Goldman Sachs cuts deal with AFSCME over dual CEO/chairman
By Bloomberg | March 28, 2012 12:01 pm
“We think it’s a step in the right direction,” said Lisa Lindsley, director of capital strategies at the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, which she said owned 7,101 Goldman Sachs shares when the union filed a proposal to split Mr. Blankfein’s roles.
Ms. Lindsley said AFSCME and Goldman Sachs reached the compromise Feb. 6.
The lead director’s responsibilities include presiding over board meetings when the chairman is absent, leading the annual CEO evaluation and acting as liaison between independent board members and management, according to a description posted on Goldman Sachs’s website. John H. Bryan, a former Sara Lee Corp. CEO who has served on Goldman Sachs’s board since November 1999, had some of those responsibilities as presiding director.
“Right now it looks like it’s John Bryan,” Ms. Lindsley said when asked who would be named lead director. “But I think that there may be some changes in the board composition.”
Goldman Sachs is holding a meeting of directors this week in India, the first time the board has convened there. The firm has 12 directors.
“We appreciated the constructive talks we had with AFSCME,” David Wells, a spokesman for Goldman Sachs in New York, said in an e-mailed statement.
The change at Goldman Sachs didn’t assuage all of the union’s concerns, some of which Greg Smith, a former derivatives salesman, highlighted in a March 14 New York Times op-ed, Ms. Lindsley said. Mr. Smith wrote that he was quitting after almost 12 years at the firm and that the company’s culture of putting clients first has eroded under Mr. Blankfein and President Gary D. Cohn, who also sits on the board of directors. The two said that most employees disagree and that the bank would investigate Mr. Smith’s assertions.
“Our members are participants in state and local government pension plans that are clients of Goldman Sachs,” Ms. Lindsley said. “And so as clients I think we’re concerned that the culture of Goldman is not only averse to the best interests of shareholders but it’s averse to the interests of clients.”