Skip to main content
MENU
Subscribe
  • Subscribe
  • Account
  • LOGIN
  • Topics
    • Alternatives
    • Consultants
    • Coronavirus
    • Courts
    • Defined Contribution
    • ESG
    • ETFs
    • Hedge Funds
    • Industry Voices
    • Investing
    • Money Management
    • Opinion
    • Partner Content
    • Pension Funds
    • Private Equity
    • Real Estate
    • Russia-Ukraine War
    • SECURE Act 2.0
    • Special Reports
    • White Papers
  • Rankings & Awards
    • 1,000 Largest Retirement Plans
    • Top-Performing Managers
    • Largest Money Managers
    • DC Money Managers
    • DC Record Keepers
    • Largest Hedge Fund Managers
    • World's Largest Retirement Funds
    • Best Places to Work in Money Management
    • Excellence & Innovation Awards
    • WPS Innovation Awards
    • Eddy Awards
  • ETFs
    • Latest ETF News
    • Fund Screener
    • Education Center
    • Equities
    • Fixed Income
    • Commodities
    • Actively Managed
    • Alternatives
    • ESG Rated
  • ESG
    • Latest ESG News
    • The Institutional Investor’s Guide to ESG Investing
    • ESG Sustainability - Gaining Momentum
    • Climate Change: The Inescapable Opportunity
    • Impact Investing
    • 2022 ESG Investing Conference
    • ESG Rated ETFs
  • Defined Contribution
    • Latest DC News
    • DC Money Manager Rankings
    • DC Record Keeper Rankings
    • Innovations in DC
    • Trends in DC: Focus on Retirement Income
    • 2022 Defined Contribution East Conference
    • 2022 DC Investment Lineup Conference
  • Searches & Hires
    • Latest Searches & Hires News
    • Searches & Hires Database
    • RFPs
  • Performance Data
    • P&I Research Center
    • Earnings Tracker
    • Endowment Returns Tracker
    • Corporate Pension Contribution Tracker
    • Pension Fund Returns Tracker
    • Pension Risk Transfer Database
    • Future of Investments Research Series
    • Charts & Infographics
    • Polls
  • Careers
  • Events
    • View All Conferences
    • View All Webinars
    • 2022 Retirement Income Conference
    • 2022 Managing Pension Risk & Liabilities
    • 2022 WorldPensionSummit
Breadcrumb
  1. Home
  2. Print
October 13, 1997 01:00 AM

LIFECYCLE ALLOCATIONS OFF: STUDY SHOWS TARGET AND ACTUAL EXPOSURES DIFFER WIDELY

Fred Williams
  • Tweet
  • Share
  • Share
  • Email
  • More
    Reprints Print

    CHICAGO - Disparities between target and actual asset allocations in some lifecycle funds are so great that conservative funds are more conservative - and aggressive funds more aggressive - than their investment policies state.

    That's one of the findings of an analysis of these defined contribution investment vehicles by Ibbotson Associates, Chicago, and disclosed during a presentation at the Profit Sharing/401(k) Council of America conference.

    (Lifecycle funds are all-purpose funds that combine investments or funds to satisfy a common goal, such as risk tolerance.)

    The disparities are greatest in risk-tolerance funds.

    For example, the average target asset allocation for stocks in conservative lifecycle funds ranges between 25%-45%; the actual stock allocation is 10%-44%. This shows that conservative funds are "more conservative" than the funds' investment policy claims, said Mark Riepe, vice president at Ibbotson.

    Aggressive lifecycle funds have a targeted equity range of 65%-80%; the actual allocation to stocks is 70%-99% - five to 19 percentage points higher than the target.

    For moderate lifecycle funds, the target equity range is 40%-65%, while the actual allocation is 43%-75%.

    Similar variations exist between target allocations to bonds and cash in risk tolerance-based lifecycle funds.

    Target and actual asset allocations are closer in time-weighted funds.

    Funds that classify themselves as short term have a target allocation to stocks of between 15%-40%, the same as the actual allocation. Long-term funds have a target equity range of 55%-90%; the actual allocation is 54%-90%.

    According to the Ibbotson analysis of 30 lifecycle products, covering most industry offerings, expenses range from 76 basis points to 375 basis points annually for non-fund-of-fund lifecycle options.

    Expenses for fund-of-funds lifecycle products average about 80 basis points, with average wrapper fees for fund-of-funds products adding another 37 basis points.

    "The axiom that you get what you pay for is not necessarily true in the money management business .*.*. It pays to shop around," Mr. Riepe said.

    "We learned there is tremendous variability across various (lifecycle) products and the target asset allocations, in many cases, don't match up. Products and expenses are all over the map."

    Part of the reason for the variation between target and actual asset allocation may be the result of the bull market in stocks. Some managers might boost returns through overexposure to stocks; others could fall behind in rebalancing the funds as the market moves ahead.

    "It sounds like they are managing the funds like tactical rather than strategic funds," said Mary Rudie Barneby, president of Delaware Investments & Retirement Services Inc., Philadelphia. Delaware plans to launch a series of lifecycle funds in January.

    "Because the market has been so strong, either they are getting 'creative' about their guidelines to take advantage of the strong equity market or are not rebalancing frequently enough," said Ms. Barneby. "These are supposed to be strategic funds but they may be pushing the envelope because of strong market performance."

    Joe Masterson, vice president at Diversified Investment Advisors, Purchase, N.Y., said he does not disagree with the Ibbotson findings. He added vendors now are tightening the variation in asset allocation ranges for lifecycle funds.

    He said Diversified is "tightening up" its allowable ranges for equity variations from the target to 10% from a 50% variation from the target allocation. Diversified will add two new lifecycle funds to its existing three next year with higher equity exposures "because people want more equities."

    Bill Landes, chief investment officer-global asset allocation at Putnam Investments, Boston, said most of the variations in the Ibbotson data may be explained by the allowable variations in lifecycle funds.

    He said, for example, Putnam guidelines allow for a 10% variation from the target ranges in equities for its three lifecycle funds. Its conservative fund has a target of 35% equities and allows variations from 24% to 45%.

    "We have been toward the upper end of our equity ranges, but we always stay within the target ranges, as specified in the prospectus," said Mr. Landes.

    Brian Ternoey, consultant with William M. Mercer Inc., Princeton, N.J., said plan sponsors considering adding lifecycle funds should do thorough due diligence.

    "If you are going out to purchase one group (of funds) over another, it can be pretty complex. Lifecycle funds haven't been around that long and it has not been standardized as to what the target allocations are. We also have seen the wide variation in expenses from 30 basis points to over 100 basis points," said Mr. Ternoey.

    In addition, he said, it is difficult to establish performance benchmarks for lifecycle funds since "the variation in investments is substantial."

    Shlomo Benartzi, a behavioral finance expert and professor at the Anderson School at UCLA, Los Angeles, is a proponent of lifecycle funds. Still, he acknowledged the differences in target and actual asset allocation in these funds is of concern.

    But he added: "The way I see these (Ibbotson) numbers is that the actual asset allocation ranges are the correct ones and should be the target ranges. I, as an investor, want a wide range in the targets, and I would feel more comfortable with the actual than the targets."

    Yet the "say one thing and do another" approach used by the fund providers is troublesome, Mr. Benartzi said.

    "I wouldn't be surprised, though, if many of them went off their original plan due to the market movement, volatility and the strong interest in equities. But it is a concern and raises the issue that really the plan sponsor might consider doing it (setting up its own fund) internally."

    Mr. Benartzi also suggested the Labor Department get involved in standardizing the reporting and target asset allocation ranges in lifecycle funds.

    Recommended for You
    Read the print edition of P&I
    Read the print edition of P&I
    How low is low? Projections say it's not low enough
    How low is low? Projections say it's not low enough
    FINRA honors Wharton's Olivia Mitchell with Ketchum Prize
    FINRA honors Wharton's Olivia Mitchell with Ketchum Prize
    SPDR® ETF’s New Approach to Bond Liquidity
    Sponsored Content: SPDR® ETF’s New Approach to Bond Liquidity

    Reader Poll

    June 6, 2022
    SEE MORE POLLS >
    Sponsored
    White Papers
    Nearing the finish line: Ideas on end-state investing for corporate DB plans
    The Meaning of "Portfolio Intelligence"
    Credit Indices: Closing the Fixed Income Evolutionary Gap
    Forever in Style: Benchmarking with the Morningstar® Broad Style Indexes℠
    Crossroads: Politics, Inflation, & Bonds
    Is there a mid-cap gap in your DC plan?
    View More
    Sponsored Content
    Partner Content
    The Industrialization of ESG Investment
    For institutional investors, ETFs can make meeting liquidity needs easier
    Gold: the most effective commodity investment
    2021 Investment Outlook | Investing Beyond the Pandemic: A Reset for Portfolios
    Ten ways retirement plan professionals add value to plan sponsors
    Gold: an efficient hedge
    View More
    E-MAIL NEWSLETTERS

    Sign up and get the best of News delivered straight to your email inbox, free of charge. Choose your news – we will deliver.

    Subscribe Today
    June 20, 2022 page one

    Get access to the news, research and analysis of events affecting the retirement and institutional money management businesses from a worldwide network of reporters and editors.

    Subscribe
    Connect With Us
    • RSS
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn

    Our Mission

    To consistently deliver news, research and analysis to the executives who manage the flow of funds in the institutional investment market.

    About Us

    Main Office
    685 Third Avenue
    Tenth Floor
    New York, NY 10017-4036

    Chicago Office
    130 E. Randolph St.
    Suite 3200
    Chicago, IL 60601

    Contact Us

    Careers at Crain

    About Pensions & Investments

     

    Advertising
    • Media Kit
    • P&I Content Solutions
    • P&I Careers | Post a Job
    • Reprints & Permissions
    Resources
    • Subscribe
    • Newsletters
    • FAQ
    • P&I Research Center
    • Site map
    • Staff Directory
    Legal
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Request
    Pensions & Investments
    Copyright © 1996-2022. Crain Communications, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
    • Topics
      • Alternatives
      • Consultants
      • Coronavirus
      • Courts
      • Defined Contribution
      • ESG
      • ETFs
      • Hedge Funds
      • Industry Voices
      • Investing
      • Money Management
      • Opinion
      • Partner Content
      • Pension Funds
      • Private Equity
      • Real Estate
      • Russia-Ukraine War
      • SECURE Act 2.0
      • Special Reports
      • White Papers
    • Rankings & Awards
      • 1,000 Largest Retirement Plans
      • Top-Performing Managers
      • Largest Money Managers
      • DC Money Managers
      • DC Record Keepers
      • Largest Hedge Fund Managers
      • World's Largest Retirement Funds
      • Best Places to Work in Money Management
      • Excellence & Innovation Awards
      • WPS Innovation Awards
      • Eddy Awards
    • ETFs
      • Latest ETF News
      • Fund Screener
      • Education Center
      • Equities
      • Fixed Income
      • Commodities
      • Actively Managed
      • Alternatives
      • ESG Rated
    • ESG
      • Latest ESG News
      • The Institutional Investor’s Guide to ESG Investing
      • ESG Sustainability - Gaining Momentum
      • Climate Change: The Inescapable Opportunity
      • Impact Investing
      • 2022 ESG Investing Conference
      • ESG Rated ETFs
    • Defined Contribution
      • Latest DC News
      • DC Money Manager Rankings
      • DC Record Keeper Rankings
      • Innovations in DC
      • Trends in DC: Focus on Retirement Income
      • 2022 Defined Contribution East Conference
      • 2022 DC Investment Lineup Conference
    • Searches & Hires
      • Latest Searches & Hires News
      • Searches & Hires Database
      • RFPs
    • Performance Data
      • P&I Research Center
      • Earnings Tracker
      • Endowment Returns Tracker
      • Corporate Pension Contribution Tracker
      • Pension Fund Returns Tracker
      • Pension Risk Transfer Database
      • Future of Investments Research Series
      • Charts & Infographics
      • Polls
    • Careers
    • Events
      • View All Conferences
      • View All Webinars
      • 2022 Retirement Income Conference
      • 2022 Managing Pension Risk & Liabilities
      • 2022 WorldPensionSummit