Skip to main content
MENU
Subscribe
  • Subscribe
  • Account
  • LOGIN
  • Topics
    • Alternatives
    • Consultants
    • Coronavirus
    • Courts
    • Defined Contribution
    • ESG
    • ETFs
    • Hedge Funds
    • Industry Voices
    • Investing
    • Money Management
    • Opinion
    • Partner Content
    • Pension Funds
    • Private Equity
    • Real Estate
    • Russia-Ukraine War
    • SECURE Act 2.0
    • Special Reports
    • White Papers
  • Rankings & Awards
    • 1,000 Largest Retirement Plans
    • Top-Performing Managers
    • Largest Money Managers
    • DC Money Managers
    • DC Record Keepers
    • Largest Hedge Fund Managers
    • World's Largest Retirement Funds
    • Best Places to Work in Money Management
    • Excellence & Innovation Awards
    • Eddy Awards
  • ETFs
    • Latest ETF News
    • Fund Screener
    • Education Center
    • Equities
    • Fixed Income
    • Commodities
    • Actively Managed
    • Alternatives
    • ESG Rated
  • ESG
    • Latest ESG News
    • The Institutional Investor’s Guide to ESG Investing
    • Climate Change: The Inescapable Opportunity
    • Impact Investing
    • 2022 ESG Investing Conference
    • ESG Rated ETFs
  • Defined Contribution
    • Latest DC News
    • DC Money Manager Rankings
    • DC Record Keeper Rankings
    • Innovations in DC
    • Trends in DC: Focus on Retirement Income
    • 2022 Defined Contribution East Conference
    • 2022 DC Investment Lineup Conference
  • Searches & Hires
    • Latest Searches & Hires News
    • Searches & Hires Database
    • RFPs
  • Performance Data
    • P&I Research Center
    • Earnings Tracker
    • Endowment Returns Tracker
    • Corporate Pension Contribution Tracker
    • Pension Fund Returns Tracker
    • Pension Risk Transfer Database
    • Future of Investments Research Series
    • Charts & Infographics
    • Polls
  • Careers
  • Events
    • View All Conferences
    • View All Webinars
    • 2022 Innovation Investing Conference
    • 2022 Defined Contribution East Conference
    • 2022 ESG Investing Conference
    • 2022 DC Investment Lineup Conference
    • 2022 Alternatives Investing Conference
Breadcrumb
  1. Home
  2. Print
June 26, 2000 01:00 AM

Differing plans

  • Tweet
  • Share
  • Share
  • Email
  • More
    Reprints Print

    So now we have two competing plans for Social Security from the presidential candidates, Messrs. Gore and Bush. Both are flawed.

    Let's look at the strengths and weaknesses of each plan.

    Vice President Al Gore's Retirement Savings Plus would give workers earning up to $100,000 a year an opportunity to save up to $2,000 a year, $4,000 a couple, for retirement tax-free outside of the Social Security system.

    In addition, the Gore plan would provide matching government money to help lower-income workers accumulate assets in these funds, which will operate and be invested much like 401(k) plans.

    The match would start at $3 for every $1 the worker put into the retirement savings plan, but would be phased down as income rose so that for people with incomes between $60,000 and $100,000, the match would be one government dollar for every three employee dollars.

    The money could be invested in a range of mutual funds.

    This plan is similar to the USA accounts proposed by President Clinton last year, but with a bigger government match. It is likely to stimulate some additional workers to save for retirement, but unless carefully designed it could simply move money from corporate 401(k) plans into the Retirement Savings Plus plans.

    And it does nothing to solve the long-term Social Security problem. The vice president separately has proposed addressing this problem by using the current Social Security surplus to pay down the national debt, and then using the savings on national debt interest payments to fund Social Security.

    There are a couple of problems with this idea. First, the current surplus in the Social Security program already has been included in the federal budget surplus and therefore already has been earmarked.

    Mr. Gore himself has proposed numerous ways of spending the federal surplus in addition to paying down the national debt. For example, his matching of employee contributions would come from the surplus. And the new Congress will have its ideas on how to spend any surplus that might occur.

    It seems likely, therefore, that the surplus will be strangled at birth, long before it can grow up to pay down the debt.

    Second, if by some miracle the surplus is not spent, and the interest savings are available, the amount will be a drop in the bucket compared with the unfunded Social Security liability -- calculated between $4 trillion and $11 trillion, depending on the assumptions used.

    In effect, the unfunded Social Security liability is estimated at anywhere from equal to the funded national debt in the hands of the public to almost three times as large.

    That unfunded liability represents promised benefits to millions of workers. The benefits still have to be paid somehow, and Mr. Gore's plan doesn't change that and doesn't begin to meet the need.

    Third, there are doubts as to how many low-income workers will be able to save enough to generate a meaningful government match.

    Texas Gov. George W. Bush's proposal would allow all workers, if they desired, to invest up to 2% of their Social Security contributions in market-related investments in individual accounts. This is a far simpler proposal.

    One of its strengths is that all workers covered by Social Security already pay Social Security taxes. The 2% to be put into individual market-invested accounts would not be an increased burden on them.

    Even low-income workers therefore would be able to easily invest in the market, if they so desired.

    It has one other thing in its favor. Employees would own the accounts into which they put their 2% of pay.

    Now employees have no legal claim on their Social Security accounts or the benefits they have accrued under the system. The benefits can be changed, or even eliminated, at the whim of Congress.

    Under the Bush plan, that would change for at least the assets in the individual self-directed accounts.

    The great defect of Bush's plan is that it is not ambitious enough. If 2% is good, why not 4%? Why not all of the Social Security tax?

    Under the Bush plan the current unfunded Social Security liability would still have to be paid, as it would under Mr. Gore's plan, although younger workers investing their 2% would not have the same claim to promised benefits as current workers, so the ultimate liability should be reduced.

    The unfunded Social Security liability will have to be paid from taxes as it falls due, or benefits will have to be cut.

    Neither plan changes that.

    Recommended for You
    Read the print edition of P&I
    Read the print edition of P&I
    How low is low? Projections say it's not low enough
    How low is low? Projections say it's not low enough
    FINRA honors Wharton's Olivia Mitchell with Ketchum Prize
    FINRA honors Wharton's Olivia Mitchell with Ketchum Prize
    OCIO, Anchor in Rough Seas
    Sponsored Content: OCIO, Anchor in Rough Seas

    Reader Poll

    May 9, 2022
    SEE MORE POLLS >
    Sponsored
    White Papers
    Are Factors a Thing of the Past?
    Q2 2022 Credit Outlook: Carry On
    Leverage does not equal risk
    Is there a mid-cap gap in your DC plan?
    Out of the Shadows: The Revolution in Shadow Accounting
    The pivotal role of fixed income markets in the ESG revolution
    View More
    Sponsored Content
    Partner Content
    The Industrialization of ESG Investment
    For institutional investors, ETFs can make meeting liquidity needs easier
    Gold: the most effective commodity investment
    2021 Investment Outlook | Investing Beyond the Pandemic: A Reset for Portfolios
    Ten ways retirement plan professionals add value to plan sponsors
    Gold: an efficient hedge
    View More
    E-MAIL NEWSLETTERS

    Sign up and get the best of News delivered straight to your email inbox, free of charge. Choose your news – we will deliver.

    Subscribe Today
    May 9, 2022 page one

    Get access to the news, research and analysis of events affecting the retirement and institutional money management businesses from a worldwide network of reporters and editors.

    Subscribe
    Connect With Us
    • RSS
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn

    Our Mission

    To consistently deliver news, research and analysis to the executives who manage the flow of funds in the institutional investment market.

    About Us

    Main Office
    685 Third Avenue
    Tenth Floor
    New York, NY 10017-4036

    Chicago Office
    130 E. Randolph St.
    Suite 3200
    Chicago, IL 60601

    Contact Us

    Careers at Crain

    About Pensions & Investments

     

    Advertising
    • Media Kit
    • P&I Content Solutions
    • P&I Careers | Post a Job
    • Reprints & Permissions
    Resources
    • Subscribe
    • Newsletters
    • FAQ
    • P&I Research Center
    • Site map
    • Staff Directory
    Legal
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Request
    Pensions & Investments
    Copyright © 1996-2022. Crain Communications, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
    • Topics
      • Alternatives
      • Consultants
      • Coronavirus
      • Courts
      • Defined Contribution
      • ESG
      • ETFs
      • Hedge Funds
      • Industry Voices
      • Investing
      • Money Management
      • Opinion
      • Partner Content
      • Pension Funds
      • Private Equity
      • Real Estate
      • Russia-Ukraine War
      • SECURE Act 2.0
      • Special Reports
      • White Papers
    • Rankings & Awards
      • 1,000 Largest Retirement Plans
      • Top-Performing Managers
      • Largest Money Managers
      • DC Money Managers
      • DC Record Keepers
      • Largest Hedge Fund Managers
      • World's Largest Retirement Funds
      • Best Places to Work in Money Management
      • Excellence & Innovation Awards
      • Eddy Awards
    • ETFs
      • Latest ETF News
      • Fund Screener
      • Education Center
      • Equities
      • Fixed Income
      • Commodities
      • Actively Managed
      • Alternatives
      • ESG Rated
    • ESG
      • Latest ESG News
      • The Institutional Investor’s Guide to ESG Investing
      • Climate Change: The Inescapable Opportunity
      • Impact Investing
      • 2022 ESG Investing Conference
      • ESG Rated ETFs
    • Defined Contribution
      • Latest DC News
      • DC Money Manager Rankings
      • DC Record Keeper Rankings
      • Innovations in DC
      • Trends in DC: Focus on Retirement Income
      • 2022 Defined Contribution East Conference
      • 2022 DC Investment Lineup Conference
    • Searches & Hires
      • Latest Searches & Hires News
      • Searches & Hires Database
      • RFPs
    • Performance Data
      • P&I Research Center
      • Earnings Tracker
      • Endowment Returns Tracker
      • Corporate Pension Contribution Tracker
      • Pension Fund Returns Tracker
      • Pension Risk Transfer Database
      • Future of Investments Research Series
      • Charts & Infographics
      • Polls
    • Careers
    • Events
      • View All Conferences
      • View All Webinars
      • 2022 Innovation Investing Conference
      • 2022 Defined Contribution East Conference
      • 2022 ESG Investing Conference
      • 2022 DC Investment Lineup Conference
      • 2022 Alternatives Investing Conference