Skip to main content
MENU
Subscribe
  • Subscribe
  • Account
  • LOGIN
  • Topics
    • Alternatives
    • Consultants
    • Coronavirus
    • Courts
    • Defined Contribution
    • ESG
    • ETFs
    • Hedge Funds
    • Industry Voices
    • Investing
    • Money Management
    • Opinion
    • Partner Content
    • Pension Funds
    • Private Equity
    • Real Estate
    • Russia-Ukraine War
    • SECURE Act 2.0
    • Special Reports
    • White Papers
  • Rankings & Awards
    • 1,000 Largest Retirement Plans
    • Top-Performing Managers
    • Largest Money Managers
    • DC Money Managers
    • DC Record Keepers
    • Largest Hedge Fund Managers
    • World's Largest Retirement Funds
    • Best Places to Work in Money Management
    • Excellence & Innovation Awards
    • Eddy Awards
  • ETFs
    • Latest ETF News
    • Fund Screener
    • Education Center
    • Equities
    • Fixed Income
    • Commodities
    • Actively Managed
    • Alternatives
    • ESG Rated
  • ESG
    • Latest ESG News
    • The Institutional Investor’s Guide to ESG Investing
    • Climate Change: The Inescapable Opportunity
    • Impact Investing
    • 2022 ESG Investing Conference
    • ESG Rated ETFs
  • Defined Contribution
    • Latest DC News
    • DC Money Manager Rankings
    • DC Record Keeper Rankings
    • Innovations in DC
    • Trends in DC: Focus on Retirement Income
    • 2022 Defined Contribution East Conference
    • 2022 DC Investment Lineup Conference
  • Searches & Hires
    • Latest Searches & Hires News
    • Searches & Hires Database
    • RFPs
  • Performance Data
    • P&I Research Center
    • Earnings Tracker
    • Endowment Returns Tracker
    • Corporate Pension Contribution Tracker
    • Pension Fund Returns Tracker
    • Pension Risk Transfer Database
    • Future of Investments Research Series
    • Charts & Infographics
    • Polls
  • Careers
  • Events
    • View All Conferences
    • View All Webinars
    • 2022 Innovation Investing Conference
    • 2022 Defined Contribution East Conference
    • 2022 ESG Investing Conference
    • 2022 DC Investment Lineup Conference
    • 2022 Alternatives Investing Conference
Breadcrumb
  1. Home
  2. Print
March 09, 1998 12:00 AM

SLUMPING MUTUAL FUNDS FORCE HARD DECISIONS

William F. Quinn
  • Tweet
  • Share
  • Share
  • Email
  • More
    Reprints Print

    An old saw voiced by equity managers is that it is far easier to select a stock than to decide when to sell it. This truism applies, as well, to mutual funds used as plan options. Given enough time, virtually every actively managed mutual fund will experience periods of underperformance and organizational changes. In this situation, the challenge for the defined contribution plan sponsor is three-fold:

    * Identify reliable and relevant indicators to help determine if a fund is capable of meeting the plan's expectations;

    * Avoid false indicators that might mislead a plan to terminate a perfectly sound fund that is experiencing a temporary period of below-par performance or style drift; and

    * Decide within what time frame a termination decision can prudently and confidently be made.

    For almost two decades, I have evaluated money managers and their performance from the dual perspective of a plan sponsor and manager of mutual funds using subadvisers. Making probation and termination decisions related to plan investment advisers is, unequivocally, the most difficult task my organization and I face. Even when it is unclear whether a fund is underperforming on a cyclical or secular basis, fiduciaries, by the nature of their position, are compelled to make one of two simple choices:

    * Do we provide talented managers with more time to overcome what one hopes is a temporary problem?

    * Or, do we disrupt a plan's existing lineup of options by selecting a replacement that, over time, may fare no better than its predecessor?

    Long experience confirms there is no simple, foolproof approach to making this decision. The best a plan sponsor can do is to seek to touch all the bases during the evaluation process. This includes reviewing investment returns, multiple risk measures and style drift, as well as qualitative factors related to the investment process and the fund manager's organization.

    JUDGING RETURNS

    The essential dilemma -- and built-in limitation -- of judging investment returns is they offer only a "rear-view" picture, and often do not provide a reliable guide to the future. Although comparing the historical returns of a fund against published indexes or a peer group might be the best guide available to sponsors, in our experience, the usefulness of published indexes for this purpose is problematic. Indexes purport to define the return parameters of various equity and fixed-income styles, but they are, of course, an artificial construct, and might not always move in tandem with the "real-life" experience of style peer groups. Indeed, many well-regarded, actively managed mutual funds do not seek to replicate the return and risk profile of a particular index, and that can complicate direct fund/index comparisons.

    Further complicating the picture are recent changes in the Russell and Wilshire indexes reflecting how the two dominant equity styles, value and growth, are defined. Both Frank Russell and Wilshire Associates now use multidimensional screens to discriminate between value and growth.

    When making comparisons using these revamped indexes, sponsors today must be especially careful to ensure apples are still being compared to apples. The value or growth approach employed by a fund may no longer correspond as closely to the newest version of an index as it did to the former, or vice versa.

    Peer groups generally prove to be more meaningful comparison measures than indexes. Assuming the fund in question is measured against an appropriate peer group, it might be helpful for the sponsor to research how often and for what period of time other funds within the group have underperformed. It is not unusual for higher quartile funds to experience below-par returns on a periodic basis. Indeed, research published by Smith Barney's Consulting Group in 1997 suggests funds enjoying several years of outperformance are far more prone than their peers to suffer underperformance in succeeding years.

    As a result, subpar returns, by themselves, can create a "false alarm" if they are not viewed over a sufficient time period, and within the context of group ebbs and flows. The sponsor should determine whether the underperforming mutual fund is simply following the pattern common to the group, or whether its returns fall outside the norm.

    MONITORING STYLE DRIFT

    Plan sponsors have two major concerns in regard to "drift." One is that plan investment advisers will forsake their stated discipline and migrate across equity styles in order to boost returns on an opportunistic, but hardly consistent, basis. An equal, if not greater, concern is a fund will assume an inappropriate asset allocation exposure. If, for instance, an equity manager starts to buy bonds and build cash; or a domestic, investment-grade fixed-income fund purchases non-dollar paper and high-yield securities, the sponsor's alert systems should start to sound.

    Portfolio-based style analysis includes reviewing the overall portfolio characteristics (price-to-earnings, price-to-book, yield, growth rate, etc.) and determining whether each individual holding in the portfolio reflects the manager's style. The most commonly employed analytical tool for style drift, return-based style analysis, does not provide as exhaustive and accurate a picture of style as portfolio-based analysis. However, return-based style analysis can deliver confirmation of whether a manager is remaining within its self-proscribed confines, as long as this data is viewed from the vantage point of an appropriate peer group over an extended period of time. Sponsors also should take the opportunity to review fund portfolios on a quarterlybasis via Securities and Exchange Commission-mandated filings, which provide a rapid snapshot of whether the manager is rigidly adhering to the fund's investment guidelines.

    EVALUATING RISK

    Plan sponsors today have an expansive tool kit with which to measure risk, but there is no set formula for deciding which particular risk measures should be employed against a particular fund.

    Accordingly, a sponsor's first step is simply to identify those risk measures that will be most meaningful for that particular plan and its participants. In addition to traditional risk measures like standard deviation and beta, sponsors may opt to view funds through the prism of:

    * The Sharpe ratio, a measure of total return per total unit of risk;

    * Risk-adjusted alpha, which subtracts expected return based on beta from real return;

    * Negative return frequency, which is the percentage of time that a weekly, monthly or annual return is below 0%

    * The information ratio, which shows relative return earned per unit of relative risk, compared to a benchmark; and

    * The consistency ratio, which expresses the percentage of positive active returns relative to a specified benchmark.

    Once again, the standard caveat applies: How a fund fares against any or all of these risk measures must be viewed within the context of its peer group.

    QUALITATIVE MEASURES

    Although defined contribution sponsors and their consultants might have numerous quantitative tools at their disposal, a complete fund analysis should include a qualitative review, focusing on the state of the fund manager, and the implementation of the investment process. Qualitative questions related to the money management group itself may include:

    * Are all the investment professionals connected with the fund, including research analysts, still in place? Are there any additions?

    * Have the duties of the investment professionals changed in any fashion? Have any of these individuals been asked to manage other funds, or to assume operational, administrative or marketing responsibilities?

    * Has any event affected the stability of the group? Is senior management still the same? Has ownership of the firm changed in any way?

    * Have fund assets grown or shrunk? If they have grown, does the fund still have adequate capacity?

    * Is the money management group expanding its product line or moving into new markets? Does this mean it will focus less attention and resources on the fund in question?

    * Is there sufficient depth to provide backup to portfolio managers, if they leave the firm?

    Similarly, when a fund's performance has stumbled, sponsors and their advisers should revisit the investment process, to ensure it hasn't been altered since the original due diligence was performed:

    * Is the investment team making buy-and-sell decisions consistent with the stated process? Can the team demonstrate this?

    * How have the recommendations of internal analysts fared in the preceding period? Do the internal analysts have a strong success rate? What value is external research adding, if any?

    * What proof can the group show that its trading process is highly efficient? Is alpha being compromised by less-than-optimal execution?

    * If recent performance has been disappointing, does the management team have a clear, persuasive understanding of why results fell short of expectations? Can they learn from past disappointments to improve future performance?

    CONCLUSION

    While a key function of a defined contribution sponsor is to select quality mutual funds for plan options, as a fiduciary that sponsor also must continually evaluate those funds, and make termination decisions on a timely basis. The "right" answer can prove to be elusive, even with all the quantitative and qualitative tools at a plan's disposal.

    At the very least, however, sponsors can carry out their fiduciary responsibilities to plan participants by committing to a comprehensive evaluation and decision-making process and following it in a disciplined, diligent manner.

    Recommended for You
    Read the print edition of P&I
    Read the print edition of P&I
    How low is low? Projections say it's not low enough
    How low is low? Projections say it's not low enough
    FINRA honors Wharton's Olivia Mitchell with Ketchum Prize
    FINRA honors Wharton's Olivia Mitchell with Ketchum Prize
    OCIO, Anchor in Rough Seas
    Sponsored Content: OCIO, Anchor in Rough Seas

    Reader Poll

    May 9, 2022
    SEE MORE POLLS >
    Sponsored
    White Papers
    Are Factors a Thing of the Past?
    Q2 2022 Credit Outlook: Carry On
    Leverage does not equal risk
    Is there a mid-cap gap in your DC plan?
    Out of the Shadows: The Revolution in Shadow Accounting
    The pivotal role of fixed income markets in the ESG revolution
    View More
    Sponsored Content
    Partner Content
    The Industrialization of ESG Investment
    For institutional investors, ETFs can make meeting liquidity needs easier
    Gold: the most effective commodity investment
    2021 Investment Outlook | Investing Beyond the Pandemic: A Reset for Portfolios
    Ten ways retirement plan professionals add value to plan sponsors
    Gold: an efficient hedge
    View More
    E-MAIL NEWSLETTERS

    Sign up and get the best of News delivered straight to your email inbox, free of charge. Choose your news – we will deliver.

    Subscribe Today
    May 9, 2022 page one

    Get access to the news, research and analysis of events affecting the retirement and institutional money management businesses from a worldwide network of reporters and editors.

    Subscribe
    Connect With Us
    • RSS
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn

    Our Mission

    To consistently deliver news, research and analysis to the executives who manage the flow of funds in the institutional investment market.

    About Us

    Main Office
    685 Third Avenue
    Tenth Floor
    New York, NY 10017-4036

    Chicago Office
    130 E. Randolph St.
    Suite 3200
    Chicago, IL 60601

    Contact Us

    Careers at Crain

    About Pensions & Investments

     

    Advertising
    • Media Kit
    • P&I Content Solutions
    • P&I Careers | Post a Job
    • Reprints & Permissions
    Resources
    • Subscribe
    • Newsletters
    • FAQ
    • P&I Research Center
    • Site map
    • Staff Directory
    Legal
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Request
    Pensions & Investments
    Copyright © 1996-2022. Crain Communications, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
    • Topics
      • Alternatives
      • Consultants
      • Coronavirus
      • Courts
      • Defined Contribution
      • ESG
      • ETFs
      • Hedge Funds
      • Industry Voices
      • Investing
      • Money Management
      • Opinion
      • Partner Content
      • Pension Funds
      • Private Equity
      • Real Estate
      • Russia-Ukraine War
      • SECURE Act 2.0
      • Special Reports
      • White Papers
    • Rankings & Awards
      • 1,000 Largest Retirement Plans
      • Top-Performing Managers
      • Largest Money Managers
      • DC Money Managers
      • DC Record Keepers
      • Largest Hedge Fund Managers
      • World's Largest Retirement Funds
      • Best Places to Work in Money Management
      • Excellence & Innovation Awards
      • Eddy Awards
    • ETFs
      • Latest ETF News
      • Fund Screener
      • Education Center
      • Equities
      • Fixed Income
      • Commodities
      • Actively Managed
      • Alternatives
      • ESG Rated
    • ESG
      • Latest ESG News
      • The Institutional Investor’s Guide to ESG Investing
      • Climate Change: The Inescapable Opportunity
      • Impact Investing
      • 2022 ESG Investing Conference
      • ESG Rated ETFs
    • Defined Contribution
      • Latest DC News
      • DC Money Manager Rankings
      • DC Record Keeper Rankings
      • Innovations in DC
      • Trends in DC: Focus on Retirement Income
      • 2022 Defined Contribution East Conference
      • 2022 DC Investment Lineup Conference
    • Searches & Hires
      • Latest Searches & Hires News
      • Searches & Hires Database
      • RFPs
    • Performance Data
      • P&I Research Center
      • Earnings Tracker
      • Endowment Returns Tracker
      • Corporate Pension Contribution Tracker
      • Pension Fund Returns Tracker
      • Pension Risk Transfer Database
      • Future of Investments Research Series
      • Charts & Infographics
      • Polls
    • Careers
    • Events
      • View All Conferences
      • View All Webinars
      • 2022 Innovation Investing Conference
      • 2022 Defined Contribution East Conference
      • 2022 ESG Investing Conference
      • 2022 DC Investment Lineup Conference
      • 2022 Alternatives Investing Conference