retirement Plans
      • Top-Performing Managers
      • Largest Money Managers
      • DC Money Managers
      • DC Record Keepers
      • Largest Hedge Fund Managers
      • World's Largest Retirement Funds
      • Best Places to Work in Money Management
      • Excellence & Innovation Awards
      • WPS Innovation Awards
      • Eddy Awards
    • ETFs
      • Latest ETF News
      • Fund Screener
      • Education Center
      • Equities
      • Fixed Income
      • Commodities
      • Actively Managed
      • Alternatives
      • ESG Rated
    • ESG
      • Latest ESG News
      • The Institutional Investor’s Guide to ESG Investing
      • ESG Sustainability - Gaining Momentum
      • Climate Change: The Inescapable Opportunity
      • Impact Investing
      • 2022 ESG Investing Conference
      • ESG Rated ETFs
    • Defined Contribution
      • Latest DC News
      • DC Money Manager Rankings
      • DC Record Keeper Rankings
      • Innovations in DC
      • Trends in DC: Focus on Retirement Income
      • 2022 Defined Contribution East Conference
      • 2022 DC Investment Lineup Conference
    • Searches & Hires
      • Latest Searches & Hires News
      • Searches & Hires Database
      • RFPs
    • Performance Data
      • P&I Research Center
      • Earnings Tracker
      • Endowment Returns Tracker
      • Corporate Pension Contribution Tracker
      • Pension Fund Returns Tracker
      • Pension Risk Transfer Database
      • Future of Investments Research Series
      • Charts & Infographics
      • Polls
    • Careers
    • Events
      • View All Conferences
      • View All Webinars
      • 2022 Retirement Income Conference
      • 2022 Managing Pension Risk & Liabilities
      • 2022 WorldPensionSummit