Skip to main content
MENU
Subscribe
  • Subscribe
  • Account
  • LOGIN
  • Topics
    • Alternatives
    • Consultants
    • Coronavirus
    • Courts
    • Defined Contribution
    • ESG
    • ETFs
    • Hedge Funds
    • Industry Voices
    • Investing
    • Money Management
    • Opinion
    • Partner Content
    • Pension Funds
    • Private Equity
    • Real Estate
    • Russia-Ukraine War
    • SECURE Act 2.0
    • Special Reports
    • White Papers
  • Rankings & Awards
    • 1,000 Largest Retirement Plans
    • Top-Performing Managers
    • Largest Money Managers
    • DC Money Managers
    • DC Record Keepers
    • Largest Hedge Fund Managers
    • World's Largest Retirement Funds
    • Best Places to Work in Money Management
    • Excellence & Innovation Awards
    • WPS Innovation Awards
    • Eddy Awards
  • ETFs
    • Latest ETF News
    • Fund Screener
    • Education Center
    • Equities
    • Fixed Income
    • Commodities
    • Actively Managed
    • Alternatives
    • ESG Rated
  • ESG
    • Latest ESG News
    • The Institutional Investor’s Guide to ESG Investing
    • ESG Sustainability - Gaining Momentum
    • Climate Change: The Inescapable Opportunity
    • Impact Investing
    • 2022 ESG Investing Conference
    • ESG Rated ETFs
  • Defined Contribution
    • Latest DC News
    • DC Money Manager Rankings
    • DC Record Keeper Rankings
    • Innovations in DC
    • Trends in DC: Focus on Retirement Income
    • 2022 Defined Contribution East Conference
    • 2022 DC Investment Lineup Conference
  • Searches & Hires
    • Latest Searches & Hires News
    • Searches & Hires Database
    • RFPs
  • Performance Data
    • P&I Research Center
    • Earnings Tracker
    • Endowment Returns Tracker
    • Corporate Pension Contribution Tracker
    • Pension Fund Returns Tracker
    • Pension Risk Transfer Database
    • Future of Investments Research Series
    • Charts & Infographics
    • Polls
  • Careers
  • Events
    • View All Conferences
    • View All Webinars
    • 2022 Retirement Income Conference
    • 2022 Managing Pension Risk & Liabilities
    • 2022 WorldPensionSummit
Breadcrumb
  1. Home
  2. Print
December 22, 1997 12:00 AM

THE WORLDWIDE 'INVISIBLE DEBT' OF RETIREMENT

Lord Moore
  • Tweet
  • Share
  • Share
  • Email
  • More
    Reprints Print

    Should governments around the world "own" the social security or pension systems? Or should governments only regulate them?

    That is one of several issues in the widening debate taking place in many countries on how best to provide retirement income.

    The issue isn't only how to reform present pay-as-you-go systems, now burdening governments with an "invisible debt" as their costs swell. That is whether to tinker with the present system or move to a privatized funded system.

    Other issues concern:

    * How to invest the assets of newly funded systems. Do investment restrictions harm returns?

    * How funded systems help capital markets and economies. But are the new funds just being shifted from other assets without a net gain in capital?

    Throughout the world, the normally dull subject of pensions is generating argument and debate. There are two fundamental reasons for the interest. First is the demographic reality. Second is the cost of current and projected public pensions to the state.

    On demographics, two major changes have occurred in the industrialized world since 1950. People have not only stopped dying so young; they also have stopped having so many children. As a result, the number of people of working age in most OECD [Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development] countries is stabilizing or set to fall.

    The ratio of people of working age to those over 65 -- known as the support ratio -- is declining. In countries like the United Kingdom and Sweden, the support ratio is 4. In the United States and Japan, it is about 6. The most striking feature is not the difference between the countries now, but how their position is expected to converge by 2040 at an average 2.7.

    The support ratio understates the extent of the problem. In practice, the proportion of people of working age who are actually in work has been falling for a variety of reasons. An increasing proportion stay on in school and further education. The number of unemployed has risen. So have the numbers taking early retirement. Also, as Christopher DeMuth, president, American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, Washington, notes, "Voluntary reduction in time spent at paid employment has become a major social and economic phenomenon." This is illustrated by Professor Robert W. Fogel, University of Chicago, who estimates that since 1880 the time devoted each week by the average American male head of household to non-work activities has risen from 10.5 hours to 40 hours a week, while time at work has been cut nearly in half, from 61.6 to 33.6 hours.

    This decline in working activity has only been partly offset by the increasing proportion of women entering paid employment.

    As a result of these factors, the real ratio of people in work -- as opposed to the support ratio -- to those above the state pension age is already only between 1.4 and 2.7 in most OECD countries. Some forecasts show it falling to as low as 1 to 1, for example in France, by the year 2020.

    The scale of the problem produced by this demographic change is indicated by the World Bank's projection on pension spending in OECD countries. It believes these costs could almost double as a percentage of gross domestic product from about 8% in 1990 to 17% in 2030. The impact on the state's share of those costs is what worries democratic politicians.

    If no action is taken, by 2030 state pension payments could be, for example, between 15% and 20% of GDP in Germany, Italy and France, surely an unsustainable position.

    There exists in these countries the "invisible debt" problem. That is the explicit and implicit liabilities by the various countries caused by their promises to pay public pensions. Public pension liabilities are in excess of 68% of GDP in all major industrial countries except the U.K. and the U.S., and this is of course on present demography and current pension plan parameters. France, Germany and Japan face the largest imbalances. Many smaller European industrial countries, including Belgium, Denmark, Greece, Luxembourg, Portugal and Spain face pension systems imbalances of a similar magnitude.

    The choices are obvious: increase contributions; decrease benefits paid; increase age of entitlement; or shift the burden from the current taxpayer to a funded system. None of the first three choices are entirely satisfactory solutions.

    More fundamental action is required. Hence the pressure to move from a taxpayer driven pay-as-you-go basis to a funded system. Many would see the last choice, however, as a transference not a removal of the cost. But the advantages of lessening dependence on the state, along with the growing diversity of income sources, is clear.

    For one, individuals will have lessened reliance on the state, and the sense of independence and choice the ownership of their retirement assets produces. The state can contemplate the graying of its population with relative financial equanimity and the diminished numbers of employees in the 21st century need not be obsessed by the proportion of their tax revenues funding ever more dependent pensioners.

    But establishing a funded system isn't enough. There are debates on how to invest the assets. One issue is the degree to which countries restrict the investment of individual pension funds' asset class or location. This limit can have a marked effect on the success or failure of a funded system. There are many illustrations of this: Belgium requires that 15% of pension fund assets are to be in Belgium government bonds or Singapore's insistence that more than 90% of its fund invest in essentially non-tradable government securities.

    The net returns over long periods show the poor results in those countries using such restraints. In Singapore, for example, the government-run Central Provident Fund has yielded since 1980 just 2% more than inflation. In the same period, U.K. private pension funds have yielded nearly 10% a year more than inflation. An actuary will tell you that investing the same amount over a working lifetime at these yields would imply a British private pension four times as large as that available from the Singapore state scheme.

    An additional debate has developed around the question of funded pension schemes: Do such funded systems add to a nation's GDP?

    The suggestion is that this, especially if compulsory, adds to the pool of investment capital, helps to deepen liquidity and, all things being equal, increases investment and ultimately GDP as a consequence. The contrary argument is that funded savings are simply offset by the discouragement to other savings. This contention is supported by conventional economic doctrine that says capital markets working in a global economy means there need be no correlation between the amounts nations save and their volume of investment.

    Having spent some years arguing with my highly intelligent officials in the U.K. Treasury, I am instinctively uncomfortable with such rational economic nostrum, and believe strongly that there would be a significant boost to GDP. Beyond this, I have yet to see a better answer than funded pension schemes to the inherent dilemma faced by a graying world dominated by unsustainable and unfunded pensions promises.

    There is one other issue that emerges from U.K. experience and that is the need to regulate, rather than own, the pensions industry. Proper regulation to protect the interests of pension beneficiaries is entirely appropriate, as the Maxwell and other cases illustrate. The U.K. lessons in this area are clear, intelligent regulation to protect the consumer from abuse, not regulation aimed at constraining the effective workings of the market.

    I am bound to say I feel faintly pessimistic about the future. The action that is needed is obvious. The issues are quite clear, but so is the short-term pain associated with action. Few politicians embrace unpopularity by choice, few nations embrace decisions with pensions time frames. This is an inevitable recipe for procrastination -- democracy's bedfellow.

    Recommended for You
    Read the print edition of P&I
    Read the print edition of P&I
    How low is low? Projections say it's not low enough
    How low is low? Projections say it's not low enough
    FINRA honors Wharton's Olivia Mitchell with Ketchum Prize
    FINRA honors Wharton's Olivia Mitchell with Ketchum Prize
    Private Markets
    Sponsored Content: Private Markets

    Reader Poll

    July 29, 2022
    SEE MORE POLLS >
    Sponsored
    White Papers
    Gaining Momentum: Where Next for Trend-Following?
    The market opportunity in U.S. residential mortgage-backed securities
    Credit Indices Evolve with Enhanced Data Inputs
    Hedge Funds 2.0: Back to the future
    How Has 2022's Carnage Reshaped Global Stock and Bond Markets?
    Crossroads: Politics, Inflation, & Bonds
    View More
    Sponsored Content
    Partner Content
    The Industrialization of ESG Investment
    For institutional investors, ETFs can make meeting liquidity needs easier
    Gold: the most effective commodity investment
    2021 Investment Outlook | Investing Beyond the Pandemic: A Reset for Portfolios
    Ten ways retirement plan professionals add value to plan sponsors
    Gold: an efficient hedge
    View More
    E-MAIL NEWSLETTERS

    Sign up and get the best of News delivered straight to your email inbox, free of charge. Choose your news – we will deliver.

    Subscribe Today
    August 1, 2022 page one

    Get access to the news, research and analysis of events affecting the retirement and institutional money management businesses from a worldwide network of reporters and editors.

    Subscribe
    Connect With Us
    • RSS
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn

    Our Mission

    To consistently deliver news, research and analysis to the executives who manage the flow of funds in the institutional investment market.

    About Us

    Main Office
    685 Third Avenue
    Tenth Floor
    New York, NY 10017-4036

    Chicago Office
    130 E. Randolph St.
    Suite 3200
    Chicago, IL 60601

    Contact Us

    Careers at Crain

    About Pensions & Investments

     

    Advertising
    • Media Kit
    • P&I Content Solutions
    • P&I Careers | Post a Job
    • Reprints & Permissions
    Resources
    • Subscribe
    • Newsletters
    • FAQ
    • P&I Research Center
    • Site map
    • Staff Directory
    Legal
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Request
    Pensions & Investments
    Copyright © 1996-2022. Crain Communications, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
    • Topics
      • Alternatives
      • Consultants
      • Coronavirus
      • Courts
      • Defined Contribution
      • ESG
      • ETFs
      • Hedge Funds
      • Industry Voices
      • Investing
      • Money Management
      • Opinion
      • Partner Content
      • Pension Funds
      • Private Equity
      • Real Estate
      • Russia-Ukraine War
      • SECURE Act 2.0
      • Special Reports
      • White Papers
    • Rankings & Awards
      • 1,000 Largest Retirement Plans
      • Top-Performing Managers
      • Largest Money Managers
      • DC Money Managers
      • DC Record Keepers
      • Largest Hedge Fund Managers
      • World's Largest Retirement Funds
      • Best Places to Work in Money Management
      • Excellence & Innovation Awards
      • WPS Innovation Awards
      • Eddy Awards
    • ETFs
      • Latest ETF News
      • Fund Screener
      • Education Center
      • Equities
      • Fixed Income
      • Commodities
      • Actively Managed
      • Alternatives
      • ESG Rated
    • ESG
      • Latest ESG News
      • The Institutional Investor’s Guide to ESG Investing
      • ESG Sustainability - Gaining Momentum
      • Climate Change: The Inescapable Opportunity
      • Impact Investing
      • 2022 ESG Investing Conference
      • ESG Rated ETFs
    • Defined Contribution
      • Latest DC News
      • DC Money Manager Rankings
      • DC Record Keeper Rankings
      • Innovations in DC
      • Trends in DC: Focus on Retirement Income
      • 2022 Defined Contribution East Conference
      • 2022 DC Investment Lineup Conference
    • Searches & Hires
      • Latest Searches & Hires News
      • Searches & Hires Database
      • RFPs
    • Performance Data
      • P&I Research Center
      • Earnings Tracker
      • Endowment Returns Tracker
      • Corporate Pension Contribution Tracker
      • Pension Fund Returns Tracker
      • Pension Risk Transfer Database
      • Future of Investments Research Series
      • Charts & Infographics
      • Polls
    • Careers
    • Events
      • View All Conferences
      • View All Webinars
      • 2022 Retirement Income Conference
      • 2022 Managing Pension Risk & Liabilities
      • 2022 WorldPensionSummit