Skip to main content
MENU
Subscribe
  • Sign Up Free
  • LOGIN
  • Subscribe
  • Topics
    • Alternatives
    • Consultants
    • Coronavirus
    • Courts
    • Defined Contribution
    • ESG
    • ETFs
    • Face to Face
    • Hedge Funds
    • Industry Voices
    • Investing
    • Money Management
    • Opinion
    • Partner Content
    • Pension Funds
    • Private Equity
    • Real Estate
    • Russia-Ukraine War
    • SECURE 2.0
    • Special Reports
    • White Papers
  • Rankings & Awards
    • 1,000 Largest Retirement Plans
    • Top-Performing Managers
    • Largest Money Managers
    • DC Money Managers
    • DC Record Keepers
    • Largest Hedge Fund Managers
    • World's Largest Retirement Funds
    • Best Places to Work in Money Management
    • Excellence & Innovation Awards
    • WPS Innovation Awards
    • Eddy Awards
  • ETFs
    • Latest ETF News
    • Fund Screener
    • Education Center
    • Equities
    • Fixed Income
    • Commodities
    • Actively Managed
    • Alternatives
    • ESG Rated
  • ESG
    • Latest ESG News
    • The Institutional Investor’s Guide to ESG Investing
    • ESG Sustainability - Gaining Momentum
    • Climate Change: The Inescapable Opportunity
    • Impact Investing
    • 2022 ESG Investing Conference
    • ESG Rated ETFs
  • Defined Contribution
    • Latest DC News
    • DC Money Manager Rankings
    • DC Record Keeper Rankings
    • Innovations in DC
    • Trends in DC: Focus on Retirement Income
    • 2022 Defined Contribution East Conference
    • 2022 DC Investment Lineup Conference
  • Searches & Hires
    • Latest Searches & Hires News
    • Searches & Hires Database
    • RFPs
  • Performance Data
    • P&I Research Center
    • Earnings Tracker
    • Endowment Returns Tracker
    • Corporate Pension Contribution Tracker
    • Pension Fund Returns Tracker
    • Pension Risk Transfer Database
    • Future of Investments Research Series
    • Charts & Infographics
    • Polls
  • Careers
  • Events
    • View All Conferences
    • View All Webinars
    • 2023 Defined Contribution East
    • 2023 ESG Investing
Breadcrumb
  1. Home
  2. Print
July 22, 1996 01:00 AM

LETTERS TO THE EDITOR;JOINT-TRUSTEE REDUX;ETIS AND ALTERNATIVES;REPLY ON ETIS;CALPERS' WATCHLIST

  • Tweet
  • Share
  • Share
  • Email
  • More
    Reprints Print

    I must speak out on your June 24 editorial "Joint-trustee redux," which totally fails to evaluate the advantages of joint trusteeship in corporate pension plans. Previously, I worked in two corporate Fortune 200 pension plan administrations and I believe your editorial, while quite arrogant and reflective of upper-management thinking, totally fails to show the potential advantages of joint trustee relationship.

    The primary purpose of corporate defined benefit pension plans is to help provide financial assistance for retired employees. How better for trustees to tailor the plan's benefits and investment structure to employees' retirement needs than to have employees serve as plan trustees? How better can corporate trustees gauge the importance of issues like benefit portability for their workforce than to have elected members of the workforce as trustees? Otherwise, trustees will spend substantial sums hiring outside consulting firms to inform them about the needs and desires of their own workforce. The key point is for the corporation to get the utmost value from each pension dollar expended. How better to find the best value than to use input from employees who depend on the pension plan dollars to provide a major portion of their retirement income?

    Employees who have a great deal of their future retirement security at risk will take a greater interest in the efficient operation of the plan and its assets when compared with current trustees. Many current trustees are participants in executive retirement plans and draw only a minor portion of their total retirement income from the corporation's primary defined benefit plan.

    Your editorial also uses the same tired, worn-out excuses that senior management has relied on for decades to argue against more employee involvement in corporate operations. The same complaints about lack of employee contributions, conservative investment policies, and disguised union organization efforts have been proclaimed for so long they now draw little attention. Why not discuss the advantages of new ideas employee trustees could bring to the "business as usual" atmosphere prevailing in many corporate plans?

    Please understand, I am not proposing corporate plans be dominated by members of the employee workforce. In many cases, employees do not have the necessary pension training, education and experience to serve as a majority of the trustee members, but neither do most management trustees.

    Pensions and Investments' credibility could be better maintained if you would show both sides of this issue and not just advocate pension reforms like increasing the maximum contribution on defined contribution plans. Anyone in the pension industry knows the average employee is not financially capable of contributing more than $30,000 per year to such a plan. The chief beneficiaries of that change would be the same executive management that wants to maintain the status quo. Please make a better effort to be fair in your coverage and not brown-nose management.

    James O. Wood, Esq. CEBS, SPHR

    Executive Director

    Louisiana State Employees' Retirement System

    Baton Rouge, La.

    The June 10 Others' Views article on "disappearing ETIs" by D. Jeanne Patterson contains a reference to the Washington State Investment Board, which has an allocation of 10% to alternative investments (mostly leveraged buy-out funds and venture capital). The juxtaposition of general ETI activity and specific alternative investments by our board (and some other state and endowment funds) was confusing. The Washington State Investment Board has not had, and is not newly adopting, an ETI program. We have had alternative investments since 1981, and this does not include ETIs.

    The author apparently wants to cite increases in alternative investments as perhaps a new home of investments that otherwise would have been in ETI programs. Interestingly, alternative investments usually are chosen for the possibility of higher rates of return. ETI programs usually are chosen for providing a collateral economic benefit (or for geographic targeting) with risk-adjusted market returns.

    I just wanted to clarify that this reference to our 10% allocation in alternative investments, somehow relating to ETI programs, does not apply in the case of the state of Washington.

    James F. Parker

    Executive director

    Washington State Investment Board

    Olympia, Wash.

    I agree with James F. Parker; alternative investments aren't ETIs. But we know many alternative investments provide a collateral economic benefit just as ETIs do (making funds available that might not be otherwise). They also provide risk-adjusted market returns, although, as he notes, the returns (and risks) are relatively high. Yet, we couldn't say Washington's investments are ETIs without studying the portfolio carefully and arriving at some economic conclusions. The Washington State Investment Board obviously knows best whether it is targeting.

    I agree, too, the article's definitions were confusing. The Sachs/Russell study defines the composition of alternative investments, whereas the Brancato Report identifies the components of ETIs. ETIs include a large share of investments related to housing/real estate; alternative investments do not.

    It's good to hear from Mr. Parker. He confirms my impression that alternative investments present a clear investment objective that many pension systems prefer over ETIs.

    D. Jeanne Patterson

    Associate professor

    School of Public and Environmental Affairs

    Indiana University

    Bloomington, Ind.

    We have read the May 13, page one article by Steve Hemmerick and Terry Williams, "4 CalPERS realty firms on thin ice." I think two of three firms placed on the watch list may have suffered as a result of a mischaracterization in one paragraph where it says, "Managers on the termination or watch list run 41% of the fund's...real estate portfolio." And later the article says, "No reason was given for putting the three managers on a watch list."

    In fact, the study states two of the firms were placed on the watch list "due to recent mergers/acquisitions, but have acceptable performance." Both of those firms, AMRESCO Advisors Inc. and GE Capital Real Estate Investment, were in the process of being acquired in November when the material for the study was gathered. We feel it is appropriate for the staff and consultant to review the impact of those mergers to determine "whether the resources that these advisers will dedicate to the CalPERS account will be sufficient to meet the CalPERS requirement."

    The two firms were ranked in the top one-third of all the advisers mentioned and rated. As each is now a part of a bigger financial service firm, there are good reasons why strong performers with enhanced capabilities will be retained by CalPERS.

    Gary R. Schwandt

    Executive Managing Director

    AMRESCO

    Boston

    Recommended for You
    Read the print edition of P&I
    Read the print edition of P&I
    Targeting millennials: Author, niece put his latest book to music
    Targeting millennials: Author, niece put his latest book to music
    How low is low? Projections say it's not low enough
    How low is low? Projections say it's not low enough
    Research for Institutional Money Management
    Sponsored Content: Research for Institutional Money Management

    Reader Poll

    January 25, 2023
    SEE MORE POLLS >
    Sponsored
    White Papers
    The Future of Infrastructure: Building a Better Tomorrow
    Fulcrum Issues: Equity Returns and Inflation — Choose Your Own Adventure
    What Matters Most in Considering a Private Debt Strategy
    Why pursue direct lending in the core middle market?
    Research for Institutional Money Management
    Are Factors a Thing of the Past?
    View More
    Sponsored Content
    Partner Content
    The Industrialization of ESG Investment
    For institutional investors, ETFs can make meeting liquidity needs easier
    Gold: the most effective commodity investment
    2021 Investment Outlook | Investing Beyond the Pandemic: A Reset for Portfolios
    Ten ways retirement plan professionals add value to plan sponsors
    Gold: an efficient hedge
    View More
    E-MAIL NEWSLETTERS

    Sign up and get the best of News delivered straight to your email inbox, free of charge. Choose your news – we will deliver.

    Subscribe Today
    December 12, 2022 page one

    Get access to the news, research and analysis of events affecting the retirement and institutional money management businesses from a worldwide network of reporters and editors.

    Subscribe
    Connect With Us
    • RSS
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn

    Our Mission

    To consistently deliver news, research and analysis to the executives who manage the flow of funds in the institutional investment market.

    About Us

    Main Office
    685 Third Avenue
    Tenth Floor
    New York, NY 10017-4036

    Chicago Office
    130 E. Randolph St.
    Suite 3200
    Chicago, IL 60601

    Contact Us

    Careers at Crain

    About Pensions & Investments

     

    Advertising
    • Media Kit
    • P&I Content Solutions
    • P&I Careers | Post a Job
    • Reprints & Permissions
    Resources
    • Subscribe
    • Newsletters
    • FAQ
    • P&I Research Center
    • Site map
    • Staff Directory
    Legal
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Request
    Pensions & Investments
    Copyright © 1996-2023. Crain Communications, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
    • Topics
      • Alternatives
      • Consultants
      • Coronavirus
      • Courts
      • Defined Contribution
      • ESG
      • ETFs
      • Face to Face
      • Hedge Funds
      • Industry Voices
      • Investing
      • Money Management
      • Opinion
      • Partner Content
      • Pension Funds
      • Private Equity
      • Real Estate
      • Russia-Ukraine War
      • SECURE 2.0
      • Special Reports
      • White Papers
    • Rankings & Awards
      • 1,000 Largest Retirement Plans
      • Top-Performing Managers
      • Largest Money Managers
      • DC Money Managers
      • DC Record Keepers
      • Largest Hedge Fund Managers
      • World's Largest Retirement Funds
      • Best Places to Work in Money Management
      • Excellence & Innovation Awards
      • WPS Innovation Awards
      • Eddy Awards
    • ETFs
      • Latest ETF News
      • Fund Screener
      • Education Center
      • Equities
      • Fixed Income
      • Commodities
      • Actively Managed
      • Alternatives
      • ESG Rated
    • ESG
      • Latest ESG News
      • The Institutional Investor’s Guide to ESG Investing
      • ESG Sustainability - Gaining Momentum
      • Climate Change: The Inescapable Opportunity
      • Impact Investing
      • 2022 ESG Investing Conference
      • ESG Rated ETFs
    • Defined Contribution
      • Latest DC News
      • DC Money Manager Rankings
      • DC Record Keeper Rankings
      • Innovations in DC
      • Trends in DC: Focus on Retirement Income
      • 2022 Defined Contribution East Conference
      • 2022 DC Investment Lineup Conference
    • Searches & Hires
      • Latest Searches & Hires News
      • Searches & Hires Database
      • RFPs
    • Performance Data
      • P&I Research Center
      • Earnings Tracker
      • Endowment Returns Tracker
      • Corporate Pension Contribution Tracker
      • Pension Fund Returns Tracker
      • Pension Risk Transfer Database
      • Future of Investments Research Series
      • Charts & Infographics
      • Polls
    • Careers
    • Events
      • View All Conferences
      • View All Webinars
      • 2023 Defined Contribution East
      • 2023 ESG Investing