Skip to main content
MENU
Subscribe
  • Subscribe
  • Account
  • LOGIN
  • Topics
    • Alternatives
    • Consultants
    • Coronavirus
    • Courts
    • Defined Contribution
    • ESG
    • ETFs
    • Hedge Funds
    • Industry Voices
    • Investing
    • Money Management
    • Opinion
    • Partner Content
    • Pension Funds
    • Private Equity
    • Real Estate
    • Russia-Ukraine War
    • SECURE Act 2.0
    • Special Reports
    • White Papers
  • Rankings & Awards
    • 1,000 Largest Retirement Plans
    • Top-Performing Managers
    • Largest Money Managers
    • DC Money Managers
    • DC Record Keepers
    • Largest Hedge Fund Managers
    • World's Largest Retirement Funds
    • Best Places to Work in Money Management
    • Excellence & Innovation Awards
    • Eddy Awards
  • ETFs
    • Latest ETF News
    • Fund Screener
    • Education Center
    • Equities
    • Fixed Income
    • Commodities
    • Actively Managed
    • Alternatives
    • ESG Rated
  • ESG
    • Latest ESG News
    • The Institutional Investor’s Guide to ESG Investing
    • Climate Change: The Inescapable Opportunity
    • Impact Investing
    • 2022 ESG Investing Conference
    • ESG Rated ETFs
  • Defined Contribution
    • Latest DC News
    • DC Money Manager Rankings
    • DC Record Keeper Rankings
    • Innovations in DC
    • Trends in DC: Focus on Retirement Income
    • 2022 Defined Contribution East Conference
    • 2022 DC Investment Lineup Conference
  • Searches & Hires
    • Latest Searches & Hires News
    • Searches & Hires Database
    • RFPs
  • Performance Data
    • P&I Research Center
    • Earnings Tracker
    • Endowment Returns Tracker
    • Corporate Pension Contribution Tracker
    • Pension Fund Returns Tracker
    • Pension Risk Transfer Database
    • Future of Investments Research Series
    • Charts & Infographics
    • Polls
  • Careers
  • Events
    • View All Conferences
    • View All Webinars
    • 2022 Innovation Investing Conference
    • 2022 Defined Contribution East Conference
    • 2022 ESG Investing Conference
    • 2022 DC Investment Lineup Conference
    • 2022 Alternatives Investing Conference
Breadcrumb
  1. Home
  2. Print
July 25, 1994 01:00 AM

LONDON TRADING COSTS RISEINTERNATIONAL TRANSACTIONS THERE ALREADY EXPENSIVE

By Joel Chernoff
  • Tweet
  • Share
  • Share
  • Email
  • More
    Reprints Print

    LONDON - Trading international stocks through London is expensive, and may have become more so in recent years, according to a new study by Birinyi Associates Inc., Greenwich, Conn.

    "The key thing is the cost of doing trades in London ... is extremely high," said Laszlo Birinyi Jr., president of the trading consulting firm bearing his name.

    London's dealer-oriented market is much more costly than order-driven markets such as the New York Stock Exchange, the study shows.

    Many trades of continental European stocks through the London Stock Exchange's SEAQ International system fall outside of the spread quoted on the local market, the study found.

    And, price shifts from trade to trade are much more common than on order-driven systems, the study found.

    Added Carole Ryavec, a director of Plexus Group, a trading-cost consultant in Santa Monica, Calif.: "Basically, the U.K. is expensive and people were surprised at how much they pay under almost any (measurement methodology)."

    The LSE is "the worst possible combination, a sort of combo between NASDAQ and the old boys' network," Ms. Ryavec added.

    Certainly, trading internationally is expensive, according to any market participant.

    While the elimination of fixed commissions and lowering of stamp duties in many markets have brought these transaction costs down in recent years, market impact costs - that is, how much the purchase or sale of stock affects the stock's price - remain high, although they are hard to measure and remain hidden to most investors.

    Ms. Ryavec estimates that in Germany, commissions average 20 to 25 basis points, with total execution costs three times that level. In France, commissions average about the same, but total transaction costs are about four times that level, she said. (In England, trades are done "net" - that is, any commission is built implicitly into the spread the dealer offers.)

    Investors tend to ignore these costs. Investors "place a little too much trust in the local brokers in the markets which have done well and risen strongly," while ignoring costs, Mr. Birinyi said. "If you're making money, you don't pay as much attention" to transaction costs, he added.

    Investors do so at their own peril. Transaction costs can eat up alpha, the measure of how much added value is provided by a money manager, Ms. Ryavec noted.

    And these costs will continue to become more significant in time, as the volume of U.S. pension fund money in international markets keeps growing. Greenwich Associates, Greenwich, Conn., said in a recent report that U.S. pension funds expect to increase their allocations to international equities to 9.6% by 1996 from 6.4% last year - an increase of $140 billion.

    Last year, institutional investors spent $915 million in commission dollars for international trades, a 53.8% increase from $595 million in 1992, Greenwich found. That is partly attributable to an increase of $40 billion in pension money going into international assets, Greenwich said.

    Of that commission dollar flow, 16% went for British stocks and 28% for continental European equities.

    Many of these continental European trades are executed through the SEAQ International system, a central market for European stocks for institutional investors. Created in 1985, SEAQ has been very successful in garnering business in continental European equities, particularly in block trades. Continental bourses, however, have been updating their systems, and have been winning back some of the trades to the local markets.

    But Mr. Birinyi has grave concerns about the costs of trading through London. He finds the size of the spreads for Continental stocks in London alarming compared to spreads for the same stocks in their home market.

    Updating a 1990 study conducted by Marcus Pagano and Ailsa Roell for the London School of Economics, Mr. Birinyi found spreads for selected French stocks had widened considerably. On SEAQ, the spread had increased, from 33% to 1,562% more than the previous level. While spreads increased somewhat on the Paris Bourse for most of those stocks, their absolute level was well below that shown by SEAQ.

    For example, the spread on SEAQ for BSN shares was 227 basis points - almost 10 times the 23 basis point spread for the same stock traded in Paris, Mr. Birinyi found. Even though transactions typically trade at the midpoint of the spread in London's dealer market vs. either the bid or ask in Paris, the gap still is much broader on SEAQ.

    Also, Mr. Birinyi said his research was based on a broader universe than the earlier study.

    Mr. Birinyi also found disturbing how much of the trades done through SEAQ were at prices outside of the spread in the home market. He found 10% of the trades done in French stocks and 9% in Italian stocks that were executed on SEAQ were outside of the range of trading for the day in the Paris and Milan exchanges, respectively.

    While various trading-cost methodologies are available, Mr. Birinyi prefers to look at how much stock prices move from one trade to the next. He found 72.7% of transactions in Dow Jones industrial stocks experienced no price change, compared with 47.1% on dealer-driven NASDAQ and 27.2% in the United Kingdom.

    Looking at the average-weighted price change, he found prices shifted 0.079% for Dow Jones stocks, 0.419% for NASDAQ stocks and 1.221% for U.K. stocks.

    SEAQ's success in garnering business, Mr. Birinyi suggested, is not due to market factors.

    Rather, a liberal regulatory environment that does not require immediate reporting of trades, less concern that prices will move while a block is being assembled, and, simply, the centralization of the money management and brokerage community in London have spurred SEAQ's success, the report said.

    One buy-side trader, who spoke on the condition of not being identified, bore the latter point out. "If you have a problem (with a trade), you can ask the broker to come around or you can meet up for a beer," he said. If the broker is in New York, it's difficult to contend with the problem, he added.

    A spokeswoman for the LSE, while not having read through the Birinyi study, observed that investors come to SEAQ for its liquidity and immediacy. She said SEAQ can handle much larger trades more quickly than the local exchanges.

    Roger Guy, a fund manager at Gartmore Investment Management PLC, London, said there normally is not a lot of difference in cost between SEAQ and local markets. He said Gartmore tends to use SEAQ when it wants to trade a large volume of stock quickly, or for program trades. Otherwise, the manager tends to go through the local market and do the trade over time.

    George Hayter, a consultant to stock exchanges and a former LSE official, added: "London was never the cheapest place to trade. The point about SEAQ International is that it enables you to trade quickly at a large size."

    But Mr. Birinyi maintained fairly good liquidity is available in local markets. "When you look at SEAQ, you don't see the trades that aren't done," he added.

    Recommended for You
    Read the print edition of P&I
    Read the print edition of P&I
    How low is low? Projections say it's not low enough
    How low is low? Projections say it's not low enough
    FINRA honors Wharton's Olivia Mitchell with Ketchum Prize
    FINRA honors Wharton's Olivia Mitchell with Ketchum Prize
    OCIO, Anchor in Rough Seas
    Sponsored Content: OCIO, Anchor in Rough Seas

    Reader Poll

    May 23, 2022
    SEE MORE POLLS >
    Sponsored
    White Papers
    Crossroads: Politics, Inflation, & Bonds
    Credit Indices: Closing the Fixed Income Evolutionary Gap
    Forever in Style: Benchmarking with the Morningstar® Broad Style Indexes℠
    Q2 2022 Credit Outlook: Carry On
    Leverage does not equal risk
    Is there a mid-cap gap in your DC plan?
    View More
    Sponsored Content
    Partner Content
    The Industrialization of ESG Investment
    For institutional investors, ETFs can make meeting liquidity needs easier
    Gold: the most effective commodity investment
    2021 Investment Outlook | Investing Beyond the Pandemic: A Reset for Portfolios
    Ten ways retirement plan professionals add value to plan sponsors
    Gold: an efficient hedge
    View More
    E-MAIL NEWSLETTERS

    Sign up and get the best of News delivered straight to your email inbox, free of charge. Choose your news – we will deliver.

    Subscribe Today
    May 23, 2022 page one

    Get access to the news, research and analysis of events affecting the retirement and institutional money management businesses from a worldwide network of reporters and editors.

    Subscribe
    Connect With Us
    • RSS
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn

    Our Mission

    To consistently deliver news, research and analysis to the executives who manage the flow of funds in the institutional investment market.

    About Us

    Main Office
    685 Third Avenue
    Tenth Floor
    New York, NY 10017-4036

    Chicago Office
    130 E. Randolph St.
    Suite 3200
    Chicago, IL 60601

    Contact Us

    Careers at Crain

    About Pensions & Investments

     

    Advertising
    • Media Kit
    • P&I Content Solutions
    • P&I Careers | Post a Job
    • Reprints & Permissions
    Resources
    • Subscribe
    • Newsletters
    • FAQ
    • P&I Research Center
    • Site map
    • Staff Directory
    Legal
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Request
    Pensions & Investments
    Copyright © 1996-2022. Crain Communications, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
    • Topics
      • Alternatives
      • Consultants
      • Coronavirus
      • Courts
      • Defined Contribution
      • ESG
      • ETFs
      • Hedge Funds
      • Industry Voices
      • Investing
      • Money Management
      • Opinion
      • Partner Content
      • Pension Funds
      • Private Equity
      • Real Estate
      • Russia-Ukraine War
      • SECURE Act 2.0
      • Special Reports
      • White Papers
    • Rankings & Awards
      • 1,000 Largest Retirement Plans
      • Top-Performing Managers
      • Largest Money Managers
      • DC Money Managers
      • DC Record Keepers
      • Largest Hedge Fund Managers
      • World's Largest Retirement Funds
      • Best Places to Work in Money Management
      • Excellence & Innovation Awards
      • Eddy Awards
    • ETFs
      • Latest ETF News
      • Fund Screener
      • Education Center
      • Equities
      • Fixed Income
      • Commodities
      • Actively Managed
      • Alternatives
      • ESG Rated
    • ESG
      • Latest ESG News
      • The Institutional Investor’s Guide to ESG Investing
      • Climate Change: The Inescapable Opportunity
      • Impact Investing
      • 2022 ESG Investing Conference
      • ESG Rated ETFs
    • Defined Contribution
      • Latest DC News
      • DC Money Manager Rankings
      • DC Record Keeper Rankings
      • Innovations in DC
      • Trends in DC: Focus on Retirement Income
      • 2022 Defined Contribution East Conference
      • 2022 DC Investment Lineup Conference
    • Searches & Hires
      • Latest Searches & Hires News
      • Searches & Hires Database
      • RFPs
    • Performance Data
      • P&I Research Center
      • Earnings Tracker
      • Endowment Returns Tracker
      • Corporate Pension Contribution Tracker
      • Pension Fund Returns Tracker
      • Pension Risk Transfer Database
      • Future of Investments Research Series
      • Charts & Infographics
      • Polls
    • Careers
    • Events
      • View All Conferences
      • View All Webinars
      • 2022 Innovation Investing Conference
      • 2022 Defined Contribution East Conference
      • 2022 ESG Investing Conference
      • 2022 DC Investment Lineup Conference
      • 2022 Alternatives Investing Conference